Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Optimal Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) Cut-Offs: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Czech Population

D. Horáková, L. Štěpánek, V. Janout, J. Janoutová, D. Pastucha, H. Kollárová, A. Petráková, L. Štěpánek, R. Husár, K. Martiník,

. 2019 ; 55 (5) : . [pub] 20190517

Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19044816

Grantová podpora
IGA UPOL LF 2019 Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci

Background and Objectives: The key pathogenetic mechanism of glucose metabolism disorders, insulin resistance (IR), can be assessed using the Homeostasis Model Assessment of IR (HOMA-IR). However, its application in clinical practice is limited due to the absence of cut-offs. In this study, we aimed to define the cut-offs for the Czech population. Methods: After undergoing anthropometric and biochemical studies, the sample of 3539 individuals was divided into either nondiabetics, including both subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT, n = 1947) and prediabetics (n = 1459), or diabetics (n = 133). The optimal HOMA-IR cut-offs between subgroups were determined to maximize the sum of the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or prediabetes. The predictive accuracy was illustrated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Logistic regression was performed to assess the association between a target variable (presence/absence of T2DM) depending on the HOMA-IR score as well as on the age and sex. Results: The HOMA-IR cut-off between nondiabetics and diabetics for both sexes together was 3.63, with a sensitivity of 0.56 and a specificity of 0.86. The area under the ROC curve was 0.73 for T2DM diagnosing in both sexes. The HOMA-IR cut-off between the NGT subjects and prediabetics was 1.82, with a sensitivity of 0.60 and a specificity of 0.66. Logistic regression showed that increased HOMA-IR is a risk factor for the presence of T2DM (odds ratio (OR) 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14-1.28, p < 0.0001). The predictive ability of HOMA-IR in diagnosing T2DM is statistically significantly lower in females (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.44-0.98). The results are valid for middle-aged European adults. Conclusions: The results suggest the existence of HOMA-IR cut-offs signaling established IR. Introduction of the instrument into common clinical practice, together with the known cut-offs, may contribute to preventing T2DM.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19044816
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200115130632.0
007      
ta
008      
200109s2019 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3390/medicina55050158 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31108989
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Horáková, Dagmar $u Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Hněvotínská 3, 77515 Olomouc, Czech Republic. dagmar.horakova@upol.cz.
245    10
$a Optimal Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) Cut-Offs: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Czech Population / $c D. Horáková, L. Štěpánek, V. Janout, J. Janoutová, D. Pastucha, H. Kollárová, A. Petráková, L. Štěpánek, R. Husár, K. Martiník,
520    9_
$a Background and Objectives: The key pathogenetic mechanism of glucose metabolism disorders, insulin resistance (IR), can be assessed using the Homeostasis Model Assessment of IR (HOMA-IR). However, its application in clinical practice is limited due to the absence of cut-offs. In this study, we aimed to define the cut-offs for the Czech population. Methods: After undergoing anthropometric and biochemical studies, the sample of 3539 individuals was divided into either nondiabetics, including both subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT, n = 1947) and prediabetics (n = 1459), or diabetics (n = 133). The optimal HOMA-IR cut-offs between subgroups were determined to maximize the sum of the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or prediabetes. The predictive accuracy was illustrated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Logistic regression was performed to assess the association between a target variable (presence/absence of T2DM) depending on the HOMA-IR score as well as on the age and sex. Results: The HOMA-IR cut-off between nondiabetics and diabetics for both sexes together was 3.63, with a sensitivity of 0.56 and a specificity of 0.86. The area under the ROC curve was 0.73 for T2DM diagnosing in both sexes. The HOMA-IR cut-off between the NGT subjects and prediabetics was 1.82, with a sensitivity of 0.60 and a specificity of 0.66. Logistic regression showed that increased HOMA-IR is a risk factor for the presence of T2DM (odds ratio (OR) 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14-1.28, p < 0.0001). The predictive ability of HOMA-IR in diagnosing T2DM is statistically significantly lower in females (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.44-0.98). The results are valid for middle-aged European adults. Conclusions: The results suggest the existence of HOMA-IR cut-offs signaling established IR. Introduction of the instrument into common clinical practice, together with the known cut-offs, may contribute to preventing T2DM.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a cholesterol $x analýza $x krev $7 D002784
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a glukosa $x analýza $7 D005947
650    _2
$a glukózový toleranční test $x metody $7 D005951
650    _2
$a homeostáza $x účinky léků $x fyziologie $7 D006706
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a inzulin $x analýza $x krev $7 D007328
650    _2
$a inzulinová rezistence $x fyziologie $7 D007333
650    _2
$a logistické modely $7 D016015
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a odhad potřeb $7 D020380
650    _2
$a odds ratio $7 D016017
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Štěpánek, Ladislav $u Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Hněvotínská 3, 77515 Olomouc, Czech Republic. stepanek.ladislav@gmail.com.
700    1_
$a Janout, Vladimír $u Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Hněvotínská 3, 77515 Olomouc, Czech Republic. janout@lf.upol.cz.
700    1_
$a Janoutová, Jana $u Department of Healthcare Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacký University Olomouc, Hněvotínská 3, 77515 Olomouc, Czech Republic. jana.janoutova01@upol.cz.
700    1_
$a Pastucha, Dalibor $u ReFit Clinic s.r.o., U Reálky 4, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic. dalibor.pastucha@refitclinic.cz.
700    1_
$a Kollárová, Helena $u Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Hněvotínská 3, 77515 Olomouc, Czech Republic. helena.kollarova@upol.cz.
700    1_
$a Petráková, Alena $u Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Hněvotínská 3, 77515 Olomouc, Czech Republic. alena.petrakova@upol.cz.
700    1_
$a Štěpánek, Lubomír $u Institute of Biophysics and Informatics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Salmovská 1, 12000 Prague, Czech Republic. Stepanek@lf1.cuni.cz.
700    1_
$a Husár, Roman $u Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Hněvotínská 3, 77515 Olomouc, Czech Republic. roman.husar@upol.cz.
700    1_
$a Martiník, Karel $u Ambulance Prof. MUDr. Karla Martiníka DrSc. s.r.o, Bratří Štefanů 895, 50003 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. ambulance@profmartinik.cz.
773    0_
$w MED00180386 $t Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) $x 1648-9144 $g Roč. 55, č. 5 (2019)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31108989 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200115131005 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1483085 $s 1083489
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 55 $c 5 $e 20190517 $i 1648-9144 $m Medicina $n Medicina (Kaunas) $x MED00180386
GRA    __
$a IGA UPOL LF 2019 $p Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200109

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...