-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Fluorescent analysis of boar sperm capacitation process in vitro
L. Ded, P. Dostalova, E. Zatecka, A. Dorosh, K. Komrskova, J. Peknicova,
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0109
ERDF
GA-18-11275S
GACR
RVO: 86652036
Akademie Věd České Republiky
NLK
BioMedCentral
od 2003-12-01
BioMedCentral Open Access
od 2003
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2003
Free Medical Journals
od 2003
PubMed Central
od 2003
Europe PubMed Central
od 2003
ProQuest Central
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2003-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2003-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2003-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2003-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2003
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
od 2003-12-01
- MeSH
- akrozomální reakce fyziologie MeSH
- faloidin MeSH
- fluorescein-5-isothiokyanát MeSH
- fluorescenční barviva * MeSH
- fluorescenční mikroskopie * metody MeSH
- fluorescenční protilátková technika MeSH
- kapacitace spermií fyziologie MeSH
- průtoková cytometrie * metody MeSH
- spermie fyziologie MeSH
- Sus scrofa fyziologie MeSH
- vápník analýza MeSH
- zona pellucida fyziologie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Capacitation involves physiological changes that spermatozoa must undergo in the female reproductive tract or in vitro to obtain the ability to bind, penetrate and fertilize the egg. Up to date, several methods have been developed to characterize this complex biological process. The goal of the presented study is to mutually compare several fluorescent techniques, check their ability to detect changes in molecular processes during the capacitation progress and determine their ability to predict the percentage of acrosome reacted (AR) sperm after the exposure to solubilized zona pellucida (ZP). The capacitation process was analyzed using four fluorescent techniques: 1. chlortetracycline (CTC) staining, 2. anti-acrosin antibody (ACR.2) assay, 3. anti-phosphotyrosine (pY) antibody assay, 4. fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated phalloidin (FITC-phall) assay. All these methods were tested using fluorescent microscopy and flow cytometry. RESULTS: All selected methods are capable to detect the capacitation progress of boar sperm in vitro, but there are significant differences in their outcome when using fluorescent microscopy or flow cytometry experimental arrangements and subsequent statistical analysis (KW-ANOVA). Also, the ability to predict the absolute numbers of sperm which will undergo ZP-induced AR differ significantly (CTC and ACR.2 gave the best predictions). CONCLUSIONS: Our study compared four largely used methods used to characterize capacitation process, highlighted their differences and showed that all are able to detect capacitation progress, CTC and ACR.2 are furthermore able to accurately predict the percentage of AR sperm after ZP-induced AR.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20023323
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240624151123.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s12958-019-0554-z $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31856844
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Ded, Lukas $u Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, BIOCEV, Vestec, Czech Republic. lukas.ded@ibt.cas.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Fluorescent analysis of boar sperm capacitation process in vitro / $c L. Ded, P. Dostalova, E. Zatecka, A. Dorosh, K. Komrskova, J. Peknicova,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Capacitation involves physiological changes that spermatozoa must undergo in the female reproductive tract or in vitro to obtain the ability to bind, penetrate and fertilize the egg. Up to date, several methods have been developed to characterize this complex biological process. The goal of the presented study is to mutually compare several fluorescent techniques, check their ability to detect changes in molecular processes during the capacitation progress and determine their ability to predict the percentage of acrosome reacted (AR) sperm after the exposure to solubilized zona pellucida (ZP). The capacitation process was analyzed using four fluorescent techniques: 1. chlortetracycline (CTC) staining, 2. anti-acrosin antibody (ACR.2) assay, 3. anti-phosphotyrosine (pY) antibody assay, 4. fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated phalloidin (FITC-phall) assay. All these methods were tested using fluorescent microscopy and flow cytometry. RESULTS: All selected methods are capable to detect the capacitation progress of boar sperm in vitro, but there are significant differences in their outcome when using fluorescent microscopy or flow cytometry experimental arrangements and subsequent statistical analysis (KW-ANOVA). Also, the ability to predict the absolute numbers of sperm which will undergo ZP-induced AR differ significantly (CTC and ACR.2 gave the best predictions). CONCLUSIONS: Our study compared four largely used methods used to characterize capacitation process, highlighted their differences and showed that all are able to detect capacitation progress, CTC and ACR.2 are furthermore able to accurately predict the percentage of AR sperm after ZP-induced AR.
- 650 _2
- $a akrozomální reakce $x fyziologie $7 D020101
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a vápník $x analýza $7 D002118
- 650 12
- $a průtoková cytometrie $x metody $7 D005434
- 650 _2
- $a fluorescein-5-isothiokyanát $7 D016650
- 650 _2
- $a fluorescenční protilátková technika $7 D005455
- 650 12
- $a fluorescenční barviva $7 D005456
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a fluorescenční mikroskopie $x metody $7 D008856
- 650 _2
- $a faloidin $7 D010590
- 650 _2
- $a kapacitace spermií $x fyziologie $7 D013075
- 650 _2
- $a spermie $x fyziologie $7 D013094
- 650 _2
- $a Sus scrofa $x fyziologie $7 D034421
- 650 _2
- $a zona pellucida $x fyziologie $7 D015044
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Dostalova, Pavla $u Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, BIOCEV, Vestec, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Žatecká, Eva $u Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, BIOCEV, Vestec, Czech Republic. $7 xx0319144
- 700 1_
- $a Dorosh, Andrej $u Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, BIOCEV, Vestec, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Komrskova, Katerina $u Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, BIOCEV, Vestec, Czech Republic. Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Peknicova, Jana $u Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, BIOCEV, Vestec, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008251 $t Reproductive biology and endocrinology $x 1477-7827 $g Roč. 17, č. 1 (2019), s. 109
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31856844 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240624151121 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1595642 $s 1113999
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 17 $c 1 $d 109 $e 20191219 $i 1477-7827 $m Reproductive biology and endocrinology $n Reprod Biol Endocrinol $x MED00008251
- GRA __
- $a CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0109 $p ERDF
- GRA __
- $a GA-18-11275S $p GACR
- GRA __
- $a RVO: 86652036 $p Akademie Věd České Republiky
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125