Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Fluorescent analysis of boar sperm capacitation process in vitro

L. Ded, P. Dostalova, E. Zatecka, A. Dorosh, K. Komrskova, J. Peknicova,

. 2019 ; 17 (1) : 109. [pub] 20191219

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20023323

Grantová podpora
CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0109 ERDF
GA-18-11275S GACR
RVO: 86652036 Akademie Věd České Republiky

BACKGROUND: Capacitation involves physiological changes that spermatozoa must undergo in the female reproductive tract or in vitro to obtain the ability to bind, penetrate and fertilize the egg. Up to date, several methods have been developed to characterize this complex biological process. The goal of the presented study is to mutually compare several fluorescent techniques, check their ability to detect changes in molecular processes during the capacitation progress and determine their ability to predict the percentage of acrosome reacted (AR) sperm after the exposure to solubilized zona pellucida (ZP). The capacitation process was analyzed using four fluorescent techniques: 1. chlortetracycline (CTC) staining, 2. anti-acrosin antibody (ACR.2) assay, 3. anti-phosphotyrosine (pY) antibody assay, 4. fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated phalloidin (FITC-phall) assay. All these methods were tested using fluorescent microscopy and flow cytometry. RESULTS: All selected methods are capable to detect the capacitation progress of boar sperm in vitro, but there are significant differences in their outcome when using fluorescent microscopy or flow cytometry experimental arrangements and subsequent statistical analysis (KW-ANOVA). Also, the ability to predict the absolute numbers of sperm which will undergo ZP-induced AR differ significantly (CTC and ACR.2 gave the best predictions). CONCLUSIONS: Our study compared four largely used methods used to characterize capacitation process, highlighted their differences and showed that all are able to detect capacitation progress, CTC and ACR.2 are furthermore able to accurately predict the percentage of AR sperm after ZP-induced AR.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20023323
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240624151123.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12958-019-0554-z $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31856844
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Ded, Lukas $u Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, BIOCEV, Vestec, Czech Republic. lukas.ded@ibt.cas.cz.
245    10
$a Fluorescent analysis of boar sperm capacitation process in vitro / $c L. Ded, P. Dostalova, E. Zatecka, A. Dorosh, K. Komrskova, J. Peknicova,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Capacitation involves physiological changes that spermatozoa must undergo in the female reproductive tract or in vitro to obtain the ability to bind, penetrate and fertilize the egg. Up to date, several methods have been developed to characterize this complex biological process. The goal of the presented study is to mutually compare several fluorescent techniques, check their ability to detect changes in molecular processes during the capacitation progress and determine their ability to predict the percentage of acrosome reacted (AR) sperm after the exposure to solubilized zona pellucida (ZP). The capacitation process was analyzed using four fluorescent techniques: 1. chlortetracycline (CTC) staining, 2. anti-acrosin antibody (ACR.2) assay, 3. anti-phosphotyrosine (pY) antibody assay, 4. fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated phalloidin (FITC-phall) assay. All these methods were tested using fluorescent microscopy and flow cytometry. RESULTS: All selected methods are capable to detect the capacitation progress of boar sperm in vitro, but there are significant differences in their outcome when using fluorescent microscopy or flow cytometry experimental arrangements and subsequent statistical analysis (KW-ANOVA). Also, the ability to predict the absolute numbers of sperm which will undergo ZP-induced AR differ significantly (CTC and ACR.2 gave the best predictions). CONCLUSIONS: Our study compared four largely used methods used to characterize capacitation process, highlighted their differences and showed that all are able to detect capacitation progress, CTC and ACR.2 are furthermore able to accurately predict the percentage of AR sperm after ZP-induced AR.
650    _2
$a akrozomální reakce $x fyziologie $7 D020101
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a vápník $x analýza $7 D002118
650    12
$a průtoková cytometrie $x metody $7 D005434
650    _2
$a fluorescein-5-isothiokyanát $7 D016650
650    _2
$a fluorescenční protilátková technika $7 D005455
650    12
$a fluorescenční barviva $7 D005456
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    12
$a fluorescenční mikroskopie $x metody $7 D008856
650    _2
$a faloidin $7 D010590
650    _2
$a kapacitace spermií $x fyziologie $7 D013075
650    _2
$a spermie $x fyziologie $7 D013094
650    _2
$a Sus scrofa $x fyziologie $7 D034421
650    _2
$a zona pellucida $x fyziologie $7 D015044
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Dostalova, Pavla $u Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, BIOCEV, Vestec, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Žatecká, Eva $u Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, BIOCEV, Vestec, Czech Republic. $7 xx0319144
700    1_
$a Dorosh, Andrej $u Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, BIOCEV, Vestec, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Komrskova, Katerina $u Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, BIOCEV, Vestec, Czech Republic. Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Peknicova, Jana $u Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Biotechnology, Czech Academy of Sciences, BIOCEV, Vestec, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00008251 $t Reproductive biology and endocrinology $x 1477-7827 $g Roč. 17, č. 1 (2019), s. 109
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31856844 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240624151121 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1595642 $s 1113999
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 17 $c 1 $d 109 $e 20191219 $i 1477-7827 $m Reproductive biology and endocrinology $n Reprod Biol Endocrinol $x MED00008251
GRA    __
$a CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0109 $p ERDF
GRA    __
$a GA-18-11275S $p GACR
GRA    __
$a RVO: 86652036 $p Akademie Věd České Republiky
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...