• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

EUS-guided transluminal drainage using lumen-apposing metal stents with or without coaxial plastic stents for treatment of walled-off necrotizing pancreatitis: a prospective bicentric randomized controlled trial

P. Vanek, P. Falt, P. Vitek, V. Zoundjiekpon, M. Horinkova, J. Zapletalova, M. Lovecek, O. Urban

. 2023 ; 97 (6) : 1070-1080. [pub] 20230113

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu randomizované kontrolované studie, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23011307

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) have proven to be effective for drainage of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON), although associated adverse events (AEs) have been reported. Anchoring coaxial double-pigtail plastic stents (DPSs) within LAMSs have been proposed to prevent LAMS-related AEs but have not been assessed in prospective studies. We aimed to evaluate the utility of such measures with a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: We randomly assigned consecutive patients with WON indications for drainage to EUS-guided transluminal drainage using LAMSs with (group A) or without (group B) DPSs. All LAMSs were to be removed after 3 weeks had elapsed from the index procedure with a preceding CT to decide whether additional steps needed to be taken (eg, transluminal necrosectomy or placing transluminal plastic stents in patients with incomplete resolution of WON). The main outcomes were failure of the index method, defined as necessity of reintervention (endoscopic, percutaneous, or surgical) before LAMS removal because of LAMS-related AEs and/or clinical deterioration; AE rates; and mortality with the LAMS in place. Variables were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test, χ2 test, or Fisher exact test as appropriate. P < .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients (37.3% women; mean age, 54 ± 14.4 years) underwent LAMS placement with (n = 34) or without (n = 33) DPS placement in 2 tertiary centers. Baseline characteristics including demographics, etiology, comorbidity, and clinical presentation (sterile vs infected necrosis) were comparable between both groups. The technical success rate in placing LAMSs and DPSs was 100%. The global rate of AEs was significantly lower in group A versus group B (20.7% vs 51.5%, respectively; P = .008). Stent occlusion was the most frequently observed AE (14.7% vs 36.3%, P = .042). Failure of the index method was lower in group A versus group B (29.4% vs 48.5%, respectively; P = .109); however, the difference did not achieve statistical significance. The same applied to the mortality rate with LAMSs in place (2.9% vs 12.1%, P = .197). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a coaxial DPS within a LAMS was associated with a significantly lower global rate of AEs and stent occlusion rate in EUS-guided drainage of WON. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03923686.).

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23011307
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230801132942.0
007      
ta
008      
230718s2023 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.gie.2022.12.026 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36646148
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Vanek, Petr $u Department of Internal Medicine II-Gastroenterology and Geriatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
245    10
$a EUS-guided transluminal drainage using lumen-apposing metal stents with or without coaxial plastic stents for treatment of walled-off necrotizing pancreatitis: a prospective bicentric randomized controlled trial / $c P. Vanek, P. Falt, P. Vitek, V. Zoundjiekpon, M. Horinkova, J. Zapletalova, M. Lovecek, O. Urban
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) have proven to be effective for drainage of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON), although associated adverse events (AEs) have been reported. Anchoring coaxial double-pigtail plastic stents (DPSs) within LAMSs have been proposed to prevent LAMS-related AEs but have not been assessed in prospective studies. We aimed to evaluate the utility of such measures with a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: We randomly assigned consecutive patients with WON indications for drainage to EUS-guided transluminal drainage using LAMSs with (group A) or without (group B) DPSs. All LAMSs were to be removed after 3 weeks had elapsed from the index procedure with a preceding CT to decide whether additional steps needed to be taken (eg, transluminal necrosectomy or placing transluminal plastic stents in patients with incomplete resolution of WON). The main outcomes were failure of the index method, defined as necessity of reintervention (endoscopic, percutaneous, or surgical) before LAMS removal because of LAMS-related AEs and/or clinical deterioration; AE rates; and mortality with the LAMS in place. Variables were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test, χ2 test, or Fisher exact test as appropriate. P < .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients (37.3% women; mean age, 54 ± 14.4 years) underwent LAMS placement with (n = 34) or without (n = 33) DPS placement in 2 tertiary centers. Baseline characteristics including demographics, etiology, comorbidity, and clinical presentation (sterile vs infected necrosis) were comparable between both groups. The technical success rate in placing LAMSs and DPSs was 100%. The global rate of AEs was significantly lower in group A versus group B (20.7% vs 51.5%, respectively; P = .008). Stent occlusion was the most frequently observed AE (14.7% vs 36.3%, P = .042). Failure of the index method was lower in group A versus group B (29.4% vs 48.5%, respectively; P = .109); however, the difference did not achieve statistical significance. The same applied to the mortality rate with LAMSs in place (2.9% vs 12.1%, P = .197). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a coaxial DPS within a LAMS was associated with a significantly lower global rate of AEs and stent occlusion rate in EUS-guided drainage of WON. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03923686.).
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    12
$a stenty $x škodlivé účinky $7 D015607
650    12
$a akutní nekrotizující pankreatitida $x chirurgie $7 D019283
650    _2
$a drenáž $x metody $7 D004322
650    _2
$a plastické hmoty $7 D010969
650    _2
$a nekróza $x etiologie $7 D009336
650    _2
$a endosonografie $7 D019160
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Falt, Premysl $u Department of Internal Medicine II-Gastroenterology and Geriatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Vitek, Petr $u Beskydske Gastrocentrum, Frydek-Mistek Hospital, Frydek-Mistek, Czech Republic; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Zoundjiekpon, Vincent $u Department of Internal Medicine II-Gastroenterology and Geriatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Horinkova, Monika $u Department of Internal Medicine II-Gastroenterology and Geriatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Zapletalova, Jana $u Department of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Lovecek, Martin $u Department of Surgery I, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Urban, Ondrej $u Department of Internal Medicine II-Gastroenterology and Geriatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00001881 $t Gastrointestinal endoscopy $x 1097-6779 $g Roč. 97, č. 6 (2023), s. 1070-1080
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36646148 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230718 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230801132938 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1963609 $s 1197572
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 97 $c 6 $d 1070-1080 $e 20230113 $i 1097-6779 $m Gastrointestinal endoscopy $n Gastrointest Endosc $x MED00001881
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230718

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...