Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

What is the current role of prophylactic cranial irradiation in the treatment algorithm for small cell lung cancer

R. Vojtíšek

. 2023 ; 28 (5) : 698-706. [pub] 20231116

Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Polsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24006180

Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is considered an important technological advance made in oncology in an effort to reduce the incidence of brain metastases (BM) and improve overall survival (OS) of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Although it is often reported that PCI improves the therapeutic potential in limited-stage (LS) SCLC, no randomised trial has ever conclusively confirmed this. Nevertheless, PCI has been considered the standard of care for LS-SCLC since the late 1990s. The data supporting the use of PCI in LS-SCLC are based on an analysis of work performed prior to the current approach to staging [brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)]. The evidence for the rationale and feasibility of this approach in the modern diagnostic era should be demonstrated. The situation with extensive stage (ES) SCLC is seemingly easier because, unlike LS-SCLC, we have data from two randomised trials. Unfortunately, their results are in direct conflict with each other. Although it is generally assumed that good control of brain disease leads to better quality of life, this has never been prospectively demonstrated. In fact, PCI is associated not only with increased treatment costs and some patient discomfort, but also with non-negligible potential toxicity. For this reason, efforts have been made to preserve cognitive function by sparing the hippocampus. This concept is called hippocampal avoidance. The optimal fractionation regimen is currently less controversial than the optimal integration of PCI into the treatment algorithm. A dose of 25 Gy administered in 10 fractions should remain the standard for the eventual use of PCI in patients with SCLC. In summary, PCI is not a conditio sine qua non in any indication. Neither in patients with LS-SCLC nor in patients with ES-SCLC has a clear improvement in OS been demonstrated at follow-up using current imaging modalities.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24006180
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240412130916.0
007      
ta
008      
240405s2023 pl f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.5603/rpor.97432 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)38179287
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a pl
100    1_
$a Vojtíšek, Radovan $u Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital in Pilsen, Czech Republic
245    10
$a What is the current role of prophylactic cranial irradiation in the treatment algorithm for small cell lung cancer / $c R. Vojtíšek
520    9_
$a Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is considered an important technological advance made in oncology in an effort to reduce the incidence of brain metastases (BM) and improve overall survival (OS) of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Although it is often reported that PCI improves the therapeutic potential in limited-stage (LS) SCLC, no randomised trial has ever conclusively confirmed this. Nevertheless, PCI has been considered the standard of care for LS-SCLC since the late 1990s. The data supporting the use of PCI in LS-SCLC are based on an analysis of work performed prior to the current approach to staging [brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)]. The evidence for the rationale and feasibility of this approach in the modern diagnostic era should be demonstrated. The situation with extensive stage (ES) SCLC is seemingly easier because, unlike LS-SCLC, we have data from two randomised trials. Unfortunately, their results are in direct conflict with each other. Although it is generally assumed that good control of brain disease leads to better quality of life, this has never been prospectively demonstrated. In fact, PCI is associated not only with increased treatment costs and some patient discomfort, but also with non-negligible potential toxicity. For this reason, efforts have been made to preserve cognitive function by sparing the hippocampus. This concept is called hippocampal avoidance. The optimal fractionation regimen is currently less controversial than the optimal integration of PCI into the treatment algorithm. A dose of 25 Gy administered in 10 fractions should remain the standard for the eventual use of PCI in patients with SCLC. In summary, PCI is not a conditio sine qua non in any indication. Neither in patients with LS-SCLC nor in patients with ES-SCLC has a clear improvement in OS been demonstrated at follow-up using current imaging modalities.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
773    0_
$w MED00154188 $t Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy $x 1507-1367 $g Roč. 28, č. 5 (2023), s. 698-706
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38179287 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20240405 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240412130909 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2076160 $s 1215942
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 28 $c 5 $d 698-706 $e 20231116 $i 1507-1367 $m Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy $n Rep Pract Oncol Radiother $x MED00154188
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20240405

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...