-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
What is the current role of prophylactic cranial irradiation in the treatment algorithm for small cell lung cancer
R. Vojtíšek
Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Polsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2001
Free Medical Journals
od 2010
PubMed Central
od 2010
Europe PubMed Central
od 2010 do Před 1 rokem
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 1998
PubMed
38179287
DOI
10.5603/rpor.97432
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is considered an important technological advance made in oncology in an effort to reduce the incidence of brain metastases (BM) and improve overall survival (OS) of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Although it is often reported that PCI improves the therapeutic potential in limited-stage (LS) SCLC, no randomised trial has ever conclusively confirmed this. Nevertheless, PCI has been considered the standard of care for LS-SCLC since the late 1990s. The data supporting the use of PCI in LS-SCLC are based on an analysis of work performed prior to the current approach to staging [brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)]. The evidence for the rationale and feasibility of this approach in the modern diagnostic era should be demonstrated. The situation with extensive stage (ES) SCLC is seemingly easier because, unlike LS-SCLC, we have data from two randomised trials. Unfortunately, their results are in direct conflict with each other. Although it is generally assumed that good control of brain disease leads to better quality of life, this has never been prospectively demonstrated. In fact, PCI is associated not only with increased treatment costs and some patient discomfort, but also with non-negligible potential toxicity. For this reason, efforts have been made to preserve cognitive function by sparing the hippocampus. This concept is called hippocampal avoidance. The optimal fractionation regimen is currently less controversial than the optimal integration of PCI into the treatment algorithm. A dose of 25 Gy administered in 10 fractions should remain the standard for the eventual use of PCI in patients with SCLC. In summary, PCI is not a conditio sine qua non in any indication. Neither in patients with LS-SCLC nor in patients with ES-SCLC has a clear improvement in OS been demonstrated at follow-up using current imaging modalities.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24006180
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240412130916.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240405s2023 pl f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.5603/rpor.97432 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38179287
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a pl
- 100 1_
- $a Vojtíšek, Radovan $u Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital in Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a What is the current role of prophylactic cranial irradiation in the treatment algorithm for small cell lung cancer / $c R. Vojtíšek
- 520 9_
- $a Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is considered an important technological advance made in oncology in an effort to reduce the incidence of brain metastases (BM) and improve overall survival (OS) of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Although it is often reported that PCI improves the therapeutic potential in limited-stage (LS) SCLC, no randomised trial has ever conclusively confirmed this. Nevertheless, PCI has been considered the standard of care for LS-SCLC since the late 1990s. The data supporting the use of PCI in LS-SCLC are based on an analysis of work performed prior to the current approach to staging [brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)]. The evidence for the rationale and feasibility of this approach in the modern diagnostic era should be demonstrated. The situation with extensive stage (ES) SCLC is seemingly easier because, unlike LS-SCLC, we have data from two randomised trials. Unfortunately, their results are in direct conflict with each other. Although it is generally assumed that good control of brain disease leads to better quality of life, this has never been prospectively demonstrated. In fact, PCI is associated not only with increased treatment costs and some patient discomfort, but also with non-negligible potential toxicity. For this reason, efforts have been made to preserve cognitive function by sparing the hippocampus. This concept is called hippocampal avoidance. The optimal fractionation regimen is currently less controversial than the optimal integration of PCI into the treatment algorithm. A dose of 25 Gy administered in 10 fractions should remain the standard for the eventual use of PCI in patients with SCLC. In summary, PCI is not a conditio sine qua non in any indication. Neither in patients with LS-SCLC nor in patients with ES-SCLC has a clear improvement in OS been demonstrated at follow-up using current imaging modalities.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 773 0_
- $w MED00154188 $t Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy $x 1507-1367 $g Roč. 28, č. 5 (2023), s. 698-706
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38179287 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240405 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240412130909 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2076160 $s 1215942
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 28 $c 5 $d 698-706 $e 20231116 $i 1507-1367 $m Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy $n Rep Pract Oncol Radiother $x MED00154188
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240405