-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Minimal Residual Disease Status Predicts Outcome in Patients With Previously Untreated Follicular Lymphoma: A Prospective Analysis of the Phase III GALLIUM Study
C. Pott, V. Jurinovic, J. Trotman, B. Kehden, M. Unterhalt, M. Herold, RV. Jagt, A. Janssens, M. Kneba, J. Mayer, M. Young, C. Schmidt, A. Knapp, T. Nielsen, H. Brown, N. Spielewoy, C. Harbron, A. Bottos, K. Mundt, R. Marcus, W. Hiddemann, E. Hoster
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2004 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library
od 1999-01-01
PubMed
38096461
DOI
10.1200/jco.23.00838
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- bendamustin hydrochlorid MeSH
- cyklofosfamid MeSH
- doxorubicin MeSH
- folikulární lymfom * MeSH
- galium * terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- prednison MeSH
- protokoly antitumorózní kombinované chemoterapie škodlivé účinky MeSH
- reziduální nádor farmakoterapie MeSH
- rituximab MeSH
- vinkristin MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
PURPOSE: We report an analysis of minimal residual/detectable disease (MRD) as a predictor of outcome in previously untreated patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) from the randomized, multicenter GALLIUM (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01332968) trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received induction with obinutuzumab (G) or rituximab (R) plus bendamustine, or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (CHOP) or cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone (CVP) chemotherapy, followed by maintenance with the same antibody in responders. MRD status was assessed at predefined time points (mid-induction [MI], end of induction [EOI], and at 4-6 monthly intervals during maintenance and follow-up). Patients with evaluable biomarker data at diagnosis were included in the survival analysis. RESULTS: MRD positivity was associated with inferior progression-free survival (PFS) at MI (hazard ratio [HR], 3.03 [95% CI, 2.07 to 4.45]; P < .0001) and EOI (HR, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.53 to 3.32]; P < .0001). MRD response was higher after G- versus R-chemotherapy at MI (94.2% v 88.9%; P = .013) and at EOI (93.1% v 86.7%; P = .0077). Late responders (MI-positive/EOI-negative) had a significantly poorer PFS than early responders (MI-negative/EOI-negative; HR, 3.11 [95% CI, 1.75 to 5.52]; P = .00011). The smallest proportion of MRD positivity was observed in patients receiving bendamustine at MI (4.8% v 16.0% in those receiving CHOP; P < .0001). G appeared to compensate for less effective chemotherapy regimens, with similar MRD response rates observed across the G-chemo groups. During the maintenance period, more patients treated with R than with G were MRD-positive (R-CHOP, 20.7% v G-CHOP, 7.0%; R-CVP, 21.7% v G-CVP, 9.4%). Throughout maintenance, MRD positivity was associated with clinical relapse. CONCLUSION: MRD status can determine outcome after induction and during maintenance, and MRD negativity is a prerequisite for long-term disease control in FL. The higher MRD responses after G- versus R-based treatment confirm more effective tumor cell clearance.
Concord Repatriation General Hospital University of Sydney Sydney NSW Australia
East Kent Hospital Canterbury United Kingdom
F Hoffmann La Roche Ltd Basel Switzerland
HELIOS Klinikum Erfurt Germany
Kings College Hospital London United Kingdom
Roche Products Ltd Welwyn Garden City United Kingdom
University Hospital and Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
University Hospital Schleswig Holstein Kiel Germany
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24007165
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240423155747.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240412s2024 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1200/JCO.23.00838 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38096461
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Pott, Christiane $u University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0009000592608340
- 245 10
- $a Minimal Residual Disease Status Predicts Outcome in Patients With Previously Untreated Follicular Lymphoma: A Prospective Analysis of the Phase III GALLIUM Study / $c C. Pott, V. Jurinovic, J. Trotman, B. Kehden, M. Unterhalt, M. Herold, RV. Jagt, A. Janssens, M. Kneba, J. Mayer, M. Young, C. Schmidt, A. Knapp, T. Nielsen, H. Brown, N. Spielewoy, C. Harbron, A. Bottos, K. Mundt, R. Marcus, W. Hiddemann, E. Hoster
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: We report an analysis of minimal residual/detectable disease (MRD) as a predictor of outcome in previously untreated patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) from the randomized, multicenter GALLIUM (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01332968) trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received induction with obinutuzumab (G) or rituximab (R) plus bendamustine, or cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (CHOP) or cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone (CVP) chemotherapy, followed by maintenance with the same antibody in responders. MRD status was assessed at predefined time points (mid-induction [MI], end of induction [EOI], and at 4-6 monthly intervals during maintenance and follow-up). Patients with evaluable biomarker data at diagnosis were included in the survival analysis. RESULTS: MRD positivity was associated with inferior progression-free survival (PFS) at MI (hazard ratio [HR], 3.03 [95% CI, 2.07 to 4.45]; P < .0001) and EOI (HR, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.53 to 3.32]; P < .0001). MRD response was higher after G- versus R-chemotherapy at MI (94.2% v 88.9%; P = .013) and at EOI (93.1% v 86.7%; P = .0077). Late responders (MI-positive/EOI-negative) had a significantly poorer PFS than early responders (MI-negative/EOI-negative; HR, 3.11 [95% CI, 1.75 to 5.52]; P = .00011). The smallest proportion of MRD positivity was observed in patients receiving bendamustine at MI (4.8% v 16.0% in those receiving CHOP; P < .0001). G appeared to compensate for less effective chemotherapy regimens, with similar MRD response rates observed across the G-chemo groups. During the maintenance period, more patients treated with R than with G were MRD-positive (R-CHOP, 20.7% v G-CHOP, 7.0%; R-CVP, 21.7% v G-CVP, 9.4%). Throughout maintenance, MRD positivity was associated with clinical relapse. CONCLUSION: MRD status can determine outcome after induction and during maintenance, and MRD negativity is a prerequisite for long-term disease control in FL. The higher MRD responses after G- versus R-based treatment confirm more effective tumor cell clearance.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a protokoly antitumorózní kombinované chemoterapie $x škodlivé účinky $7 D000971
- 650 _2
- $a bendamustin hydrochlorid $7 D000069461
- 650 _2
- $a cyklofosfamid $7 D003520
- 650 _2
- $a doxorubicin $7 D004317
- 650 12
- $a galium $x terapeutické užití $7 D005708
- 650 12
- $a folikulární lymfom $7 D008224
- 650 _2
- $a reziduální nádor $x farmakoterapie $7 D018365
- 650 _2
- $a prednison $7 D011241
- 650 _2
- $a rituximab $7 D000069283
- 650 _2
- $a vinkristin $7 D014750
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 700 1_
- $a Jurinovic, Vindi $u Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany $u Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Trotman, Judith $u Concord Repatriation General Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000180094593
- 700 1_
- $a Kehden, Britta $u University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Unterhalt, Michael $u Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Herold, Michael $u HELIOS Klinikum, Erfurt, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000268013292
- 700 1_
- $a Jagt, Richard van der $u University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada $1 https://orcid.org/0000000157060109
- 700 1_
- $a Janssens, Ann $u University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- 700 1_
- $a Kneba, Michael $u University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Mayer, Jiri $u University Hospital and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000305679887
- 700 1_
- $a Young, Moya $u East Kent Hospital, Canterbury, United Kingdom
- 700 1_
- $a Schmidt, Christian $u Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Knapp, Andrea $u F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Nielsen, Tina $u F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Brown, Helen $u Roche Products Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom $1 https://orcid.org/000900073637891X
- 700 1_
- $a Spielewoy, Nathalie $u F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Harbron, Chris $u Roche Products Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom
- 700 1_
- $a Bottos, Alessia $u F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Mundt, Kirsten $u F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Marcus, Robert $u Kings College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- 700 1_
- $a Hiddemann, Wolfgang $u Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Hoster, Eva $u Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany $u Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000207491389
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002596 $t Journal of clinical oncology $x 1527-7755 $g Roč. 42, č. 5 (2024), s. 550-561
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38096461 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240412 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240423155743 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2081258 $s 1216932
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 42 $c 5 $d 550-561 $e 20231214 $i 1527-7755 $m Journal of clinical oncology $n J. clin. Oncol. $x MED00002596
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240412