-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
External validation of nomograms including MRI features for the prediction of side-specific extraprostatic extension
JG. Heetman, EJRJ. van der Hoeven, P. Rajwa, F. Zattoni, C. Kesch, S. Shariat, F. Dal Moro, G. Novara, G. La Bombara, F. Sattin, N. von Ostau, N. Pötsch, PAT. Baltzer, L. Wever, JPA. Van Basten, HHE. Van Melick, RCN. Van den Bergh, G. Gandaglia,...
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, validační studie
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 2000-07-01 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library
od 1997-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2000-07-01 do Před 1 rokem
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2000-07-01 do Před 1 rokem
- MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- magnetická rezonanční tomografie * metody MeSH
- nádory prostaty * diagnostické zobrazování patologie chirurgie MeSH
- nomogramy * MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- prostata diagnostické zobrazování patologie chirurgie MeSH
- prostatektomie * metody MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- roboticky asistované výkony metody MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- validační studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Prediction of side-specific extraprostatic extension (EPE) is crucial in selecting patients for nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (RP). Multiple nomograms, which include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) information, are available predict side-specific EPE. It is crucial that the accuracy of these nomograms is assessed with external validation to ensure they can be used in clinical practice to support medical decision-making. METHODS: Data of prostate cancer (PCa) patients that underwent robot-assisted RP (RARP) from 2017 to 2021 at four European tertiary referral centers were collected retrospectively. Four previously developed nomograms for the prediction of side-specific EPE were identified and externally validated. Discrimination (area under the curve [AUC]), calibration and net benefit of four nomograms were assessed. To assess the strongest predictor among the MRI features included in all nomograms, we evaluated their association with side-specific EPE using multivariate regression analysis and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). RESULTS: This study involved 773 patients with a total of 1546 prostate lobes. EPE was found in 338 (22%) lobes. The AUCs of the models predicting EPE ranged from 72.2% (95% CI 69.1-72.3%) (Wibmer) to 75.5% (95% CI 72.5-78.5%) (Nyarangi-Dix). The nomogram with the highest AUC varied across the cohorts. The Soeterik, Nyarangi-Dix, and Martini nomograms demonstrated fair to good calibration for clinically most relevant thresholds between 5 and 30%. In contrast, the Wibmer nomogram showed substantial overestimation of EPE risk for thresholds above 25%. The Nyarangi-Dix nomogram demonstrated a higher net benefit for risk thresholds between 20 and 30% when compared to the other three nomograms. Of all MRI features, the European Society of Urogenital Radiology score and tumor capsule contact length showed the highest AUCs and lowest AIC. CONCLUSION: The Nyarangi-Dix, Martini and Soeterik nomograms resulted in accurate EPE prediction and are therefore suitable to support medical decision-making.
Department of Radiation Oncology University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands
Department of Radiology St Antonius Hospital Utrecht The Netherlands
Department of Special Surgery The University of Jordan Amman Jordan
Department of Surgery Oncology and Gastroenterology University of Padua Padua Italy
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czechia
Department of Urology Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital Nijmegen The Netherlands
Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology St Antonius Hospital Utrecht The Netherlands
Department of Urology University Hospital Essen Essen Germany
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas USA
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York USA
Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
Unit of Urology Division of Oncology San Raffaele Hospital Milan Italy
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24019224
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20241024111432.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 241015s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1038/s41391-023-00738-3 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)37932522
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Heetman, J G $u Department of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands $1 https://orcid.org/0000000295607387
- 245 10
- $a External validation of nomograms including MRI features for the prediction of side-specific extraprostatic extension / $c JG. Heetman, EJRJ. van der Hoeven, P. Rajwa, F. Zattoni, C. Kesch, S. Shariat, F. Dal Moro, G. Novara, G. La Bombara, F. Sattin, N. von Ostau, N. Pötsch, PAT. Baltzer, L. Wever, JPA. Van Basten, HHE. Van Melick, RCN. Van den Bergh, G. Gandaglia, TFW. Soeterik, European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Party
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Prediction of side-specific extraprostatic extension (EPE) is crucial in selecting patients for nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (RP). Multiple nomograms, which include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) information, are available predict side-specific EPE. It is crucial that the accuracy of these nomograms is assessed with external validation to ensure they can be used in clinical practice to support medical decision-making. METHODS: Data of prostate cancer (PCa) patients that underwent robot-assisted RP (RARP) from 2017 to 2021 at four European tertiary referral centers were collected retrospectively. Four previously developed nomograms for the prediction of side-specific EPE were identified and externally validated. Discrimination (area under the curve [AUC]), calibration and net benefit of four nomograms were assessed. To assess the strongest predictor among the MRI features included in all nomograms, we evaluated their association with side-specific EPE using multivariate regression analysis and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). RESULTS: This study involved 773 patients with a total of 1546 prostate lobes. EPE was found in 338 (22%) lobes. The AUCs of the models predicting EPE ranged from 72.2% (95% CI 69.1-72.3%) (Wibmer) to 75.5% (95% CI 72.5-78.5%) (Nyarangi-Dix). The nomogram with the highest AUC varied across the cohorts. The Soeterik, Nyarangi-Dix, and Martini nomograms demonstrated fair to good calibration for clinically most relevant thresholds between 5 and 30%. In contrast, the Wibmer nomogram showed substantial overestimation of EPE risk for thresholds above 25%. The Nyarangi-Dix nomogram demonstrated a higher net benefit for risk thresholds between 20 and 30% when compared to the other three nomograms. Of all MRI features, the European Society of Urogenital Radiology score and tumor capsule contact length showed the highest AUCs and lowest AIC. CONCLUSION: The Nyarangi-Dix, Martini and Soeterik nomograms resulted in accurate EPE prediction and are therefore suitable to support medical decision-making.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a nomogramy $7 D049451
- 650 12
- $a nádory prostaty $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D011471
- 650 12
- $a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $x metody $7 D008279
- 650 12
- $a prostatektomie $x metody $7 D011468
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a prostata $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D011467
- 650 _2
- $a prognóza $7 D011379
- 650 _2
- $a roboticky asistované výkony $x metody $7 D065287
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a validační studie $7 D023361
- 700 1_
- $a van der Hoeven, E J R J $u Department of Radiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Rajwa, P $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $1 https://orcid.org/0000000340736584
- 700 1_
- $a Zattoni, F $u Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy $1 https://orcid.org/000000024178373X
- 700 1_
- $a Kesch, C $u Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany $1 https://orcid.org/0000000226562664
- 700 1_
- $a Shariat, S $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia $u Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA $u Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia $u Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Dal Moro, F $u Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy $1 https://orcid.org/0000000188509239
- 700 1_
- $a Novara, G $u Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy $1 https://orcid.org/0000000346935058
- 700 1_
- $a La Bombara, G $u Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Sattin, F $u Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a von Ostau, N $u Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Pötsch, N $u Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Baltzer, P A T $u Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Wever, L $u Department of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Van Basten, J P A $u Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Van Melick, H H E $u Department of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Van den Bergh, R C N $u Department of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Gandaglia, G $u Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Soeterik, T F W $u Department of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands. t.soeterik@antoniusziekenhuis.nl $u Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. t.soeterik@antoniusziekenhuis.nl
- 710 2_
- $a European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Party
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008064 $t Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases $x 1476-5608 $g Roč. 27, č. 3 (2024), s. 492-499
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37932522 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20241015 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20241024111426 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2201835 $s 1231197
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 27 $c 3 $d 492-499 $e 20231106 $i 1476-5608 $m Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases $n Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis $x MED00008064
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20241015