-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
PVI-only is not enough for all patients with persistent AF: A FLOW-AF subgroup analysis
A. Verma, S. Castellano, MH. Kong, P. Neuzil, T. Szili-Torok, SG. Spitzer, A. Rillig, VY. Reddy
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie
- MeSH
- fibrilace síní * chirurgie patofyziologie diagnóza MeSH
- katetrizační ablace * metody MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- převodní systém srdeční * patofyziologie chirurgie MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- venae pulmonales * chirurgie patofyziologie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Since the Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation Trial Part II (STAR-AF II), there has been a trend toward pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)-only ablation strategies for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). Electrographic flow (EGF) mapping can identify active sources of atrial fibrillation (AF) and estimate the electrographic flow consistency (EGFC) of wavefront propagation through substrate, revealing functional AF mechanisms. OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the success of a PVI-only ablation strategy for a redo PeAF/longstanding PeAF population. METHODS: Electrographic Flow-Guided Ablation in Redo Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (FLOW-AF [NCT04473963]) prospectively enrolled patients with nonparoxysmal AF undergoing redo ablation at 4 centers. One-minute EGF recordings using 64-pole basket catheters were obtained both pre-PVI and post-PVI following a 20-minute wait and confirmation of electrical isolation of veins. Patients with EGF-identified sources were randomized 1:1 to EGF-guided source ablation vs PVI-only. Patients with no sources were not randomized and mostly received PVI only. RESULTS: Study of 85 patients enrolled 24 with EGF-identified sources randomized to PVI only and 23 with no sources receiving PVI only. Of these 47 patients, those with sources (Group 2) had different clinical characteristics including older age and higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores compared with those with no sources (Group 1). After PVI only, Group 1 had 70% (16 of 23) freedom from recurrent AF (FFAF) within 1 year vs Group 2 with 35% (8 of 23), P = .018. In addition, patients with high electrographic flow consistency (EGFC) indicative of healthy or normal substrate had 67% (10 of 15) FFAF vs 45% (14 of 31) in those with low EGFC suggestive of abnormal substrate, P = .011. CONCLUSION: Success rates in no-sources patients receiving PVI only are better than in those with sources randomized to PVI only. For the clinically heterogenous population of patients with PeAF, the presence of EGF-identified sources matters clinically, and PVI only will not be enough for all patients.
Cardiology Center University of Szeged Szeged Hungary
Cortex Inc Menlo Park California
Department of Cardiology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York
Homolka Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25015999
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250731091431.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250708s2025 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.10.037 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39447813
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Verma, Atul $u McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- 245 10
- $a PVI-only is not enough for all patients with persistent AF: A FLOW-AF subgroup analysis / $c A. Verma, S. Castellano, MH. Kong, P. Neuzil, T. Szili-Torok, SG. Spitzer, A. Rillig, VY. Reddy
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Since the Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation Trial Part II (STAR-AF II), there has been a trend toward pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)-only ablation strategies for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). Electrographic flow (EGF) mapping can identify active sources of atrial fibrillation (AF) and estimate the electrographic flow consistency (EGFC) of wavefront propagation through substrate, revealing functional AF mechanisms. OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the success of a PVI-only ablation strategy for a redo PeAF/longstanding PeAF population. METHODS: Electrographic Flow-Guided Ablation in Redo Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (FLOW-AF [NCT04473963]) prospectively enrolled patients with nonparoxysmal AF undergoing redo ablation at 4 centers. One-minute EGF recordings using 64-pole basket catheters were obtained both pre-PVI and post-PVI following a 20-minute wait and confirmation of electrical isolation of veins. Patients with EGF-identified sources were randomized 1:1 to EGF-guided source ablation vs PVI-only. Patients with no sources were not randomized and mostly received PVI only. RESULTS: Study of 85 patients enrolled 24 with EGF-identified sources randomized to PVI only and 23 with no sources receiving PVI only. Of these 47 patients, those with sources (Group 2) had different clinical characteristics including older age and higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores compared with those with no sources (Group 1). After PVI only, Group 1 had 70% (16 of 23) freedom from recurrent AF (FFAF) within 1 year vs Group 2 with 35% (8 of 23), P = .018. In addition, patients with high electrographic flow consistency (EGFC) indicative of healthy or normal substrate had 67% (10 of 15) FFAF vs 45% (14 of 31) in those with low EGFC suggestive of abnormal substrate, P = .011. CONCLUSION: Success rates in no-sources patients receiving PVI only are better than in those with sources randomized to PVI only. For the clinically heterogenous population of patients with PeAF, the presence of EGF-identified sources matters clinically, and PVI only will not be enough for all patients.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a fibrilace síní $x chirurgie $x patofyziologie $x diagnóza $7 D001281
- 650 12
- $a venae pulmonales $x chirurgie $x patofyziologie $7 D011667
- 650 12
- $a katetrizační ablace $x metody $7 D017115
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 12
- $a převodní systém srdeční $x patofyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D006329
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 700 1_
- $a Castellano, Steven $u Cortex, Inc, Menlo Park, California. Electronic address: steven.castellano@gmail.com
- 700 1_
- $a Kong, Melissa H $u Cortex, Inc, Menlo Park, California
- 700 1_
- $a Neuzil, Petr $u Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Szili-Torok, Tamas $u Cardiology Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- 700 1_
- $a Spitzer, Stefan G $u Praxisklinik Herz und Gefäße, Dresden, Germany & Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Institute of Medical Technology, Cottbus, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Rillig, Andreas $u University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Reddy, Vivek Y $u Department of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
- 773 0_
- $w MED00156180 $t Heart rhythm $x 1556-3871 $g Roč. 22, č. 5 (2025), s. 1170-1178
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39447813 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250708 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250731091425 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2366689 $s 1253124
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 22 $c 5 $d 1170-1178 $e 20241022 $i 1556-3871 $m Heart rhythm $n Heart Rhythm $x MED00156180
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250708