Pathogenicity and protective effect of rough mutants of Salmonella species in germ-free piglets

. 1997 Dec ; 65 (12) : 5238-43.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid09393821

In this study, two stable, rough, streptomycin-sensitive Salmonella mutants with different types of genetic defects were used to colonize groups of germ-free (GF) piglets. The lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of Salmonella typhimurium SF 1591 was of the Ra chemotype (complete core), whereas the LPS of the S. minnesota mR 595 deep-rough mutant contained only lipid A and 2-keto-3-deoxyoctulosonic acid (Re chemotype). Both strains readily colonized the intestinal tracts of GF piglets and were stable during the whole experiment. All animals survived, and only transient fever was observed in some piglets colonized with the SF 1591 strain. Finally, streptomycin and virulent, smooth, streptomycin-resistant S. typhimurium LT2 were administered perorally 1 week later. All piglets colonized previously with the deep-rough mutant mR 595 died of sepsis, in contrast to piglets infected with the LT2 strain and colonized with the SF 1591 mutant, all of which survived. This difference is explained by the penetration of the mesenteric lymph nodes, spleen, and liver by great numbers of live bacteria in the latter case, resulting in prominent systemic and local immune responses. On the other hand, live bacteria were found only rarely in the mesenteric lymph nodes of animals colonized with the mR 595 strain and a negligible antibody response was observed.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Am J Med. 1984 Apr;76(4):664-71 PubMed

J Hyg (Lond). 1972 Jun;70(2):335-42 PubMed

J Exp Med. 1966 Oct 1;124(4):573-83 PubMed

Lab Invest. 1963 Mar;12:355-64 PubMed

Infect Immun. 1972 May;5(5):792-7 PubMed

Infect Immun. 1995 Oct;63(10):3904-13 PubMed

Infect Immun. 1979 Feb;23(2):403-11 PubMed

Infect Immun. 1970 Sep;2(3):309-15 PubMed

Eur J Biochem. 1969 Jun;9(2):245-9 PubMed

Microbiol Immunol. 1989;33(9):699-708 PubMed

J Bacteriol. 1968 Feb;95(2):406-17 PubMed

Microbiol Rev. 1989 Jun;53(2):210-30 PubMed

J Immunol. 1984 Aug;133(2):950-7 PubMed

Infect Agents Dis. 1993 Apr;2(2):55-73 PubMed

Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 1994 Oct;43(1-3):135-42 PubMed

Infect Immun. 1972 Oct;6(4):451-8 PubMed

N Engl J Med. 1972 Aug 10;287(6):261-7 PubMed

Infect Immun. 1992 May;60(5):1786-92 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Aug;86(16):6383-7 PubMed

Infect Immun. 1996 Sep;64(9):3811-7 PubMed

Res Microbiol. 1994 Sep;145(7):543-52 PubMed

J Exp Med. 1994 Jul 1;180(1):15-23 PubMed

Immunology. 1996 Aug;88(4):611-7 PubMed

J Bacteriol. 1969 Feb;97(2):667-75 PubMed

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1983 Jun 30;409:96-113 PubMed

Science. 1991 May 17;252(5008):934-8 PubMed

Infect Immun. 1992 May;60(5):1820-5 PubMed

Eur J Biochem. 1980;107(1):137-43 PubMed

Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A. 1971 Jun;217(2):183-97 PubMed

Infect Immun. 1984 Sep;45(3):631-6 PubMed

Microbiol Rev. 1985 Sep;49(3):298-337 PubMed

Infect Immun. 1985 Dec;50(3):716-20 PubMed

Adv Exp Med Biol. 1995;371A:473-7 PubMed

Cell. 1991 Jun 28;65(7):1099-102 PubMed

Infect Immun. 1997 Dec;65(12):5244-9 PubMed

J Infect Dis. 1984 Sep;150(3):425-35 PubMed

J Infect Dis. 1988 Jan;157(1):78-84 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...