Ophthalmological examination and VEPs in preterm children with perinatal CNS involvement

. 2008 Sep ; 117 (2) : 137-45. [epub] 20080131

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid18236090

Five children with a history of preterm birth (mean gestational age of 27 weeks; birth weight 870-1,380 g) and perinatal post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus were examined ophthalmologically at ages ranging from 4-11 years. An extended visual evoked potentials (VEPs) examination was simultaneously performed, using pattern-reversal, motion-onset, and cognitive visual stimuli. Although 3 of the 10 eyes displayed about normal visual acuity (> or =0.9), all of the examined eyes were abnormal for at least one variant of the tested VEPs. Pathological changes in VEPs (missing responses, shape abnormalities due to delayed VEPs maturation, prolonged peak latencies, and reduced amplitudes) were roughly proportional to both gestational age and reduction in visual acuity. A more severe pathology was found in the motion-onset VEPs (in all five subjects - nine eyes) when compared to the pattern-reversal VEPs (in four subjects - eight eyes). These observations suggest that the magnocellular system/dorsal stream of the visual pathway (which is particularly activated in response to motion stimuli) may be more frequently affected in preterm children than the parvocellular system/ventral stream (tested mostly by the standard pattern-reversal VEPs). This pilot study may encourage further testing of the combined pattern and motion-related VEPs examinations in preterm children as a way of detecting hidden cortical/cerebral visual impairment (CVI).

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Doc Ophthalmol. 2004 Sep;109(2):169-75 PubMed

Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Aug;90(8):960-3 PubMed

Am J Ophthalmol. 1997 Feb;123(2):218-23 PubMed

Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Nov;82(11):1231-5 PubMed

Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Sep;123(9):1215-20 PubMed

Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 Nov;90(6):F474-9 PubMed

Doc Ophthalmol. 1990 Aug;75(1):67-72 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Apr;83(8):2755-7 PubMed

Vision Res. 2006 Feb;46(4):536-44 PubMed

Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Nov;82(11):1225-6 PubMed

Vision Res. 1984;24(1):25-32 PubMed

Vision Res. 2007 Jan;47(2):189-202 PubMed

Neuroimage. 2001 Dec;14(6):1409-15 PubMed

Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Sep;86(9):1035-40 PubMed

Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001 Feb;43(2):113-7 PubMed

Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001 Jan;43(1):56-60 PubMed

Strabismus. 2002 Jun;10(2):179-83 PubMed

Am J Occup Ther. 1995 Oct;49(9):899-903 PubMed

Ophthalmologica. 2004 Nov-Dec;218(6):397-401 PubMed

Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Nov;87(11):1345-9 PubMed

Vision Res. 1994 Jun;34(12):1541-7 PubMed

Eye (Lond). 2004 Nov;18(11):1038-48 PubMed

Dev Med Child Neurol. 1994 Oct;36(10):849-62 PubMed

Brain Dev. 2004 Dec;26(8):506-12 PubMed

Ann Neurol. 1999 Nov;46(5):755-60 PubMed

Eye (Lond). 2004 Jan;18(1):27-34 PubMed

Doc Ophthalmol. 1992;81(2):209-18 PubMed

Doc Ophthalmol. 2007 Mar;114(2):83-105 PubMed

J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2002 May-Jun;39(3):157-65 PubMed

Surv Ophthalmol. 1994 Jan-Feb;38(4):351-64 PubMed

J Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Oct;23(5):416-20 PubMed

Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 Jun;83(6):670-5 PubMed

J Neurophysiol. 1986 Aug;56(2):462-80 PubMed

Nat Neurosci. 2000 Dec;3(12):1322-8 PubMed

Doc Ophthalmol. 1992;80(1):83-9 PubMed

Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 May;83(5):509-10 PubMed

Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2001;99:253-69 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace