Enterococci from piglets--probiotic properties and responsiveness to natural antibacterial substances

. 2009 Nov ; 54 (6) : 538-44. [epub] 20100207

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid20140723

Fifty-five strains of enterococci isolated from the piglet intestine were characterized in vitro for probiotic activity. Identification of the isolates revealed Enterococcus faecium as the predominant species (84 %). Forty strains (73 %) were found to produce bacteriocin-like substances (only into solid media) with activity almost only toward Gram-positive genera. Thirty-eight % of strains were resistant to tetracycline, 27 % to chloramphenicol, 18 % to erythromycin and 16 % to vancomycin. In addition to control of strain safety, 6 % of isolates were beta-hemolytic and 16 % produced gelatinase. Seven strains selected for further probiotic assays exhibited sufficient survival rate at pH 3.0 after 3 h, in the presence of 1 % ox-bile and lysozyme after 1 d (over 107 CFU/mL in all tests). The adhesion of tested strains to porcine and human intestinal mucus was found in a similar range (1.4-14.0 % and 1.4-17.6 %, respectively). In accordance with current research effort to use and/or to combine various health promoting substances, the sensitivity of all isolates toward plant extracts and toward bacteriocins produced by animal and environmental strains was determined. All enterococci were sensitive toward oregano and sage extracts and toward one (E. faecium EF55--chicken isolate, activity of 25 600 AU/mL) of ten bacteriocin substances. It means that a similar anti-enterococcal potential of some bacteriocin substances may be observed as for certain plant extracts.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Jan;72(1):239-44 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2001;46(2):157-60 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2002;47(4):391-400 PubMed

Anaerobe. 2006 Oct-Dec;12(5-6):242-8 PubMed

Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002 Jan;9(1):184-6 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2004;49(4):411-7 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2004;49(6):763-8 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 2000 Nov;38(11):4201-7 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2006;51(4):320-4 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Apr;67(4):1628-35 PubMed

Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A. 1983 Dec;256(2):168-74 PubMed

Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2005 May 1;105(1-2):151-61 PubMed

J Anim Sci. 2006 Mar;84(3):608-17 PubMed

Vet Res Commun. 2003 May;27(4):275-80 PubMed

J Appl Microbiol. 2006 Feb;100(2):296-305 PubMed

Vet Microbiol. 2008 Dec 10;132(3-4):293-301 PubMed

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 May;45(5):1374-8 PubMed

FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2007 Apr;31(3):293-310 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2004;49(2):203-7 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2001;46(1):49-52 PubMed

J Dairy Sci. 1990 Apr;73(4):905-11 PubMed

Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Feb 25;19(4):861-6 PubMed

Vet Res Commun. 2004 Nov;28(8):647-55 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1999;44(6):707-11 PubMed

Infect Immun. 2005 Jul;73(7):4346-53 PubMed

Nejnovějších 20 citací...

Zobrazit více v
Medvik | PubMed

Probiotic characteristics of bacteriocin-producing Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from human milk and colostrum

. 2019 Nov ; 64 (6) : 735-750. [epub] 20190209

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...