Indoor and outdoor sources of size-resolved mass concentration of particulate matter in a school gym-implications for exposure of exercising children
Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Gymnastics statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Inhalation Exposure statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Air Pollutants analysis MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Environmental Monitoring MeSH
- Particulate Matter analysis MeSH
- Schools statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Physical Education and Training statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Particle Size MeSH
- Air Pollution, Indoor analysis statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Air Pollutants MeSH
- Particulate Matter MeSH
INTRODUCTION: It has been noticed many times that schools are buildings with high levels of particulate matter concentrations. Several authors documented that concentrations of particulate matter in indoor school microenvironments exceed limits recommended by WHO namely when school buildings are situated near major roads with high traffic densities. In addition, exercise under conditions of high particulate concentrations may increase the adverse health effects, as the total particle deposition increases in proportion to minute ventilation, and the deposition fraction nearly doubles from rest to intense exercise. SITE AND METHODS: Mass concentrations of size-segregated aerosol were measured simultaneously in an elementary school gym and an adjacent outdoor site in the central part of Prague by two pairs of collocated aerosol monitors-a fast responding photometer DusTrak and a five stage cascade impactor. To encompass seasonal and annual differences, 89 days of measurements were performed during ten campaigns between 2005 and 2009. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The average (all campaigns) outdoor concentration of PM(2.5) (28.3 μg m(-3)) measured by the cascade impactors was higher than the indoor value (22.3 μg m(-3)) and the corresponding average from the nearest fixed site monitor (23.6 μg m(-3)). Indoor and outdoor PM(2.5) concentrations exceeded the WHO recommended 24-h limit in 42% and 49% of the days measured, respectively. The correlation coefficient (r) between corresponding outdoor and indoor aerosol sizes increased with decreasing aerodynamic diameter of the collected particles (r = 0.32-0.87), suggesting a higher infiltration rate of fine and quasi-ultrafine particles. Principal component analysis revealed five factors explaining more than 82% of the data variability. The first two factors reflected a close association between outdoor and indoor fine and quasi-ultrafine particles confirming the hypothesis of high infiltration rate of particles from outdoors. The third factor indicated that human activity is the main source of indoor emission of coarse particles. The fourth factor involved only outdoor variables showing the resuspension of coarse ambient aerosol on dry and warm days without its seeming effect on the indoor coarse PM levels. Having in mind that high concentrations of both fine and coarse aerosol were frequently observed in the studied space, our results suggest that indoor exercise in polluted urbanized areas may increase the overall exposure and thus represent a potential health risk to young individuals during physical education at schools.
See more in PubMed
Eur Respir J. 2002 Jul;20(1):198-209 PubMed
Epidemiology. 1997 May;8(3):298-303 PubMed
Indoor Air. 2005 Feb;15(1):2-12 PubMed
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2007 Apr;57(4):394-406 PubMed
Environ Res. 2005 Oct;99(2):143-9 PubMed
Indoor Air. 2003 Mar;13(1):53-64 PubMed
Occup Environ Med. 1997 Dec;54(12):888-94 PubMed
Indoor Air. 2008 Oct;18(5):386-93 PubMed
Indoor Air. 2008 Dec;18(6):454-63 PubMed
N Engl J Med. 2007 Sep 13;357(11):1147-9 PubMed
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2006 Sep;16(5):457-70 PubMed
Eur Respir J. 2005 Aug;26(2):309-18 PubMed
Environ Sci Technol. 2004 Mar 15;38(6):1759-64 PubMed
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2009 Jan;212(1):45-55 PubMed
Environ Sci Technol. 2001 May 15;35(10):2089-99 PubMed
Environ Monit Assess. 2009 Sep;156(1-4):377-90 PubMed
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2008 Jun;391(4):1459-68 PubMed
Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Jan;112(1):61-6 PubMed
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2001 Nov;5(11):1059-66 PubMed
J Environ Monit. 2005 May;7(5):450-6 PubMed
Inhal Toxicol. 2007 Feb;19(2):133-40 PubMed
Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Aug;115(8):1177-82 PubMed
Chemosphere. 2000 Jul;41(1-2):109-13 PubMed
N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 9;351(11):1057-67 PubMed
Arch Environ Health. 2002 Sep-Oct;57(5):450-60 PubMed
J Environ Health. 2002 Sep;65(2):9-17, 37 PubMed