Influence of transition metals on Streptomyces coelicolor and S. sioyaensis and generation of chromate-reducing mutants
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Drug Resistance, Bacterial * MeSH
- Biotransformation MeSH
- Chromates metabolism toxicity MeSH
- Hydrogen-Ion Concentration MeSH
- Metals metabolism toxicity MeSH
- Culture Media chemistry MeSH
- Environmental Pollutants metabolism toxicity MeSH
- Microbial Viability drug effects MeSH
- Mutation * MeSH
- Oxidation-Reduction MeSH
- Streptomyces drug effects growth & development metabolism MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Chromates MeSH
- Metals MeSH
- Culture Media MeSH
- Environmental Pollutants MeSH
Bacteria-assisted bioremediation is widely recognized as a low-cost method to minimize the consequences of soil pollution with toxic metals originating from industrial sites. Strains used in bioremediation have to deal with high metal load via biosorption, reduction, bioprecipitation, metal sequestration, and/or chelation. Actinobacteria, and streptomycetes in particular, are considered a perspective group for bioremediation as natural soil inhabitants with extensive secondary metabolism. Nevertheless, there is no reference information on survival of the model streptomycetes in the presence of the most abundant metal pollutants. Also, there are no reports describing the selection approaches towards improvement of bioremediation properties. In this work, the resistance of Streptomyces coelicolor M145 and Streptomyces sioyaensis Lv81 to certain transition metals and their growth under different pH values are described for the first time. Spontaneous chromate-resistant S. sioyaensis Lv81-138 strain was selected in the course of this work. Strain Lv81-138 is the most efficient actinobacterial Cr(VI) reducer reported so far, capable of converting 12 mmol/L of Cr(VI) into Cr(III) in a medium supplemented with 50 mmol/L K2CrO4.
See more in PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Aug;55(8):2030-2035 PubMed
J Basic Microbiol. 2013 May;53(5):420-8 PubMed
Environ Microbiol. 2002 Nov;4(11):764-9 PubMed
Mikrobiologiia. 2004 Jan-Feb;73(1):89-93 PubMed
Biometals. 2012 Oct;25(5):905-17 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2009;54(2):91-6 PubMed
Microbiology (Reading). 2001 Sep;147(Pt 9):2447-2459 PubMed
Curr Opin Microbiol. 2009 Apr;12(2):138-44 PubMed
Nature. 2002 May 9;417(6885):141-7 PubMed
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2005;41(1):32-8 PubMed
Adv Microb Physiol. 2000;42:47-238 PubMed
Chemosphere. 2012 Feb;86(8):847-52 PubMed
Mol Microbiol. 2009 Dec;74(6):1427-44 PubMed
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010 Jul;87(4):1271-80 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Mar;56(3):675-80 PubMed
Adv Microb Physiol. 2009;54:201-55 PubMed
J Appl Microbiol. 2007 Dec;103(6):2704-12 PubMed
Chemosphere. 2011 Mar;82(11):1583-8 PubMed
J Gen Appl Microbiol. 2010 Feb;56(1):11-8 PubMed