Tecemotide (L-BLP25) versus placebo after chemoradiotherapy for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (START): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze III, srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
24331154
DOI
10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70510-2
PII: S1470-2045(13)70510-2
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- chemoradioterapie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- membránové glykoproteiny terapeutické užití MeSH
- nádory plic farmakoterapie mortalita patologie MeSH
- nemalobuněčný karcinom plic farmakoterapie mortalita patologie MeSH
- protinádorové vakcíny terapeutické užití MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- staging nádorů MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- L-BLP25 MeSH Prohlížeč
- membránové glykoproteiny MeSH
- protinádorové vakcíny MeSH
BACKGROUND: Effective maintenance therapies after chemoradiotherapy for lung cancer are lacking. Our aim was to investigate whether the MUC1 antigen-specific cancer immunotherapy tecemotide improves survival in patients with stage III unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer when given as maintenance therapy after chemoradiation. METHODS: The phase 3 START trial was an international, randomised, double-blind trial that recruited patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer who had completed chemoradiotherapy within the 4-12 week window before randomisation and received confirmation of stable disease or objective response. Patients were stratified by stage (IIIA vs IIIB), response to chemoradiotherapy (stable disease vs objective response), delivery of chemoradiotherapy (concurrent vs sequential), and region using block randomisation, and were randomly assigned (2:1, double-blind) by a central interactive voice randomisation system to either tecemotide or placebo. Injections of tecemotide (806 μg lipopeptide) or placebo were given every week for 8 weeks, and then every 6 weeks until disease progression or withdrawal. Cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m(2) (before tecemotide) or saline (before placebo) was given once before the first study drug administration. The primary endpoint was overall survival in a modified intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00409188. FINDINGS: From Feb 22, 2007, to Nov 15, 2011, 1513 patients were randomly assigned (1006 to tecemotide and 507 to placebo). 274 patients were excluded from the primary analysis population as a result of a clinical hold, resulting in analysis of 829 patients in the tecemotide group and 410 in the placebo group in the modified intention-to-treat population. Median overall survival was 25.6 months (95% CI 22.5-29.2) with tecemotide versus 22.3 months (19.6-25.5) with placebo (adjusted HR 0.88, 0.75-1.03; p=0.123). In the patients who received previous concurrent chemoradiotherapy, median overall survival for the 538 (65%) of 829 patients assigned to tecemotide was 30.8 months (95% CI 25.6-36.8) compared with 20.6 months (17.4-23.9) for the 268 (65%) of 410 patients assigned to placebo (adjusted HR 0.78, 0.64-0.95; p=0.016). In patients who received previous sequential chemoradiotherapy, overall survival did not differ between the 291 (35%) patients in the tecemotide group and the 142 (35%) patients in the placebo group (19.4 months [95% CI 17.6-23.1] vs 24.6 months [18.8-33.0], respectively; adjusted HR 1.12, 0.87-1.44; p=0.38). Grade 3-4 adverse events seen with a greater than 2% frequency with tecemotide were dyspnoea (49 [5%] of 1024 patients in the tecemotide group vs 21 [4%] of 477 patients in the placebo group), metastases to central nervous system (29 [3%] vs 6 [1%]), and pneumonia (23 [2%] vs 12 [3%]). Serious adverse events with a greater than 2% frequency with tecemotide were pneumonia (30 [3%] in the tecemotide group vs 14 [3%] in the placebo group), dyspnoea (29 [3%] vs 13 [3%]), and metastases to central nervous system (32 [3%] vs 9 [2%]). Serious immune-related adverse events did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION: We found no significant difference in overall survival with the administration of tecemotide after chemoradiotherapy compared with placebo for all patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. However, tecemotide might have a role for patients who initially receive concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and further study in this population is warranted. FUNDING: Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany).
Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho Cancer Institute São Paulo Brazil
Centre Hospitalier du Bois de l'Abbaye et de Hesbaye Seraing Belgium
Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary Chelyabinsk Russia
Christie Hospital NHS Trust Manchester UK
Cross Cancer Institute Edmonton AB Canada
Hospital Virgen de la Victoria Málaga Spain
Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec Quebec QC Canada
Juravinski Cancer Centre Hamilton ON Canada
Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden
Klinika Pneumologie a Hrudní Chirurgie Univerzity Karlovy Prague Czech Republic
Maria Curie Sklodowska Memorial Institute Warsaw Poland
Olivia Newton John Cancer and Wellness Centre Austin Hospital Melbourne VIC Australia
Sahlgrenska University Hospital Göteborg Sweden
University Health Network Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Toronto ON Canada
University of Warmia and Mazury Olsztyn Poland; Silesian Medical University Katowice Poland
UPMC Cancer Pavilion Pittsburgh PA USA
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
Trial watch: Peptide-based vaccines in anticancer therapy
Trial Watch: Immunogenic cell death inducers for anticancer chemotherapy
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT00409188