Responsiveness and clinically meaningful improvement, according to disability level, of five walking measures after rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: a European multicenter study
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
24503204
DOI
10.1177/1545968314521010
PII: 1545968314521010
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- clinically meaningful improvement, multiple sclerosis rehabilitation, responsiveness, walking measures,
- MeSH
- Walking physiology MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Recovery of Function MeSH
- Disability Evaluation * MeSH
- Reference Standards MeSH
- Multiple Sclerosis diagnosis rehabilitation MeSH
- Physical Therapy Modalities * standards MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
BACKGROUND: Evaluation of treatment effects on walking requires appropriate and responsive outcome measures. OBJECTIVES: To determine responsiveness of 5 walking measures and provide reference values for clinically meaningful improvements, according to disability level, in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). METHODS: Walking tests were measured pre- and postrehabilitation in 290 pwMS from 17 European centers. Combined anchor- and distribution-based methods determined responsiveness of objective short and long walking capacity tests (Timed 25-Foot Walk [T25FW] and 2- and 6-Minute Walk Tests [2MWT and 6MWT] and of the patient-reported Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 [MSWS-12]). A global rating of change scale, from patients' and therapists' perspective, was used as external criteria to determine the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), minimally important change (MIC), and smallest real change (SRC). Patients were stratified into disability subgroups (Expanded Disability Status Scale score ≤4 [n = 98], >4 [n = 186]). RESULTS: MSWS-12, 2MWT, and 6MWT were more responsive (AUC 0.64-0.73) than T25FW (0.50-0.63), especially in moderate to severely disabled pwMS. Clinically meaningful changes (MICs) from patient and therapist perspective were -10.4 and -11.4 for MSWS-12 (P < .01), 9.6 m and 6.8 m for 2MWT (P < .05), and 21.6 m (P < .05) and 9.1 m (P = .3) for 6MWT. In subgroups, MIC was significant from patient perspective for 2MWT (10.8 m) and from therapist perspective for MSWS-12 (-10.7) in mildly disabled pwMS. In moderate to severely disabled pwMS, MIC was significant for MSWS-12 (-14.1 and -11.9). CONCLUSIONS: Long walking tests and patient-reported MSWS-12 were more appropriate than short walking tests in detecting clinically meaningful improvement after physical rehabilitation, particularly the MSWS-12 for moderate to severely disabled pwMS.
Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark
Centre Neurologique et de Réadaptation Fonctionelle Fraiture en Condroz Belgium
Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Eugenia Epalza Rehabilitation Center Bilbao Spain
Hasselt University Diepenbeek Belgium
Haukeland University Hospital Bergen Norway
Helsinki MS Neuvola Helsinki Finland
Hospital de Dia de Barcelona CEMCat Barcelona Spain
Kongsgaarden Physiotherapy AS Nordland Hospital Trust Bodø Norway
Masku Neurological Rehabilitation Center Masku Finland
Multiple Sclerosis Center Hakadal AS Norway
Multiple Sclerosis Hospital Haslev Denmark Multiple Sclerosis Hospital Ry Denmark
National Multiple Sclerosis Center Melsbroek Belgium
Plymouth University Plymouth UK
Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Dorset UK
Rehabilitation and Multiple Sclerosis Center Overpelt Belgium
References provided by Crossref.org