Minimally invasive video-assisted versus minimally invasive nonendoscopic thyroidectomy
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky kontrolované, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
24800227
PubMed Central
PMC3996987
DOI
10.1155/2014/450170
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- audiovizuální záznam metody MeSH
- bolest krku diagnóza etiologie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- endoskopie škodlivé účinky metody MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- miniinvazivní chirurgické výkony škodlivé účinky metody MeSH
- ochrnutí hlasivek diagnóza etiologie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- tyreoidektomie škodlivé účinky metody MeSH
- uzly štítné žlázy komplikace patologie chirurgie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky kontrolované MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) and minimally invasive nonendoscopic thyroidectomy (MINET) represent well accepted and reproducible techniques developed with the main goal to improve cosmetic outcome, accelerate healing, and increase patient's comfort following thyroid surgery. Between 2007 and 2011, a prospective nonrandomized study of patients undergoing minimally invasive thyroid surgery was performed to compare advantages and disadvantages of the two different techniques. There were no significant differences in the length of incision to perform surgical procedures. Mean duration of hemithyroidectomy was comparable in both groups, but it was more time consuming to perform total thyroidectomy by MIVAT. There were more patients undergoing MIVAT procedures without active drainage in the postoperative course and we also could see a trend for less pain in the same group. This was paralleled by statistically significant decreased administration of both opiates and nonopiate analgesics. We encountered two cases of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsies in the MIVAT group only. MIVAT and MINET represent safe and feasible alternative to conventional thyroid surgery in selected cases and this prospective study has shown minimal differences between these two techniques.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Sakorafas GH. Historical evolution of thyroid surgery: from the ancient times to the dawn of the 21st century. World Journal of Surgery. 2010;34(8):1793–1804. PubMed
DuBose J, Barnett R, Ragsdale T. Honest and sensible surgeons: the history of thyroid surgery. Current Surgery. 2004;61(2):213–219. PubMed
Adams M, Doherty G. Conventional thyroidectomy. Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. 2009;20(1):2–6.
Simental AA, Jr., Myers EN. Thyroidectomy: technique and applications. Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. 2003;14(2):63–73.
Gagner M. Endoscopic subtotal parathyroidectomy in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. British Journal of Surgery. 1996;83(6):p. 875. PubMed
Miccoli P, Berti P, Conte M, Bendinelli C, Marcocci C. Minimally invasive surgery for thyroid small nodules: preliminary report. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation. 1999;22(11):849–851. PubMed
Miccoli P, Berti P, Frustaci GL, Ambrosini CE, Materazzi G. Video-assisted thyroidectomy: indications and results. Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery. 2006;391(2):68–71. PubMed
Norman J, Chheda H, Farrell C. Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism: decreasing operative time and potential complications while improving cosmetic results. The American Surgeon. 1998;64(5):391–396. PubMed
Ferzli GS, Sayad P, Abdo Z, Cacchione RN. Minimally invasive, nonendoscopic thyroid surgery. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2001;192(5):665–668. PubMed
Rafferty M, Timon C. Minimal incision thyroidectomy. Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery. 2008;19(1):2–7.
Testini M, Nacchiero M, Piccinni G, et al. Total thyroidectomy is improved by loupe magnification. Microsurgery. 2004;24(1):39–42. PubMed
Seven H, Calis AB, Vural C, Turgut S. Microscopic thyroidectomy: a prospective controlled trial. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head & Neck. 2005;262(1):41–44. PubMed
Touzopoulos P, Karanikas M, Zarogoulidis P, et al. Current surgical status of thyroid diseases. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2011;4:441–449. PubMed PMC
Docimo G, Tolone S, Gili S, et al. Minimally invasive thyroidectomy (MIT) indications and results. Annali Italiani di Chirurgia. 2012;84:617–622. PubMed
Ikeda Y, Takami H, Niimi M, Kan S, Sasaki Y, Takayama J. Endoscopic thyroidectomy by the axillary approach. Surgical Endoscopy. 2001;15(11):1362–1364. PubMed
Karakas E, Steinfeldt T, Gockel A, et al. Transoral thyroid and parathyroid surgery—development of a new transoral technique. Surgery. 2011;150(1):108–115. PubMed
Schardey HM, Barone M, Pörtl S, von Ahnen M, von Ahnen T, Schopf S. Invisible scar endoscopic dorsal approach thyroidectomy: a clinical feasibility study. World Journal of Surgery. 2010;34(12):2997–3006. PubMed
Shabana W, Peeters E, de Maeseneer M. Measuring thyroid gland volume: should we change the correction factor? American Journal of Roentgenology. 2006;186(1):234–236. PubMed
Durai R, Ng PCH. Surgical vacuum drains: types, uses, and complications. AORN Journal. 2010;91(2):266–274. PubMed
Frampton CL, Hughes-Webb P. The measurement of pain. Clinical Oncology. 2011;23(6):381–386. PubMed
Svec JG, Schutte HK. Kymographic imaging of laryngeal vibrations. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery. 2012;20(6):458–465. PubMed
Fik Z, Chovanec M, Zabrodsky M, Lukes P, Astl J, Betka J. Conventional versus minimallyinvasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: limits and benefits of the minimally invasive approach. Otorinolaryngologie a Foniatrie. 2012;6(1):3–12.
Perigli G, Cortesini C, Qirici E, Boni D, Cianchi F. Clinical benefits of minimally invasive techniques in thyroid surgery. World Journal of Surgery. 2008;32(1):45–50. PubMed
Ezzat WH, O’Hara BJ, Fisher KJ, Rosen D, Pribitkin EA. The minimally-invasive thyroidectomy incision: a histological analysis. Medical Science Monitor. 2011;17(2):SC7–SC10. PubMed PMC
del Rio P, Sommaruga L, Cataldo S, Robuschi G, Arcuri MF, Sianesi M. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: the learning curve. European Surgical Research. 2008;41(1):33–36. PubMed
Brunaud L, Zarnegar R, Wada N, Ituarte P, Clark OH, Duh Q-Y. Incision length for standard thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy: when is it minimally invasive? Archives of Surgery. 2003;138(10):1140–1143. PubMed
Henry J-F. Minimally invasive thyroid and parathyroid surgery is not a question of length of the incision. Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery. 2008;393(5):621–626. PubMed
Toll EC, Loizou P, Davis CR, Porter GC, Pothier DD. Scars and satisfaction: do smaller scars improve patient-reported outcome? European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2012;269(1):309–313. PubMed
Miccoli P, Pinchera A, Materazzi G, et al. Surgical treatment of low- and intermediate-risk papillary thyroid cancer with minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2009;94(5):1618–1622. PubMed
Zullino A, Maiuolo A, Fumarola A, et al. Minimally invasive thyroidectomy and the differentiated lesions: the way to follow. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. 2012;16(4):519–524. PubMed
Miccoli P, Minuto MN, Berti P, Materazzi G. Update on the diagnosis and treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer. Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2009;53(5):465–472. PubMed
Wu B, Ding Z, Fan Y, et al. Video-assisted selective lateral neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery. 2013;398(3):395–401. PubMed
Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, de Crea C, Sessa L, Rampulla V, Bellantone R. Video-assisted versus conventional total thyroidectomy and central compartment neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma. World Journal of Surgery. 2012;36(6):1225–1230. PubMed
Zabrodsky M, Boucek J, Kastner J, Kuchar M, Chovanec M, Betka J. Immediate revision in patients with bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy after thyroid and parathyroid surgery. How worthy is it? Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica. 2012;32(4):222–228. PubMed PMC
Ruggieri M, Straniero A, Genderini M, et al. The eligibility of MIVA approach in thyroid surgery. Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery. 2007;392(4):413–416. PubMed
Lai SY, Walvekar RR, Ferris RL. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: expanded indications and oncologic completeness. Head & Neck. 2008;30(11):1403–1407. PubMed PMC
Durel J, Kluka E, Rohan RW. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for treatment of benign solitary thyroid nodules in pediatric patients. The Ochsner Journal. 2011;11(2):128–131. PubMed PMC
Fan Y, Guo B, Guo S, et al. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: experience of 300 cases. Surgical Endoscopy. 2010;24(10):2393–2400. PubMed
Gosnell JE, Sackett WR, Sidhu S, Sywak M, Reeve TS, Delbridge LW. Minimal access thyroid surgery: technique and report of the first 25 cases. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 2004;74(5):330–334. PubMed
Alvarado R, McMullen T, Sidhu SB, Delbridge LW, Sywak MS. Minimally invasive thyroid surgery for single nodules: an evidence-based review of the lateral mini-incision technique. World Journal of Surgery. 2008;32(7):1341–1348. PubMed
Betka J, Astl J, Chovanec M, Lukes P, Zabrodsky M, Plzak J. Minimálně invazivní endoskopická chirurgie štítné žlázy a příštítných tělísek. Endoskopie. 2009;18(3):112–115.
Dhiman SV, Inabnet WB. Minimally invasive surgery for thyroid diseases and thyroid cancer. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2008;97(8):665–668. PubMed
Minuto MN, Berti P, Miccoli M, et al. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: an analysis of results and a revision of indications. Surgical Endoscopy. 2012;26(3):818–822. PubMed
Gal I, Solymosi T, Szabo Z, Balint A, Bolgar G. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surgical Endoscopy. 2008;22(11):2445–2449. PubMed