Now you see it, now you don't: flushing hosts prior to experimentation can predict their responses to brood parasitism
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
25762433
PubMed Central
PMC4356969
DOI
10.1038/srep09060
PII: srep09060
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- chování zvířat MeSH
- interakce hostitele a parazita * MeSH
- ptáci parazitologie MeSH
- vejce MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Brood parasitic birds lay their eggs in other birds' nests, leaving hosts to raise their offspring. To understand parasite-host coevolutionary arms races, many studies have examined host responses to experimentally introduced eggs. However, attending parents often need to be flushed from their nests to add experimental eggs. If these birds witness parasitism events, they may recognize and reject foreign eggs more readily than parents who did not. We found that, after being flushed, female blackbirds, Turdus merula, remained close to their nests. Flushed females were more likely to eject foreign eggs and did so more quickly than females that were not flushed during experimentation. In contrast, flushing did not predict responses and latency to responses to parasitism by song thrush, Turdus philomelos, which flew farther from their nests and likely did not witness experimental parasitism. When statistically considering flushing, previously published conclusions regarding both species' response to experimental parasitism did not change. Nevertheless, we recommend that researchers record and statistically control for whether hosts were flushed prior to experimental parasitism. Our results have broad implications because more vigilant and/or bolder parents can gain more information about parasitism events and therefore have better chances of successfully defending against brood parasitism.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Davies N. B. Cuckoos, cowbirds, and other cheats. (T. & Poyser, A. D. 2000).
Stevens M., Troscianko J. & Spottiswoode C. N. Repeated targeting of the same hosts by a brood parasite compromises host egg rejection. Nat. Commun. 4, 2475 (2013). PubMed PMC
Swynnerton C. F. M. Rejections by birds of eggs unlike their own: with remarks on some of the cuckoo problems. Ibis 60, 127–154 (1918).
Swynnerton C. F. M. On the coloration of the mouths and eggs of birds. II. On the coloration of eggs. Ibis 4, 529–606 (1916).
Grim T. Equal rights for chick brood parasites. Ann. Zool. Fennici 44, 1–7 (2007).
Davies N. B. & Brooke M. D. An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. I. Host egg discrimination. J. Anim. Ecol. 58, 207–224 (1989).
Rothstein S. I. Evolutionary rates and host defenses against avian brood parasitism. Am. Nat. 109, 161–176 (1975).
Moksnes A. et al. Common cuckoo Cuculus canorus and host behaviour at reed warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus nests. Ibis 142, 247–258 (2000). PubMed
Hobson K. A. & Sealy S. G. Responses of yellow warblers to the threat of cowbird parasitism. Anim. Behav. 38, 510–519 (1989).
Trnka A. & Prokop P. Does social mating system influence nest defence behaviour in great reed warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) males? Ethology 116, 1075–1083 (2010).
Požgayová M., Procházka P., Polačiková L. & Honza M. Closer clutch inspection—quicker egg ejection: timing of host responses toward parasitic eggs. Behav. Ecol. 22, 46–51 (2011).
Grim T. et al. Constraints on host choice: why do parasitic birds rarely exploit some common potential hosts? J. Anim. Ecol. 80, 508–18 (2011). PubMed
Pérez-Tris J., Diaz J. A. & Telleria J. L. Loss of body mass under predation risk: cost of antipredatory behaviour or adaptive fit-for-escape? Anim. Behav. 67, 511–521 (2004).
Samas P., Hauber M. E., Cassey P. & Grim T. Host responses to interspecific brood parasitism: a by-product of adaptations to conspecific parasitism? Front. Zool. 11, 34 (2014). PubMed PMC
Cornell H. N., Marzluff J. M. & Pecoraro S. Social learning spreads knowledge about dangerous humans among American crows. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 279, 499–508 (2012). PubMed PMC
Levey D. J. et al. Urban mockingbirds quickly learn to identify individual humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106, 8959–8962 (2009). PubMed PMC
Moskát C., Karcza Z. & Csörgő T. Egg rejection in European blackbirds (Turdus merula): the effect of mimicry. Ornis Fenn. 80, 86–91 (2003).
Norman R. F. & Robertson R. J. Nest-searching behavior in the brown-headed cowbird. Auk 92, 610–611 (1973).
Wyllie I. The cuckoo. (Batsford, 1981).
Bártol I., Karcza Z., Moskát C., Røskaft E. & Kisbenedek T. Responses of great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus to experimental brood parasitism: the effects of a cuckoo Cuculus canorus dummy and egg mimicry. J. Avian Biol. 33, 420–425 (2002).
Guigueno M. F. & Sealy S. G. Aggression towards egg-removing cowbird elicits clutch abandonment in parasitized yellow warblers, Dendroica petechia. Anim. Behav. 81, 211–218 (2011).
Trnka A. & Grim T. Testing for correlations between behaviours in a cuckoo host: why do host defences not covary? Anim. Behav. 92, 185–193 (2014).
Sealy S. G. & Neudorf D. L. Male northern orioles eject cowbird eggs: implications for the evolution of rejection behavior. Condor 97, 369–375 (1995).
Hanley D., Samaš P., Hauber M. E. & Grim T. Who moved my eggs? An experimental test of the egg arrangement hypothesis for the rejection of brood parasitic eggs. Anim. Cogn. 18, 299–305 (2015). PubMed PMC
Weidinger K. Interactive effects of concealment, parental behaviour and predators on the survival of open passerine nests. J. Anim. Ecol. 71, 424–437 (2002).
Strachoňová Z. Breeding biology of songbirds in urban habitats of the town of Olomouc. Sylvia 44, 27–36 (2008).
Grim T., Samaš P. & Hauber M. The repeatability of avian egg ejection behaviors across different temporal scales, breeding stages, female ages and experiences. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 68, 749–759 (2014).
Samaš P., Hauber M. E., Cassey P. & Grim T. Repeatability of foreign egg rejection: testing the assumptions of co-evolutionary theory. Ethology 117, 606–619 (2011).
Samaš P. et al. Ecological predictors of reduced avian reproductive investment in the southern hemisphere. Ecography 36, 809–818 (2013).
Glue D. & Morgan R. Cuckoo hosts in British habitats. Bird Study 19, 187–192 (1972).
Moksnes A. & Røskaft E. Egg-morphs and host preference in the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): an analysis of cuckoo and host eggs from European museum colletions. J. Zool. 236, 625–648 (1995).
Samaš P., Heryán J. & Grim T. How does urbanization affect dispersal in Eurasian blackbirds (Turdus merula)? Sylvia 49, 21–38 (2013).
Díaz M. et al. The geography of fear: a latitudinal gradient in anti-predator escape distances of birds across Europe. PLoS ONE 8, e64634 (2013). PubMed PMC
Igic B. et al. A shared chemical basis of avian host-parasite egg colour mimicry. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 279, 1068–76 (2012). PubMed PMC
Polačiková L. & Grim T. Blunt egg pole holds cues for alien egg discrimination: experimental evidence. J. Avian Biol. 41, 111–116 (2010).
Hauber M. E. et al. The value of artificial stimuli in behavioral research: making the case for egg rejection studies in avian brood parasitism. Ethology 10.1111/eth.12359 (2015). DOI
Nagelkerke N. J. D. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika 78, 691–692 (1991).
Zuur A. F., Hilbe J. M. & Ieno E. N. A beginner's guide to GLM and GLMM with R: a frequentist and Bayesian perspective for ecologists. (Highland Statistics Ltd., 2013).
Grafen A. & Hails R. Modern statistics for the life sciences. (Oxford University Press, 2002).
Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
Does contrast between eggshell ground and spot coloration affect egg rejection?
Egg discrimination along a gradient of natural variation in eggshell coloration