Dynamics and Reversibility of the DNA Methylation Landscape of Grapevine Plants (Vitis vinifera) Stressed by In Vitro Cultivation and Thermotherapy
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
25973746
PubMed Central
PMC4431845
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0126638
PII: PONE-D-14-41673
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- DNA rostlinná analýza izolace a purifikace MeSH
- elektroforéza kapilární MeSH
- epigeneze genetická MeSH
- fyziologický stres * MeSH
- metylace DNA * MeSH
- rostlinné buňky metabolismus MeSH
- sekvenční analýza DNA MeSH
- teplota MeSH
- Vitis genetika růst a vývoj MeSH
- vysokoúčinná kapalinová chromatografie MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- DNA rostlinná MeSH
There is relatively little information concerning long-term alterations in DNA methylation following exposure of plants to environmental stress. As little is known about the ratio of non-heritable changes in DNA methylation and mitotically-inherited methylation changes, dynamics and reversibility of the DNA methylation states were investigated in grapevine plants (Vitis vinifera) stressed by in vitro cultivation. It was observed that significant part of induced epigenetic changes could be repeatedly established by exposure to particular planting and stress conditions. However, once stress conditions were discontinued, many methylation changes gradually reverted and plants returned to epigenetic states similar to those of maternal plants. In fact, in the period of one to three years after in vitro cultivation it was difficult to distinguish the epigenetic states of somaclones and maternal plants. Forty percent of the observed epigenetic changes disappeared within a year subsequent to termination of stress conditions ending and these probably reflect changes caused by transient and reversible stress-responsive acclimation mechanisms. However, sixty percent of DNA methylation diversity remained after 1 year and probably represents mitotically-inherited epimutations. Sequencing of regions remaining variable between maternal and regenerant plants revealed that 29.3% of sequences corresponded to non-coding regions of grapevine genome. Eight sequences (19.5%) corresponded to previously identified genes and the remaining ones (51.2%) were annotated as "hypothetical proteins" based on their similarity to genes described in other species, including genes likely to undergo methylation changes following exposure to stress (V. vinifera gypsy-type retrotransposon Gret1, auxin-responsive transcription factor 6-like, SAM-dependent carboxyl methyltransferase).
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Larkin P, Scowcroft W (1981) Somaclonal variation—a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor Appl Genet 60: 197–214. 10.1007/BF02342540 PubMed DOI
Popescu CF, Falk A, Glimelius K (2002) Application of AFLPs to characterize somaclonal variation in anther derived grapevines. Vitis 41: 177–182.
Xu M, Li X, Korban SS (2004) DNA-methylation alterations and exchanges during in vitro cellular differentiation in rose (Rosa hybrida L.). Theor Appl Genet 109: 899–910. PubMed
Li X, Yu X, Wang N, Feng Q, Dong Z, Liu L, et al. (2007) Genetic and epigenetic instabilities induced by tissue culture in wild barley (Hordeum brevisubulatum (Trin.) Link). Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 90: 153–168.
Gribaudo I, Mannini F, Lisa A, Cuozzo D (2000) Phenotypical modifications of micropropagated grapevines. Acta Hortic 530: 231–236.
Brar DS, Jain SM (1998) Somaclonal variation: Mechanism and applications in crop improvement In: Jain SM, Brar DS and Ahloowalia BS, eds. Somaclonal Variation and Induced Mutations in Crop Improvement. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: pp. 15–37.
Kwasniewska J, Nawrocki W, Siwinska D, Maluszynska J (2012) DNA damage in Crepis capillaris cells in response to in vitro conditions. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica 54(2): 93–101.
Alzohairy AM, Yousef MA, Edris S, Kerti B, Gyulai G, Bahieldin A. (2012) Detection of LTR Retrotransposons Reactivation induced by in vitro Environmental Stresses in Barley (Hordeum vulgare) via RT-qPCR. Life Science Journal—Acta Zhengzhou University Overseas Edition 9(4): 5019–5026.
Smulders MJM, De Klerk GJ (2011) Epigenetics in plant tissue culture. Plant Growth Regul 63:137–146.
Miguel C, Marum L (2011) An epigenetic view of plant cells cultured in vitro: somaclonal variation and beyond. J Exp Bot 62: 3713–3725. 10.1093/jxb/err155 PubMed DOI
Valledor L, Hasbun R, Meijon M, Rodriguez JL, Santamaria E, Viejo M, et al. (2007) Involvement of DNA methylation in tree development and micropropagation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 91:75–86.
Chinnusamy V, Zhu JK. 2009. Epigenetic regulation of stress responses in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12: 133–139. 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.12.006 PubMed DOI PMC
Fraga MF, Esteller M (2002) DNA methylation: a profile of methods and applications. BioTechniques 33: 632–649. PubMed
Laird PW (2010) Principles and challenges of genome-wide DNA methylation analysis. Nat Rev Genet 11: 191–203. 10.1038/nrg2732 PubMed DOI
Vogel N, Schiebel K, Humeny A (2009) Technologies in the wholegenome age: MALDI-TOF-based genotyping. Transfus Med Hemother 36: 253–262. PubMed PMC
Matarazzo MR, Lembo F, Angrisano T, Ballestar E, Ferraro M, Pero R, et al. (2004) In vivo analysis of DNA methylation patterns recognized by specific proteins: coupling ChIP and bisulfite analysis. BioTechniques 37: 666–673. PubMed
Roh TY, Ngau WC, Cui K, Landsman D, Zhao K (2004) Highresolution genome-wide mapping of histone modifications. Nat Biotechnol 22: 1013–1016. PubMed
Shi H, Wei SH, Leu YW, Rahmatpanah F, Liu JC, Yan PS, et al. (2003) Triple analysis of the cancer epigenome: an integrated microarray system for assessing gene expression, DNA methylation, and histone acetylation. Cancer Res 63: 2164–2171. PubMed
Fraga MF, Uriol E, Diego LB, Berdasco M, Esteller M, Cañal MJ, et al. (2002) High-performance capillary electrophoretic method for the quantification of 5-methyl 20-deoxycytidine in genomic DNA: application to plant, animal and human cancer tissues. Electrophoresis 23: 1677–1681. PubMed
Frommer M, McDonald LE, Millar DS, Collis CM, Watt F, Grigg GW, et al. (1992) A genomic sequencing protocol that yields a positive display of 5-methylcytosine residues in individual DNA strands. Proc Natl Acad Sci 89: 1827–1831. PubMed PMC
Warnecke PM, Stirzaker C, Song J, Grunau C, Melki JR, Clark SJ (2002) Identification and resolution of artifacts in bisulfite sequencing. Methods 27: 101–107. PubMed
Down TA, Rakyan VK, Turner DJ, Flicek P, Li H, Kulesha E, et al. (2008) A Bayesian deconvolution strategy for immunoprecipitation-based DNA methylome analysis. Nature Biotechnol 26(7): 779–785. 10.1038/nbt1414 PubMed DOI PMC
Diede SJ, Guenthoer J, Geng LN, Mahoney SE, Marotta M, Olson JM, et al. (2010) DNA methylation of developmental genes in pediatric medulloblastomas identified by denaturation analysis of methylation differences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 234–239 10.1073/pnas.0907606106 PubMed DOI PMC
Bunyan DJ, Bullman HMS, Lever M, Saminathan SD, Keng WT, Araffin R, et al. (2011) Different denaturation rates between methylated and non-methylated genomic DNA can result in allele-specific PCR amplification. Open J Genet 1: 13–14
Kiselev KV, Dubrovina AS, Tyunin AP (2015) The methylation status of plant genomic DNA influences PCR efficiency. J Plant Physiol 175: 59–67 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.10.017 PubMed DOI
Rathore MS, Mastan SG, Agarwal PK (2015) Evaluation of DNA methylation using methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism in plant tissues grown in vivo and in vitro. Plant Growth Regulation 75: 11–19.
Machczyńska J, Orłowska R, Mańkowski DR, Zimny J, Bednarek PT (2014) DNA methylation changes in triticale due to in vitro culture plant regeneration and consecutive reproduction. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 119: 289–299.
Sáez-Laguna E, Guevara MÁ, Díaz LM, Sánchez-Gómez D, Collada C, Aranda I, et al. (2014) Epigenetic variability in the genetically uniform forest tree species Pinus pinea L. PLOS one, 9(8), e103145 10.1371/journal.pone.0103145 PubMed DOI PMC
Landey RB, Cenci A, Georget F, Bertrand B, Camayo G, Dechamp E, et al. (2013) High genetic and epigenetic stability in Coffea arabica plants derived from embryogenic suspensions and secondary embryogenesis as revealed by AFLP, MSAP and the phenotypic variation rate. PLOS one, 8(2), e56372 10.1371/journal.pone.0056372 PubMed DOI PMC
Dann AL, Wilson CR (2011) Comparative assessment of genetic and epigenetic variation among regenerants of potato (Solanum tuberosum) derived from long-term nodal tissue-culture and cell selection. Plant Cell Rep 30(4): 631–639. 10.1007/s00299-010-0983-9 PubMed DOI
Gao X, Yang D, Cao D, Ao M, Sui X, Wang Q, et al. (2010) In vitro micropropagation of Freesia hybrida and the assessment of genetic and epigenetic stability in regenerated plantlets. J Plant Growth Regul 29: 257–267.
Lopez CMR, Wetten AC, Wilkinson MJ (2010). Progressive erosion of genetic and epigenetic variation in callus—derived cocoa (Theobroma cacao) plants. New Phytol 186: 856–868. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03242.x PubMed DOI
Smýkal P, Valledor L, Rodriguez R, Griga M (2007) Assessment of genetic and epigenetic stability in long-term in vitro shoot culture of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Plant Cell Reports, 26: 1985–1998. PubMed
Fraga MF, Rodriguez R, Cañal MJ (2002) Genomic DNA methylation–demethylation during aging and reinvigoration of Pinus radiata . Tree Physiol 22: 813–816. PubMed
Baránek M, Raddová J, Křižan B, Pidra M (2009) Genetic changes in grapevine genome after stress induced by in vitro cultivation, thermotherapy and virus infection, as revealed by AFLP. Genet Mol Biol 32: 834–839. 10.1590/S1415-47572009005000079 PubMed DOI PMC
Baránek M, Ondrušiková E (2012) Evaluation of the AFLP and MSAP methods as tools for studying of DNA changes in grapevine plants long period after their in vitro thermotherapy. Acta Hortic 961: 73–80.
Baránek M, Křižan B, Ondrušiková E, Pidra M (2010) DNA-methylation changes in grapevine somaclones following in vitro culture and thermotherapy. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 101: 11–22.
Mackenzie DJ, McLean MA, Mukerij S, Green M (1997) Improved RNA extraction from woody plants for the detection of viral pathogens by reverse transkriptase–polymerase chain reaction. Plant Dis 18: 222–226. PubMed
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497.
Nei M, Li WH (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci 76: 5269–5273. PubMed PMC
Kaeppler SM, Phillips RL (1993) DNA methylation and tissue culture-induced variation in plants. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 29: 125–130.
Gao G, Li J, Li H, Li F, Xu K, Yan G, et al. (2014) Comparison of the heat stress induced variations in DNA methylation between heat-tolerant and heat-sensitive rapeseed seedlings. Breeding science 64: 125–133. 10.1270/jsbbs.64.125 PubMed DOI PMC
Li H, Geng M, Liu Q, Jin C, Zhang Q, Chen C, et al. (2014) Characteristics of cytosine methylation status and methyltransferase genes in the early development stage of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis). Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 117(2): 187–199.
Vining K, Pomraning KR, Wilhelm LJ, Ma C, Pellegrini M, Di Y, et al. (2013) Methylome reorganization during in vitro dedifferentiation and regeneration of Populus trichocarpa . BMC Plant Biology 13: 92 10.1186/1471-2229-13-92 PubMed DOI PMC
Maury S, Trap-Gentil MV, Hébrard C, Weyens G, Delaunay A, Barnes S, et al. (2012) Genic DNA methylation changes during in vitro organogenesis: organ specificity and conservation between parental lines of epialleles. Physiol Plant 146(3): 321–335. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01634.x PubMed DOI
Tsaftaris AS, Polidoros AN, Kapazoglou A, Tani E, Kovaèeviæ NM. (2008) Epigenetics and Plant Breeding In: Plant Breeding Reviews Volume 30 (ed Janick J.): John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA: 10.1002/9780470380130.ch2 DOI
Koukalova B, Fojtova M, Lim KY, Fulnecek J, Leitch AR, Kovarik A (2005) Dedifferentiation of tobacco cells is associated with ribosomal RNA gene hypomethylation, increased transcription, and chromatin alterations. Plant Physiol, 139(1): 275–286. PubMed PMC
Latzel V, Janeček Š, Doležal J, Klimešová J, Bossdorf O (2014) Adaptive transgenerational plasticity in the perennial Plantago lanceolata . Oikos 123(1): 41–46.
Kou HP, Li Y, Song XX, Ou XF, Xing SC, Ma J, et al. (2011) Heritable alteration in DNA methylation induced by nitrogen-deficiency stress accompanies enhanced tolerance by progenies to the stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Plant Physiol 168(14): 1685–1693. 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.03.017 PubMed DOI
Smulders MJM, Rus-Kortekaas W, Vosman B (1995) Tissue culture-induced DNA methylation polymorphisms in repetitive DNA of tomato calli and regenerated plants. Theor Appl Genet 91(8): 1257–1264. 10.1007/BF00220938 PubMed DOI
Law RD, Suttle JC (2005) Chromatin remodeling in plant cell culture:patterns of DNA methylation and histone H3 and H4 acetylation vary during growth of asynchronous potato cell suspensions. Plant Physiol Biochem 43:527–534. PubMed
Peredo EL, Arroyo-García R, Revilla MA (2009) Epigenetic changes detected in micropropagated hop plants. J Plant Physiol 166: 1101–1111. 10.1016/j.jplph.2008.12.015 PubMed DOI
Molinier J, Ries G, Zipfel C, Hohn B (2006) Transgeneration memory of stress in plants. Nature 42(7106): 1046–1049. PubMed
Jaillon O, Aury JM, Noel B, Policriti A, Clepet C, Casagrande A, et al. (2007) The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature 449(7161): 463–467. PubMed
Ito H, Gaubert H, Bucher E, Mirouze M, Vaillant I, Paszkowski J (2011) An siRNA pathway prevents transgenerational retrotransposition in plants subjected to stress. Nature 472(7341): 115–119. 10.1038/nature09861 PubMed DOI
Voronova A, Belevich V, Jansons A, Rungis D (2014) Stress-induced transcriptional activation of retrotransposon-like sequences in the Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) genome. Tree Genetics & Genomes 10: 937–951
Matsunaga W, Ohama N, Tanabe N, Masuta Y, Masuda S, Mitani N, et al. (2015) A small RNA mediated regulation of a stress-activated retrotransposon and the tissue specific transposition during the reproductive period in Arabidopsis. Frontiers in Plant Science 6: 48 10.3389/fpls.2015.00048 PubMed DOI PMC
Martin JL, McMillan FM (2002) SAM (dependent) I AM: The S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methyltransferase fold. Curr Opin Struct Biol 12: 783–793. PubMed
Tyunin AP, Kiselev KV, Karetin YA (2013) Differences in the methylation patterns of the VaSTS1 and VaSTS10 genes of Vitis amurensis Rupr. Biotechnol Lett 35:1525–1532 10.1007/s10529-013-1235-1 PubMed DOI
Somers DE, Fujiwara S (2009) Thinking outside the F-box: novel ligands for novel receptors. Trends Plant Sci 14(4): 206–213. 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.01.003 PubMed DOI