Health Impacts of Active Transportation in Europe
Language English Country United States Media electronic-ecollection
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
Wellcome Trust - United Kingdom
MR/K023187/1
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
British Heart Foundation - United Kingdom
MR/K025147/1
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
MR/K021796/1
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
Cancer Research UK - United Kingdom
PubMed
26930213
PubMed Central
PMC4773008
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0149990
PII: PONE-D-15-44310
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Walking physiology MeSH
- Exercise physiology MeSH
- Bicycling physiology MeSH
- Transportation methods MeSH
- Accidents, Traffic statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Risk Assessment methods statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Health Impact Assessment methods statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Risk Factors MeSH
- Cities MeSH
- Environment MeSH
- Air Pollution analysis MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
- Denmark MeSH
- Paris MeSH
- Poland MeSH
- Spain MeSH
- Switzerland MeSH
- Cities MeSH
Policies that stimulate active transportation (walking and bicycling) have been related to heath benefits. This study aims to assess the potential health risks and benefits of promoting active transportation for commuting populations (age groups 16-64) in six European cities. We conducted a health impact assessment using two scenarios: increased cycling and increased walking. The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality related to changes in physical activity level, exposure to fine particulate matter air pollution with a diameter <2.5 μm, as well as traffic fatalities in the cities of Barcelona, Basel, Copenhagen, Paris, Prague, and Warsaw. All scenarios produced health benefits in the six cities. An increase in bicycle trips to 35% of all trips (as in Copenhagen) produced the highest benefits among the different scenarios analysed in Warsaw 113 (76-163) annual deaths avoided, Prague 61 (29-104), Barcelona 37 (24-56), Paris 37 (18-64) and Basel 5 (3-9). An increase in walking trips to 50% of all trips (as in Paris) resulted in 19 (3-42) deaths avoided annually in Warsaw, 11(3-21) in Prague, 6 (4-9) in Basel, 3 (2-6) in Copenhagen and 3 (2-4) in Barcelona. The scenarios would also reduce carbon dioxide emissions in the six cities by 1,139 to 26,423 (metric tonnes per year). Policies to promote active transportation may produce health benefits, but these depend of the existing characteristics of the cities. Increased collaboration between health practitioners, transport specialists and urban planners will help to introduce the health perspective in transport policies and promote active transportation.
Agency for Environment and Energy Management Paris France
CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública Madrid Spain
Imperial College London London United Kingdom
ISGlobal Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology Barcelona Spain
Kolin Institute of Technology Kolin Czech Republic
Municipal Institute of Medical Research Barcelona Spain
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute Basel Switzerland
The Systems Research Institute Warsaw Poland
Université de Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines Versailles France
See more in PubMed
European Environment Agency. The European Environment, State and Outlook 2010, Urban Environment. EEA, European Commission, editors. 2010. Copenhagen.
UNEP. Share the Road: Investment in Walking and Cycling Road Infrastructure. United Nations Environment Programme, editor. 2010. Nairobi.
EPA. Guide to Sustainable Transportation Performance Measures. 2011. US, Environmental Protection Agency.
Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2013; 380(9859):2224–2260. PubMed PMC
The World Bank, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Transport for Health: The Global Burden of Disease from Motorized Road Transport. 2014. Washington, DC, The World Bank. Global Road Safety Facility.
de Nazelle A, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Anto JM, Brauer M, Briggs D, Braun-Fahrlander C et al. Improving health through policies that promote active travel: a review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment. Environ Int 2011; 37(4):766–777. 10.1016/j.envint.2011.02.003 PubMed DOI
Rojas-Rueda D, de Nazelle A, Teixido O, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. Replacing car trips by increasing bike and public transport in the greater Barcelona metropolitan area: a health impact assessment study. Environ Int 2012; 49:100–109. 10.1016/j.envint.2012.08.009 PubMed DOI
De Hartog J, Boogaard H, Nijland H, Hoek G. Do the health benefits of cycling outweigh the risks? Environ Health Perspect 2010; 118(8):1109–1116. 10.1289/ehp.0901747 PubMed DOI PMC
Rabl A, de Nazelle A. Benefits of shift from car to active transport. Transport Policy 2012; 19:121–131.
Woodcock J, Edwards P, Tonne C, Armstrong BG, Ashiru O, Banister D et al. Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: urban land transport. Lancet 2009; 374(9705):1930–1943. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61714-1 PubMed DOI
Grabow ML, Spak SN, Holloway T, Stone JB, Mednick AC, Patz JA. Air Quality and Exercise-Related Health Benefits from Reduced Car Travel in the Midwestern United States. Environ Health Perspect 2011. PubMed PMC
Joffe M, Mindell J. A framework for the evidence base to support Health Impact Assessment. J Epidemiol Community Health 2002; 56(2):132–138. PubMed PMC
Kahlmeier S, Cavill N, Dinsdale H, Rutter H, Götschi T, Foster C et al. Health economic assessment tools (HEAT) for walking and for cycling. Methodology and user guide Economic assessment of transport infrastructure and policies. 2011. Copenhagen, World Health Organization Europe.
Rojas-Rueda D, de Nazelle A, Tainio M, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. The health risks and benefits of cycling in urban environments compared with car use: health impact assessment study. BMJ 2011; 343:d4521 10.1136/bmj.d4521 PubMed DOI PMC
Autoridad del Transporte Metropolitano EMQ 2006, Región Metropolitana de Barcelona. ATM, editor. 2007. Barcelona.
Jacobsen PL. Safety in numbers: more walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling. Inj Prev 2003; 9(3):205–209. PubMed PMC
Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, Meckes N, Bassett DR Jr., Tudor-Locke C et al. 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43(8):1575–1581. PubMed
Woodcock J, Franco OH, Orsini N, Roberts I. Non-vigorous physical activity and all-cause mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Int J Epidemiol 2010. PubMed
Hoek G, Krishnan RM, Beelen R, Peters A, Ostro B, Brunekreef B et al. Long-term air pollution exposure and cardio- respiratory mortality: a review. Environ Health 2013; 12(1):43 10.1186/1476-069X-12-43 PubMed DOI PMC
de Nazelle A, Fruin S, Westerdahl D, Martinez D, Ripoll A, Kubesch N et al. A travel mode comparison of commuters' exposures to air pollutants in Barcelona. Atmospheric Environment 2012; 59:151–159.
Beelen R, Stafoggia M, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Andersen ZJ, Xun WW, Katsouyanni K et al. Long-term exposure to air pollution and cardiovascular mortality: an analysis of 22 European cohorts. Epidemiology 2014; 25(3):368–378. PubMed
Laden F, Neas LM, Dockery DW, Schwartz J. Association of fine particulate matter from different sources with daily mortality in six U.S. cities. Environ Health Perspect 2000; 108(10):941–947. PubMed PMC
Wichmann HE, Spix C, Tuch T, Wolke G, Peters A, Heinrich J et al. Daily mortality and fine and ultrafine particles in Erfurt, Germany part I: role of particle number and particle mass. Res Rep Health Eff Inst 2000;(98):5–86. PubMed
Perez L, Kunzli N. From measures of effects to measures of potential impact. Int J Public Health 2009; 54(1):45–48. 10.1007/s00038-008-8025-x PubMed DOI
World Health Organization. Global Burden of Disease 2004. WHO, editor. 2008.
Sattelmair J, Pertman J, Ding EL, Kohl HW III, Haskell W, Lee IM. Dose response between physical activity and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis. Circulation 2011; 124(7):789–795. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.010710 PubMed DOI PMC
Woodcock J, Givoni M, Morgan AS. Health Impact Modelling of Active Travel Visions for England and Wales Using an Integrated Transport and Health Impact Modelling Tool (ITHIM). PLoS One 2013; 8(1):e51462 10.1371/journal.pone.0051462 PubMed DOI PMC
Donaire-Gonzalez D, de Nazelle A, Cole-Hunter T, Rodriguez D, Mendez M, Garcia-Aymerich J et al. The Added Benefit of Bicycle Commuting on the Regular Amount of Physical Activity Performed. Am.J.Prev.Med. 2015. "In Press". PubMed
Sahlqvist S, Song Y, Ogilvie D. Is active travel associated with greater physical activity? The contribution of commuting and non-commuting active travel to total physical activity in adults. Prev Med 2012; 55(3):206–211. PubMed PMC
Terzano K, Morckel VC. Walk or Bike to a Healthier Life: Commuting Behavior and Recreational Physical Activity. Environ Behav 2011; 43(4):488–500.
Rojas-Rueda D, de Nazelle A, Teixido O, Nieuwenhuijsen M. Health impact assessment of increasing public transport and cycling use in Barcelona: A morbidity and burden of disease approach. Prev Med 2013. PubMed
Holm AL, Glumer C, Diderichsen F. Health Impact Assessment of increased cycling to place of work or education in Copenhagen. BMJ Open 2012; 2(4). PubMed PMC
Woodcock J, Tainio M, Cheshire J, O'Brien O, Goodman A. Health effects of the London bicycle sharing system: health impact modelling study. BMJ 2014; 348:g425 10.1136/bmj.g425 PubMed DOI PMC