Pitfalls of the Geographic Population Structure (GPS) Approach Applied to Human Genetic History: A Case Study of Ashkenazi Jews

. 2016 Aug 16 ; 8 (7) : 2259-65. [epub] 20160816

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid27389685

In a recent interdisciplinary study, Das et al. have attempted to trace the homeland of Ashkenazi Jews and of their historical language, Yiddish (Das et al. 2016 Localizing Ashkenazic Jews to Primeval Villages in the Ancient Iranian Lands of Ashkenaz. Genome Biol Evol. 8:1132-1149). Das et al. applied the geographic population structure (GPS) method to autosomal genotyping data and inferred geographic coordinates of populations supposedly ancestral to Ashkenazi Jews, placing them in Eastern Turkey. They argued that this unexpected genetic result goes against the widely accepted notion of Ashkenazi origin in the Levant, and speculated that Yiddish was originally a Slavic language strongly influenced by Iranian and Turkic languages, and later remodeled completely under Germanic influence. In our view, there are major conceptual problems with both the genetic and linguistic parts of the work. We argue that GPS is a provenancing tool suited to inferring the geographic region where a modern and recently unadmixed genome is most likely to arise, but is hardly suitable for admixed populations and for tracing ancestry up to 1,000 years before present, as its authors have previously claimed. Moreover, all methods of historical linguistics concur that Yiddish is a Germanic language, with no reliable evidence for Slavic, Iranian, or Turkic substrata.

Erratum v

PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Alexander DH, Lange K. 2011. Enhancements to the ADMIXTURE algorithm for individual ancestry estimation. BMC Bioinformatics 12:246.. PubMed PMC

Allentoft ME, et al. 2015. Population genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia. Nature 522:167–172. PubMed

Atzmon G, et al. 2010. Abraham’s children in the genome era: major Jewish diaspora populations comprise distinct genetic clusters with shared middle eastern ancestry. Am J Hum Genet. 86:850–859. PubMed PMC

Behar DM, et al. 2010. The genome-wide structure of the Jewish people. Nature 466:238–242. PubMed

Behar DM, et al. 2013. No evidence from genome-wide data of a Khazar origin for the Ashkenazi Jews. Hum Biol. 85:859–900. PubMed

Campbell L, Poser WJ. 2008. Language classification: history and method. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Costa MD, et al. 2013. A substantial prehistoric European ancestry amongst Ashkenazi maternal lineages. Nat Commun. 4:2543.. PubMed PMC

Das R, et al. 2016. Localizing Ashkenazic Jews to primeval villages in the ancient Iranian lands of Ashkenaz. Genome Biol Evol. 8:1132–1149. PubMed PMC

Elhaik E. 2013. The missing link of Jewish European ancestry: contrasting the Rhineland and the Khazarian hypotheses. Genome Biol Evol. 5:61–74. PubMed PMC

Elhaik E, et al. 2014. Geographic population structure analysis of worldwide human populations infers their biogeographical origins. Nat Commun. 5:3513.. PubMed PMC

Flegontov P, et al. 2016. Genomic study of the Ket: a Paleo-Eskimo-related ethnic group with significant ancient North Eurasian ancestry. Sci Rep. 6:20768.. PubMed PMC

Haak W, et al. 2015. Massive migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European languages in Europe. Nature 522:207–211. PubMed PMC

Harbert W. 2007. The Germanic languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hellenthal G, et al. 2014. A genetic atlas of human admixture history. Science 343:747–751. PubMed PMC

Jacobs NG, et al. 1994. Yiddish In König E, Auwera J van der, editors. The Germanic languages. London: Routledge; p. 388–419.

Kozlov K, et al. 2015. Differential Evolution approach to detect recent admixture. BMC Genomics 16(Suppl 8):S9.. PubMed PMC

Lawson DJ, Hellenthal G, Myers S, Falush D. 2012. Inference of population structure using dense haplotype data. PLoS Genet. 8:11–17. PubMed PMC

Leslie S, et al. 2015. The fine-scale genetic structure of the British population. Nature 519:309–314. PubMed PMC

Roberge P. 2010. Contact and the history of Germanic languages In Hickey R, editor. The handbook of language contact. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; p. 406–431.

Rootsi S, et al. 2013. Phylogenetic applications of whole Y-chromosome sequences and the Near Eastern origin of Ashkenazi Levites. Nat Commun. 4:2928.. PubMed PMC

Rothstein RA. 2006. Yiddish In Brown K, editor. Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. 2nd ed Vol. 13 Oxford: Elsevier; p. 730–733.

Schiffels S, et al. 2016. Iron age and Anglo-Saxon genomes from East England reveal British migration history. Nat Commun. 7:10408.. PubMed PMC

Stampfer S. 2013. Did the Khazars convert to Judaism? Jewish Social Studies. 19:1–72.

Thomason SG, Kaufman T. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Thomason SG. 2001. Language contact. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

van Coetsem F. 2000. A general and unified theory of the transmission process in language contact. Heidelberg: Winter.

Wexler P. 1991. Yiddish — the fifteenth Slavic language. A study of partial language shift from Judeo-Sorbian to German. Int J Soc Lang. 1991:9–150.

Wexler P. 2002. Two-tiered relexification in Yiddish: Jews, Sorbs, Khazars, and the Kiev-Polessian dialect. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Wexler P. 2010. Do Jewish Ashkenazim (i.e., “Scythians”) originate in Iran and the Caucasus and is Yiddish Slavic? In Stadnik-Holzer E, Holzer G, editors. Sprache und Leben der frühmittelalterlichen Slaven: Festschrift für Radoslav Katičić zum 80. Geburtstag. Frankfurt: Peter Lang; p. 189–216.

Winford D. 2003. An introduction to contact linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...