A randomized phase III study of carfilzomib vs low-dose corticosteroids with optional cyclophosphamide in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (FOCUS)
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze III, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
27416912
PubMed Central
PMC5220126
DOI
10.1038/leu.2016.176
PII: leu2016176
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- anemie chemicky indukované MeSH
- cyklofosfamid aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- hormony kůry nadledvin aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- míra přežití MeSH
- mnohočetný myelom komplikace farmakoterapie mortalita MeSH
- neutropenie chemicky indukované MeSH
- oligopeptidy aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- přežití po terapii bez příznaků nemoci MeSH
- recidiva MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- trombocytopenie chemicky indukované MeSH
- záchranná terapie škodlivé účinky metody mortalita MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- carfilzomib MeSH Prohlížeč
- cyklofosfamid MeSH
- hormony kůry nadledvin MeSH
- oligopeptidy MeSH
This randomized, phase III, open-label, multicenter study compared carfilzomib monotherapy against low-dose corticosteroids and optional cyclophosphamide in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients were randomized (1:1) to receive carfilzomib (10-min intravenous infusion; 20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1; 27 mg/m2 thereafter) or a control regimen of low-dose corticosteroids (84 mg of dexamethasone or equivalent corticosteroid) with optional cyclophosphamide (1400 mg) for 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Three-hundred and fifteen patients were randomized to carfilzomib (n=157) or control (n=158). Both groups had a median of five prior regimens. In the control group, 95% of patients received cyclophosphamide. Median OS was 10.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 8.4-14.4) vs 10.0 months (95% CI 7.7-12.0) with carfilzomib vs control (hazard ratio=0.975; 95% CI 0.760-1.249; P=0.4172). Progression-free survival was similar between groups; overall response rate was higher with carfilzomib (19.1 vs 11.4%). The most common grade ⩾3 adverse events were anemia (25.5 vs 30.7%), thrombocytopenia (24.2 vs 22.2%) and neutropenia (7.6 vs 12.4%) with carfilzomib vs control. Median OS for single-agent carfilzomib was similar to that for an active doublet control regimen in heavily pretreated RRMM patients.
Amedeo Avogadro University of Eastern Piedmont Novara Italy
Chaim Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer Israel
Charles University Teaching Hospital Hradec Králové Czech Republic
Clinica di Ematologia Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona Ancona Italy
Clínica Universidad de Navarra CIMA IDISNA Navarra Spain
Hadassah Medical Center Jerusalem Israel
Hopital Huriez CHRU Lille France
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
Hospital Elisabethinen Linz Linz Austria
Institut Català d'Oncologia Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol Barcelona Spain
Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Meir Medical Center Kfar Saba Israel
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece
Nicolaus Copernicus Hospital Toruń Poland
Onyx Pharmaceuticals Inc an Amgen subsidiary South San Francisco CA USA
Petz Aladár Megyei Oktató Kórház Vasvári Pál Hungary
Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy
Southampton General Hospital Hampshire UK
St István and St László Hospital of Budapest Budapest Hungary
University College London Cancer Institute London UK
University Hospital La Fe and Universidad Católica de València 'San Vicente Mártir' València Spain
University Hospital Olomouc and Medical Faculty of Palacky University Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic
University Hospital Ostrava and Faculty of Medicine University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
University Medicine Mainz Mainz Germany
University of Pécs Pécs Hungary
University of Torino Torino Italy
Durie BG, Moreau P, Sonneveld P, Morgan GJ, Lahuerta JJ, Beksac M et al. Regional differences in the treatment approaches for relapsed multiple myeloma: an IMF study. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 15s (abstract 8095).
NCCNClinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Multiple Myeloma version 4.2015. Available at http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/myeloma.pdf accessed 23 April 2015.
Interpreting clinical trial data in multiple myeloma: translating findings to the real-world setting
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01302392