Evolutionary dynamics of mixed-ploidy populations in an annual herb: dispersal, local persistence and recurrent origins of polyploids
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
28398545
PubMed Central
PMC5737363
DOI
10.1093/aob/mcx032
PII: 3192349
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Matricaria perforata, Tripleurospermum inodorum, aneuploidy, annual plant, cytotype coexistence, flow cytometry, mixed-ploidy population, neopolyploid, ploidy screening, temporal dynamics, triploid,
- MeSH
- Asteraceae genetika MeSH
- biologická evoluce * MeSH
- diploidie MeSH
- polyploidie * MeSH
- tetraploidie MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Despite the recent wealth of studies targeted at contact zones of cytotypes in various species, some aspects of polyploid evolution are still poorly understood. This is especially the case for the frequency and success rate of spontaneous neopolyploidization or the temporal dynamics of ploidy coexistence, requiring massive ploidy screening and repeated observations, respectively. To fill this gap, an extensive study of spatio-temporal patterns of ploidy coexistence was initiated in the widespread annual weed Tripleurospermum inodorum (Asteraceae). METHODS: DNA flow cytometry along with confirmatory chromosome counts was employed to assess ploidy levels of 11 018 adult individuals and 1263 ex situ germinated seedlings from 1209 Central European populations. The ploidy screening was conducted across three spatial scales and supplemented with observations of temporal development of 37 mixed-ploidy populations. KEY RESULTS: The contact zone between the diploid and tetraploid cytotypes has a diffuse, mosaic-like structure enabling common cytotype coexistence from the within-population to the landscape level. A marked difference in monoploid genome size between the two cytotypes enabled the easy distinction of neotetraploid mutants from long-established tetraploids. Neotetraploids were extremely rare (0·03 %) and occurred solitarily. Altogether five ploidy levels (2 x -6 x ) and several aneuploids were discovered; the diversity in nuclear DNA content was highest in early ontogenetic stages (seedlings) and among individuals from mixed-ploidy populations. In spite of profound temporal oscillations in cytotype frequencies in mixed-ploidy populations, both diploids and tetraploids usually persisted up to the last census. CONCLUSIONS: Diploids and tetraploids commonly coexist at all spatial scales and exhibit considerable temporal stability in local ploidy mixtures. Mixed-ploidy populations containing fertile triploid hybrids probaby act as effective generators of cytogenetic novelty and may facilitate inter-ploidy gene flow. Neopolyploid mutants were incapable of local establishment.
Institute of Botany The Czech Academy of Sciences Zámek 1 CZ 252 43 Pruhonice Czech Republic
Institute of Botany The Czech Academy of Sciences Zámek 1 CZ 252 43 Průhonice Czech Republic
National Centre for Biosystematics Natural History Museum University of Oslo NO 0318 Oslo Norway
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Arnold B, Kim ST, Bomblies K.. 2015. Single geographic origin of a widespread autotetraploid PubMed
Arora OP, Madhusoodanan KJ.. 1981. Nature of tetraploidy in
Arvanitis L, Wiklund C, Ehrlén J.. 2008. Plant ploidy level influences selection by butterfly seed predators. Oikos 117: 1020–1025.
Baack EJ. 2004. Cytotype segregation on regional and microgeographic scales in snow buttercups ( PubMed
Baack EJ. 2005a. Ecological factors influencing tetraploid establishment in snow buttercups ( PubMed
Baack EJ. 2005b. To succeed globally, disperse locally: effects of local pollen and seed dispersal on tetraploid establishment. Heredity 94: 538–546. PubMed
Barringer BC. 2007. Polyploidy and self-fertilization in flowering plants. American Journal of Botany 94: 1527–1533. PubMed
Bowes GG, Thomas AG, Lefkovitch LP.. 1995. Changes with time in the germination of buried scentless chamomile (
Bretagnolle F, Thompson JD.. 1995. Tansley review no. 78. Gametes with the somatic chromosome number: mechanisms of their formation and role in the evolution of autopolypoid plants. New Phytologist 129: 1–22. PubMed
Buckley YM, Hinz HL, Matthies D, Rees M.. 2001. Interactions between density-dependent processes, population dynamics and control of an invasive plant species,
Buggs RJA. 2007. Empirical study of hybrid zone movement. Heredity 99: 301–312. PubMed
Buggs RJA, Pannell JR.. 2006. Rapid displacement of a monoecious plant lineage is due to pollen swamping by a dioecious relative. Current Biology 16: 996–1000. PubMed
Buggs RJA, Pannell JR.. 2007. Ecological differentiation and diploid superiority across a moving ploidy contact zone. Evolution 61: 125–140. PubMed
Burton TL, Husband BC.. 1999. Population cytotype structure in the polyploid PubMed
Castro S, Loureiro J, Santos C, Ater M, Ayensa G, Navarro L.. 2007. Distribution of flower morphs, ploidy level and sexual reproduction of the invasive weed PubMed PMC
Castro S, Loureiro J, Procházka T, Münzbergová Z.. 2012. Cytotype distribution at a diploid-hexaploid contact zone in PubMed PMC
Chapman MA, Abbott RJ.. 2010. Introgression of fitness genes across a ploidy barrier. New Phytologist 186: 63–71. PubMed
Collins AR, Naderi R, Mueller-Schaerer H.. 2011. Competition between cytotypes changes across a longitudinal gradient in PubMed
Comai L. 2005. The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nature Reviews. Genetics 6: 836–846. PubMed
Coyne JA, Orr HA.. 2004. Speciation. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J.. 2007. Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nature Protocols 2: 2233–2244. PubMed
Dray S, Dufour AB.. 2007. The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. Journal of Statistical Software 22: 1–20.
Duchoslav M, Šafářová L, Krahulec F.. 2010. Complex distribution patterns, ecology and coexistence of ploidy levels of PubMed PMC
Dyer AF. 1963. The use of lacto-propionic orcein in rapid squash methods for chromosome preparations. Stain Technology 38: 85–90.
Flagel LE, Wendel JF.. 2009. Gene duplication and evolutionary novelty in plants. New Phytologist 183: 557–564. PubMed
Fowler NL, Levin DA.. 1984. Ecological constraints on the establishment of a novel polyploid in competition with its diploid progenitor. The American Naturalist 124: 703–711.
Godsoe W, Larson MA, Glennon KL, Segraves KA.. 2013. Polyploidization in PubMed
Greilhuber J. 2005. Intraspecific variation in genome size in angiosperms: identifying its existence. Annals of Botany 95: 91–98. PubMed PMC
Hagberg A, Ellerström S.. 1959. The competition between diploid, tetraploid and aneuploid rye: theoretical and practical aspects. Hereditas 45: 369–416.
Hahn MA, Buckley YM, Müller-Schärer H.. 2012. Increased population growth rate in invasive polyploid PubMed
Halverson K, Heard SB, Nason JD, Stireman JO.. 2008. Origins, distribution, and local co-occurrence of polyploid cytotypes in PubMed
Hanzl M, Kolář F, Nováková D, Suda J.. 2014. Nonadaptive processes governing early stages of polyploid evolution: insights from a primary contact zone of relict serpentine PubMed
Hegarty M, Coate J, Sherman-Broyles S, Abbott R, Hiscock S, Doyle J.. 2013. Lessons from natural and artificial polyploids in higher plants. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 140: 204–225. PubMed
Hroudová Z, Zákravský P.. 1993. Ecology of two cytotypes of
Hülber K, Sonnleitner M, Suda J, et al. 2015. Ecological differentiation, lack of hybrids involving diploids, and asymmetric gene flow between polyploids in narrow contact zones of PubMed PMC
Husband BC. 2000. Constraints on polyploid evolution: a test of the minority cytotype exclusion principle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B – Biological Sciences 267: 217–223. PubMed PMC
Husband BC. 2004. The role of triploid hybrids in the evolutionary dynamics of mixed-ploidy populations. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 82: 537–546.
Husband BC, Sabara HA.. 2003. Reproductive isolation between autotetraploids and their diploid progenitors in fireweed, PubMed
Kao RH. 2007. Asexuality and the coexistence of cytotypes. New Phytologist 175: 764–772. PubMed
Kay QON. 1965.
Kay QON. 1969. The origin and distribution of diploid and tetraploid
Kay QON. 1976. 60.
Kay QON. 1994.
Keeler KH. 2004. Impact of intraspecific polyploidy in
Keeler KH, Davis GA.. 1999. Comparison of common cytotypes of PubMed
Kennedy BF, Sabara HA, Haydon D, Husband BC.. 2006. Pollinator-mediated assortative mating in mixed ploidy populations of PubMed
Kliber A, Eckert CG.. 2005. Interaction between founder effect and selection during biological invasion in an aquatic plant. Evolution 59: 1900–1913. PubMed
Kolář F, Štech M, Trávníček P, et al. 2009. Towards resolving the PubMed PMC
Kolář F, Lučanová M, Vít P, et al. 2013. Diversity and endemism in deglaciated areas: ploidy, relative genome size and niche differentiation in the PubMed PMC
Koutecký P, Štěpánek J, Baďurová T.. 2012. Differentiation between diploid and tetraploid
Krahulcová A, Jarolímová V.. 1993. Ecology of two cytotypes of
Kubát K. 2004. 33.
Lankosz-Mróz M. 1976. Karyological investigations on
Levin DA. 1975. Minority cytotype exclusion in local plant populations. Taxon 24: 35–43.
Levin DA. 1983. Polyploidy and novelty in flowering plants. The American Naturalist 122: 1–25.
Levin DA. 2002. The role of chromosomal change in plant evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Li BH, Xu XM, Ridout MS.. 2004. Modelling the establishment and spread of autotetraploid plants in a spatially heterogeneous environment. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17: 562–573. PubMed
Lumaret R, Guillerm JL, Delay J, Ait Lhaj Loutfi A, Izco J, Jay M.. 1987. Polyploidy and habitat differentiation in PubMed
Maceira NO, Jacquard P, Lumaret R.. 1993. Competition between diploid and derivative autotetraploid PubMed
Mantel N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a general regression approach. Cancer Research 27: 209–220. PubMed
Manzaneda AJ, Rey PJ, Bastida JM, Weiss-Lehman C, Raskin E, Mitchell-Olds T.. 2012. Environmental aridity is associated with cytotype segregation and polyploidy occurrence in PubMed PMC
McAllister C, Blaine R, Kron P, et al. 2015. Environmental correlates of cytotype distribution in PubMed
McArthur ED, Sanderson SC.. 1999. Cytogeography and chromosome evolution of subgenus Tridentatae of PubMed
Meirmans PG, Calame FG, Bretagnolle F, Felber F, den Nijs JCM.. 1999. Anthropogenic disturbance and habitat differentiation between sexual diploid and apomictic triploid
Mráz P, Šingliarová B, Urfus T, Krahulec F.. 2008. Cytogeography of PubMed PMC
Mráz P, Španiel S, Keller A, et al. 2012. Anthropogenic disturbance as a driver of microspatial and microhabitat segregation of cytotypes of PubMed PMC
Norrmann GA, Quarín CL, Keeler KH.. 1997. Evolutionary implications of meiotic chromosome behavior, reproductive biology, and hybridization in 6 PubMed
Nuismer SL, Thompson JN.. 2001. Plant polyploidy and non-uniform effects on insect herbivores. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B – Biological Sciences 268: 1937–1940. PubMed PMC
Oswald BP, Nuismer SL.. 2011. Neopolyploidy and diversification in PubMed PMC
Otisková V, Koutecký T, Kolář F, Koutecký P.. 2014. Occurrence and habitat preferences of diploid and tetraploid cytotypes of
Peckert T, Chrtek J.. 2006. Mating interactions between coexisting diploid, triploid and tetraploid cytotypes of
Petit C, Lesbros P, Ge X, Thompson JD.. 1997. Variation in flowering phenology and selfing rate across a contact zone between diploid and tetraploid
Petit C, Bretagnolle F, Felber F.. 1999. Evolutionary consequences of diploid-polyploid hybrid zones in wild species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 306–311. PubMed
Ramsey J. 2007. Unreduced gametes and neopolyploids in natural populations of PubMed
Ramsey J. 2011. Polyploidy and ecological adaptation in wild yarrow. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 108: 7096–7101. PubMed PMC
Ramsey J, Schemske DW.. 1998. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29: 467–501.
Rausch JH, Morgan MT.. 2005. The effect of self-fertilization, inbreeding depression, and population size on autopolyploid establishment. Evolution 59: 1867–1875. PubMed
Rodríguez DJ. 1996. A model for the establishment of polyploidy in plants. The American Naturalist 147: 33–46.
Rottgardt K. 1956. Morphologische, cytologische und physiologische Untersuchungen von Ökotypen in Schleswig-Holstein. Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 32: 225–278.
Segraves KA, Thompson JN.. 1999. Plant polyploidy and pollination: floral traits and insect visits to diploid and tetraploid PubMed
Schönswetter P, Suda J, Popp M, Weiss-Schneeweiss H, Brochmann C.. 2007. Circumpolar phylogeography of PubMed
Soltis DE, Albert VA, Leebens-Mack J, et al. 2009. Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification. American Journal of Botany 96: 336–348. PubMed
Sonnleitner M, Flatscher R, Escobar García P, et al. 2010. Distribution and habitat segregation on different spatial scales among diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid cytotypes of PubMed PMC
Sora D, Kron P, Husband BC.. 2016. Genetic and environmental determinants of unreduced gamete production in PubMed PMC
Stuessy TF, Weiss-Schneeweiss H, Keil DJ.. 2004. Diploid and polyploid cytotype distribution in PubMed
Suda J, Krahulcová A, Trávníček P, Krahulec F.. 2006. Ploidy level versus DNA ploidy level: an appeal for consistent terminology. Taxon 55: 447–450.
Trávníček P, Kubátová B, Čurn V, et al. 2011. Remarkable coexistence of multiple cytotypes of the PubMed PMC
Treier UA, Broennimann O, Normand S, et al. 2009. Shift in cytotype frequency and niche space in the invasive plant PubMed
Weiss-Schneeweiss H, Emadzade K, Jang TS, Schneeweiss GM.. 2013. Evolutionary consequences, constraints and potential of polyploidy in plants. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 140: 137–150. PubMed PMC
Woo SL, Thomas AG, Peschken DP, et al. 1991. The biology of Canadian weeds. 99.
Wood TE, Takebayashi N, Barker MS, Mayrose I, Greenspoon PB, Rieseberg LH.. 2009. The frequency of polyploid speciation in vascular plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106: 13875–13879. PubMed PMC
Bridging micro and macroevolution: insights from chromosomal dynamics in plants
Temporal stability of spatial cytotype structure in mixed-ploidy populations of Centaurea stoebe
Role of ploidy in colonization of alpine habitats in natural populations of Arabidopsis arenosa
Polyploid evolution: The ultimate way to grasp the nettle