Polyploidization is generally considered to be an important evolutionary driver affecting the genetic diversity, that can alter the morphology, phenology, physiology or ecology of plants, which in turn may make the taxonomy of polyploids more difficult. One such example is the Symphytum officinale complex, a polyploid species group represented by three major cytotypes: tetraploids (2n = 48), less common, geographically restricted diploids (2n = 24) and hypotetraploids (2n = 40). In most European floras only one polymorphic species, S. officinale, is widely recognized, while the particular cytotypes are usually considered conspecific. Our study provided a thorough evaluation of the ploidy level diversity, morphological and ecological variation, with a special attempt to clarify the status of 'white-flowered' diploids. Using flow cytometry, we identified three cytotypes: widespread tetraploids (76.1 %); less frequent diploids (23.6 %) with scattered distribution across the range of tetraploids and confined only to several areas of Europe; and extremely rare triploids (0.3 %). Diploids and tetraploids showed diffuse parapatric pattern of distribution, with only four mixed-cytotype populations (2.7 %) found, but almost entirely without triploids, suggesting reproductive isolation between di- and tetraploids. Niche of diploids falls nearly completely within the niche of tetraploids that showed niche expansion. Tetraploids also showed a shift in niche optimum towards a less continental and colder climate, coupled with expansion to more disturbance-prone sites with higher nutrient availability. Diploids were clearly distinguishable morphologically from tetraploids. The morphological differentiation of studied cytotypes appears to be taxonomically significant, especially in combination with ecological differences and the apparent presence of hybridization barriers. Both cytotypes should be treated as separate species (i.e. S. bohemicum and S. officinale s. str.).

Plant Biosystematics and Ecology RG Department of Botany Faculty of Science Palacký University Šlechtitelů 27 783 71 Olomouc Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Arnold B, Kim ST, Bomblies K.. 2015. Single geographic origin of a widespread autotetraploid Arabidopsis arenosa lineage followed by interploidy admixture. Molecular Biology and Evolution 6:1382–1395. PubMed

Baniaga AE, Marx HE, Arrigo N, Barker MS.. 2020. Polyploid plants have faster rates of multivariate niche differentiation than their diploid relatives. Ecology Letters 23:68–78. PubMed

Basler A. 1972. Cytotaxonomische Untersuchungen an der Boraginaceen-Gattung Symphytum L. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 92:508–553.

Broennimann O, Fitzpatrick MC, Pearman PB, Petitpierre B, Pellissier L, Yoccoz NG, Thuiller W, Fortin MJ, Randin C, Zimmermann NE, Graham CH, Guisan A.. 2012. Measuring ecological niche overlap from occurrence and spatial environmental data. Global Ecology and Biogeography 21:481–497.

Brown JL, Carnaval AC.. 2019. A tale of two niches: methods, concepts and evolution. Frontiers of Biogeography 11:e44158.

Buch C, Loss GH, Keil P.. 2007. Aspekte der flora und vegetation des NSG “Rheinaue Friemersheim” in Duisburg. Decheniana (Bonn) 160:133–153.

Bucknall C. 1913. A revision of the genus Symphytum, Tourn. Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Botany 41:491–556.

Casazza G, Boucher FC, Minuto L, Randin CF, Conti E.. 2016. Do floral and niche shifts favour the establishment and persistence of newly arisen polyploids? A case study in an Alpine primrose. Annals of Botany 119:81–93. PubMed PMC

Castro M, Castro S, Figueiredo A, Husband B, Loureiro J.. 2018. Complex cytogeographical patterns reveal a dynamic tetraploid–octoploid contact zone. AoB PLANTS 10:ply012; doi:10.1093/aobpla/ply012. PubMed DOI PMC

Cecchi L, Selvi F.. 2015. Synopsis of Boraginaceae subfam. Boraginoideae tribe Boragineae in Italy. Plant Biosystems 149:630–677.

Cecchi L, Selvi F.. 2017. Flora critica d’Italia. Boraginaceae–Boragineae. Firenze, Italy: Fondazione per la Flora Italiana.

Čertner M, Fenclová E, Kúr P, Kolář F, Koutecký P, Krahulcová A, Suda J.. 2017. Evolutionary dynamics of mixed-ploidy populations in an annual herb: dispersal, local persistence and recurrent origins of polyploids. Annals of Botany 120:303–315. PubMed PMC

Čertner M, Rydlo J, Dudáš M, Hroudová Z.. 2022. A unique diploid–triploid contact zone provides insights into the evolutionary mechanisms of cytotype coexistence in flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus). Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 54:125659.

Chacón J, Luebert F, Hilger HH, Ovchinnikova S, Selvi F, Cecchi L, Guilliams CM, Hasenstab-Lehman K, Sutorý K, Simpson MG, Weigend M.. 2016. The borage family (Boraginaceae s.s.): a revised infrafamilial classification based on new phylogenetic evidence, with emphasis on the placement of some enigmatic genera. Taxon 65:523–546.

Chung MY, López-Pujol J, Chung JM, Kim K-J, Park SJ, Chung MG.. 2015. Polyploidy in Lilium lancifolium: evidence of autotriploidy and no niche divergence between diploid and triploid cytotypes in their native ranges. Flora 213:57–68.

Chytrý M, Rafajová M.. 2003. Czech National Phytosociological Database: basic statistics of the available vegetation plot-data. Preslia 75:1–15.

Chytrý M, Tichý L, Dřevojan P, Sádlo J, Zelený D.. 2018. Ellenberg-type indicator values for the Czech flora. Preslia 90:83–103.

Czerepanov SK. 2007. Vascular plants of Russia and adjacent states (the former USSR), 1st edn. Cambridge:‎ Cambridge University Press.

Danihelka J, Chrtek J, Kaplan Z.. 2012. Checklist of vascular plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia 84:647–811.

Degen A. 1930. Bemerkungen über einige orientalische Pflanzenarten LXXXIX. Über Symphytum uliginosum Kern. Magyar Botanikai Lapok 29:144–148.

Di Cola V, Broennimann O, Petitpierre B, Breiner FT, D’Amen M, Randin C, Engler R, Pottier J, Pio D, Dubuis A, Pellissier L, Mateo RG, Hordijk W, Salamin N, Guisan A.. 2017. Ecospat: a R package to support spatial analyses and modelling of species niches and distributions. Ecography 40:774–787.

Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Lucretti S, Meister A, Lysák MA, Nardi L, Obermayer R.. 1998. Plant genome size estimation by flow cytometry: inter-laboratory comparison. Annals of Botany 82:17–26.

Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J.. 2007. Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nature Protocols 2: 2233–2244. PubMed

Duchoslav M, Jandová M, Kobrlová L, Šafářová L, Brus J, Vojtěchová K.. 2020. Intricate distribution patterns of six cytotypes of Allium oleraceum at a continental scale: niche expansion and innovation followed by niche contraction with increasing ploidy level. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:591137. PubMed PMC

Fedorov AA, ed. 2001. Flora of Russia: the European part & bordering regions, Vol. 5. ‎Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Fick SE, Hijmans RJ.. 2017. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 37:4302–4315.

Fischer MA, Oswald K, Adler W.. 2008. Exkursionsflora für Österreich, Liechtenstein und Südtirol, 3rd edn. Linz, Austria: Biologiezentrum der Oberösterreichischen Landesmuseen.

Fowler NL, Levin DA.. 1984. Ecological contrasts on the establishment of a novel polyploid in competition with its diploid progenitor. The American Naturalist 124:703–711.

Gadella TWJ. 1972. Cytological and hybridization studies in the genus Symphytum. Symposia Biologica Hungarica 12:189–199.

Gadella TWJ. 1984. Notes on Symphytum (Boraginaceae) in North America. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 71:1061–1067.

Gadella TWJ, Kliphuis E.. 1963. Chromosome numbers of flowering plants in the Netherlands. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 12:195–230.

Gadella TWJ, Kliphuis E.. 1967. Cytotaxonomic studies in the genus Symphytum I. Symphytum officinale L. in the Netherlands. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Series C: Biological and Medical Sciences 70:378–391.

Gadella TWJ, Kliphuis E.. 1969. Cytotaxonomic studies in the genus Symphytum II. Crossing experiments between Symphytum officinale L. and Symphytum asperum Lepech. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 18:544–549.

Gadella TWJ, Kliphuis E.. 1970. Cytotaxonomic investigations in some angiosperms collected in the Valley of Aosta and in Tre National Park “Gran Paradiso”. Caryologia 23:363–379.

Gadella TWJ, Kliphuis E.. 1972. Cytotaxonomic studies in the genus Symphytum IV. Cytogeographic investigation in Symphytum officinale L. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 21:169–173.

Gadella TWJ, Kliphuis E.. 1973. Cytotaxonomic studies in the genus Symphytum V. Some notes on W. European plants with the chromosome number 2n = 40. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 93:530–538.

Gadella TWJ, Kliphuis E.. 1978. Cytotaxonomic studies in the genus Symphytum VIII. Chromosome numbers and classification of ten European species. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Series C: Biological and Medical Sciences 81:162–172.

Gadella TWJ, Kliphuis E, Huizing HJ.. 1983. Cyto- and chemotaxonomical studies on the sections Officinalia and Coerulea of the genus Symphytum. Botanica Helvetica 93:169–192.

Gadella TWJ, Kliphuis E, Kramer KU.. 1970. Zytotaxonomische Untersuchungen an Blüten pflanzen aus dem Osten Österreichs. Wissenschaftliche Arbeiten aus dem Burgenland 44:187–195.

Gadella TWJ, Kliphuis E, Perring FH.. 1974. Cytotaxonomic studies in the genus Symphytum VI. Some notes on Symphytum in Britain. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 23:433–437.

Godsoe W, Larson MA, Glennon KL, Segraves KA.. 2013. Polyploidization in Heuchera cylindrica (Saxifragaceae) did not result in a shift in climatic requirements. American Journal of Botany 100:496–508. PubMed

Gracia VR, Castroviejo S.. 2012. Symphytum L. In: Talavera S, Andrés C, Arista M, Fernández Piedra MP, Gallego MJ, Ortiz PL, Romero Zarco C, Salgueiro FJ, Silvestre S, Quintana A, eds. Flora iberica, volume 11: Gentianaceae–Boraginaceae. Madrid, Spain: Real Jardín Botánico, 332–336.

Greilhuber J. 1998. Intraspecific variation in genome size: a critical reassessment. Annals of Botany 82:27–35. PubMed PMC

Greilhuber J, Doležel J, Lysák MA, Bennett MD.. 2005. The origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms ‘genome size’ and ‘C-value’ to describe nuclear DNA contents. Annals of Botany 95:255–260. PubMed PMC

Guisan A, Petitpierre B, Broennimann O, Daehler C, Kueffer C.. 2014. Unifying niche shift studies: insights from biological invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29:260–269. PubMed

Hengl T, de Jesus JM, Heuvelink GBM, Gonzalez MR, Kilibarda M, Blagotić A, Shangguan W, Wright MN, Geng X, Bauer-Marschallinger B, Guevara MA, Vargas R, MacMillan RA, Batjes NH, Leenaars JGB, Ribeiro E, Wheeler I, Mantel S, Kempen B.. 2017. SoilGrids250m: global gridded soil information based on machine learning. PLoS One 12:e0169748. PubMed PMC

Hultén E, Fries M.. 1986. Atlas of North European vascular plants north of the Tropic of Cancer, Vol. 1–3. Königstein, Germany: Koeltz Scientific Books.

Husband BC, Baldwin SJ, Suda J.. 2013. The incidence of polyploidy in natural plant populations: major patterns and evolutionary processes. In: Greilhuber J, Doležel J, Wendel J, eds. Plant genome diversity 2: physical structure, behaviour and evolution of plant genomes. Vienna, Austria: Springer, 255–276.

Jäger EJ, ed. 2009. Rothmaler—Exkursionsflora von Deutschland. Bd. 3: Gefäßpflanzen: Atlasband. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.

Janssen JAM, Rodwell JS, Criado MG, Gubbay S, Haynes T, Nieto A, Sanders N, Landucci F, Loidi J, Symank A, Tahvanainen T, Valderrabano M, Acosta A, Aronsson M, Arts G, Attorre F, Bergmeier E, Bijlsma RJ, Bioret F, Biţă-Nicolae C, Biurrun I, Calix M, Capelo J, Čarni A, Chytrý M, Dengler J, Dimopoulos P, Essl F, Gardfjell H, Gigante D, Giussodel Galdo G, Hájek M, Jansen F, Jansen J, Kapfer J, Mickolajczak A, Molina JA, Molnár Z, Paternoster D, Piernik A, Poulin B, Renaux B, Schaminée JHJ, Šumberová K, Toivonen H, Tonteri T, Tsiripidis I, Tzonev R, Valachovič M.. 2016. European Red List of habitats. Part 2. Terrestrial and freshwater habitats. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Jørgensen PM, Nee MH, Beck SG, eds. 2014. Catálogo de las plantas vasculares de Bolivia. Monographs in systematic botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden, vol. 127. St. Louis, MO: Missouri Botanical Garden Press.

Kamari G, Blanché C, Garbari F.. 2001. Mediterranean chromosome number reports: 11. Flora Mediterranea 11:435–483.

Kaplan Z, Danihelka J, Lepší M, Lepší P, Ekrt L, Chrtek J Jr, Kocián J, Prančl J, Kobrlová L, Hroneš M, Šulc V.. 2016. Distributions of vascular plants in the Czech Republic. Part 3. Preslia 88:459–544.

Király G, Virók V, Molnár VA.. 2011. Új magyar füvészkönyv. Magyarország hajtásos növényei. Határozókulcsok. Jósvafő, Hungary: Aggteleki Nemzeti Park Igazgatóság.

Kirschner J, Kirschnerová L, Štěpánek J.. 2007. Generally accepted plant names based on material from the Czech Republic and published in 1753–1820. Preslia 79:323–365.

Kobrlová L. 2017. Rod Symphytum (kostival) v České republice II. S. officinale agg. Zprávy České Botanické Společnosti 52:175–223.

Kobrlová L, Hroneš M.. 2019. First insights into the evolution of genome size in the borage family—complete data set of Boraginaceae in the Czech Republic. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 189:115–131.

Kobrlová L, Hroneš M, Koutecký P, Štech M, Trávníček B.. 2016. Symphytum tuberosum complex in central Europe: cytogeography, morphology, ecology and taxonomy. Preslia 88:77–112.

Kolář F, Čertner M, Suda J, Schönswetter P, Husband BC.. 2017. Mixed-ploidy species: progress and opportunities in polyploid research. Trends in Plant Science 22:1041–1055. PubMed

Kolář F, Štech M, Trávníček P, Rauchová J, Urfus T, Vít P, Kubešová M, Suda J.. 2009. Towards resolving the Knautia arvensis agg. (Dipsacaceae) puzzle: primary and secondary contact zones and ploidy segregation at landscape and microgeographic scales. Annals of Botany 103:963–974. PubMed PMC

Kolarčik V, Kocová V, Caković D, Kačmárová T, Piovár J, Mártonfi P.. 2018. Nuclear genome size variation in the allopolyploid Onosma arenaria–O. pseudoarenaria species group: methodological issues and revised data. Botany 96:397–410.

Koutecký P. 2015. MorphoTools: a set of R functions for morphometric analysis. Plant Systematics and Evolution 301:1115–1121.

Kuznetsov N. 1910. Kavkazskie vidy roda Symphytum (Tourn.) L. Mémoires de l’Académie Impériale des Sciences de St. Pétersbourg 25:1–94.

Legendre P, Legendre L.. 1998. Numerical ecology. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.

Levin DA. 1975. Minority cytotype exclusion in local plant populations. Taxon 24:35–43.

Levin DA. 2002. The role of chromosomal change in plant evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Levin DA, Palestis BG, Jones RN, Trivers R.. 2005. Phyletic hot spots for B chromosomes in angiosperms. Evolution 59:962–969. PubMed

Liu C, Newell G, White M.. 2016. On the selection of thresholds for predicting species occurrence with presence-only data. Ecology & Evolution 6:337–348. PubMed PMC

Loureiro J, Rodriguez E, Doležel J, Santos C.. 2006. Flow cytometric and microscopic analysis of the effect of tannic acid on plant nuclei and estimation of DNA content. Annals of Botany 98:515–527. PubMed PMC

Macas J, Novák P, Pellicer J, Čížková J, Koblížková A, Neumann P, Fuková I, Doležel J, Kelly LJ, Leitch IJ.. 2015. In depth characterization of repetitive DNA in 23 plant genomes reveals sources of genome size variation in the Legume tribe Fabeae. PLoS One 10:e0143424. PubMed PMC

Májovský J, ed. 1974. Index of chromosome numbers of Slovakian flora (part 3). Acta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium Universitatis Comenianae, Botanica 22:1–20.

Májovský J, Hegedüšová Z.. 1993. Symphytum L. In: Bertová L, Goliášová K, eds. Flóra Slovenska, volume 5/2. Bratislava, Slovakia: Veda, 76–97.

Májovský J, Uhríková A.. 1985. Karyotaxonomisches Studium einiger Arten der slowakischen Flora V. Acta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium Universitatis Comenianae, Botanica 32:59–65.

Mandáková T, Lysák MA.. 2018. Post-polyploid diploidization and diversification through dysploid changes. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 42:555–565. PubMed

Markowa M, Iwanowa P.. 1970. Karyologische Untersuchung der Vertreiter der Fam. Borraginaceae, Labiatae und Scrophulariaceae in Bulgarien. Izvestiya na Botanicheskaya Institut 20:93–98.

Martinčič A. 2007. Mala flora Slovenije, 4th edn. Ljubljana, Slovenia: Tehniška založba Slovenije.

Mekki L, Hart HAT, El-Alfy NZ, Dewedar A, Gadella TWJ.. 1987. The Giemsa C-banded karyotype of diploid Symphytum officinale (Boraginaceae). Acta Botanica Neerlandica 36:33–37.

Melichárková A, Šlenker M, Zozomová-Lihová J, Skokanová K, Šingliarová B, Kačmárová T, Caboňová M, Kempa M, Šrámková G, Mandáková T, Lysák MA, Svitok M, Mártonfiová L, Marhold K.. 2021. So closely related and yet so different: strong contrasts between the evolutionary histories of species of the Cardamine pratensis polyploid complex in Central Europe. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:588856. PubMed PMC

Meusel H, Jäger EJ, Rauschert S, Weinert E.. 1978. Vergleichende Chorologie der zentraleuropäischen Flora. Band II. Jena, Germany: Gustav Fischer.

Mráz P, Šingliarová B, Urfus T, Krahulec F.. 2008. Cytogeography of Pilosella officinarum (Compositae): altitudinal and longitudinal differences in ploidy level distribution in the Czech Republic and Slovakia and the general pattern in Europe. Annals of Botany 101:59–71. PubMed PMC

Murín A, Májovský J.. 1982. Die Bedeutung der Polyploidie in der Entwicklung der in der Slowakei wachsenden Arten der Gattung Symphytum L. Acta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium Universitatis Comenianae, Botanica 29:1–25.

Němečková H, Krak K, Chrtek J.. 2019. Complex pattern of ploidal and genetic variation in Seseli libanotis (Apiaceae). Annales Botanici Fennici 56:57–77.

Otto SP, Whitton J.. 2000. Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annual Review of Genetics 34:401–437. PubMed

Parisod C, Holderegger R, Brochmann C.. 2010. Evolutionary consequences of autopolyploidy. New Phytologist 186:5–17. PubMed

Pawłowski B. 1961. Uwagi o żywokostach—observationes ad genus Symphytum L. pertinentes. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica 7:327–356.

Pawłowski B, ed. 1963. Flora Polska. Rośliny naczyniowe Polski i ziem ościennych, volume 10. Warszawa-Kraków: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

Pawłowski B. 1972. Symphytum L. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA, eds. Flora Europaea, volume 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 103–105.

Perring FH. 1975. Symphytum survey. Watsonia 10:296–297.

Peruzzi L, Garbari F, Bottega S.. 2001. Symphytum tanaicense (Boraginaceae) new for the Italian flora. Willdenowia 31:33–41.

Petit CH, Bretagnolle F, Felber F.. 1999. Evolutionary consequences of diploid–polyploid hybrid zones in wild species. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14:306–311. PubMed

Petitpierre B, Kueffer C, Broennimann O, Randin C, Daehler C, Guisan A.. 2012. Climatic niche shifts are rare among terrestrial plant invaders. Science 335:1344–1348. PubMed

Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE.. 2006. Maximum entropy modelling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 190:231–259.

Phillips SJ, Dudík M.. 2008. Modelling of species distributions with MaxEnt: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31:161–175.

Popov MG. 1953. Symphytum L. In: Shishkin BK, ed. Flora of the U.S.S.R. Volume XIX: Tubiflorae. Moscow-Leningrad: Izdateľstvo Akademii nauk SSSR.

Prančl J, Kaplan Z, Trávníček P, Jarolímová V.. 2014. Genome size as a key to evolutionary complex aquatic plants: polyploidy and hybridization in Callitriche (Plantaginaceae). PLoS One 9:e105997. PubMed PMC

R Development Core Team. 2021. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Ramsey J, Schemske DW.. 2002. Neopolyploidy in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33:589–639.

Rejlová L, Chrtek J, Trávníček P, Lučanová M, Vít P, Urfus T.. 2019. Polyploid evolution: the ultimate way to grasp the nettle. PLoS One 14:e0218389. PubMed PMC

Rice A, Šmarda P, Novosolov M, Drori M, Glick L, Sabath N, Meiri S, Belmaker J, Mayrose I.. 2019. The global biogeography of polyploid plants. Nature Ecology & Evolution 3:265–273. PubMed

Sandbrink JM, van Brederode J, Gadella TWJ.. 1990. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Symphytum L. (Boraginaceae). Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Series C: Biological and Medical Sciences 93:295–334.

Schmeil O, Fitschen J.. 1988. Flora von Deutschland und seinen angrenzenden Gebieten. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.

Shirato K, Shintani T, Nakanishi G, Kamizyö A.. 1985. Chromosome numbers in genus Symphytum. Chromosome Information Service 38:21–23.

Slavík B. 2000. Symphytum L. In: Slavík B, ed. Květena České republiky, vol. 6. Praha, Czech Republic: Academia, 202–210.

Šmarda P, Bureš P.. 2010. Understanding intraspecific variation in genome size in plants. Preslia 82:41–61.

Šmarda P, Knápek O, Březinová A, Horová L, Grulich V, Danihelka J, Veselý P, Šmerda J, Rotreklová O, Bureš P.. 2019. Genome sizes and genomic guanine+cytosine (GC) contents of the Czech vascular flora with new estimates for 1700 species. Preslia 91:117–142.

Smejkal M. 1978. Rod Symphytum L. v Československu. Zprávy Československé Botanické Společnosti 13:145–161.

Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Schemske DW, Hancock JF, Thompson JN, Husband BC, Judd WS.. 2007. Autopolyploidy in angiosperms: have we grossly underestimated the number of species? Taxon 56:13–30.

Spoelhof JP, Soltis PS, Soltis DE.. 2017. Pure polyploidy: closing the gaps in autopolyploid research. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 55:340–352.

Stace C. 2010. New flora of the British Isles, 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Strey M. 1931. Karyologische Studien an Boraginoideae. Planta 14:682–730.

Suda J, Krahulcová A, Trávníček P, Krahulec F.. 2006. Ploidy level versus DNA ploidy level: an appeal for consistent terminology. Taxon 55:447–450.

Suda J, Krahulcová A, Trávníček P, Rasenbaumová R, Peckert T, Krahulec F.. 2007. Genome size variation and species relationships in Hieracium sub-genus Pilosella (Asteraceae) as inferred by flow cytometry. Annals of Botany 100:1323–1335. PubMed PMC

te Beest M, Le Roux JJ, Richardson DM, Brysting AK, Suda J, Kubešová M, Pyšek P.. 2012. The more the better? The role of polyploidy in facilitating plant invasions. Annals of Botany 109:19–45. PubMed PMC

Tichý L. 2002. JUICE, software for vegetation classification. Journal of Vegetation Science 13:451–453.

Tischler G. 1935. Die Bedeutung der Polyploidie für die Verbreitung der Angiospermen: erläutert an den Arten Schleswig-Holsteins, mit Ausblicken auf andere Florengebiete. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 67:1–36.

Trivers R, Burt A, Palestis BG.. 2004. B chromosomes and genome size in flowering plants. Genome 47:1–8. PubMed

Urfus T, Kopecký M, Urfusová R, Chrtek J.. 2021. Whole genome duplication increases ecological niche breadth of the perennial herb Urtica dioica. Preslia 93:305–319.

van de Peer Y, Mizrachi E, Marchal K.. 2017. The evolutionary significance of polyploidy. Nature Reviews Genetics 18:411–424. PubMed

van Loon JCH. 1987. A cytotaxonomical atlas of the Balkan flora. Berlin/Stuttgart: J. Cramer.

Veselý P, Šmarda P, Bureš P.. 2013. Nutrient reserves may allow for genome size increase: evidence from comparison of geophytes and their sister non-geophytic relatives. Annals of Botany 112:1193–1200. PubMed PMC

Visger CJ, Germain-Aubrey CC, Patel M, Sessa EB, Soltis PS, Soltis DE.. 2016. Niche divergence between diploid and autotetraploid Tolmiea. American Journal of Botany 103:1396–1406. PubMed

Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M.. 2008. Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution 62:2868–2883. PubMed

Warren DL, Matzke NJ, Cardillo M, Baumgartner JB, Beaumont LJ, Turelli M, Glor RE, Huron NA, Simões M, Iglesias TL, Piquet JC, Dinnage R.. 2021. ENMTools 1.0: an R package for comparative ecological biogeography. Ecography 44:504–511.

Wille I. 1998. Symphytum officinale (Boraginaceae) in Süd- und Mittelhessen. Cytologisch-morphologische Untersuchungen zur Abgrenzung der Sippen. Botanik und Naturschutz in Hessen 10:87–119.

Zelený D, Chytrý M.. 2019. Ecological specialization indices for species of the Czech flora. Preslia 91:93–116.

Zelený D, Schaffers AP.. 2012. Too good to be true: pitfalls of using mean Ellenberg indicator values in vegetation analyses. Journal of Vegetation Science 23:419–431.

Zhu GL, Riedl H, Kamelin R.. 1995. Boraginaceae. In: Wu CY, Raven PH, Hong DY, eds. Flora of China 16. Beijing: Science Press; and St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press, 329–427.

Zonneveld BJM. 2001. Nuclear DNA contents of all species of Helleborus (Ranunculaceae) discriminate between species and sectional divisions. Plant Systematics and Evolution 229:125–130.

Zozomová-Lihová J, Krak K, Mandáková T, Shimizu KK, Španiel S, Vít P, Lysák MA.. 2014. Multiple hybridization events in Cardamine (Brassicaceae) during the last 150 years: revisiting a textbook example of neoallopolyploidy. Annals of Botany 113:817–830. PubMed PMC

New estimates and synthesis of chromosome numbers, ploidy levels and genome size variation in Allium sect. Codonoprasum: advancing our understanding of the unresolved diversification and evolution of this section

First insight into the genomes of the Pulmonaria officinalis group (Boraginaceae) provided by repeatome analysis and comparative karyotyping