Free energy calculations on the stability of the 14-3-3ζ protein
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
I 1999
Austrian Science Fund FWF - Austria
W 1224
Austrian Science Fund FWF - Austria
PubMed
29203375
PubMed Central
PMC5881884
DOI
10.1016/j.bbapap.2017.11.012
PII: S1570-9639(17)30280-7
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- 14-3-3 protein, Differential scanning calorimetry, Free energy calculation, Molecular dynamics simulation, Protein stability, Thermodynamic integration,
- MeSH
- cystein chemie genetika metabolismus MeSH
- hydrofobní a hydrofilní interakce MeSH
- kinetika MeSH
- konformace proteinů MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- molekulární modely MeSH
- multimerizace proteinu * MeSH
- mutace MeSH
- počítačová simulace MeSH
- proteiny 14-3-3 chemie genetika metabolismus MeSH
- stabilita proteinů MeSH
- termodynamika * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- cystein MeSH
- proteiny 14-3-3 MeSH
- YWHAZ protein, human MeSH Prohlížeč
Mutations of cysteine are often introduced to e.g. avoid formation of non-physiological inter-molecular disulfide bridges in in-vitro experiments, or to maintain specificity in labeling experiments. Alanine or serine is typically preferred, which usually do not alter the overall protein stability, when the original cysteine was surface exposed. However, selecting the optimal mutation for cysteines in the hydrophobic core of the protein is more challenging. In this work, the stability of selected Cys mutants of 14-3-3ζ was predicted by free-energy calculations and the obtained data were compared with experimentally determined stabilities. Both the computational predictions as well as the experimental validation point at a significant destabilization of mutants C94A and C94S. This destabilization could be attributed to the formation of hydrophobic cavities and a polar solvation of a hydrophilic side chain. A L12E, M78K double mutant was further studied in terms of its reduced dimerization propensity. In contrast to naïve expectations, this double mutant did not lead to the formation of strong salt bridges, which was rationalized in terms of a preferred solvation of the ionic species. Again, experiments agreed with the calculations by confirming the monomerization of the double mutants. Overall, the simulation data is in good agreement with experiments and offers additional insight into the stability and dimerization of this important family of regulatory proteins.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Aitken A, Collinge DB, van Heusden BPH, Isobe T, Roseboom PH, Rosenfeld G, Soll J. 14-3-3 proteins: a highly conserved, widespread family of eukaryotic proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 17:498–501. PubMed
Wang W, Shakes DC. Molecular evolution of the 14-3-3 protein family. J Mol Evol. 1996;43:384–398. PubMed
Rosenquist M, Sehnke P, Ferl RJ, Sommarin M, Larsson C. Evolution of the 14-3-3 protein family: does the large number of isoforms in multicellular organisms reflect functional specificity? J Mol Evol. 2000;51:446–458. PubMed
Aitken A. 14-3-3 proteins: a historic overview. Semin Cancer Biol. 2006;16:162–172. PubMed
Jones DH, Ley S, Aitken A. Isoforms of 14-3-3 protein can form homo- and heterodimers in vivo and in vitro: implications for function as adapter proteins. FEBS Lett. 1995;368:55–58. PubMed
Messaritou G, Grammenoudi S, Skoulakis EMC. Dimerization is essential for 14-3-3 zeta stability and function in vivo. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:1692–1700. PubMed PMC
Yang XW, Lee WH, Sobott F, Papagrigoriou E, Robinson CV, Grossmann JG, Sundstrom M, et al. Structural basis for protein-protein interactions in the 14-3-3 protein family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:17237–17242. PubMed PMC
Liu D, Bienkowska J, Petosa C, Collier RJ, Fu H, Liddington R. Crystal structure of the zeta isoform of the 14-3-3 protein. Nature. 1995;376:191–194. PubMed
Gardino AK, Smerdon SJ, Yaffe MB. Structural determinants of 14-3-3 binding specificities and regulation of subcellular localization of 14-3-3-ligand complexes: a comparison of the X-ray crystal structures of all human 14-3-3 isoforms. Semin Cancer Biol. 2006;16:173–182. PubMed
Burbelo PD, Hall A. 14-3-3 proteins. Hot numbers in signal transduction. Curr Biol. 1995;5:95–96. PubMed
Rubio MP, Geraghty KM, Wong BHC, Wood NT, Campbell DG, Morrice N, Mackintosh C. 14-3-3-affinity purification of over 200 human phosphoproteins reveals new links to regulation of cellular metabolism, proliferation and trafficking. Biochem J. 2004;379:395–408. PubMed PMC
Johnson LN, Barford D. The effects of phosphorylation on the structure and function of proteins. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1993;22:199–232. PubMed
Hubbard MJ, Cohen P. On target with a new mechanism for the regulation of protein phosphorylation. Trends Biochem Sci. 1993;18:172–177. PubMed
Pawson T, Scott JD. Signaling through scaffold, anchoring, and adaptor proteins. Science. 1997;278:2075–2080. PubMed
Pawson T, Raina M, Nash P. Interaction domains: from simple binding events to complex cellular behavior. FEBS Lett. 2002;513:2–10. PubMed
Mackintosh C. Dynamic interactions between 14-3-3 proteins and phosphoproteins regulate diverse cellular processes. Biochem J. 2004;381:329–342. PubMed PMC
Nagata K, Puls A, Futter C, Aspenstrom P, Schaefer E, Nakata T, Hirokawa N, et al. The MAP kinase kinase kinase MLK2 co-localizes with activated JNK along microtubules and associates with kinesin superfamily motor KIF3. EMBO J. 1998;17:149–158. PubMed PMC
Tzivion G, Shen YH, Zhu J. 14-3-3 proteins; bringing new definitions to scaffolding. Oncogene. 2001;20:6331–6338. PubMed
Yaffe MB, Rittinger K, Volinia S, Caron PR, Aitken A, Leffers H, Gamblin SJ, et al. The structural basis for 14-3-3:phosphopeptide binding specificity. Cell. 1997;91:961–971. PubMed
Nagy G, Oostenbrink C, Hritz J. Exploring the binding pathways of the 14-3-3zeta protein: structural and free-energy profiles revealed by Hamiltonian replica exchange molecular dynamics with distancefield distance restraints. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0180633. PubMed PMC
Yaffe MB. How do 14-3-3 proteins work?— gatekeeper phosphorylation and the molecular anvil hypothesis. FEBS Lett. 2002;513:53–57. PubMed
Johnson C, Crowther S, Stafford MJ, Campbell DG, Toth R, MacKintosh C. Bioinformatic and experimental survey of 14-3-3-binding sites. Biochem J. 2010;427:69–78. PubMed PMC
Hritz J, Byeon IjL, Krzysiak T, Martinez A, Sklenar V, Gronenborn AM. Dissection of binding between a phosphorylated tyrosine hydroxylase peptide and 14-3-3ζ: a complex story elucidated by NMR. Biophys J. 2014:2185–2194. PubMed PMC
Rees DC, Robertson AD. Some thermodynamic implications for the thermostability of proteins. Protein Sci. 2001;10:1187–1194. PubMed PMC
Becktel WJ, Schellman JA. Protein stability curves. Biopolymers. 1987;26:1859–1877. PubMed
Razvi A, Scholtz JM. Lessons in stability from thermophilic proteins. Protein Soc. 2006;15:1569–1578. PubMed PMC
Cohen R, Tom, Frey JG, Holström B, IUPAC . Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry. 2nd ed. Blackwell Scientific Publications; Oxford: 1993.
Shi YY, Mark AE, Wang CX, Huang F, Berendsen HJ, van Gunsteren WF. Can the stability of protein mutants be predicted by free energy calculations? Protein Eng. 1993;6:289–295. PubMed
Christ CD, Mark AE, van Gunsteren WF. Feature article basic ingredients of free energy calculations: a review. J Comput Chem. 2010;31:1569–1582. PubMed
Sugita Y, Kitao A. Dependence of protein stability on the structure of the denatured state: free energy calculations of I56V mutation in human lysozyme. Biophys J. 1998;75:2178–2187. PubMed PMC
Eichenberger AP, van Gunsteren WF, Riniker S, von Ziegler L, Hansen N. The key to predicting the stability of protein mutants lies in an accurate description and proper configurational sampling of the folded and denatured states. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2015;1850:983–995. PubMed
Bonet R, Vakonakis I, Campbell ID. Characterization of 14-3-3-zeta interactions with integrin tails. J Mol Biol. 2013;425:3060–3072. PubMed PMC
Schmid N, Christ CD, Christen M, Eichenberger AP, van Gunsteren WF. Architecture, implementation and parallelisation of the GROMOS software for biomolecular simulation. Comput Phys Commun. 2012;183:890–903.
Reif MM, Winger M, Oostenbrink C. Testing of the GROMOS force-field parameter set 54A8: structural properties of electrolyte solutions, lipid bilayers, and proteins. J Chem Theory Comput. 2013;9:1247–1264. PubMed PMC
Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF, Hermans J. Interaction models for water in relation to protein hydration. In: Pullman B, editor. Intermolecular Forces: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Jerusalem Symposium on Quantum Chemistry and Biochemistry Held in Jerusalem, Israel, April 13–16, 1981; Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 1981. pp. 331–342.
Amadei A, Chillemi G, Ceruso MA, Grottesi A, Di Nola A. Molecular dynamics simulations with constrained roto-translational motions: theoretical basis and statistical mechanical consistency. J Chem Phys. 2000;112:9–23.
Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, Vangunsteren WF, Dinola A, Haak JR. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys. 1984;81:3684–3690.
Ryckaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC. Numerical integration of cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints - molecular dynamics of N-alkanes. J Comput Phys. 1977;23:327–341.
Tironi IG, Sperb R, Smith PE, van Gunsteren WF. A generalized reaction field method for molecular dynamics simulations. J Chem Phys. 1995;102:5451–5459.
Heinz TN, van Gunsteren WF, Hünenberger PH. Comparison of four methods to compute the dielectric permittivity of liquids from molecular dynamics simulations. J Chem Phys. 2001;115:1125–1136.
Beutler TC, Mark AE, van Schaik RC, Gerber PR, van Gunsteren WF. Avoiding singularities and numerical instabilities in free energy calculations based on molecular simulations. Chem Phys Lett. 1994;222:529–539.
Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers. 1983;22:2577–2637. PubMed
Hu G, Li H, Liu JY, Wang J. Insight into conformational change for 14-3-3sigma protein by molecular dynamics simulation. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15:2794–2810. PubMed PMC
Dill KA. Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry. 1990;29:7133–7155. PubMed
Nagano N, Ota M, Nishikawa K. Strong hydrophobic nature of cysteine residues in proteins. FEBS Lett. 1999;458:69–71. PubMed
Eriksson AE, Baase WA, Zhang XJ, Heinz DW, Blaber M, Baldwin EP, Matthews BW. Response of a protein structure to cavity-creating mutations and its relation to the hydrophobic effect. Science. 1992;255:178–183. PubMed
Schrödinger L. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. Version~1. 8 ed. 2015.
Sluchanko NN, Gusev NB. Oligomeric structure of 14-3-3 protein: what do we know about monomers? FEBS Lett. 2012;586:4249–4256. PubMed
Reif MM, Oostenbrink C. Net charge changes in the calculation of relative ligandbinding free energies via classical atomistic molecular dynamics simulation. J Comput Chem. 2014;35:227–243. PubMed PMC
Strop P, Mayo SL. Contribution of surface salt bridges to protein stability. Biochemistry. 2000;39:1251–1255. PubMed
Makhatadze GI, Loladze VV, Ermolenko DN, Chen X, Thomas ST. Contribution of surface salt bridges to protein stability: guidelines for protein engineering. J Mol Biol. 2003;327:1135–1148. PubMed
Phosphorylated and Phosphomimicking Variants May Differ-A Case Study of 14-3-3 Protein