A greater proportion of participants with type 2 diabetes achieve treatment targets with insulin degludec/liraglutide versus insulin glargine 100 units/mL at 26 weeks: DUAL VIII, a randomized trial designed to resemble clinical practice
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
Novo Nordisk - International
PubMed
31903724
PubMed Central
PMC7187233
DOI
10.1111/dom.13957
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- clinical trial, insulin degludec, liraglutide, type 2 diabetes,
- MeSH
- diabetes mellitus 2. typu * farmakoterapie MeSH
- dlouhodobě působící inzulin MeSH
- glykovaný hemoglobin analýza MeSH
- hypoglykemika škodlivé účinky MeSH
- inzulin glargin škodlivé účinky MeSH
- krevní glukóza MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- liraglutid * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- dlouhodobě působící inzulin MeSH
- glykovaný hemoglobin MeSH
- hypoglykemika MeSH
- insulin degludec MeSH Prohlížeč
- inzulin glargin MeSH
- krevní glukóza MeSH
- liraglutid * MeSH
This report presents the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) versus insulin glargine 100 units/mL (IGlar U100) as initial injectable therapy at 26 weeks in the 104-week DUAL VIII durability trial (NCT02501161). Participants (N = 1012) with type 2 diabetes (T2D) uncontrolled on oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) were randomized 1:1 to open-label IDegLira or IGlar U100. Visits were scheduled at weeks 1, 2, 4 and 12, and every 3 months thereafter. After 26 weeks, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) reductions were greater with IDegLira versus IGlar U100 (-21.5 vs. -16.4 mmol/mol [-2.0 vs. -1.5%]), as was the percentage of participants achieving HbA1c <53 mmol/mol (78.7% vs. 55.7%) and HbA1c targets without weight gain and/or hypoglycaemia. Estimated treatment differences for insulin dose (-13.01 U) and body weight change (-1.57 kg) significantly favoured IDegLira. The hypoglycaemia rate was 44% lower with IDegLira versus IGlar U100. Safety results were similar. In a trial resembling clinical practice, more participants receiving IDegLira than IGlar U100 met treatment targets, supporting use of IDegLira as an initial injectable therapy for people with T2D uncontrolled on OADs and eligible for insulin initiation.
Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts United States
Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine Sapienza University of Rome Rome Italy
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism Hacettepe University School of Medicine Ankara Turkey
MedStar Health Research Institute Hyattsville Maryland United States
Zobrazit více v PubMed
American Diabetes Association . 9. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: standards of medical care in diabetes‐2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42:S90‐S102. PubMed
Davies MJ, D'Alessio DA, Fradkin J, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2018;41:2669‐2701. PubMed PMC
Roumie CL, Greevy RA, Grijalva CG, Hung AM, Liu X, Griffin MR. Diabetes treatment intensification and associated changes in HbA1c and body mass index: a cohort study. BMC Endocr Disord. 2016;16:32. PubMed PMC
Blonde L, Raccah D, Lew E, et al. Treatment intensification in type 2 diabetes: A real‐world study of 2‐OAD regimens, GLP‐1 RAs, or basal insulin. Diabetes Ther. 2018;9:1169‐1184. PubMed PMC
Buysman EK, Fan T, Blauer‐Peterson C, Miller‐Wilson LA. Glycaemic impact of treatment intensification in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with oral antidiabetes drugs or basal insulin. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2018;1:e00019. PubMed PMC
Gough SC, Bode B, Woo V, et al. Efficacy and safety of a fixed‐ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) compared with its components given alone: results of a phase 3, open‐label, randomised, 26‐week, treat‐to‐target trial in insulin‐naive patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2:885‐893. PubMed
Philis‐Tsimikas A, Billings LK, Busch R, et al. Superior efficacy of insulin degludec/liraglutide versus insulin glargine U100 as add‐on to sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitor therapy: A randomized clinical trial in people with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019;21:1399‐1408. PubMed PMC
Rodbard HW, Bode BW, Harris SB, et al. Safety and efficacy of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) added to sulphonylurea alone or to sulphonylurea and metformin in insulin‐naive people with Type 2 diabetes: the DUAL IV trial. Diabet Med. 2017;34:189‐196. PubMed PMC
Gough SC, Bode BW, Woo VC, et al. One‐year efficacy and safety of a fixed combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of a 26‐week extension to a 26‐week main trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17:965‐973. PubMed PMC
Harris SB, Kocsis G, Prager R, et al. Safety and efficacy of IDegLira titrated once weekly versus twice weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on oral antidiabetic drugs: DUAL VI randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19:858‐865. PubMed PMC
Aroda VR, Gonzalez‐Galvez G, Gron R, et al. Durability of insulin degludec plus liraglutide versus insulin glargine U100 as initial injectable therapy in type 2 diabetes (DUAL VIII): a multicentre, open‐label, phase 3b, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7:596‐605. PubMed
International Conference of Harmonisation . ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline Good Clinical Practice; 1996.
World Medical Association . World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310:2191‐2194. PubMed
Marso SP, Daniels GH, Brown‐Frandsen K, et al. Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:311‐322. PubMed PMC
Abdul‐Ghani M, DeFronzo RA. Is it time to change the type 2 diabetes treatment paradigm? Yes! GLP‐1 RAs should replace metformin in the type 2 diabetes algorithm. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:1121‐1127. PubMed PMC
Ratner RE, Gough SC, Mathieu C, et al. Hypoglycaemia risk with insulin degludec compared with insulin glargine in type 2 and type 1 diabetes: a pre‐planned meta‐analysis of phase 3 trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15:175‐184. PubMed PMC
Heise T, Hermanski L, Nosek L, Feldman A, Rasmussen S, Haahr H. Insulin degludec: four times lower pharmacodynamic variability than insulin glargine under steady‐state conditions in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012;14:859‐864. PubMed
Marso SP, McGuire DK, Zinman B, et al. Efficacy and safety of degludec versus glargine in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:723‐732. PubMed PMC