Guideline-based indicators for adult patients with myelodysplastic syndromes
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
32841339
PubMed Central
PMC7448599
DOI
10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002314
PII: S2473-9529(20)31163-0
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- myelodysplastické syndromy * diagnóza terapie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) represent a heterogeneous group of hematological stem cell disorders with an increasing burden on health care systems. Evidence-based MDS guidelines and recommendations (G/Rs) are published but do not necessarily translate into better quality of care if adherence is not maintained in daily clinical practice. Guideline-based indicators (GBIs) are measurable elements for the standardized assessment of quality of care and, thus far, have not been developed for adult MDS patients. To this end, we screened relevant G/Rs published between 1999 and 2018 and aggregated all available information as candidate GBIs into a formalized handbook as the basis for the subsequent consensus rating procedure. An international multidisciplinary expert panel group (EPG) of acknowledged MDS experts (n = 17), health professionals (n = 7), and patient advocates (n = 5) was appointed. The EPG feedback rates for the first and second round were 82% (23 of 28) and 96% (26 of 27), respectively. A final set of 29 GBIs for the 3 domains of diagnosis (n = 14), therapy (n = 8), and provider/infrastructural characteristics (n = 7) achieved the predefined agreement score for selection (>70%). We identified shortcomings in standardization of patient-reported outcomes, toxicity, and geriatric assessments that need to be optimized in the future. Our GBIs represent the first comprehensive consensus on measurable elements addressing best practice performance, outcomes, and structural resources. They can be used as a standardized instrument with the goal of assessing, comparing, and fostering good quality of care within clinical development cycles in the daily care of adult MDS patients.
3rd Medical Department Hanusch Hospital Vienna Austria
Amsterdam University Medical Center Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
Clinic of Hematology Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland Bellinzona Switzerland
Department for BioMedical Research University of Bern Bern Switzerland
Department of Hematology and Central Hematology Laboratory Inselspital Bern University Hospital and
Department of Hematology Leeds Teaching Hospitals Leeds United Kingdom
Department of Hematology University Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland
Department of Internal Medicine 5 Innsbruck Medical University Innsbruck Austria
Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology Cantonal Hospital St Gallen St Gallen Switzerland
Department of Medical Oncology Dana Farber Cancer Institute Harvard Medical School Boston MA
Department of Molecular Medicine University of Pavia Pavia Italy
Department of Physiotherapy Bern University Hospital Bern Switzerland
Department of Public Health Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam The Netherlands
Fondazione Italiana Sindromi Mielodisplastiche Florence Italy
Hôpital St Louis Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris Paris University Paris France
Hospital da Luz Lisboa Portugal
Institute of Pharmacology University of Bern Bern Switzerland
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine and
MDS Unit Hematology Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi University of Florence Florence Italy
Policlinic 1 Hematology and Cellular Therapy Leipzig University Hospital Leipzig Germany
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993;342(8883):1317-1322. PubMed
Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA; The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group . Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. BMJ. 1998;317(7156):465-468. PubMed PMC
Lawrence M, Olesen F. Indicators of quality in health care. Eur J Gen Pract. 1997;3(3):103-108.
Lugtenberg M, Burgers JS, Westert GP. Effects of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on quality of care: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18(5):385-392. PubMed
Shapiro DW, Lasker RD, Bindman AB, Lee PR. Containing costs while improving quality of care: the role of profiling and practice guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health. 1993;14:219-241. PubMed
Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med. 2010;363(26):2477-2481. PubMed
Califf RM, Peterson ED, Gibbons RJ, et al. ; American Heart Association . Integrating quality into the cycle of therapeutic development. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40(11):1895-1901. PubMed
Shekelle PG. Quality indicators and performance measures: methods for development need more standardization. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(12):1338-1339. PubMed
Chiang AC. Why the quality oncology practice initiative matters: it’s not just about cost. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:e102-e107. PubMed
Kowalski C, Schulte H, Wesselmann S. Reporting program for cancer care quality indicators. J Oncol Pract. 2015;11(2):158-160. PubMed
Wennekes L, Ottevanger PB, Raemaekers JM, et al. . Development and measurement of guideline-based indicators for patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(11):1436-1444. PubMed
Wood L, Bjarnason GA, Black PC, et al. . Using the Delphi technique to improve clinical outcomes through the development of quality indicators in renal cell carcinoma. J Oncol Pract. 2013;9(5):e262-e267. PubMed
Spencer BA, Steinberg M, Malin J, Adams J, Litwin MS. Quality-of-care indicators for early-stage prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(10):1928-1936. PubMed
Bilimoria KY, Raval MV, Bentrem DJ, Wayne JD, Balch CM, Ko CY. National assessment of melanoma care using formally developed quality indicators. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(32):5445-5451. PubMed
Greenberg PL. Myelodysplastic syndromes: dissecting the heterogeneity. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(15):1937-1938. PubMed
Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. . The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127(20):2391-2405. PubMed
Cogle CR. Incidence and burden of the myelodysplastic syndromes. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2015;10(3):272-281. PubMed PMC
Bonadies N, Feller A, Rovo A, et al. ; NICER Working Group . Trends of classification, incidence, mortality, and survival of MDS patients in Switzerland between 2001 and 2012. Cancer Epidemiol. 2017;46:85-92. PubMed
Frosch ZA, Abel GA. Assessing quality of care for the myelodysplastic syndromes. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2016;11(6):402-407. PubMed
Campbell SM, Braspenning J, Hutchinson A, Marshall M. Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11(4):358-364. PubMed PMC
Kötter T, Blozik E, Scherer M. Methods for the guideline-based development of quality indicators–a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):21. PubMed PMC
Ketelaars CA. Using the RUMBA requirements in developing criteria. Nurs Qual Connect. 1994;4(2):7. PubMed
Chassin M. How do we decide whether an investigation or procedure is appropriate? : Hopkins A, Appropriate Investigation and Treatment in Clinical Practice. London, United Kingdom: Royal College of Physicians; 1989.
Coulter I, Herman P, Ryan G, Hilton L, Hays RD; Members of CERC Team . The challenge of determining appropriate care in the era of patient-centered care and rising health care costs. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2019;24(3):201-206. PubMed PMC
Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M, Sibony O, Alberti C. Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20476. PubMed PMC
Shekelle PG, Woolf SH, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: developing guidelines. BMJ. 1999;318(7183):593-596. PubMed PMC
European Consortium for Accreditation ECA Principles for the Selection of Experts. http://ecahe.eu/w/images/1/11/Eca-principles-for-the-selection-of-experts.pdf. Accessed 10 January 2018.
Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. ; REDCap Consortium . The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208. PubMed PMC
Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau MM, et al. . International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 1997;89(6):2079-2088. PubMed
Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J, et al. . Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2012;120(12):2454-2465. PubMed PMC
Malcovati L, Papaemmanuil E, Ambaglio I, et al. . Driver somatic mutations identify distinct disease entities within myeloid neoplasms with myelodysplasia. Blood. 2014;124(9):1513-1521. PubMed PMC
Bejar R, Stevenson K, Abdel-Wahab O, et al. . Clinical effect of point mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(26):2496-2506. PubMed PMC
Bejar R, Stevenson KE, Caughey B, et al. . Somatic mutations predict poor outcome in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(25):2691-2698. PubMed PMC
Della Porta MG, Malcovati L, Boveri E, et al. . Clinical relevance of bone marrow fibrosis and CD34-positive cell clusters in primary myelodysplastic syndromes. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(5):754-762. PubMed
Sorror ML, Maris MB, Storb R, et al. . Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index: a new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT. Blood. 2005;106(8):2912-2919. PubMed PMC
Moreno Berggren D, Folkvaljon Y, Engvall M, et al. . Prognostic scoring systems for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in a population-based setting: a report from the Swedish MDS register. Br J Haematol. 2018;181(5):614-627. PubMed
Regionala Cancercentrum SYD. Kvalitetsregisterrapporter MDS. https://www.cancercentrum.se/syd/cancerdiagnoser/blod-lymfom-myelom/myelodysplastiskt-syndrom-mds/kvalitetsregister/rapporter/. Accessed 11 January 2019.
Rochau U, Stojkov I, Conrads-Frank A, et al. . Development of a core outcome set for myelodysplastic syndromes—a Delphi study from the EUMDS Registry Group. Br. J. Haematol. doi:10.1111/bjh.16654 PubMed DOI PMC
University of Chicago Hematopoietic Malignancies Cancer Risk Team How I diagnose and manage individuals at risk for inherited myeloid malignancies. Blood. 2016;128(14):1800-1813. PubMed PMC
Fenaux P, Platzbecker U, Mufti GJ, et al. . Luspatercept in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(2):140-151. PubMed
Abel GA, Cronin AM, Odejide OO, Uno H, Stone RM, Steensma DP. Influence of patient and provider characteristics on quality of care for the myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol. 2016;173(5):713-721. PubMed
Gattermann N, Kündgen A, Kellermann L, Zeffel M, Paessens B, Germing U. The impact of age on the diagnosis and therapy of myelodysplastic syndromes: results from a retrospective multicenter analysis in Germany. Eur J Haematol. 2013;91(6):473-482. PubMed
Santini V, Della Porta M, Enrico B, et al. . Evaluation of adherence to treatment recommendations according to Italian and European guidelines in MDS patients enrolled in the Italian FISiM Registry. In: Proceedings from the 15th International Symposium on Myelodysplastic Syndromes; 8-11 May 2019; Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dinmohamed AG, van Norden Y, Visser O, et al. . The use of medical claims to assess incidence, diagnostic procedures and initial treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in the Netherlands. Leuk Res. 2015;39(2):177-182. PubMed
Dinmohamed AG, Visser O, Posthuma EFM, et al. . MDS classification is improving in an era of the WHO 2016 criteria of MDS: a population-based analysis among 9159 MDS patients diagnosed in the Netherlands. Cancer Epidemiol. 2017;50(pt A):137-140. PubMed
Thol F, Platzbecker U. Do next-generation sequencing results drive diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in MDS? Blood Adv. 2019;3(21):3449-3453. PubMed PMC
Sanz GF, Ibañez M, Such E. Do next-generation sequencing results drive diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in MDS? Blood Adv. 2019;3(21):3454-3460. PubMed PMC
Hellström-Lindberg E, Gulbrandsen N, Lindberg G, et al. ; Scandinavian MDS Group . A validated decision model for treating the anaemia of myelodysplastic syndromes with erythropoietin + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: significant effects on quality of life. Br J Haematol. 2003;120(6):1037-1046. PubMed
Kasprzak A, Nachtkamp K, Kondakci M, et al. . Combined retro- and prospective analysis of adherence to guidelines and patient-tailored therapeutic recommendations in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) at a tertiary care centre [abstract]. Blood. 2019;134(suppl 1). Abstract 4250.
de Witte T, Bowen D, Robin M, et al. . Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for MDS and CMML: recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood. 2017;129(13):1753-1762. PubMed PMC
Fenaux P, Haase D, Sanz GF, Santini V, Buske C; ESMO Guidelines Working Group . Myelodysplastic syndromes: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(suppl 3):iii57-iii69. PubMed
Malcovati L, Hellström-Lindberg E, Bowen D, et al. ; European Leukemia Net . Diagnosis and treatment of primary myelodysplastic syndromes in adults: recommendations from the European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2013;122(17):2943-2964. PubMed PMC
Killick SB, Carter C, Culligan D, et al. ; British Committee for Standards in Haematology . Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of adult myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol. 2014;164(4):503-525. PubMed