Search for top squark pair production using dilepton final states in pp collision data collected at s = 13 TeV

. 2021 ; 81 (1) : 3. [epub] 20210105

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Francie Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid33465186

A search is presented for supersymmetric partners of the top quark (top squarks) in final states with two oppositely charged leptons (electrons or muons), jets identified as originating from b quarks, and missing transverse momentum. The search uses data from proton-proton collisions at s = 13 TeV collected with the CMS detector, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb - 1 . Hypothetical signal events are efficiently separated from the dominant top quark pair production background with requirements on the significance of the missing transverse momentum and on transverse mass variables. No significant deviation is observed from the expected background. Exclusion limits are set in the context of simplified supersymmetric models with pair-produced lightest top squarks. For top squarks decaying exclusively to a top quark and a lightest neutralino, lower limits are placed at 95 % confidence level on the masses of the top squark and the neutralino up to 925 and 450 GeV , respectively. If the decay proceeds via an intermediate chargino, the corresponding lower limits on the mass of the lightest top squark are set up to 850 GeV for neutralino masses below 420 GeV . For top squarks undergoing a cascade decay through charginos and sleptons, the mass limits reach up to 1.4 TeV and 900 GeV respectively for the top squark and the lightest neutralino.

Academy of Scientific Research and Technology of the Arab Republic of Egypt Egyptian Network of High Energy Physics Cairo Egypt

AGH University of Science and Technology Faculty of Computer Science Electronics and Telecommunications Krakow Poland

Baylor University Waco USA

Beihang University Beijing China

Benemerita Universidad Autonoma de Puebla Puebla Mexico

Bhabha Atomic Research Centre Mumbai India

Bogazici University Istanbul Turkey

Boston University Boston USA

Brown University Providence USA

Brunel University Uxbridge UK

California Institute of Technology Pasadena USA

Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh USA

Catholic University of America Washington DC USA

Center for High Energy Physics Fayoum University El Fayoum Egypt

Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas Rio de Janeiro Brazil

Centro de Investigacion y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN Mexico City Mexico

Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas Medioambientales y Tecnológicas Madrid Spain

CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research Geneva Switzerland

Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Chonnam National University Institute for Universe and Elementary Particles Kwangju Korea

Cornell University Ithaca USA

Department of Physics Faculty of Science Chulalongkorn University Bangkok Thailand

Department of Physics Isfahan University of Technology Isfahan Iran

Department of Physics Tsinghua University Beijing China

Department of Physics University of California Santa Barbara Santa Barbara USA

Department of Physics University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland

Department of Physics University of Ruhuna Matara Sri Lanka

Department of Physics Yonsei University Seoul Korea

Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron Hamburg Germany

Escuela Politecnica Nacional Quito Ecuador

Eszterhazy Karoly University Karoly Robert Campus Gyongyos Hungary

ETH Zurich Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics Zurich Switzerland

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia USA

Florida Institute of Technology Melbourne USA

Florida State University Tallahassee USA

Georgian Technical University Tbilisi Georgia

Ghent University Ghent Belgium

Hanyang University Seoul Korea

Helsinki Institute of Physics Helsinki Finland

Imperial College London UK

Indian Institute of Science Bangalore India

Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune India

Indian Institute of Technology Madras Madras India

INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati Frascati Italy

INFN Sezione di Bari Università di Bari Politecnico di Bari Bari Italy

INFN Sezione di Bologna Università di Bologna Bologna Italy

INFN Sezione di Catania Università di Catania Catania Italy

INFN Sezione di Firenze Università di Firenze Florence Italy

INFN Sezione di Genova Università di Genova Genoa Italy

INFN Sezione di Milano Bicocca Università di Milano Bicocca Milan Italy

INFN Sezione di Napoli Università di Napoli 'Federico II' Napoli Italy Università della Basilicata Potenza Italy Università G Marconi Rome Italy

INFN Sezione di Padova Università di Padova Padova Italy Università di Trento Trento Italy

INFN Sezione di Pavia Università di Pavia Pavia Italy

INFN Sezione di Perugia Università di Perugia Perugia Italy

INFN Sezione di Pisa Università di Pisa Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa Pisa Italy

INFN Sezione di Roma Sapienza Università di Roma Rome Italy

INFN Sezione di Torino Università di Torino Turin Italy Università del Piemonte Orientale Novara Italy

INFN Sezione di Trieste Università di Trieste Trieste Italy

Institut für Hochenergiephysik Vienna Austria

Institute for High Energy Physics of National Research Centre 'Kurchatov Institute' Protvino Russia

Institute for Nuclear Problems Minsk Belarus

Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Sofia Bulgaria

Institute for Nuclear Research Moscow Russia

Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences Tehran Iran

Institute for Scintillation Materials of National Academy of Science of Ukraine Kharkov Ukraine

Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics named by A 1 Alikhanov of NRC 'Kurchatov Institute' Moscow Russia

Institute of Experimental Physics Faculty of Physics University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland

Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing China

Institute of Modern Physics and Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion beam Application Fudan University Shanghai China

Institute of Nuclear and Particle Physics NCSR Demokritos Aghia Paraskevi Greece

Institute of Nuclear Research ATOMKI Debrecen Hungary

Institute of Physics University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary

Institute Rudjer Boskovic Zagreb Croatia

Instituto de Física de Cantabria CSIC Universidad de Cantabria Santander Spain

IRFU CEA Université Paris Saclay Gif sur Yvette France

Istanbul Technical University Istanbul Turkey

Istanbul University Istanbul Turkey

Johns Hopkins University Baltimore USA

Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna Russia

Kansas State University Manhattan USA

Karlsruher Institut fuer Technologie Karlsruhe Germany

Korea University Seoul Korea

Kyung Hee University Department of Physics Seoul Republic of Korea

Kyungpook National University Daegu Korea

Laboratoire Leprince Ringuet CNRS IN2P3 Ecole Polytechnique Institut Polytechnique de Paris Paris France

Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas Lisbon Portugal

Lappeenranta University of Technology Lappeenranta Finland

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore USA

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge USA

Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology Moscow Russia

MTA ELTE Lendület CMS Particle and Nuclear Physics Group Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece

National Central University Chung Li Taiwan

National Centre for Nuclear Research Swierk Poland

National Centre for Particle Physics Universiti Malaya Kuala Lumpur Malaysia

National Centre for Physics Quaid 1 Azam University Islamabad Pakistan

National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics Tallinn Estonia

National Institute of Science Education and Research HBNI Bhubaneswar India

National Research Nuclear University 'Moscow Engineering Physics Institute' Moscow Russia

National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University Tomsk Russia

National Scientific Center Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology Kharkov Ukraine

National Taiwan University Taipei Taiwan

National Technical University of Athens Athens Greece

Northeastern University Boston USA

Northwestern University Evanston USA

Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russia

P N Lebedev Physical Institute Moscow Russia

Panjab University Chandigarh India

Paul Scherrer Institut Villigen Switzerland

Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute Gatchina Russia

Physics Department Middle East Technical University Ankara Turkey

Physics Department Science and Art Faculty Çukurova University Adana Turkey

Princeton University Princeton USA

Purdue University Northwest Hammond USA

Purdue University West Lafayette USA

Rice University Houston USA

Riga Technical University Riga Latvia

Rutgers The State University of New Jersey Piscataway USA

Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot UK

RWTH Aachen University 1 Physikalisches Institut Aachen Germany

RWTH Aachen University 3 Physikalisches Institut A Aachen Germany

RWTH Aachen University 3 Physikalisches Institut B Aachen Germany

Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics HBNI Kolkata India

Sejong University Seoul Korea

Seoul National University Seoul Korea

Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics Lomonosov Moscow State University Moscow Russia

State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology Peking University Beijing China

State University of New York at Buffalo Buffalo USA

Sun Yat Sen University Guangzhou China

Sungkyunkwan University Suwon Korea

Tata Institute of Fundamental Research A Mumbai India

Tata Institute of Fundamental Research B Mumbai India

Texas A and M University College Station USA

Texas Tech University Lubbock USA

The Ohio State University Columbus USA

The University of Alabama Tuscaloosa USA

The University of Iowa Iowa City USA

The University of Kansas Lawrence USA

Tomsk State University Tomsk Russia

Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Madrid Spain

Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí San Luis Potosí Mexico

Universidad de Antioquia Medellin Colombia

Universidad de Los Andes Bogota Colombia

Universidad de Oviedo Instituto Universitario de Ciencias y Tecnologías Espaciales de Asturias Oviedo Spain

Universidad de Sonora Hermosillo Mexico

Universidad Iberoamericana Mexico City Mexico

Universidad San Francisco de Quito Quito Ecuador

Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil

Universidade Estadual Paulista Universidade Federal do ABC São Paulo Brazil

Universität Zürich Zurich Switzerland

Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain la Neuve Belgium

Université de Lyon Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 CNRS IN2P3 Institut de Physique Nucléaire de Lyon Villeurbanne France

Université de Strasbourg CNRS IPHC UMR 7178 Strasbourg France

Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium

Universiteit Antwerpen Antwerp Belgium

University College Dublin Dublin Ireland

University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand

University of Belgrade Faculty of Physics and VINCA Institute of Nuclear Sciences Belgrade Serbia

University of Bristol Bristol UK

University of California Davis Davis USA

University of California Los Angeles USA

University of California Riverside Riverside USA

University of California San Diego La Jolla USA

University of Canterbury Christchurch New Zealand

University of Colombo Colombo Sri Lanka

University of Colorado Boulder Boulder USA

University of Cyprus Nicosia Cyprus

University of Delhi Delhi India

University of Florida Gainesville USA

University of Hamburg Hamburg Germany

University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago USA

University of Ioánnina Ioánnina Greece

University of Maryland College Park USA

University of Minnesota Minneapolis USA

University of Mississippi Oxford USA

University of Montenegro Podgorica Montenegro

University of Nebraska Lincoln Lincoln USA

University of Notre Dame Notre Dame USA

University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez USA

University of Rochester Rochester USA

University of Seoul Seoul Korea

University of Sofia Sofia Bulgaria

University of Split Faculty of Electrical Engineering Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture Split Croatia

University of Split Faculty of Science Split Croatia

University of Tennessee Knoxville USA

University of Virginia Charlottesville USA

University of Wisconsin Madison Madison WI USA

Vanderbilt University Nashville USA

Vilnius University Vilnius Lithuania

Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussels Belgium

Wayne State University Detroit USA

Wigner Research Centre for Physics Budapest Hungary

Yerevan Physics Institute Yerevan Armenia

Zhejiang University Hangzhou China

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Witten E. Dynamical breaking of supersymmetry. Nucl. Phys. B. 1981;188:513. doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(81)90006-7. DOI

Barbieri R, Giudice GF. Upper bounds on supersymmetric particle masses. Nucl. Phys. B. 1988;306:63. doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(88)90171-X. DOI

ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC”, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1, 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020, arXiv:1207.7214

CMS Collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012). 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021. arXiv:1207.7235

Bertone G, Hooper D, Silk J. Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints. Phys. Rept. 2005;405:279. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031. DOI

Feng JL. Dark matter candidates from particle physics and methods of detection. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2010;48:495. doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101659. DOI

Ramond P. Dual theory for free fermions. Phys. Rev. D. 1971;3:2415. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.3.2415. DOI

Gol’fand YA, Likhtman EP. Extension of the algebra of Poincaré group generators and violation of P invariance. JETP Lett. 1971;13:323.

Neveu A, Schwarz JH. Factorizable dual model of pions. Nucl. Phys. B. 1971;31:86. doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(71)90448-2. DOI

Volkov DV, Akulov VP. Possible universal neutrino interaction. JETP Lett. 1972;16:438.

Wess J, Zumino B. A Lagrangian model invariant under supergauge transformations. Phys. Lett. B. 1974;49:52. doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(74)90578-4. DOI

Wess J, Zumino B. Supergauge transformations in four dimensions. Nucl. Phys. B. 1974;70:39. doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(74)90355-1. DOI

Fayet P. Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino. Nucl. Phys. B. 1975;90:104. doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(75)90636-7. DOI

Nilles HP. Supersymmetry, supergravity and particle physics. Phys. Rep. 1984;110:1. doi: 10.1016/0370-1573(84)90008-5. DOI

Dimopoulos S, Georgi H. Softly broken supersymmetry and SU(5) Nucl. Phys. B. 1981;193:150. doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(81)90522-8. DOI

Kaul RK, Majumdar P. Cancellation of quadratically divergent mass corrections in globally supersymmetric spontaneously broken gauge theories. Nucl. Phys. B. 1982;199:36. doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(82)90565-X. DOI

Farrar GR, Fayet P. Phenomenology of the production, decay, and detection of new hadronic states associated with supersymmetry. Phys. Lett. B. 1978;76:575. doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(78)90858-4. DOI

Papucci M, Ruderman JT, Weiler A. Natural SUSY endures. JHEP. 2012;09:035. doi: 10.1007/JHEP09(2012)035. DOI

Smith J, van Neerven WL, Vermaseren JAM. The transverse mass and width of the DOI

Lester CG, Summers DJ. Measuring masses of semi-invisibly decaying particles pair produced at hadron colliders. Phys. Lett. B. 1999;463:99. doi: 10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00945-4. DOI

Alwall J, Schuster P, Toro N. Simplified models for a first characterization of new physics at the LHC. Phys. Rev. D. 2009;79:075020. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.075020. DOI

Alwall J, Le M-P, Lisanti M, Wacker JG. Model-independent jets plus missing energy searches. Phys. Rev. D. 2009;79:015005. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.015005. DOI

LHC New Physics Working Group, Simplified models for LHC new physics searches. J. Phys. G 39, 105005 (2012). 10.1088/0954-3899/39/10/105005. arXiv:1105.2838

CMS Collaboration, Interpretation of searches for supersymmetry with simplified models. Phys. Rev. D 88, 052017 (2013). 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.052017. arXiv:1301.2175

ATLAS Collaboration, “ATLAS Run 1 searches for direct pair production of third-generation squarks at the Large Hadron Collider”, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 510, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3726-9, arXiv:1506.08616. [Erratum: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-3935-x] PubMed PMC

ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for top squark pair production in final states with one isolated lepton, jets, and missing transverse momentum in

ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for direct top-squark pair production in final states with two leptons in pp collisions at

ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for top squarks in final states with one isolated lepton, jets, and missing transverse momentum in

ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for direct top squark pair production in final states with two leptons in PubMed PMC

ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for a scalar partner of the top quark in the jets plus missing transverse momentum final state at

ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for top-squark pair production in final states with one lepton, jets, and missing transverse momentum using 36 fb

ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for a scalar partner of the top quark in the all-hadronic

CMS Collaboration, Search for top-squark pair production in the single-lepton final state in pp collisions at

CMS Collaboration, Search for direct pair production of scalar top quarks in the single- and dilepton channels in proton-proton collisions at

CMS Collaboration, Searches for pair production of third-generation squarks in PubMed PMC

CMS Collaboration, Search for top squark pair production in pp collisions at

CMS Collaboration, Search for direct production of supersymmetric partners of the top quark in the all-jets final state in proton-proton collisions at

CMS Collaboration, Search for top squarks and dark matter particles in opposite-charge dilepton final states at

CMS Collaboration, Search for the pair production of light top squarks in the e

CMS Collaboration, Search for direct top squark pair production in events with one lepton, jets, and missing transverse momentum at 13 TeV with the CMS experiment. JHEP 05, 032 (2020). 10.1007/JHEP05(2020)032. arXiv:1912.08887

CMS Collaboration, The CMS trigger system. JINST 12, P01020 (2017). 10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01020. arXiv:1609.02366

CMS Collaboration, The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC. JINST 3, S08004 (2008). 10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004

Nason P. A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms. JHEP. 2004;11:040. doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040. DOI

Frixione S, Nason P, Oleari C. Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method. JHEP. 2007;11:070. doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070. DOI

Alioli S, Nason P, Oleari C, Re E. A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX. JHEP. 2010;06:043. doi: 10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043. DOI

Campbell JM, Ellis RK, Nason P, Re E. Top-pair production and decay at NLO matched with parton showers. JHEP. 2015;04:114. doi: 10.1007/JHEP04(2015)114. DOI

S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, E. Re, NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG:

Frixione S, Nason P, Ridolfi G. A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction. JHEP. 2007;09:126. doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/126. DOI

Aliev M, et al. HATHOR: HAdronic Top and Heavy quarks crOss section calculatoR. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2011;182:1034. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2010.12.040. DOI

Kant P, et al. HatHor for single top-quark production: Updated predictions and uncertainty estimates for single top-quark production in hadronic collisions. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2015;191:74. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2015.02.001. DOI

Czakon M, Mitov A. Top++: a program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2014;185:2930. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2014.06.021. DOI

Re E. Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2011;71:1547. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1547-z. DOI

Kidonakis N. Two-loop soft anomalous dimensions for single top quark associated production with a W- or H- Phys. Rev. D. 2010;82:054018. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.054018. DOI

Kidonakis N. NNLL threshold resummation for top-pair and single-top production. Phys. Part. Nucl. 2014;45:714. doi: 10.1134/S1063779614040091. DOI

Hartanto HB, Jager B, Reina L, Wackeroth D. Higgs boson production in association with top quarks in the POWHEG BOX. Phys. Rev. D. 2015;91:094003. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.094003. DOI

Alwall J, et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations. JHEP. 2014;07:079. doi: 10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079. DOI

Gavin R, Li Y, Petriello F, Quackenbush S. FEWZ 2.0: A code for hadronic Z production at next-to-next-to-leading order. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2011;182:2388. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2011.06.008. DOI

Garzelli MV, Kardos A, Papadopoulos CG, Trocsanyi Z. DOI

Frixione S, et al. Electroweak and QCD corrections to top-pair hadroproduction in association with heavy bosons. JHEP. 2015;06:184. doi: 10.1007/JHEP06(2015)184. DOI

LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, “Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector”, CERN (2016) 10.23731/CYRM-2017-002, arXiv:1610.07922

Sjöstrand T, et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2015;191:159. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024. DOI

Skands P, Carrazza S, Rojo J. Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash tune. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2013;74(2014):3024. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3024-y. DOI

CMS Collaboration, Event generator tunes obtained from underlying event and multiparton scattering measurements. Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 155 (2016). 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-3988-x. arXiv:1512.00815 PubMed PMC

CMS Collaboration, Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements. Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 4 (2020). 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7499-4. arXiv:1903.12179 PubMed PMC

NNPDF Collaboration, “Parton distributions for the LHC Run II”, JHEP 04 (2015) 040, 10.1007/JHEP04(2015)040, arXiv:1410.8849

NNPDF Collaboration, “Parton distributions from high-precision collider data”, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 663, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5199-5, arXiv:1706.00428 PubMed PMC

Alwall J, et al. Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2008;53:473. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0490-5. DOI

Frederix R, Frixione S. Merging meets matching in MC@NLO. JHEP. 2012;12:061. doi: 10.1007/JHEP12(2012)061. DOI

GEANT4 Collaboration, Geant4–a simulation toolkit. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506, 250 (2003). 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

Beenakker W, Hopker R, Spira M, Zerwas PM. Squark and gluino production at hadron colliders. Nucl. Phys. B. 1997;492:51. doi: 10.1016/S0550-3213(97)80027-2. DOI

Kulesza A, Motyka L. Threshold resummation for squark-antisquark and gluino-pair production at the LHC. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009;102:111802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.111802. PubMed DOI

Kulesza A, Motyka L. Soft gluon resummation for the production of gluino-gluino and squark-antisquark pairs at the LHC. Phys. Rev. D. 2009;80:095004. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.095004. PubMed DOI

Beenakker W, et al. Soft-gluon resummation for squark and gluino hadroproduction. JHEP. 2009;12:041. doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/12/041. DOI

Beenakker W, et al. Squark and gluino hadroproduction. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A. 2011;26:2637. doi: 10.1142/S0217751X11053560. DOI

Borschensky C, et al. Squark and gluino production cross sections in pp collisions at PubMed DOI PMC

Beenakker W, et al. NNLL resummation for squark-antisquark pair production at the LHC. JHEP. 2012;01:076. doi: 10.1007/JHEP01(2012)076. DOI

Beenakker W, et al. Towards NNLL resummation: hard matching coefficients for squark and gluino hadroproduction. JHEP. 2013;10:120. doi: 10.1007/JHEP10(2013)120. DOI

Beenakker W, et al. NNLL resummation for squark and gluino production at the LHC. JHEP. 2014;12:023. doi: 10.1007/JHEP12(2014)023. DOI

Beenakker W, et al. NNLL-fast: predictions for coloured supersymmetric particle production at the LHC with threshold and Coulomb resummation. JHEP. 2016;12:133. doi: 10.1007/JHEP12(2016)133. DOI

Beenakker W, et al. Stop production at hadron colliders. Nucl. Phys. B. 1998;515:3. doi: 10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00014-5. DOI

Beenakker W, et al. Supersymmetric top and bottom squark production at hadron colliders. JHEP. 2010;08:098. doi: 10.1007/JHEP08(2010)098. DOI

Beenakker W, et al. NNLL resummation for stop pair-production at the LHC. JHEP. 2016;05:153. doi: 10.1007/JHEP05(2016)153. DOI

CMS Collaboration, The Fast Simulation of the CMS detector at LHC. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 331, 032049 (2011). 10.1088/1742-6596/331/3/032049

Giammanco A. The Fast Simulation of the CMS experiment. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2014;513:022012. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/513/2/022012. DOI

CMS Collaboration, Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector. JINST 12, P10003 (2017). 10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/P10003. arXiv:1706.04965

CMS Collaboration, Performance of electron reconstruction and selection with the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at

CMS Collaboration, Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at

Cacciari M, Salam GP, Soyez G. The anti- DOI

Cacciari M, Salam GP, Soyez G. FastJet user manual. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2012;72:1896. doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2. DOI

CMS Collaboration, Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV. JINST 13, P05011 (2018). 10.1088/1748-0221/13/05/P05011. arXiv:1712.07158

CMS Collaboration, Missing transverse energy performance of the CMS detector. JINST 6, P09001 (2011). 10.1088/1748-0221/6/09/P09001. arXiv:1106.5048

CMS Collaboration, Performance of the CMS missing transverse momentum reconstruction in pp data at

CMS Collaboration, Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at

Barr A, Lester C, Stephens P. DOI

Burns M, Kong K, Matchev KT, Park M. Using subsystem DOI

Lester CG, Nachman B. Bisection-based asymmetric DOI

CMS Collaboration, Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV. JINST 12, P02014 (2017). 10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/P02014. arXiv:1607.03663

CMS Collaboration, Measurement of top quark pair production in association with a Z boson in proton-proton collisions at

CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurement for the 2016 data taking period”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001 (2017)

CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data taking period”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004 (2017)

CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at

Butterworth J, et al. PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II. J. Phys. G. 2016;43:023001. doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/43/2/023001. DOI

Catani S, de Florian D, Grazzini M, Nason P. Soft gluon resummation for Higgs boson production at hadron colliders. JHEP. 2003;07:028. doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2003/07/028. DOI

M. Cacciari et al., “The

A. Kalogeropoulos, J. Alwall, “The SysCalc code: A tool to derive theoretical systematic uncertainties”, (2018). arXiv:1801.08401

G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics. Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1554 (2011). 10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0. arXiv:1007.1727. [Erratum: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2501-z]

Junk T. Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics. Nucl. Instr. Meth. A. 1999;434:435. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00498-2. DOI

Read AL. Presentation of search results: the CL DOI

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...