Excellent option for mass testing during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: painless self-collection and direct RT-qPCR
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Validation Study
Grant support
IGA_LF_2021_15
Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci
FNOl, 00098892
Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
RVO: RO 0518
Veterinární a Farmaceutická Univerzita Brno
CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000495
Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
PubMed
33947425
PubMed Central
PMC8094981
DOI
10.1186/s12985-021-01567-3
PII: 10.1186/s12985-021-01567-3
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- COVID-19, Mass molecular testing, Nasal mid-turbinate swab, PCR diagnostics, Post-pandemic era, Self-collection,
- MeSH
- COVID-19 diagnosis prevention & control MeSH
- Diagnostic Tests, Routine methods MeSH
- Clinical Laboratory Techniques methods MeSH
- Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Specimen Handling methods MeSH
- Mass Screening methods MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
- Self-Examination methods MeSH
- SARS-CoV-2 genetics MeSH
- Sensitivity and Specificity MeSH
- COVID-19 Testing methods MeSH
- Viral Load methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Validation Study MeSH
The early identification of asymptomatic yet infectious cases is vital to curb the 2019 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and to control the disease in the post-pandemic era. In this paper, we propose a fast, inexpensive and high-throughput approach using painless nasal-swab self-collection followed by direct RT-qPCR for the sensitive PCR detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This approach was validated in a large prospective cohort study of 1038 subjects, analysed simultaneously using (1) nasopharyngeal swabs obtained with the assistance of healthcare personnel and analysed by classic two-step RT-qPCR on RNA isolates and (2) nasal swabs obtained by self-collection and analysed with direct RT-qPCR. Of these subjects, 28.6% tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 using nasopharyngeal swab sampling. Our direct RT-qPCR approach for self-collected nasal swabs performed well with results similar to those of the two-step RT-qPCR on RNA isolates, achieving 0.99 positive and 0.98 negative predictive values (cycle threshold [Ct] < 37). Our research also reports on grey-zone viraemia, including samples with near-cut-off Ct values (Ct ≥ 37). In all investigated subjects (n = 20) with grey-zone viraemia, the ultra-small viral load disappeared within hours or days with no symptoms. Overall, this study underscores the importance of painless nasal-swab self-collection and direct RT-qPCR for mass testing during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and in the post-pandemic era.
Hospital Sumperk Šumperk Czech Republic
Institute of Applied Biotechnologies a s Prague Czech Republic
See more in PubMed
Akmatov MK, Gatzemeier A, Schughart K, Pessler F. Equivalence of self- and staff-collected nasal swabs for the detection of viral respiratory pathogens. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e48508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048508. PubMed DOI PMC
Al-Rifai RH, Acuna J, Al Hossany FI, Aden B, Al Memari SA, Al Mazrouei SK, Ahmed LA. Epidemiological characterization of symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID-19 cases and positivity in subsequent RT-PCR tests in the United Arab Emirates. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0246903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246903. PubMed DOI PMC
Buitrago-Garcia D, Egli-Gany D, Counotte MJ, Hossmann S, Imeri H, Ipekci AM, Salanti G, Low N. Occurrence and transmission potential of asymptomatic and presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections: a living systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2020;17:e1003346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003346. PubMed DOI PMC
Byambasuren O, Cardona M, Bell K, Clark J, McLaws M-L, Glasziou P. Estimating the extent of asymptomatic COVID-19 and its potential for community transmission: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Canada. 2020;5:223–234. doi: 10.3138/jammi-2020-0030. PubMed DOI PMC
CDC, 2020. Interim guidelines for collecting, handling, and testing clinical specimens for COVID-19. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/guidelines-clinical-specimens.html. Accessed on 16 March 2021.
Chowdhury MA, Hossain N, Kashem MA, Shahid MA, Alam A. Immune response in COVID-19: a review. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13:1619–1629. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.07.001. PubMed DOI PMC
Coste J, Pouchot J. A grey zone for quantitative diagnostic and screening tests. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32:304–313. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyg054. PubMed DOI
Dahdouh E, Lázaro-Perona F, Romero-Gómez MP, Mingorance J, García-Rodriguez J. Ct values from SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic PCR assays should not be used as direct estimates of viral load. J Infect. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.10.017. PubMed DOI PMC
Dang Y, Liu N, Tan C, Feng Y, Yuan X, Fan D, Peng Y, Jin R, Guo Y, Lou J. Comparison of qualitative and quantitative analyses of COVID-19 clinical samples. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;510:613–616. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.08.033. PubMed DOI PMC
Dogra P, Ruiz-Ramírez J, Sinha K, Butner JD, Peláez MJ, Rawat M, Yellepeddi VK, Pasqualini R, Arap W, Sostman HD, Cristini V, Wang Z. Innate immunity plays a key role in controlling viral load in COVID-19: mechanistic insights from a whole-body infection dynamics model. Version 2. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.10.30.20215335. PubMed DOI PMC
FDA U.S., 2020. Policy for coronavirus disease-2019 tests during the public health emergency (Revised). Immediately in Effect Guidance for Clinical Laboratories, Commercial Manufacturers, and Food and Drug Administration Staff. https://www.fda.gov/media/135659/download. Accessed 16 March 2021.
Fitzpatrick MC, Pandey A, Wells CR, Sah P, Galvani AP. Buyer beware: inflated claims of sensitivity for rapid COVID-19 tests. Lancet. 2021;397:24–25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32635-0. PubMed DOI PMC
Hasan MR, Mirza F, Al-Hail H, Sundararaju S, Xaba T, Iqbal M, Alhussain H, Yassine HM, Perez-Lopez A, Tang P. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by direct RT-qPCR on nasopharyngeal specimens without extraction of viral RNA. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0236564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236564. PubMed DOI PMC
Jackson ML, Nguyen M, Kirlin B, Madziwa L. Self-collected nasal swabs for respiratory virus surveillance. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2015 doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofv152. PubMed DOI PMC
Kriegova E, Fillerova R, Kvapil P. Direct-RT-qPCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 without RNA extraction as part of a COVID-19 testing strategy: from sample to result in one hour. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020;10:605. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10080605. PubMed DOI PMC
Lübke N, Senff T, Scherger S, Hauka S, Andrée M, Adams O, Timm J, Walker A. Extraction-free SARS-CoV-2 detection by rapid RT-qPCR universal for all primary respiratory materials. J Clin Virol. 2020;130:104579. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104579. PubMed DOI PMC
Madas BG, Füri P, Farkas Á, Nagy A, Czitrovszky A, Balásházy I, Schay GG, Horváth A. Deposition distribution of the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) in the human airways upon exposure to cough-generated droplets and aerosol particles. Sci Rep. 2020;10:22430. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79985-6. PubMed DOI PMC
Meyerowitz EA, Richterman A, Bogoch II, Low N, Cevik M. Towards an accurate and systematic characterisation of persistently asymptomatic infection with SARS-CoV-2. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;S1473-3099(20)30837-9. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30837-9. PubMed PMC
Péré H, Podglajen I, Wack M, Flamarion E, Mirault T, Goudot G, Hauw-Berlemont C, Le L, Caudron E, Carrabin S, Rodary J, Ribeyre T, Bélec L, Veyer D. Nasal swab sampling for SARS-CoV-2: a convenient alternative in times of nasopharyngeal swab shortage. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;58:e00721–e1720. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00721-20. PubMed DOI PMC
Pinninti S, Trieu C, Pati SK, Latting M, Cooper J, Seleme MC, Boppana S, Arora N, Britt WJ, Boppana SB. Comparing nasopharyngeal and mid-turbinate nasal swab testing for the identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa882. PubMed DOI PMC
Pujadas E, Chaudhry F, McBride R, Richter F, Zhao S, Wajnberg A, Nadkarni G, Glicksberg BS, Houldsworth J, Cordon-Cardo C. SARS-CoV-2 viral load predicts COVID-19 mortality. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:e70. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30354-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Russo A, Minichini C, Starace M, Astorri R, Calò F, Coppola N, Coppola N. On behalf of the Vanvitelli COVID-19 group: current status of laboratory diagnosis for COVID-19: a narrative review. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;13:2657–2665. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S264020. PubMed DOI PMC
Savvides C, Siegel R. Asymptomatic and presymptomatic transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review. medRxiv. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.06.11.20129072. PubMed DOI PMC
Shanghai ZJ Bio-Tech Co., Ltd, 2020. Liferiver, novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) real time multiplex RT-PCR Kit (detection for 3 genes) instructions for use. https://www.mobitec.com/media/datasheets/liferiverbio-tech/RR-0479-02-ZJ.pdf. Accessed 16 March 2021.
Smyrlaki I, Ekman M, Lentini A, Rufino de Sousa N, Papanicolaou N, Vondracek M, Aarum J, Safari H, Muradrasoli S, Rothfuchs AG, Albert J, Högberg B, Reinius B. Massive and rapid COVID-19 testing is feasible by extraction-free SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. Nat Commun. 2020;11:4812. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18611-5. PubMed DOI PMC
Tu Y-P, Jennings R, Hart B, Cangelosi GA, Wood RC, Wehber K, Verma P, Vojta D, Berke EM. Swabs collected by patients or health care workers for SARS-CoV-2 testing. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:494–496. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2016321. PubMed DOI PMC
Vlek ALM, Wesselius TS, Achterberg R, Thijsen SFT. Combined throat/nasal swab sampling for SARS-CoV-2 is equivalent to nasopharyngeal sampling. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021;40:193–195. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-03972-y. PubMed DOI PMC
Wang J, Cai K, Zhang R, He X, Shen X, Liu J, Xu J, Qiu F, Lei W, Wang J, Li X, Gao Y, Jiang Y, Xu W, Ma X. Novel one-step single-tube nested quantitative real-time PCR assay for highly sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2. Anal Chem. 2020;92:9399–9404. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c01884. PubMed DOI
Wehrhahn MC, Robson J, Brown S, Bursle E, Byrne S, New D, Chong S, Newcombe JP, Siversten T, Hadlow N. Self-collection: an appropriate alternative during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. J Clin Virol. 2020;128:104417. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104417. PubMed DOI PMC
WHO, 2020. COVID-19 coronavirus real time PCR Kit. https://www.who.int/diagnostics_laboratory/eual/eul_0515_202_00_covid19_coronavirus_real_time_pcr_kit_ifu.pdf?ua=1. Accessed on 16 March 2021.
WHO, 2020. WHO Emergency Use Assessment Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) IVDs PUBLIC REPORT. https://extranet.who.int/pqweb/sites/default/files/documents/200728_final_pqpr_eul_0515_202_00_covid19_real_time_pcr_kit%20%281%29.pdf. Accessed 16 March 2021.
Yu F, Yan L, Wang N, Yang S, Wang L, Tang Y, Gao G, Wang S, Ma C, Xie R, Wang F, Tan C, Zhu L, Guo Y, Zhang F. Quantitative detection and viral load analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in infected patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:793–798. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa345. PubMed DOI PMC
Sawicki R, Korona-Glowniak I, Boguszewska A, Stec A, Polz-Dacewicz M. Sample pooling as a strategy for community monitoring for SARS-CoV-2. Sci Rep. 2021;11:3122. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82765-5. PubMed DOI PMC