Biosimilar SB11 versus reference ranibizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: 1-year phase III randomised clinical trial outcomes
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze III, randomizované kontrolované studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
34656987
PubMed Central
PMC9985746
DOI
10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-319637
PII: bjophthalmol-2021-319637
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- degeneration, macula, neovascularisation, retina,
- MeSH
- biosimilární léčivé přípravky * terapeutické užití MeSH
- inhibitory angiogeneze terapeutické užití MeSH
- injekce intravitreální MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- makulární degenerace * farmakoterapie MeSH
- ranibizumab terapeutické užití MeSH
- vaskulární endoteliální růstový faktor A MeSH
- vlhká makulární degenerace * diagnóza farmakoterapie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- zraková ostrost MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- biosimilární léčivé přípravky * MeSH
- inhibitory angiogeneze MeSH
- ranibizumab MeSH
- vaskulární endoteliální růstový faktor A MeSH
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To provide longer-term data on efficacy, safety, immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ranibizumab biosimilar SB11 compared with the reference ranibizumab (RBZ) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). METHODS: Setting: Multicentre. Design: Randomised, double-masked, parallel-group, phase III equivalence study. Patient population: ≥50 years old participants with nAMD (n=705), one 'study eye'. INTERVENTION: 1:1 randomisation to monthly intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg SB11 or RBZ. Main outcome measures: Visual efficacy endpoints, safety, immunogenicity and PK up to 52 weeks. RESULTS: Baseline and disease characteristics were comparable between treatment groups. Of 705 randomised participants (SB11: n=351; RBZ: n=354), 634 participants (89.9%; SB11: n=307; RBZ: n=327) completed the study until week 52. Previously reported equivalence in primary efficacy remained stable up to week 52 and were comparable between SB11 and RBZ. The adjusted treatment difference between SB11 and RBZ in full analysis set at week 52 of change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity was -0.6 letters (90% CI -2.1 to 0.9) and of change from baseline in central subfield thickness was -14.9 µm (95% CI -25.3 to -4.5). The incidence of ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (SB11: 32.0% vs RBZ: 29.7%) and serious ocular TEAE (SB11: 2.9% vs RBZ: 2.3%) appeared comparable between treatment groups, and no new safety concerns were observed. The PK and immunogenicity profiles were comparable, with a 4.2% and 5.5% cumulative incidence of antidrug antibodies up to week 52 for SB11 and RBZ, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Longer-term results of this study further support the biosimilarity established between SB11 and RBZ.
Department of Ophthalmology 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Ophthalmology Asan Medical Center Songpa gu Seoul South Korea
Department of Ophthalmology Bajcsy Zsilinszky Hospital and Clinic Budapest Hungary
Department of Ophthalmology Central Military Hospital Praha Czech Republic
Department of Ophthalmology Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Department of Ophthalmology Hungarian Defence Forces Medical Centre Budapest Hungary
Department of Ophthalmology Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary
Department of Ophthalmology Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Seongnam South Korea
Department of Ophthalmology Seoul National University College of Medicine Seoul South Korea
Department of Ophthalmology University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady Prague Czech Republic
Department of Ophthalmology University of Debrecen Debrecen Hajdú Bihar Hungary
Diagnostic and Microsurgery Center of the Eye LENS Olsztyn Poland
Johns Hopkins Medicine Wilmer Eye Institute Baltimore Maryland USA
Retina Consultants of Southern Colorado PC Colorado Springs Colorado USA
Samsung Bioepis Co Ltd Incheon South Korea
University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic
University Hospital Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove Královéhradecký Czech Republic
University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady Praha Czech Republic
University of Ulsan College of Medicine Songpa gu Seoul South Korea
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Friedman DS, O'Colmain BJ, Muñoz B, et al. . Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:564–72. 10.1001/archopht.122.4.564 PubMed DOI
Mitchell P, Liew G, Gopinath B, et al. . Age-Related macular degeneration. Lancet 2018;392:1147–59. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31550-2 PubMed DOI
Lim LS, Mitchell P, Seddon JM, et al. . Age-Related macular degeneration. The Lancet 2012;379:1728–38. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60282-7 PubMed DOI
Agarwal A, Aggarwal K, Gupta V. Management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a review on landmark randomized controlled trials. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2016;23:27–37. 10.4103/0974-9233.173133 PubMed DOI PMC
Bakri SJ, Thorne JE, Ho AC, et al. . Safety and efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a report by the American Academy of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2019;126:55–63. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.07.028 PubMed DOI
Grisanti S, Tatar O. The role of vascular endothelial growth factor and other endogenous interplayers in age-related macular degeneration. Prog Retin Eye Res 2008;27:372–90. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2008.05.002 PubMed DOI
Hussain RM, Ciulla TA. Emerging vascular endothelial growth factor antagonists to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2017;22:235–46. 10.1080/14728214.2017.1362390 PubMed DOI
Sacconi R, Giuffrè C, Corbelli E, et al. . Emerging therapies in the management of macular edema: a review. F1000Res 2019;8. 10.12688/f1000research.19198.1. [Epub ahead of print: 12 08 2019]. PubMed DOI PMC
Shao J, Choudhary MM, Schachat AP. Neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Dev Ophthalmol 2016;55:125–36. 10.1159/000438969 PubMed DOI
Jensen TB, Kim SC, Jimenez-Solem E, et al. . Shift from adalimumab Originator to biosimilars in Denmark. JAMA Intern Med 2020;180:902–3. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0338 PubMed DOI PMC
Peyrin-Biroulet L, Danese S, Cummings F, et al. . Anti-Tnf biosimilars in Crohn's disease: a patient-centric interdisciplinary approach. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;13:731–8. 10.1080/17474124.2019.1645595 PubMed DOI
Dörner T, Strand V, Cornes P, et al. . The changing landscape of biosimilars in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:974–82. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209166 PubMed DOI PMC
European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) . Promoting safe and effective biosimilars can lead to more affordable biologic medicines. Available: https://www.efpia.eu/publications/data-center/medicines-costs-in-context/biosimilars/ [Accessed 24 Mar 2020].
Triplitt C, Hinnen D, Valentine V. How similar are biosimilars? what do clinicians need to know about Biosimilar and follow-on insulins? Clin Diabetes 2017;35:209–16. 10.2337/cd16-0072 PubMed DOI PMC
Bui LA, Hurst S, Finch GL, et al. . Key considerations in the preclinical development of biosimilars. Drug Discov Today 2015;20 Suppl 1:3–15. 10.1016/j.drudis.2015.03.011 PubMed DOI
European Medicines Agency (EMA) . Guideline on similar biological medicinal product - Rev 1. Available: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-similar-biological-medicinal-products-rev1_en.pdf [Accessed 24 Mar 2020].
United States Federal Drug Administration (US FDA) . Scientific considerations in demonstrating Biosimilarity to a reference product. Available: https://www.fda.gov/media/82647/download [Accessed 24 Mar 2020].
European Medicines Agency (EMA) . Biosimilars in the EU - Information guide for healthcare professionals. Available: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/leaflet/biosimilars-eu-information-guide-healthcare-professionals_en.pdf [Accessed 24 Mar 2020].
United States Federal Drug Administration (US FDA) . Biosimilar development, review, and approval. Available: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/biosimilars/biosimilar-development-review-and-approval [Accessed 24 Mar 2020].
Blackstone EA, Joseph PF. The economics of biosimilars. Am Health Drug Benefits 2013;6:469–78. PubMed PMC
Woo SJ, Veith M, Hamouz J, et al. . Efficacy and safety of a proposed ranibizumab Biosimilar product vs a reference ranibizumab product for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol 2021;139:68–76. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.5053 PubMed DOI PMC
Barbazetto I, Burdan A, Bressler NM, et al. . Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization with verteporfin: fluorescein angiographic guidelines for evaluation and treatment--TAP and VIP report No. 2. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:1253–68. 10.1001/archopht.121.9.1253 PubMed DOI
Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS, et al. . Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2006;355:1419–31. 10.1056/NEJMoa054481 PubMed DOI
Kaiser PK, Blodi BA, Shapiro H, et al. . Angiographic and optical coherence tomographic results of the marina study of ranibizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2007;114:1868–75. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.04.030 PubMed DOI
Brown DM, Michels M, Kaiser PK, et al. . Ranibizumab versus verteporfin photodynamic therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: two-year results of the anchor study. Ophthalmology 2009;116:57–65. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.10.018 PubMed DOI
Sadda SR, Stoller G, Boyer DS, et al. . Anatomical benefit from ranibizumab treatment of predominantly classic neovascular age-related macular degeneration in the 2-year anchor study. Retina 2010;30:1390–9. 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181e44599 PubMed DOI
Regillo CD, Brown DM, Abraham P, et al. . Randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled trial of ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: PIER study year 1. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:239–48. 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.10.004 PubMed DOI
CATT Research Group, Martin DF, Maguire MG, et al. . Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1897–908. 10.1056/NEJMoa1102673 PubMed DOI PMC
Busbee BG, Ho AC, Brown DM, et al. . Twelve-month efficacy and safety of 0.5 Mg or 2.0 Mg ranibizumab in patients with subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2013;120:1046–56. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.10.014 PubMed DOI
Lucentis prescribing information. Available: https://www.gene.com/download/pdf/lucentis_prescribing.pdf [Accessed 2 Apr 2020].
Lucentis - Summary of Product Characteristics. Available: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/lucentis-epar-product-information_en.pdf [Accessed 8 Dec 2020].
Bressler NM, Ranibizumab B. Biosimilar ranibizumab (SB11) vs reference Ranibizumab-Diving deeper for safety and Efficacy-Reply. JAMA Ophthalmol 2021;139:678–9. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.1043 PubMed DOI
Dutta B, Huys I, Vulto AG, et al. . Identifying key benefits in European Off-Patent biologics and Biosimilar markets: it is not only about price! BioDrugs 2020;34:159–70. 10.1007/s40259-019-00395-w PubMed DOI PMC
Jensen TB, Bartels D, Sædder EA, et al. . The Danish model for the quick and safe implementation of infliximab and etanercept biosimilars. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2020;76:35–40. 10.1007/s00228-019-02765-3 PubMed DOI
Chong V. Ranibizumab for the treatment of wet AMD: a summary of real-world studies. Eye 2016;30:270–86. 10.1038/eye.2015.217 PubMed DOI PMC
Holz FG, Bandello F, Gillies M, et al. . Safety of ranibizumab in routine clinical practice: 1-year retrospective pooled analysis of four European neovascular AMD registries within the luminous programme. Br J Ophthalmol 2013;97:1161–7. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303232 PubMed DOI PMC
Holz FG, Figueroa MS, Bandello F. Ranibizumab treatment in treatment-naive neovascular age-related macular degeneration: results from luminous, a global real-world study. Retina 2019. 10.1097/iae.0000000000002670 PubMed DOI PMC
Holz FG, Tadayoni R, Beatty S, et al. . Multi-country real-life experience of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for wet age-related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol 2015;99:220–6. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305327 PubMed DOI PMC
Kiss S, Campbell J, Almony A, et al. . Management and outcomes for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: analysis of United States electronic health records. Ophthalmology 2020;127:1179–88. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.02.027 PubMed DOI
Sharma A, Reddy P, Kuppermann BD, et al. . Biosimilars in ophthalmology: "Is there a big change on the horizon?". Clinical ophthalmology 2018;12:2137–43. 10.2147/OPTH.S180393 PubMed DOI PMC