The ECHELON-2 Trial: 5-year results of a randomized, phase III study of brentuximab vedotin with chemotherapy for CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphoma
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze III, časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
P30 CA008748
NCI NIH HHS - United States
R01 CA151899
NCI NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
34921960
PubMed Central
PMC9447792
DOI
10.1016/j.annonc.2021.12.002
PII: S0923-7534(21)04875-4
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- CHOP, brentuximab vedotin, frontline treatment, overall survival, peripheral T-cell lymphoma, randomized clinical trial,
- MeSH
- antigen Ki-1 * metabolismus terapeutické užití MeSH
- brentuximab vedotin MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- periferní T-buněčný lymfom * farmakoterapie MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie škodlivé účinky MeSH
- vinkristin škodlivé účinky MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antigen Ki-1 * MeSH
- brentuximab vedotin MeSH
- vinkristin MeSH
BACKGROUND: For patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), outcomes using frontline treatment with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) or CHOP-like therapy are typically poor. The ECHELON-2 study demonstrated that brentuximab vedotin plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (A+CHP) exhibited statistically superior progression-free survival (PFS) per independent central review and improvements in overall survival versus CHOP for the frontline treatment of patients with systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma or other CD30-positive PTCL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ECHELON-2 is a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, placebo-controlled, active-comparator phase III study. We present an exploratory update of the ECHELON-2 study, including an analysis of 5-year PFS per investigator in the intent-to-treat analysis group. RESULTS: A total of 452 patients were randomized (1 : 1) to six or eight cycles of A+CHP (N = 226) or CHOP (N = 226). At median follow-up of 47.6 months, 5-year PFS rates were 51.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 42.8% to 59.4%] with A+CHP versus 43.0% (95% CI: 35.8% to 50.0%) with CHOP (hazard ratio = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.53-0.91), and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 70.1% (95% CI: 63.3% to 75.9%) with A+CHP versus 61.0% (95% CI: 54.0% to 67.3%) with CHOP (hazard ratio = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.53-0.99). Both PFS and OS were generally consistent across key subgroups. Peripheral neuropathy was resolved or improved in 72% (84/117) of patients in the A+CHP arm and 78% (97/124) in the CHOP arm. Among patients who relapsed and subsequently received brentuximab vedotin, the objective response rate was 59% with brentuximab vedotin retreatment after A+CHP and 50% with subsequent brentuximab vedotin after CHOP. CONCLUSIONS: In this 5-year update of ECHELON-2, frontline treatment of patients with PTCL with A+CHP continues to provide clinically meaningful improvement in PFS and OS versus CHOP, with a manageable safety profile, including continued resolution or improvement of peripheral neuropathy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Spedali Civili di Brescia Brescia Italy
Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital Waratah Australia
China Medical University Hospital Taichung Taiwan
CHRU de Lille Lille cedex Nord Pas de Calais France
Debreceni Egyetem Debrecen Hajdu Bihar Hungary
Department of Medical Oncology and University of British Columbia BC Cancer Vancouver Canada
Freeman Hospital Newcastle upon Tyne UK
Institut Catala D'oncologia L'Hospitalet de Llobregat Barcelona Spain
John Theurer Cancer Center Hackensack Meridian Health School of Medicine Hackensack USA
MD Anderson Cancer Center University of Texas Houston USA
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York USA
National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan
Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark
Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Saitama Japan
Stanford Cancer Center Blood and Marrow Transplant Program Stanford USA
Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Samsung Medical Center Seoul Republic of Korea
Universitatsklinikum Essen Essen Nordrhein Westfalen Germany
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen Göttingen Germany
University of Virginia Cancer Center University of Virginia Charlottesville USA
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Vose J, Armitage J, Weisenburger D, International T-Cell lymphoma project. International peripheral T-cell and natural killer/T-cell lymphoma study: pathology findings and clinical outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:4124–4130. PubMed
Savage KJ, Harris NL, Vose JM, et al. ALK- anaplastic large-cell lymphoma is clinically and immunophenotypically different from both ALK+ ALCL and peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified: report from the International Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Project. Blood. 2008;111:5496–5504. PubMed
Chihara D, Fanale MA, Miranda RN, et al. The survival outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2017;176:750–778. PubMed PMC
Ellin F, Landstrom J, Jerkeman M, Relander T. Real-world data on prognostic factors and treatment in peripheral T-cell lymphomas: a study from the Swedish Lymphoma Registry. Blood. 2014;124:1570–1577. PubMed
Bellei M, Foss FM, Shustov AR, et al. The outcome of peripheral T-cell lymphoma patients failing first-line therapy: a report from the prospective, International T-cell Project. Haematologica. 2018;103:1191–1197. PubMed PMC
Maurer MJ, Ellin F, Srour L, et al. International assessment of event-free survival at 24 months and subsequent survival in peripheral T-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:4019–4026. PubMed PMC
Mak V, Hamm J, Chhanabhai M, et al. Survival of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma after first relapse or progression: spectrum of disease and rare long-term survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:1970–1976. PubMed
Wulf GG, Altmann B, Ziepert M, et al. Alemtuzumab plus CHOP versus CHOP in elderly patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma: the DSHNHL2006–1B/ACT-2 trial. Leukemia. 2021;35:143–155. PubMed
Kluin-Nelemans HC, van Marwijk Kooy M, Lugtenburg PJ, et al. Intensified alemtuzumab-CHOP therapy for peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:1595–1600. PubMed
Foss FM, Sjak-Shie N, Goy A, et al. A multicenter phase II trial to determine the safety and efficacy of combination therapy with denileukin diftitox and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone in untreated peripheral T-cell lymphoma: the CONCEPT study. Leuk Lymphoma. 2013;54:1373–1379. PubMed
Deng S, Lin S, Shen J, Zeng Y. Comparison of CHOP vs CHOPE for treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphoma: a meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:2335–2342. PubMed PMC
Simon A, Peoch M, Casassus P, et al. Upfront VIP-reinforced-ABVD (VIP-rABVD) is not superior to CHOP/21 in newly diagnosed peripheral T cell lymphoma. Results of the randomized phase III trial GOELAMS-LTP95. Br J Haematol. 2010;151:159–166. PubMed
Sabattini E, Pizzi M, Tabanelli V, et al. CD30 expression in peripheral T-cell lymphomas. Haematologica. 2013;98:e81–e82. PubMed PMC
Fanale MA, Horwitz SM, Forero-Torres A, et al. Five-year outcomes for frontline brentuximab vedotin with CHP for CD30-expressing peripheral T-cell lymphomas. Blood. 2018;131:2120–2124. PubMed PMC
Horwitz S, O’Connor OA, Pro B, et al. Brentuximab vedotin with chemotherapy for CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphoma (ECHELON-2): a global, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393:229–240. PubMed PMC
Zain JM. Aggressive T-cell lymphomas: 2019 updates on diagnosis, risk stratification and management. Am J Hematol. 2019;94:929–946. PubMed
Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, et al. Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:579–586. PubMed
Pfreundschuh M, Trumper L, Kloess M, et al. Two-weekly or 3-weekly CHOP chemotherapy with or without etoposide for the treatment of elderly patients with aggressive lymphomas: results of the NHL-B2 trial of the DSHNHL. Blood. 2004;104:634–641. PubMed
Pfreundschuh M, Trumper L, Kloess M, et al. Two-weekly or 3-weekly CHOP chemotherapy with or without etoposide for the treatment of young patients with good-prognosis (normal LDH) aggressive lymphomas: results of the NHL-B1 trial of the DSHNHL. Blood. 2004;104:626–633. PubMed
Schmitz N, Trumper L, Ziepert M, et al. Treatment and prognosis of mature T-cell and NK-cell lymphoma: an analysis of patients with T-cell lymphoma treated in studies of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group. Blood. 2010;116:3418–3425. PubMed
Bachy E, Camus V, Thieblemont C, et al. Romidepsin plus CHOP versus CHOP in patients with previously untreated peripheral T-cell lymphoma: results of the Ro-CHOP phase III study (conducted by LYSA). J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(3):242–251. PubMed
Jagadeesh D, Horwitz SM, Bartlett NL, et al. Response to brentuximab vedotin by CD30 expression: results from five trials in PTCL, CTCL, and B-cell lymphomas. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:7543.
Gardai SJ, Epp A, Law CL. Brentuximab vedotin-mediated immunogenic cell death. Cancer Res. 2015;75:2469.
Li F, Emmerton KK, Jonas M, et al. Intracellular released payload influences potency and bystander-killing effects of antibody-drug conjugates in preclinical models. Cancer Res. 2016;76:2710–2719. PubMed
Muller P, Martin K, Theurich S, et al. Microtubule-depolymerizing agents used in antibody-drug conjugates induce antitumor immunity by stimulation of dendritic cells. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2:741–755. PubMed
Jagadeesh D, Horwitz S, Bartlett NL, et al. Response to brentuximab vedotin by CD30 expression: results from five trials in PTCL, CTCL, and B-cell lymphomas. Hematol Oncol. 2019;37:470–471.
Horwitz SM, Advani RH, Bartlett NL, et al. Objective responses in relapsed T-cell lymphomas with single-agent brentuximab vedotin. Blood. 2014;123:3095–3100. PubMed PMC
Prince HM, Kim YH, Horwitz SM, et al. Brentuximab vedotin or physician’s choice in CD30-positive cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (ALCANZA): an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2017;390:555–566. PubMed
Duvic M, Tetzlaff MT, Gangar P, Clos AL, Sui D, Talpur R. Results of a phase II trial of brentuximab vedotin for CD30+ cutaneous t-cell lymphoma and lymphomatoid papulosis. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3759–3765. PubMed PMC
Bartlett NL, Smith MR, Siddiqi T, et al. Brentuximab vedotin activity in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with CD30 undetectable by visual assessment of conventional immunohistochemistry. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017;58:1607–1616. PubMed
Jacobsen ED, Sharman JP, Oki Y, et al. Brentuximab vedotin demonstrates objective responses in a phase 2 study of relapsed/refractory DLBCL with variable CD30 expression. Blood. 2015;125:1394–1402. PubMed
Oflazoglu E, Stone IJ, Gordon KA, et al. Macrophages contribute to the antitumor activity of the anti-CD30 antibody SGN-30. Blood. 2007;110: 4370–4372. PubMed
Jagadeesh D, Sims RB, Horwitz SM. Trial-in-progress: frontline brentuximab vedotin and CHP (A+CHP) in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma with less than 10% CD30 expression. Blood. 2020;136:30.
Bartlett NL, Chen R, Fanale MA, et al. Retreatment with brentuximab vedotin in patients with CD30-positive hematologic malignancies. J Hematol Oncol. 2014;7:24. PubMed PMC
Ahmed S, Lisano J, Newhook T. A phase 2 study of retreatment with brentuximab vedotin in patients with cHL, sALCL or other CD30-expressing PTCL. Blood. 2019;134:4054.
Herrera AF, Zain J, Savage KJ, et al. Preliminary results from a phase 2 trial of brentuximab vedotin plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, and prednisone (CHEP-BV) followed by BV consolidation in patients with CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphomas. Blood. 2019;134:4023. PubMed
Herrera AF, Zain J, Savage KJ, et al. Brentuximab vedotin plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, and prednisone (CHEP-BV) followed by BV consolidation in patients with CD30-expressing peripheral T-cell lymphomas. Blood. 2021;138:133.
Chimeric Antigen Receptor Based Cellular Therapy for Treatment Of T-Cell Malignancies