Efficacy and Safety of Autologous Dendritic Cell-Based Immunotherapy, Docetaxel, and Prednisone vs Placebo in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: The VIABLE Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze III, časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
35142815
PubMed Central
PMC8832307
DOI
10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.7298
PII: 2789073
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- dendritické buňky patologie MeSH
- docetaxel škodlivé účinky MeSH
- dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
- imunoterapie škodlivé účinky MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory prostaty rezistentní na kastraci * farmakoterapie MeSH
- prednison MeSH
- protokoly antitumorózní kombinované chemoterapie škodlivé účinky MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- docetaxel MeSH
- prednison MeSH
IMPORTANCE: DCVAC/PCa is an active cellular immunotherapy designed to initiate an immune response against prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of DCVAC/PCa plus chemotherapy followed by DCVAC/PCa maintenance treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The VIABLE double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, phase 3 randomized clinical trial enrolled patients with mCRPC among 177 hospital clinics in the US and Europe between June 2014 and November 2017. Data analyses were performed from December 2019 to July 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Eligible patients were randomized (2:1) to receive DCVAC/PCa (add-on and maintenance) or placebo, both in combination with chemotherapy (docetaxel plus prednisone). The stratification was applied according to geographical region (US or non-US), prior therapy (abiraterone, enzalutamide, or neither), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0-1 or 2). DCVAC/PCa or placebo was administered subcutaneously every 3 to 4 weeks (up to 15 doses). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), defined as the time from randomization until death due to any cause, in all randomized patients. Survival was compared using 2-sided log-rank test stratified by geographical region, prior therapy with abiraterone and/or enzalutamide, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. RESULTS: A total of 1182 men with mCRPC (median [range] age, 68 [46-89] years) were randomized to receive DCVAC/PCa (n = 787) or placebo (n = 395). Of these, 610 (81.8%) started DCVAC/PCa, and 376 (98.4%) started placebo. There was no difference in OS between the DCVAC/PCa and placebo groups in all randomized patients (median OS, 23.9 months [95% CI, 21.6-25.3] vs 24.3 months [95% CI, 22.6-26.0]; hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.90-1.21; P = .60). No differences in the secondary efficacy end points (radiological progression-free survival, time to prostate-specific antigen progression, or skeletal-related events) were observed. Treatment-emergent adverse events related to DCVAC/PCa or placebo occurred in 69 of 749 (9.2%) and 48 of 379 (12.7%) patients, respectively. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (DCVAC/PCa [n = 749] vs placebo [n = 379]) were fatigue (271 [36.2%] vs 152 [40.1%]), alopecia (222 [29.6%] vs 130 [34.3%]), and diarrhea (206 [27.5%] vs 117 [30.9%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this phase 3 randomized clinical trial, DCVAC/PCa combined with docetaxel plus prednisone and continued as maintenance treatment did not extend OS in patients with mCRPC and was well tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02111577.
Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre Bristol United Kingdom
Center of Oncology of the Lublin Region St Jana z Dukli Lublin Poland
Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada Las Vegas
Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove Charles University Czechia
Georges Pompidou European Hospital University of Paris Paris France
Geza Hetenyi Hospital in Szolnok Szolnok Hungary
Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil Porto Portugal
Minsk City Oncological Dispensary Minsk Belarus
Oncology Center Institute Marii Sklodowskiej Curie Warszawa Poland
Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation Long Beach California
Oregon Health and Science University Portland
Radboud UMC Nijmegen the Netherlands
Regional Hospital Liberec Liberec Czechia
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust Sutton United Kingdom
Studienpraxis Urologie Nuertingen Germany
University Clinic of Urology Tuebingen Germany
University Hospital Medical Center Bezanijska Kosa Belgrade Serbia
University Hospital Ostrava Ostrava Czechia
University of Maryland Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center Baltimore Maryland
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(1):9-29. doi:10.3322/caac.21208 PubMed DOI
Maluf FC, Smaletz O, Herchenhorn D. Castration-resistant prostate cancer: systemic therapy in 2012. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012;67(4):389-394. doi:10.6061/clinics/2012(04)13 PubMed DOI PMC
Petrylak DP, Tangen CM, Hussain MH, et al. . Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(15):1513-1520. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa041318 PubMed DOI
Berthold DR, Pond GR, Soban F, de Wit R, Eisenberger M, Tannock IF. Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer: updated survival in the TAX 327 study. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(2):242-245. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.12.4008 PubMed DOI
Bonaventura P, Shekarian T, Alcazer V, et al. . Cold tumors: a therapeutic challenge for immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2019;10:168. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.00168 PubMed DOI PMC
Rijnders M, de Wit R, Boormans JL, Lolkema MPJ, van der Veldt AAM. Systematic review of immune checkpoint inhibition in urological cancers. Eur Urol. 2017;72(3):411-423. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2017.06.012 PubMed DOI
Kantoff PW, Higano CS, Shore ND, et al. ; IMPACT Study Investigators . Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(5):411-422. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1001294 PubMed DOI
Wang Y, Xiang Y, Xin VW, et al. . Dendritic cell biology and its role in tumor immunotherapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13(1):107. doi:10.1186/s13045-020-00939-6 PubMed DOI PMC
Kantoff PW, Schuetz TJ, Blumenstein BA, et al. . Overall survival analysis of a phase II randomized controlled trial of a Poxviral-based PSA-targeted immunotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(7):1099-1105. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0597 PubMed DOI PMC
Gulley JL, Borre M, Vogelzang NJ, et al. . Phase III trial of PROSTVAC in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(13):1051-1061. doi:10.1200/JCO.18.02031 PubMed DOI PMC
Podrazil M, Horvath R, Becht E, et al. . Phase I/II clinical trial of dendritic-cell based immunotherapy (DCVAC/PCa) combined with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;6(20):18192-18205. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.4145 PubMed DOI PMC
National Cancer Institute . Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.03). Accessed January 3, 2022. https://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03/
Halabi S, Small EJ, Kantoff PW, et al. . Prognostic model for predicting survival in men with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(7):1232-1237. doi:10.1200/JCO.2003.06.100 PubMed DOI
Smaletz O, Scher HI, Small EJ, et al. . Nomogram for overall survival of patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer after castration. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(19):3972-3982. doi:10.1200/JCO.2002.11.021 PubMed DOI
Dallos MC, Drake CG. Blocking PD-1/PD-L1 in genitourinary malignancies: to immunity and beyond. Cancer J. 2018;24(1):20-30. doi:10.1097/PPO.0000000000000302 PubMed DOI
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02111577