Although the Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) task is a widely used experimental method for studying divided attention, tracking objects in the real world usually looks different. For example, in the real world, objects are usually clearly distinguishable from each other and also possess different movement patterns. One such case is tracking groups of creatures, such as tracking fish in an aquarium. We used movies of fish in an aquarium and measured general tracking performance in this task (Experiment 1). In Experiment 2, we compared tracking accuracy within-subjects in fish tracking, tracking typical MOT stimuli, and in a third condition using standard MOT uniform objects which possessed movement patterns similar to the real fish. This third condition was added to further examine the impact of different motion characteristics on tracking performance. Results within a Bayesian framework showed that tracking real fish shares similarities with tracking simple objects in a typical laboratory MOT task. Furthermore, we observed a close relationship between performance in both laboratory MOT tasks (typical and fish-like) and real fish tracking, suggesting that the commonly used laboratory MOT task possesses a good level of ecological validity.

Institute of Psychology Czech Academy of Sciences Prague Czech Republic

Nottingham Trent University Nottingham United Kingdom

See more in PubMed

Bürkner PC. brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software. 2017;80:1–28.

Cavanagh P, Alvarez GA. Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2005;9(7):349–354. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.009. PubMed DOI

Christ SE. Motion onset captures attention. Psychological Science. 2003;14:427–432. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.01458. PubMed DOI

DeCarlo LT. Signal detection theory and generalized linear models. Psychological Methods. 1998;3(2):186. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.3.2.186. DOI

DeCarlo LT. On the statistical and theoretical basis of signal detection theory and extensions: unequal variance, random coefficient, and mixture models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 2010;54(3):304–313. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2010.01.001. DOI

Ericson JM, Beck MR. Changing target trajectories influences tracking performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2013;20(5):951–956. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0424-1. PubMed DOI

Ericson JM, Parr SA, Beck MR, Wolshon B. Compensating for failed attention while driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2017;45(5):65–74. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2016.11.015. DOI

Fehd HM, Seiffert AE. Eye movements during multiple object tracking: where do participants look? Cognition. 2008;108(1):201–209. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.008. PubMed DOI PMC

Franconeri SL, Jonathan SV, Scimeca JM. Tracking multiple objects is limited only by object spacing, not by speed, time, or capacity. Psychological Science. 2010;21(7):920–925. doi: 10.1177/0956797610373935. PubMed DOI

Gelman A, Goodrich B, Gabry J, Vehtari A. R-squared for Bayesian regression models. The American Statistician. 2019;73(3):307–309. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2018.1549100. DOI

Hall JR, Cuthill IC, Baddeley R, Shohet AJ, Scott-Samuel NE. Camouflage, detection and identification of moving targets. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2013;280(1758):20130064. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0064. PubMed DOI PMC

Horowitz TS, Birnkrant RS, Fencsik DE, Tran L, Wolfe JM. How do we track invisible objects? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2006;13(3):516–523. doi: 10.3758/BF03193879. PubMed DOI

Horowitz TS, Klieger SB, Fencsik DE, Yang KK, Alvarez GA, Wolfe JM. Tracking unique objects. Perception & Psychophysics. 2007;69(2):172–184. doi: 10.3758/BF03193740. PubMed DOI

Howard CJ, Holcombe AO. Unexpected changes in direction of motion attract attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 2010;72(8):2087–2095. doi: 10.3758/BF03196685. PubMed DOI

Howard CJ, Masom D, Holcombe AO. Position representations lag behind targets in multiple object tracking. Vision Research. 2011;51(17):1907–1919. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.07.001. PubMed DOI

Howard CJ, Uttley J, Andrews S. Team ball sport participation is associated with performance in two sustained visual attention tasks: position monitoring and target identification in rapid serial visual presentation streams. Progress in Brain Research. 2018;240(13):53–69. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.09.001. PubMed DOI

Howe PD, Holcombe AO. Motion information is sometimes used as an aid to the visual tracking of objects. Journal of Vision. 2012;12(13):10. doi: 10.1167/12.13.10. PubMed DOI

Huth A, Wissel C. The simulation of the movement of fish schools. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 1992;156(3):365–385. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80681-2. DOI

Huth A, Wissel C. The simulation of fish schools in comparison with experimental data. Ecological Modelling. 1994;75:135–146. doi: 10.1016/0304-3800(94)90013-2. DOI

Ivry RB, Cohen A. Asymmetry in visual search for targets defined by differences in movement speed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1992;18(4):1045. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.18.4.1045. PubMed DOI

Keane BP, Pylyshyn ZW. Is motion extrapolation employed in multiple object tracking? Tracking as a low-level, non-predictive function. Cognitive Psychology. 2006;52(4):346–368. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.12.001. PubMed DOI

Lochner MJ, Trick LM. Multiple-object tracking while driving: the multiple-vehicle tracking task. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 2014;76(8):2326–2345. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0694-3. PubMed DOI

Lukavsky J. Eye movements in repeated multiple object tracking. Journal of Vision. 2013;13(7):9. doi: 10.1167/13.7.9. PubMed DOI

Lukavsky J. motrack: tools for multiple object tracking experiments. 2021. https://jirilukavsky.github.io/motrack/ https://jirilukavsky.github.io/motrack/ R package version 0.3.0.

Lukavsky J, Oksama L, Dechterenko F. Tracking objects out of the observer’s view. 2022. https://psyarxiv.com/gw7nm/ https://psyarxiv.com/gw7nm/

Luu T, Howe PD. Extrapolation occurs in multiple object tracking when eye movements are controlled. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 2015;77(6):1919–1929. PubMed

Makovski T, Jiang YV. The role of visual working memory in attentive tracking of unique objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2009;35(6):1687. doi: 10.1037/a0016453. PubMed DOI PMC

Memmert D, Simons DJ, Grimme T. The relationship between visual attention and expertise in sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2009;10(1):146–151. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.06.002. DOI

Meyerhoff HS, Papenmeier F, Huff M. Studying visual attention using the multiple object tracking paradigm: a tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 2017;79(5):1255–1274. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1338-1. PubMed DOI

Meyerhoff HS, Papenmeier F, Jahn G, Huff M. Not FLEXible enough: exploring the temporal dynamics of attentional reallocations with the multiple object tracking paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2016;42(6):776. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000187. PubMed DOI

Papenmeier F, Meyerhoff HS, Jahn G, Huff M. Tracking by location and features: object correspondence across spatiotemporal discontinuities during multiple object tracking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2014;40(1):159. doi: 10.1037/a0033117. PubMed DOI

Peirce J, Gray JR, Simpson S, MacAskill M, Höchenberger R, Sogo H, Kastman E, Lindeløv JK. PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods. 2019;51(1):195–203. PubMed PMC

Pylyshyn ZW, Storm RW. Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision. 1988;3(3):179–197. PubMed

Qiu F, Pi Y, Liu K, Li X, Zhang J, Wu Y. Influence of sports expertise level on attention in multiple object tracking. PeerJ. 2018;6(3):e5732. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5732. PubMed DOI PMC

R Core Team . R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: The R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020.

Royden CS, Wolfe JM, Klempen N. Visual search asymmetries in motion and optic flow fields. Perception & Psychophysics. 2001;63(3):436–444. doi: 10.3758/BF03194410. PubMed DOI

Scholl BJ, Pylyshyn ZW. Tracking multiple items through occlusion: clues to visual objecthood. Cognitive Psychology. 1999;38(2):259–290. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0698. PubMed DOI

Sharman RJ, Moncrieff SJ, Lovell PG. Dissociating the effect of disruptive colouration on localisation and identification of camouflaged targets. Scientific Reports. 2018;8(1):1–6. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25014-6. PubMed DOI PMC

Troscianko J, Lown AE, Hughes AE, Stevens M. Defeating crypsis: detection and learning of camouflage strategies. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(9):e73733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073733. PubMed DOI PMC

Yantis S. Multielement visual tracking: attention and perceptual organization. Cognitive Psychology. 1992;24(3):295–340. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90010-Y. PubMed DOI

Zelinsky GJ, Neider MB. An eye movement analysis of multiple object tracking in a realistic environment. Visual Cognition. 2008;16(5):553–566. doi: 10.1080/13506280802000752. DOI

Zhao C, Hu L, Wei L, Wang C, Li X, Hu B, Zhang X. How do humans perform in multiple object tracking with unstable features. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020;11:1940. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01940. PubMed DOI PMC