Normative values of skeletal muscle mass, strength and performance in the Indian population
Jazyk angličtina Země Indie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
38758434
DOI
10.1007/s12664-024-01565-7
PII: 10.1007/s12664-024-01565-7
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Asian (Indian population), Chair-stand test, Gait velocity, Hand-grip strength, Jamar dynamometer, Sarcopenia, Skeletal muscle index, Slice-O-Matic software, Version 5 (Tomo Vision), Western population,
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- kosterní svaly * diagnostické zobrazování fyziologie anatomie a histologie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- počítačová rentgenová tomografie * MeSH
- referenční hodnoty MeSH
- rychlost chůze fyziologie MeSH
- sarkopenie * diagnóza patofyziologie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- síla ruky * fyziologie MeSH
- svalová síla * fyziologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Indie MeSH
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Skeletal muscle is characterized by its mass, strength and performance. These normative values are pivotal in defining sarcopenia. Sarcopenia is associated with poor outcome of numerous medical and surgical conditions. This study aimed to establish normative benchmarks for skeletal muscle mass, strength and performance within the context of the Asian (Indian) population. METHODS: Our investigation utilized the computed tomography (CT) skeletal muscle index (SMI), handgrip strength (HGS), gait velocity and chair-stand test to construct reference values for muscle characteristics in the Indian population. RESULTS: The SMI analysis incorporated 1485 cases of acute abdomen (54.7%) males). The calculated SMI (kg/m2) was 38.50 (35.05-42.30) in males and 36.30 (32.20-41.20) in females (p = 0.510). The study also involved 3083 healthy individuals (67.6% males) evaluated for muscle strength and performance between August 2017 and August 2018. Notably, HGS (kg force) was recorded at 34.95 (26.50-43.30) in males and 25.50 (18.60-31.20) in females (p < 0.001). Gait velocity (metres/second) exhibited values of 1.25 (1.04-1.56) in males and 1.24 (1.03-1.56) in females (p = 0.851). Additionally, chair-stand test (seconds) results were 10.00 (9.00-13.00) in males and 12.00 (10.00-14.00) in females (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The investigation determined that males had greater muscle strength and performance than females. But gender wise, there was no significant difference in muscle mass. Interestingly, our population's muscle parameters were consistently lower compared to western literature benchmarks. These normative values will help to define sarcopenia parameters in our population, which have prognostic value in multiple ailments.
1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czechia
Department of Gastroenterology Dayanand Medical College and Hospital Ludhiana 141 001 India
Department of Radiodiagnosis Dayanand Medical College and Hospital Ludhiana 141 001 India
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48:16–31.
Jung Lee S, Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Ross R. Relation between whole-body and regional measures of human skeletal muscle. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80:1215–21.
American Council on Exercise. How to select the right intensity and repetitions for your clients. https://www.acefitness.org/resources/pros/expert-articles/4922/how-to-select-the-right-intensity-and-repetitions-foryour-clients/ . Assessed 12 March 2024.
Beaudart C, Rolland Y, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, et al. Assessment of muscle function and physical performance in daily clinical practice: a position paper endorsed by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects Of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO). Calcif Tissue Int. 2019;105:1–4.
Cao M, Lian J, Lin X, et al. Prevalence of sarcopenia under different diagnostic criteria and the changes in muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical function with age in Chinese old adults. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22:889.
Kang SH, Park JW, Yoon KW, Do JY. Limb/trunk lean mass ratio as a risk factor for mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients. J Ren Nutr. 2013;23:315–23. PubMed DOI
Wijarnpreecha K, Werlang M, Panjawatanan P, et al. Association between sarcopenia and hepatic encephalopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Hepatol. 2020;19:245–50.
Narumi T, Watanabe T, Kadowaki S, et al. Sarcopenia evaluated by fat-free mass index is an important prognostic factor in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Intern Med. 2015;26:118–22.
Batsis JA, Mackenzie TA, Barre LK, Lopez-Jimenez F, Bartels SJ. Sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity and mortality in older adults: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68:1001–7. PubMed DOI
Slice-O-Matic software, version 5 (2018, July) (TomoVision, 3280 chemin Milletta, Magog, J1X 0R4,Canada. https://www.tomovision.com › products › sliceomatic.
Sousa-Santos AR, Amaral TF. Differences in handgrip strength protocols to identify sarcopenia and frailty-a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17:1–21.
Gait Speed Test (4-metre) – https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/health/practitioner-pro/bc-guidelines/frailty-gaitspeed.pdf .
Lab #8: Exercise Testing the Healthy Elderly Client. http://themcr.com/4231/elderlytest.pdf . (Accessed on Dated 3 April 2018).
Aziz N, Kallur SD, Nirmalan PK. Implications of the revised consensus body mass indices for Asian Indians on clinical obstetric practice. J Clin Diag Res. 2014;8:OC01–3.
Aggarwal R, Ranganathan P. Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: the use of correlation techniques. Perspect Clin Res. 2016;7:187–90.
van der Werf A, Langius JAE, de van der Schueren MAE, et al. Percentiles for skeletal muscle index, area and radiation attenuation based on computed tomography imaging in a healthy Caucasian population. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018;72:288–96.
Ufuk F, Herek D. Reference skeletal muscle mass values at L3 vertebrae level based on computed tomography in healthy Turkish adults. Int J Geront. 2019;13:221–5.
Derstine BA, Holcombe SA, Ross BE, Wang NC, Su GL, Wang SC. Skeletal muscle cutoff values for sarcopenia diagnosis using T10 to L5 measurements in a healthy US population. Sci Rep. 2018;8:11369.
Benjamin J, Shasthry V, Kaal CR, et al. Characterization of body composition and definition of sarcopenia in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis: a computed tomography based study. Liver Int. 2017;37:1668–74.
Choudhary S, Wadhawan M, Dhawan S, et al. Normative values of skeletal muscle indices for nutritional assessment and implications on definition of sarcopenia in Indian adult population. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2022;41:69–76.
Newman AB, Kuelian V, Visser M, et al. Strength, but not muscle mass, is associated with mortality in the health, aging and body composition study cohort. J Gerontol: Ser A. 2006;61:72–7.
Leong DP, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, et al. Reference ranges of handgrip strength from 125,462 healthy adults in 21 countries: a prospective urban rural epidemiologic (PURE) study. J Cachex Sarcopenia Muscle. 2016;7:535–46.
Lee KS, Woo KJ, Shim JH, Lee GH. The clinical study of grip and pinch strength in normal Korean adults. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 1995;30:1589–97. DOI
Kim CR, Jeon Y-J, Kim MC, Jeong T, Koo WR. Reference values for hand grip strength in the South Korean population. PLoS One. 2018;13:1–12.
Lauretani F, Russo CR, Bandinelli S, et al. Age-associated changes in skeletal muscles and their effect on mobility: an operational diagnosis of sarcopenia. J Appl Physiol. 2003;95:1851–60.
Hogrel JY. Grip strength measured by high precision dynamometry in healthy subjects from 5 to 80 years. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:139. PubMed DOI PMC
Anjum SN, Choudary P, Dimri R, Ankarath S. Comparative evaluation of grip and pinch strength in an Asian and European population. Hand Ther. 2012;17:11–4.
Auvinet B, Berrut G, Touzard C, et al. Reference data for normal subjects obtained with an accelerometric device. Gait Posture. 2002;16:124–34.
Kadaba MP, Ramakrishnan HK, Wootten ME. Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking. J Orthop Res. 1990;8:383–92.
Bohannon RW, Williams AA. Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2011;97:182–9.
Bohannon RW, Bubela DJ, Magasi SR, Wang YC, Gershon RC. Sit-to-stand test: performance and determinants across the age-span. IsokinetExerc Sci. 2010;18:235–40.
Melzer D, Lan T-Y, Guralnik JM. The predictive validity for mortality of the index of mobility-related limitation – results from the EPESE study. Age Ageing. 2003;32:619–25.