INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme implementation on treatment costs at a university-type centre, using the DRG scheme. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients' data in a group of 604 individuals enroled in the study. We evaluated three groups of patients according to the ERAS clinical protocol (CP): (1) CP oncogynaecology, (2) CP simple hysterectomy, (3) CP laparoscopy. The study aimed to evaluate the impact on the length of stay (LOS), savings in bed-days, and the reduction in direct treatment costs. Three parameters-antibiotic consumption, blood derivative consumption and laboratory test costs-were chosen to compare direct treatment costs. The statistical significance of the difference in the observed parameters was tested by a two-sample unpaired t test with unequal variances at the 0.05 significance level. RESULTS: We analysed data from 604 patients. In all three groups, the length of stay (LOS) was significantly reduced. The most significant reduction was observed in the CP oncogynaecology group, where the LOS was reduced from 11.1 days to 6.8 days (2022) and 7.6 days (2023) compared to 2019 (p < 0.05). Furthermore, there was a notable reduction in inpatient bed-days, which resulted in the capacity being made available to admit additional patients. A statistically significant reduction in direct costs was observed in the group of CP hysterectomy (antibiotic use) and in the CP laparoscopy (laboratory test costs). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the ERAS principles resulted in a number of significant positive economic impacts-reduction in the LOS and a corresponding increase in bed capacity for new patients. Additionally, direct treatment costs, including those related to antibiotic use or laboratory testing were reduced. The Czech Republic's acute healthcare system, like the majority of European healthcare systems, is financed by the DRG system. This flat-rate payment per patient encourages hospital management to seek cost-reduction strategies. The results of our study indicate that fast-track protocols represent a potential viable approach to reducing the cost of treatment while simultaneously meeting the recommendations of evidence-based medicine.

Advance Hospital Analytics Prague Czech Republic

Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 1st Faculty of Medicine and Bulovka University Hospital Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Physiotherapy and Medical Rehabilitation Department Bulovka University Hospital Prague Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78(5):606‐617. 10.1093/bja/78.5.606 PubMed DOI

Nelson G, Altman AD, Nick A, et al. Guidelines for pre‐ and intra‐operative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations—part I. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;140(2):313‐322. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.11.015 PubMed DOI

Nelson G, Altman AD, Nick A, et al. Guidelines for postoperative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations—part II. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;140(2):323‐332. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.12.019 PubMed DOI PMC

Nelson G, Bakkum‐Gamez J, Kalogera E, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations‐2019 update. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019;29(4):651‐668. 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000356 PubMed DOI

Grant MC, Gibbons MM, Ko CY, et al. Evidence review conducted for the AHRQ safety program for improving surgical care and recovery: focus on anesthesiology for gynecologic surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019;44:437‐446 10.1136/rapm-2018-100071 PubMed DOI

Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(3):292‐298. 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952 PubMed DOI

Carey ET, Moulder JK. Perioperative management and implementation of enhanced recovery programs in gynecologic surgery for benign indications. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(1):137‐146. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002696 PubMed DOI

Gentry ZL, Boitano TKL, Smith HJ, Eads DK, Russell JF, Straughn JM Jr.. The financial impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in an academic gynecologic oncology practice. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;156(2):284‐287. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.11.017 PubMed DOI

Harrison RF, Li Y, Guzman A, et al. Impact of implementation of an enhanced recovery program in gynecologic surgery on healthcare costs. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(1):66.e1‐66.e9. 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.039 PubMed DOI PMC

Roulin D, Donadini A, Gander S, et al. Cost‐effectiveness of the implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2013;100(8):1108‐1114. 10.1002/bjs.9184 PubMed DOI

Stowers MDJ, Lemanu DP, Hill AG. Health economics in enhanced recovery after surgery programs. Can J Anaesth. 2015;62(2):219‐230. 10.1007/s12630-014-0272-0 PubMed DOI

Gerardi MA, Santillan A, Meisner B, et al. A clinical pathway for patients undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery with rectosigmoid colectomy for advanced ovarian and primary peritoneal cancers. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;108(2):282‐286. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.10.014 PubMed DOI

Bisch SP, Wells T, Gramlich L, et al. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in gynecologic oncology: system‐wide implementation and audit leads to improved value and patient outcomes. Gynecol Oncol. 2018;151(1):117‐123. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.08.007 PubMed DOI

Kotherová Z, Caithamlová M, Nemec J, Dolejšová K. The use of diagnosis‐related group‐based reimbursement in the Czech Hospital Care System. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(10):5463. 10.3390/ijerph18105463 PubMed DOI PMC

Chilingerian Jon. Origins of DRGs in the United States: a technical, political and cultural story. In: Kimberly J, de Pouvourville G, D'Aunno TA, eds. The Globalization of Managerial Innovationin Health Care, 2008:4‐33.

Ren S, Yang L, Du J, He M, Shen B. DRGKB: a knowledgebase of worldwide diagnosis‐related groups' practices for comparison, evaluation and knowledge‐guided application. Database. 2024;2024:baae046. 10.1093/database/baae046 PubMed DOI PMC

Kotherová Z, Caithamlová M, Nemec J, Dolejšová K. The use of diagnosis‐related group‐based reimbursement in the Czech Hospital Care System. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(10):5463. 10.3390/ijerph18105463 PubMed DOI PMC

Adamina M, Kehlet H, Tomlinson GA, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP. Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery. Surgery. 2011;149(6):830‐840. 10.1016/j.surg.2010.11.003 PubMed DOI

Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CHC, Fearon KCH, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr. 2010;29(4):434‐440. 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.01.004 PubMed DOI

Zhuang CL, Ye XZ, Zhang XD, Chen BC, Yu Z. Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional care for colorectal surgery: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(5):667‐678. 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182812842 PubMed DOI

Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH, et al. Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg. 2006;93(7):800‐809. 10.1002/bjs.5384 PubMed DOI

Boitano TKL, Smith HJ, Rushton T, et al. Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on gastrointestinal function in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2018;151(2):282‐286. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.09.009 PubMed DOI

Wijk L, Franzen K, Ljungqvist O, Nilsson K. Implementing a structured Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol reduces length of stay after abdominal hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93(8):749‐756. 10.1111/aogs.12423 PubMed DOI