Workplace monitoring of hazardous medicinal products (HMPs) using surface wipe sampling is becoming common practice in many European hospitals and pharmacies. However, no independent quality control is available to validate wiping procedures and analytical methods. This study aimed to conduct a Europe-wide interlaboratory comparison (ILC) program to independently and blindly assess laboratory performance and variability in HMP detection. Four European laboratories participated in the study. Six HMPs-cyclophosphamide, etoposide, gemcitabine, ifosfamide, methotrexate, and paclitaxel-were prepared at four concentrations (5000, 2000, 200, and 20 ng/mL) and applied to a 400-cm2 stainless-steel surface, then wiped by the coordinating body according to each laboratory's protocol. Wipe samples were distributed to individual laboratories, where blind analyses were conducted. Target criteria for accuracy and recovery were set at 70%-130% and 50%-130%, respectively. Of the 80 samples, 69 (86%) met accuracy targets, and 70 (88%) met recovery targets. Accuracy was often overestimated for the lowest concentrations of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, methotrexate, and paclitaxel by Laboratory A. Laboratory D showed low accuracy for paclitaxel at three lower concentrations. Among the 10 samples that did not meet recovery targets, all were below 50% and involved etoposide and paclitaxel. This ILC program demonstrates a viable method for evaluating laboratory performance in HMP detection, offering an external validation mechanism for surface wipe sampling methods. A future goal is to establish a global ILC program with a designated coordinating body for managing it effectively.

ALiCE Associate Laboratory in Chemical Engineering Faculty of Engineering University of Porto Porto Portugal

Apotheek Haagse Ziekenhuizen The Hague the Netherlands

Centre for Water and Environmental Research University of Duisburg Essen Essen Germany

Department of Hospital Pharmacy Haaglanden Medisch Centrum The Hague the Netherlands

Department of Hospital Pharmacy Haga Teaching Hospital The Hague the Netherlands

Department of Hospital Pharmacy University Clinical Hospital Poznan Poland

Department of Pharmacy and Clinical Pharmacology Amsterdam UMC Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands

EPIUnit ITR Institute of Public Health of the University Porto University of Porto Porto Portugal

Institut für Umwelt and Energie Technik and Analytik e 5 Duisburg Germany

Instrumental Analytical Chemistry University of Duisburg Essen Essen Germany

Laboratory of Separation and Reaction Engineering Laboratory of Catalysis and Materials Faculty of Engineering University of Porto Porto Portugal

LEPABE Laboratory for Process Engineering Environment Biotechnology and Energy Faculty of Engineering University of Porto Porto Portugal

RECETOX Faculty of Science Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU‐OSHA) , Guidance for the Safe Management of Hazardous Medicinal Products at Work, 2nd ed., (Publications Office of the European Union, 2023), https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/guidance‐safe‐management‐hazardous‐medicinal‐products‐work.

European Society of Oncology Pharmacy (ESOP) , QuapoS—Quality Standard for the Oncology Pharmacy Service, 7th ed., (ESOP, 2024), https://esop.li/quapos/.

Odraska P., Dolezalova L., Kuta J., Oravec M., Piler P., and Blaha L., “Evaluation of the Efficacy of Additional Measures Introduced for the Protection of Healthcare Personnel Handling Antineoplastic Drugs,” Annals of Occupational Hygiene 57, no. 2 (2013): 240–250, 10.1093/annhyg/mes057. PubMed DOI

Brouwers E. E. M., Huitema A. D. R., Bakker E. N., et al., “Monitoring of Platinum Surface Contamination in Seven Dutch Hospital Pharmacies Using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry,” International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 80, no. 8 (2007): 689–699, 10.1007/s00420-007-0181-4. PubMed DOI PMC

Odraska P., Dolezalova L., Kuta J., et al., “Association of Surface Contamination by Antineoplastic Drugs With Different Working Conditions in Hospital Pharmacies,” Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health 69, no. 3 (2014): 148–158, 10.1080/19338244.2013.763757. PubMed DOI

Crul M., Hilhorst S., Breukels O., Bouman‐d'Onofrio J. R. C., Stubbs P., and van Rooij J. G., “Occupational Exposure of Pharmacy Technicians and Cleaning Staff to Cytotoxic Drugs in Dutch Hospitals,” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 17, no. 7–8 (2020): 343–352, 10.1080/15459624.2020.1776299. PubMed DOI

Bláhová L., Kuta J., Doležalová L., Kozáková Š., Krovová T., and Bláha L., “The Efficiency of Antineoplastic Drug Contamination Removal by Widely Used Disinfectants‐Laboratory and Hospital Studies,” International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 94, no. 7 (2021): 1687–1702, 10.1007/s00420-021-01671-5. PubMed DOI

Quartucci C., Rooney J. P. K., Nowak D., and Rakete S., “Evaluation of Long‐Term Data on Surface Contamination by Antineoplastic Drugs in Pharmacies,” International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 96, no. 5 (2023): 675–683, 10.1007/s00420-023-01963-y. PubMed DOI PMC

Crul M. and Simons‐Sanders K., “Carry‐Over of Antineoplastic Drug Contamination in Dutch Hospital Pharmacies,” Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice 24, no. 7 (2018): 483–489, 10.1177/1078155217704990. PubMed DOI

Schierl R., Böhlandt A., and Nowak D., “Guidance Values for Surface Monitoring of Antineoplastic Drugs in German Pharmacies,” Annals of Occupational Hygiene 53, no. 7 (2009): 703–711, 10.1093/annhyg/mep050. PubMed DOI

Kiffmeyer T. K., Tuerk J., Hahn M., et al., “Application and Assessment of a Regular Environmental Monitoring of the Antineoplastic Drug Contamination Level in Pharmacies—The MEWIP Project,” Annals of Occupational Hygiene 57, no. 4 (2013): 444–455, 10.1093/annhyg/mes081. PubMed DOI

Bláhová L., Bláha L., Doležalová L., Kuta J., and Hojdarová T., “Proposals of Guidance Values for Surface Contamination by Antineoplastic Drugs Based on Long Term Monitoring in Czech and Slovak Hospitals and Pharmacies,” Frontiers in Public Health 11 (2023): 1235496, 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1235496. PubMed DOI PMC

International Organization for Standardization (ISO) , ISO/IEC 17025:2017: General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories, 3rd ed., (ISO, 2017), https://www.iso.org/standard/66912.html.

International Organization for Standardization (ISO) , ISO 15189:2022: Medical Laboratories—Requirements for Quality and Competence, 4th ed., (International Organization for Standardization, 2022), https://www.iso.org/standard/76677.html.

Kweekel D. M., McCune J. S., Punt A. M., van Luin M., and Franssen E. J. F., “Busulfan Interlaboratory Proficiency Testing Program Revealed Worldwide Errors in Drug Quantitation and Dose Recommendations,” Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 45, no. 6 (2023): 760–765, 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001107. PubMed DOI PMC

Le Doare K., Gaylord M. A., Anderson A. S., et al., “Interlaboratory Comparison of a Multiplex Immunoassay That Measures Human Serum IgG Antibodies Against Six‐Group B Streptococcus Polysaccharides,” Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics 20, no. 1 (2024): 2330138, 10.1080/21645515.2024.2330138. PubMed DOI PMC

Tuerk J., Kiffmeyer T. K., Hadtstein C., et al., “Development and Validation of an LC–MS/MS Procedure for Environmental Monitoring of Eight Cytostatic Drugs in Pharmacies,” International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry 91, no. 12 (2011): 1178–1190, 10.1080/03067319.2010.494769. DOI

Hetzel T., Vom Eyser C., Tuerk J., Teutenberg T., and Schmidt T. C., “Micro‐Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry for the Analysis of Antineoplastic Drugs From Wipe Samples,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 408, no. 28 (2016): 8221–8229, 10.1007/s00216-016-9932-y. PubMed DOI

Portilha‐Cunha M. F., Ramos S., Silva A. M. T., Norton P., Alves A., and Santos M. S. F., “An Improved LC‐MS/MS Method for the Analysis of Thirteen Cytostatics on Workplace Surfaces,” Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 14, no. 8 (2021): 754, 10.3390/ph14080754. PubMed DOI PMC

Štenglová Netíková I. R., Petruželka L., Šťastný M., and Štengl V., “Safe Decontamination of Cytostatics From the Nitrogen Mustards Family. Part One: Cyclophosphamide and Ifosfamide,” International Journal of Nanomedicine 13 (2018): 7971–7985, 10.2147/IJN.S159328. PubMed DOI PMC

Queruau Lamerie T., Nussbaumer S., Décaudin B., et al., “Evaluation of Decontamination Efficacy of Cleaning Solutions on Stainless Steel and Glass Surfaces Contaminated by 10 Antineoplastic Agents,” Annals of Occupational Hygiene 57, no. 4 (2013): 456–469, 10.1093/annhyg/mes087. PubMed DOI

Kibby T., “A Review of Surface Wipe Sampling Compared to Biologic Monitoring for Occupational Exposure to Antineoplastic Drugs,” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 14, no. 3 (2017): 159–174, 10.1080/15459624.2016.1237026. PubMed DOI

Heath E., Česen M., Negreira N., et al., “First Inter‐Laboratory Comparison Exercise for the Determination of Anticancer Drugs in Aqueous Samples,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 23, no. 15 (2016): 14692–14704, 10.1007/s11356-015-4982-9. PubMed DOI

Parmar K., Komarow L., Ellison D. W., et al., “Interlaboratory Comparison of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Phage Susceptibility Testing,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology 61, no. 12 (2023): e0061423, 10.1128/jcm.00614-23. PubMed DOI PMC

Benkstein K. D., Balakrishnan G., Bhirde A., et al., “An Interlaboratory Comparison on the Characterization of a Sub‐Micrometer Polydisperse Particle Dispersion,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 111, no. 3 (2022): 699–709, 10.1016/j.xphs.2021.11.006. PubMed DOI PMC

Portilha‐Cunha M. F., Alves A., and Santos M. S. F., “Cytostatics in Indoor Environment: An Update of Analytical Methods,” Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 14, no. 6 (2021): 574, 10.3390/ph14060574. PubMed DOI PMC

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) , Evaluation Guidelines for Surface Sampling Methods (OSHA, 2001).

Fu Y., Barkley D., Li W., Picard F., and Flarakos J., “Evaluation, Identification and Impact Assessment of Abnormal Internal Standard Response Variability in Regulated LC‐MS Bioanalysis,” Bioanalysis 12, no. 8 (2020): 545–559, 10.4155/bio-2020-0058. PubMed DOI

Imre S., Tero‐Vescan A., Dogaru M. T., et al., “With or Without Internal Standard in HPLC Bioanalysis. A Case Study,” Journal of Chromatographic Science 57, no. 3 (2019): 243–248, 10.1093/chromsci/bmy106. PubMed DOI

Rappold B. A., “Review of the Use of Liquid Chromatography‐Tandem Mass Spectrometry in Clinical Laboratories: Part I‐Development,” Annals of Laboratory Medicine 42, no. 2 (2022): 121–140, 10.3343/alm.2022.42.2.121. PubMed DOI PMC

Rappold B. A., “Review of the Use of Liquid Chromatography‐Tandem Mass Spectrometry in Clinical Laboratories: Part II‐Operations,” Annals of Laboratory Medicine 42, no. 5 (2022): 531–557, 10.3343/alm.2022.42.5.531. PubMed DOI PMC

Tian J. and Stella V. J., “Degradation of Paclitaxel and Related Compounds in Aqueous Solutions II: Nonepimerization Degradation Under Neutral to Basic pH Conditions,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 97, no. 8 (2008): 3100–3108, 10.1002/jps.21214. PubMed DOI

Jeronimo M., Colombo M., Astrakianakis G., and Hon C.‐Y., “A Surface Wipe Sampling and LC‐MS/MS Method for the Simultaneous Detection of Six Antineoplastic Drugs Commonly Handled by Healthcare Workers,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 407, no. 23 (2015): 7083–7092, 10.1007/s00216-015-8868-y. PubMed DOI

Bouin A.‐S. and Wierer M., “Quality Standards of the European Pharmacopoeia,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 158, no. Pt B (2014): 454–457, 10.1016/j.jep.2014.07.020. PubMed DOI

Hedmer M., Jönsson B. A. G., and Nygren O., “Development and Validation of Methods for Environmental Monitoring of Cyclophosphamide in Workplaces,” Journal of Environmental Monitoring 6, no. 12 (2004): 979–984, 10.1039/b409277e. PubMed DOI

Kåredal M., Jönsson R., Wetterling M., Björk B., and Hedmer M., “A Quantitative LC–MS Method to Determine Surface Contamination of Antineoplastic Drugs by Wipe Sampling,” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 19, no. 1 (2022): 50–66, 10.1080/15459624.2021.2000617. PubMed DOI

Gonzalo N., Rey M., Fontanals S., Quer N., Clopés A., and Muñoz C., “Simultaneous Determination of Five Cytotoxic Drugs in Surface Wiped Samples Using Liquid Chromatography and Tandem Mass Spectrometry for the Control of Environmental Contamination in a Comprehensive Cancer Centre,” International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry 104, no. 11 (2024): 2675–2690, 10.1080/03067319.2022.2070013. DOI

Chesher D., “Evaluating Assay Precision,” Clinical Biochemist Reviews 29, no. Suppl 1 (2008): S23–S26. PubMed PMC