Understanding the proximate and ultimate causes of genome size variation has been the focus of considerable research. However, the extent and cause of intraspecific variation in genome size are debated and poorly understood. This study aimed to test the role of genome size in adaptation through variations in intraspecific genome size. Genome size was measured in 53 Roscoea tibetica populations from the Hengduan Mountains using flow cytometry. Stomatal size and density data were collected from wild and common garden populations. Associations among genome size, environmental factors, and stomatal traits were explored. We found that high genome size variability was positively correlated with most environmental factors but negatively correlated with solar radiation during the growing season. The environment, rather than geography, significantly influenced variations in genome size. Stomatal traits measured in the wild were significantly correlated with genome size, but no such correlations were detected in the common garden. Populations in the common garden had larger stomatal sizes and lower stomatal densities. Populations with smaller genome size presented a larger degree of stomatal trait variation from the wild to the common garden. Our findings suggest that intraspecific genome size has undergone adaptive evolution driven by environmental stress. A smaller genome size is more advantageous for the alpine ginger to adapt to and thrive in changing alpine habitats.

Department of Botany Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czech Republic

State Key Laboratory of Vegetation Structure Function and Construction Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Transboundary Ecosecurity of Southwest China School of Ecology and Environmental Science Yunnan Key Laboratory of Plant Reproductive Adaptation and Evolutionary Ecology Institute of Biodiversity Yunnan University Kunming 650500 China

See more in PubMed

Acquisti  C, Elser  JJ, Kumar  S. Ecological nitrogen limitation shapes the DNA composition of plant genomes. Mol Biol Evol.  2009:26:953–956. 10.1093/molbev/msp038. PubMed DOI PMC

Ahlmann-Eltze  C, Patil  I. ggsignif: significance brackets for ‘ggplot2'. R package version 0.6.1. 2021. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggsignif.

Armstrong  EM, et al.  One hundred important questions facing plant science: an international perspective. New Phytol.  2023:238:470–481. 10.1111/nph.18771. DOI

Bales  AL, Hersch-Green  EI. Effects of soil nitrogen on diploid advantage in fireweed, PubMed DOI PMC

Beaulieu  JM, Leitch  IJ, Patel  S, Pendharkar  A, Knight  CA. Genome size is a strong predictor of cell size and stomatal density in angiosperms. New Phytol.  2008:179:975–986. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02528.x. PubMed DOI

Bennett  MD. The time and duration of meiosis. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci. 1977:277:201–226. 10.1098/rstb.1977.0012. PubMed DOI

Bennett  MD. Variation in genomic form in plants and its ecological implications. New Phytol.  1987:106:177–200. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb04689.x. DOI

Bennett  MD, Price  HJ, Johnston  JS. Anthocyanin inhibits propidium iodide DNA fluorescence in PubMed DOI PMC

Bhadra  S, Leitch  IJ, Onstein  RE. From genome size to trait evolution during angiosperm radiation. Trends Genet.  2023:39:728–735. 10.1016/j.tig.2023.07.006. PubMed DOI

Bilinski  P, et al.  Parallel altitudinal clines reveal trends in adaptive evolution of genome size in PubMed DOI PMC

Blommaert  J. Genome size evolution: towards new model systems for old questions. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci.  2020:287:20201441. 10.1098/rspb.2020.1441. PubMed DOI PMC

Bureš  P, et al.  The global distribution of angiosperm genome size is shaped by climate. New Phytol.  2024:242:744–759. 10.1111/nph.19544. PubMed DOI

Cavalier-Smith  T. Nuclear volume control by nucleoskeletal DNA, selection for cell volume and cell growth rate, and the solution of the DNA C-value paradox. J Cell Sci.  1978:34:247–278. 10.1242/jcs.34.1.247. PubMed DOI

Cavalier-Smith  T. Economy, speed and size matter: evolutionary forces driving nuclear genome miniaturization and expansion. Ann Bot.  2005:95:147–175. 10.1093/aob/mci010. PubMed DOI PMC

Dastpak  A, et al.  Cell size has pervasive effects on the functional composition and morphology of leaves: a case study in PubMed DOI

de Boer  HJ, et al.  Optimal allocation of leaf epidermal area for gas exchange. New Phytol.  2016:210:1219–1228. 10.1111/nph.13929. PubMed DOI PMC

Diez  CM, et al.  Genome size variation in wild and cultivated maize along altitudinal gradients. New Phytol.  2013:199:264–276. 10.1111/nph.12247. PubMed DOI PMC

Doležel  J, Bartoš  J. Plant DNA flow cytometry and estimation of nuclear genome size. Ann Bot.  2005:95:99–110. 10.1093/aob/mci005. PubMed DOI PMC

Faizullah  L, et al.  Exploring environmental selection on genome size in angiosperms. Trends Plant Sci.  2021:26:1039–1049. 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.06.001. PubMed DOI

Fick  SE, Hijmans  RJ. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol.  2017:37:4302–4315. 10.1002/joc.5086. DOI

Gregory  TR, Hebert  PDN. The modulation of DNA content: proximate causes and ultimate consequences. Genome Res.  1999:9:317–324. 10.1101/gr.9.4.317. PubMed DOI

Greilhuber  J, et al.  Nuclear DNA content measurement. In: Doležel  J, editor. Flow cytometry with plant cells: analysis of genes, chromosomes and genomes. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.KGaA; 2007. p. 67–101.

Guignard  MS, et al.  Genome size and ploidy influence angiosperm species’ biomass under nitrogen and phosphorus limitation. New Phytol.  2016:210:1195–1206. 10.1111/nph.13881. PubMed DOI PMC

Hessen  DO, Jeyasingh  PD, Neiman  M, Weider  LJ. Genome streamlining and the elemental costs of growth. Trends Ecol Evol.  2010:25:75–80. 10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.004. PubMed DOI

Hetherington  AM, Woodward  FI. The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature. 2003:424:901–908. 10.1038/nature01843. PubMed DOI

Hijmans  RJ. geosphere: spherical Trigonometry. R package version 1.5-10. 2019. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=geosphere.

Hoffmann  AA, Hercus  MJ. Environmental stress as an evolutionary force. BioScience. 2000:50:217–226. 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0217:ESAAEF]2.3.CO;2. DOI

Jiang  G-F, et al.  Diverse mangroves deviate from other angiosperms in their genome size, leaf cell size and cell packing density relationships. Ann Bot.  2023:131:347–360. 10.1093/aob/mcac151. PubMed DOI PMC

Jordan  GJ, Carpenter  RJ, Koutoulis  A, Price  A, Brodribb  TJ. Environmental adaptation in stomatal size independent of the effects of genome size. New Phytol.  2015:205:608–617. 10.1111/nph.13076. PubMed DOI PMC

Kang  M, Wang  J, Huang  HW. Nitrogen limitation as a driver of genome size evolution in a group of karst plants. Sci Rep.  2015:5:8. 10.1038/srep11636. PubMed DOI PMC

Kassambara  A. ggpubr: ‘ggplot2' based publication ready plots. R package version 0.4.0. 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggpubr.

Kennedy  D, Norman  C. What don't we know?  Science. 2005:309:75. 10.1126/science.309.5731.75. PubMed DOI

Knight  CA, Molinari  NA, Petrov  DA. The large genome constraint hypothesis: evolution, ecology and phenotype. Ann Bot.  2005:95:177–190. 10.1093/aob/mci011. PubMed DOI PMC

Leitch  AR, Leitch  IJ, Trimmer  M, Guignard  MS, Woodward  G. Impact of genomic diversity in river ecosystems. Trends Plant Sci.  2014:19:361–366. 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.12.005. PubMed DOI

Leitch  IJ, Leitch  AR. Genome size diversity and evolution in land plants. In: Greilhuber  J, editor. Plant genome diversity. Volume 2: physical structure, behaviour and evolution of plant genomes. Springer; 2013. p. 307–322.

Li  C, et al.  The HuangZaoSi maize genome provides insights into genomic variation and improvement history of maize. Mol Plant.  2019:12:402–409. 10.1016/j.molp.2019.02.009. PubMed DOI

Li  L, et al.  Local adaptation-induced evolutionary trap in alpine plants under climate change.  Res Square. 2023. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2886110/v1. DOI

Li  L, Zhang  J, Lu  Z, Zhao  J, Li  Q. Genomic data reveal two distinct species from the widespread alpine ginger DOI

Lomax  BH, et al.  Reconstructing relative genome size of vascular plants through geological time. New Phytol.  2014:201:636–644. 10.1111/nph.12523. PubMed DOI

Loureiro  J, et al.  Micropropagation of DOI

Lumley  T. leaps: regression subset selection. R package version 3.1. 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=leaps.

Marais  GAB, Batut  B, Daubin  V. Genome evolution: mutation is the main driver of genome size in prokaryotes. Curr Biol.  2020:30:R1083–R1085. 10.1016/j.cub.2020.07.093. PubMed DOI

Nix  J, Ranney  TG, Lynch  NP, Chen  H. Flow cytometry for estimating plant genome size: revisiting assumptions, sources of variation, reference standards, and best practices. J Am Soc Hortic Sci.  2024:149:131–141. 10.21273/JASHS05376-24. DOI

Noirot  M, Barre  P, Duperray  C. Investigation on the causes of stoichiometric error in genome size estimation using heat experiments: consequences on data interpretation. Ann Bot.  2005:95:111–118. 10.1093/aob/mci006. PubMed DOI PMC

Oksanen  J, Blanchet  FG, Friendly  M. vegan: community ecology package. 2018. Available from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html.

Olson  ME. Spandrels and trait delimitation: no such thing as “architectural constraint”. Evol Dev.  2019:21:59–71. 10.1111/ede.12279. PubMed DOI

Pellicer  J, Powell  RF, Leitch  IJ. The application of flow cytometry for estimating genome size, ploidy level endopolyploidy, and reproductive modes in plants. In: Besse  P, editor. Methods in molecular biology. Humana; 2021. p. 325–361. PubMed

Peng  Y, et al.  Plant genome size modulates grassland community responses to multi-nutrient additions. New Phytol.  2022:236:2091–2102. 10.1111/nph.18496. PubMed DOI

Praca-Fontes  MM, Carvalho  CR, Clarindo  WR, Cruz  CD. Revisiting the DNA C-values of the genome size-standards used in plant flow cytometry to choose the “best primary standards”. Plant Cell Rep.  2011:30:1183–1191. 10.1007/s00299-011-1026-x. PubMed DOI

R Core Team . R: a language and environment for statistical computing, v.4.0 ed. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021. Available online at https://www.R-project.org/.

Roddy  AB, et al.  The scaling of genome size and cell size limits maximum rates of photosynthesis with implications for ecological strategies. Int J Plant Sci.  2020:181:75–87. 10.1086/706186. DOI

Rueden  CT, et al.  Imagej2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2017:18:529. 10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z. PubMed DOI PMC

Sanders  S, Levine  AG, French  B, Huntsinger  JD. 125 questions: exploration and discovery. Science. 2021:Booklet:1–44.

Schubert  I, Vu  GTH. Genome stability and evolution: attempting a holistic view. Trends Plant Sci.  2016:21:749–757. 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.06.003. PubMed DOI

Shangguan  W, et al.  A China data set of soil properties for land surface modeling. J Adv Model Earth Syst.  2013:5:212–224. 10.1002/jame.20026. DOI

Simko  TWAV. R package “corrplot”: visualization of a correlation matrix (version 0.88). 2021. Available from https://github.com/taiyun/corrplot.

Simonin  KA, Roddy  AB. Genome downsizing, physiological novelty, and the global dominance of flowering plants. PLoS Biol.  2018:16:e2003706. 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003706. PubMed DOI PMC

Šímová  I, Herben  T. Geometrical constraints in the scaling relationships between genome size, cell size and cell cycle length in herbaceous plants. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci.  2012:279:867–875. 10.1098/rspb.2011.1284. PubMed DOI PMC

Šmarda  P, et al.  Growth, physiology, and stomatal parameters of plant polyploids grown under ice age, present-day, and future CO PubMed DOI

Šmarda  P, Horová  L, Bureš  P, Hralová  I, Marková  M. Stabilizing selection on genome size in a population of PubMed DOI

Sun  Y, Yan  F, Cui  X, Liu  F. Plasticity in stomatal size and density of potato leaves under different irrigation and phosphorus regimes. J Plant Physiol.  2014:171:1248–1255. 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.06.002. PubMed DOI

Théroux-Rancourt  G, et al.  Maximum CO PubMed DOI PMC

Trávníček  P, et al.  Challenges of flow-cytometric estimation of nuclear genome size in orchids, a plant group with both whole-genome and progressively partial endoreplication. Cytometry Part A. 2015:87:958–966. 10.1002/cyto.a.22681. PubMed DOI

Veselý  P, et al.  Environmental pressures on stomatal size may drive plant genome size evolution: evidence from a natural experiment with Cape geophytes. Ann Bot.  2020:126:323–330. 10.1093/aob/mcaa095. PubMed DOI PMC

Wang  MH, et al.  Phenotypic plasticity of stomatal and photosynthetic features of four PubMed DOI PMC

Wickham  H. Ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag; 2016.

Yang  YF, Zhu  T, Niu  DK. Association of intron loss with high mutation rate in PubMed DOI PMC

Záveská  E, et al.  Testing the large genome constraint hypothesis in tropical rhizomatous herbs: life strategies, plant traits and habitat preferences in gingers. Plant J.  2024:117:1223–1238. 10.1111/tpj.16559. PubMed DOI