Cost-effectiveness of apixaban vs. aspirin for the reduction of thrombo-embolism in high-risk patients with device-detected atrial fibrillation: insights from the ARTESiA trial

. 2025 Sep 01 ; 27 (9) : .

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, srovnávací studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, multicentrická studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid40886070

Grantová podpora
20161001610PTJ-378238 CIHR - Canada
Bristol Myers Squibb-Pfizer Alliance
Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
Canadian Stroke Prevention Intervention Network
Hamilton Health Sciences
Accelerating Clinical Trials Network
Population Health Research Institute
Medtronic

AIMS: Apixaban was superior to aspirin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in participants with subclinical atrial fibrillation (SCAF) in the Apixaban for the Reduction of Thromboembolism in Patients With Device-Detected Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation trial. This was especially true for those with CHA2DS2-VASc score > 4. Understanding the cost-effectiveness of treating SCAF is important for decision-makers. METHODS AND RESULTS: Canadian, UK, German, and US direct healthcare costs [in 2023 US dollars (USD)] were applied to hospitalized events (including strokes and bleeds) and study drugs for all participants with a CHA2DS2-VASc score > 4 to determine the mean cost per participant during the trial (mean follow-up 3.5 years). A daily cost of $0.63, $0.11, $2.26, and $6.06 for apixaban in Canada, the UK, Germany, and the USA was used. If in-trial results were not cost-saving (below $0), the prospective plan was to perform a lifetime cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov model and a willingness-to-pay of 50 000 USD per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). After considering the cost of study medication and clinical events over 3.5 years, apixaban was dominant (cost-saving and more effective) in Canada (-$2301) and the UK (-$902) but cost more in Germany and the USA ($600 and $1990, respectively). Over a lifetime, treatment with apixaban produced a net gain of 0.107 QALYs, but with costs in both Germany ($2623 more) and the USA ($9110 more), yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $24 514 per QALY for Germany and $85 140 for the USA. CONCLUSION: In patients with SCAF and a CHA2DS2-VASc score > 4, apixaban is cost saving in Canada and the UK and cost-effective in Germany. Apixaban was not cost-effective in the USA under the base cost assumption but would be cost-effective at a daily cost of $4.35 and cost saving at $3.59.

Arrhytmia Unit Hospital Universitario La Luz Madrid Spain

Breda and WCN Amphia Ziekenhuis Utrecht Netherlands

Canadian VIGOUR Centre University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada

Cardiology Clinical Academic Group Molecular and Clinical Sciences Institute City St George's University of London London UK

Clinical Cardiovascular Research Center University of Rochester Rochester NY USA

Department of Cardiac Sciences University of Calgary Calgary AB Canada

Department of Cardiology Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark

Department of Cardiology Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel Basel Switzerland

Department of Cardiology Goethe University University Hospital Frankfurt Germany

Department of Cardiology Herlev Gentofte Hospital Copenhagen Denmark

Department of Cardiology J W Goethe University Frankfurt am Main Germany

Department of Cardiology Karolinska Institutet Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden

Department of Cardiology Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital Liverpool UK

Department of Cardiology Oslo University Hospital Ulleval Oslo Norway

Department of Cardiology The Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Praha 4 Czech Republic

Department of Cardiology University Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland

Department of Clinical Medicine Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark

Department of Medicine Medical University of South Carolina Charleston SC USA

Division of Cardiology University of Ottawa Heart Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada

Duke Clinical Research Institute Duke University Durham NC USA

Heart and Vascular Center Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary

Heart Vascular and Neurology Theme Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden

Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway

Population Health Research Institute McMaster University 237 Barton Street East Hamilton Ontario L8L2X2 Canada

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Wolf  PA, Abbott  RD, Kannel  WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke  1991;22:983–8. PubMed

Lip  GYH, Nieuwlaat  R, Pisters  R, Lane  DA, Crijns  HJGM. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest  2010;137:263–72. PubMed

Healey  JS, Connolly  SJ, Gold  MR, Israel  CW, Van Gelder  IC, Capucci  A  et al.  Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. N Engl J Med  2012;366:120–9. PubMed

Healey  JS, Lopes  RD, Granger  CB, Alings  M, Rivard  L, McIntyre  WF  et al.  Apixaban for stroke prevention in subclinical atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med  2024;390:107–17. PubMed

Lopes  RD, Granger  CB, Wojdyla  DM, McIntyre  WF, Alings  M, Mani  T  et al.  Apixaban vs aspirin according to CHA2DS2-VASc score in subclinical atrial fibrillation: insights from ARTESiA. J Am Coll Cardiol  2024;84:354–64. PubMed

Shoamanesh  A, Field  TS, Coutts  SB, Sharma  M, Gladstone  D, Hart  RG  et al.  Apixaban versus aspirin for stroke prevention in people with subclinical atrial fibrillation and a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack: subgroup analysis of the ARTESiA randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol  2025;24:140–51. PubMed

Boriani  G, McIntyre  WF, Ramasundarahettige  C, Proietti  M, Glotzer  TV, Diemberger  I  et al.  Atrial fibrillation progression in patients with device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation: insights from the ARTESiA trial. Heart Rhythm  2025:S1547-5271(25)02631-1. PubMed

Lamy  A, Tong  W, Joseph  P, Gao  P, Huffman  MD, Roshandel  G  et al.  Cost effectiveness analysis of a fixed dose combination pill for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease from an individual participant data meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine  2024;73:102651. PubMed PMC

Lamy  A, Eikelboom  J, Tong  W, Yuan  F, Bangdiwala  SI, Bosch  J  et al.  The cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in the COMPASS trial. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes  2023;9:502–10. PubMed

Medicinal forms | Apixaban | Drugs | BNF | NICE . https://bnf.nice.org.uk/drugs/apixaban/medicinal-forms/ (accessed 12 March 2025).

NHS England .

Synnott  PG, McQueen  RB, Ollendorf  DA, Campbell  JD, Pearson  SD. The effectiveness and value of rivaroxaban and icosapent ethyl as additive therapies for cardiovascular disease. J Manag Care Spec Pharm  2020;26:782–5. PubMed PMC

Medicare Inpatient Hospitals—by Geography and Service | CMS Data . https://data.cms.gov/provider-summary-by-type-of-service/medicare-inpatient-hospitals/medicare-inpatient-hospitals-by-geography-and-service/data/2021 (accessed 12 March 2025).

Mittmann  N, Seung  SJ, Hill  MD, Phillips  SJ, Hachinski  V, Coté  R  et al.  Impact of disability status on ischemic stroke costs in Canada in the first year. Can J Neurol Sci  2012;39:793–800. PubMed

van Leeuwen  KG, Meijer  FJA, Schalekamp  S, Rutten  MJCM, van Dijk  EJ, van Ginneken  B  et al.  Cost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence aided vessel occlusion detection in acute stroke: an early health technology assessment. Insights Imaging  2021;12:133. PubMed PMC

Muntendorf  L-K, Konnopka  A, König  H-H, Boutitie  F, Ebinger  M, Endres  M  et al.  Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging-guided thrombolysis for patients with stroke with unknown time of onset. Value Health  2021;24:1620–7. PubMed

Simpson  KN, Simpson  AN, Mauldin  PD, Palesch  YY, Yeatts  SD, Kleindorfer  D  et al.  Observed cost and variations in short term cost-effectiveness of therapy for ischemic stroke in interventional management of stroke (IMS) III. J Am Heart Assoc  2017;6:e004513. PubMed PMC

Frausing  MHJP, Nielsen  JC, Westergaard  CL, Gerdes  C, Kjellberg  J, Boriani  G  et al.  Economic analyses in cardiac electrophysiology: from clinical efficacy to cost utility. Europace  2024;26:euae031. PubMed PMC

Arias  E, Xu  J, Kochanek  K. United States life tables, 2021. Natl Vital Stat Rep  2023;72:1–64. PubMed

Ali  M, MacIsaac  R, Quinn  TJ, Bath  PM, Veenstra  DL, Xu  Y  et al.  Dependency and health utilities in stroke: data to inform cost-effectiveness analyses. Eur Stroke J  2017;2:70–6. PubMed PMC

Rangaraju  S, Haussen  D, Nogueira  RG, Nahab  F, Frankel  M. Comparison of 3-month stroke disability and quality of life across modified Rankin scale categories. Interv Neurol  2017;6:36–41. PubMed PMC

Kiadaliri  AA, Eliasson  B, Gerdtham  U-G. Does the choice of EQ-5D tariff matter? A comparison of the Swedish EQ-5D-3L index score with UK, US, Germany and Denmark among type 2 diabetes patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes  2015;13:145. PubMed PMC

Büssgen  M, Stargardt  T. 10 years of AMNOG: what is the willingness-to-pay for pharmaceuticals in Germany?  Appl Health Econ Health Policy  2023;21:751–9. PubMed PMC

Pichon-Riviere  A, Drummond  M, Palacios  A, Garcia-Marti  S, Augustovski  F. Determining the efficiency path to universal health coverage: cost-effectiveness thresholds for 174 countries based on growth in life expectancy and health expenditures. Lancet Glob Health  2023;11:e833–42. PubMed

Anderson  JL, Heidenreich  PA, Barnett  PG, Creager  MA, Fonarow  GC, Gibbons  RJ  et al.  ACC/AHA statement on cost/value methodology in clinical practice guidelines and performance measures: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures and Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol  2014;63:2304–22. PubMed

Hart  RG, Pearce  LA, Aguilar  MI. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med  2007;146:857–67. PubMed

Lip  GYH, Proietti  M, Potpara  T, Mansour  M, Savelieva  I, Tse  HF  et al.  Atrial fibrillation and stroke prevention: 25 years of research at EP Europace journal. Europace  2023;25:euad226. PubMed PMC

Toennis  T, Bertaglia  E, Brandes  A, Dichtl  W, Fluschnik  N, de Groot  JR  et al.  The influence of atrial high-rate episodes on stroke and cardiovascular death: an update. Europace  2023;25:euad166. PubMed PMC

Schnabel  RB, Benezet-Mazuecos  J, Becher  N, McIntyre  WF, Fierenz  A, Lee  SF  et al.  Anticoagulation in device-detected atrial fibrillation with or without vascular disease: a combined analysis of the NOAH-AFNET 6 and ARTESiA trials. Eur Heart J  2024;45:4902–16. PubMed PMC

Connolly  SJ, Eikelboom  JW, Ng  J, Hirsh  J, Yusuf  S, Pogue  J  et al.  Net clinical benefit of adding clopidogrel to aspirin therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation for whom vitamin K antagonists are unsuitable. Ann Intern Med  2011;155:579–86. PubMed

Lahaye  S, Regpala  S, Lacombe  S, Sharma  M, Gibbens  S, Ball  D  et al.  Evaluation of patients’ attitudes towards stroke prevention and bleeding risk in atrial fibrillation. Thromb Haemost  2014;111:465–73. PubMed

Devereaux  PJ, Anderson  DR, Gardner  MJ, Putnam  W, Flowerdew  GJ, Brownell  BF  et al.  Differences between perspectives of physicians and patients on anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation: observational study. BMJ  2001;323:1218–22. PubMed PMC

Mei  DA, Imberti  JF, Bonini  N, Romiti  GF, Corica  B, Proietti  M  et al.  Performance of HAS-BLED and DOAC scores to predict major bleeding events in atrial fibrillation patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants: a report from a prospective European observational registry. Eur J Intern Med  2024;128:63–70. PubMed

Frothingham  S.

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...