BACKGROUND: Efficacy of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) for peripheral arthritis in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has been established in randomized clinical trials that have used improvement in summated joint counts as an outcome. Whether joints at different anatomical locations might respond differentially to TNFi remains unknown. The aim of the study was to investigate potential variations in the responsiveness to a first tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) among joints at distinct locations in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treated in routine clinical care. METHODS: Bionaive PsA patients from nine European countries were included in this observational cohort study if ≥ 1 joint was swollen at the initiation of a first TNFi as monotherapy or added to methotrexate. Only the 28-joint count was available without imaging data confirming the presence of synovitis. The primary outcome was time to first resolution of joint swelling at each joint level. Hazard ratios (HR) for resolution comparing different joint locations were estimated using interval-censored mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards models, including a random effect for country and patient, adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: A total of 1729 patients with 8397 swollen joints at the start of TNFi were included. Considering the upper extremity, a higher rate of resolution of joint swelling (HR, 95% CI) was observed for the shoulder (1.65, 1.16-2.35) and elbow (1.90, 1.38-2.61), while a lower rate was found for the wrist (0.72, 0.62-0.83) compared to the joints of digit 3. Within fingers, and using the same reference, joint swelling resolved fastest in digit 4 (1.77, 1.49-2.11) and digit 5 (1.88, 1.53-2.31). A lower rate of resolution of joint swelling was found for the knee in comparison to the elbow, the corresponding joint on the upper limb (0.56, 0.40-0.78). CONCLUSION: The time to resolution of joint swelling upon treatment with TNFi in patients with PsA seems to depend on the localisation of the affected joints.

• MeSH
• Antirheumatic Agents * therapeutic use   MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors therapeutic use   MeSH
• Cohort Studies MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Arthritis, Psoriatic * drug therapy   MeSH
• Registries * MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha antagonists & inhibitors   MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Observational Study MeSH
• Geographicals
• Europe MeSH

This is the first report comparing EULAR and national treatment recommendations for PsA patients across Europe, and the first this decade to compare ASAS-EULAR and national treatment recommendations in axSpA patients. An electronic survey was completed from October 2021-April 2022 by rheumatologists in 15 European countries. One and four countries followed all EULAR and ASAS-EULAR recommendations, respectively. Five countries had no national treatment recommendations for PsA and/or axSpA, but followed other regulations. In several countries, national treatment recommendations predated the most recent EULAR/ASAS-EULAR recommendations. Entry criteria for starting biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs varied considerably. In several countries, for PsA patients with significant skin involvement, interleukin-17 inhibitors were not given preference. The positioning of Janus Kinase inhibitors differed and Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors were not in use/reimbursed in most countries. This study may motivate European countries to update their national treatment recommendations, to align them better with the latest international recommendations.

• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Review MeSH