EudraVigilance Dotaz Zobrazit nápovědu
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used and are an important cornerstone in antithrombotic therapy. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) such as bleedings have only partially been investigated during clinical trials. The primary goal was to analyse pharmacovigilance data based on spontaneous reports of gastrointestinal (GI) bleedings with DOACs reported to EudraVigilance. A second goal was to compare GI safety profiles between DOACs based on these signals. All DOAC related GI bleedings mentioned in individual case safety reports (ICSRs) from 2012 till 2017 in the European Economic Area were classified in four GI categories based on the reported site of occurrence of the haemorrhage. Age group and gender of the patient, seriousness and ADR outcome, and the reporter's qualification were assessed per category and per DOAC. Disproportionality analyses were performed to evaluate whether or not the reported ADRs were more prevalent with a given DOAC. ICSRs were bleeding-related in about half of the cases (n = 28,992/53,471). Of these bleedings, >25% was GI-related. Most patients experiencing GI bleedings were between 65 and 85 years old, with no obvious differences between men and women. Stomach, ulcer-related duodenal, and rectal bleedings were the most reported GI bleedings with a fatal outcome in 5.8%, 7.5%, and 9.8% of the cases for rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran, respectively. The disproportionality data suggest that dabigatran is more frequently involved in GI bleeding events than the other DOACs. DOACs were significantly associated with GI bleedings. Although the data should be interpreted with caution, it seems that dabigatran was associated more often than other DOACs with GI bleedings based on the analysis of spontaneous pharmacovigilance reports.
- MeSH
- antikoagulancia škodlivé účinky MeSH
- aplikace orální MeSH
- cévní mozková příhoda * farmakoterapie MeSH
- dabigatran škodlivé účinky MeSH
- fibrilace síní * farmakoterapie MeSH
- gastrointestinální krvácení chemicky indukované epidemiologie farmakoterapie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- rivaroxaban škodlivé účinky MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
The recent reports of oral side effects (SEs) following COVID-19 vaccination warrant further investigation into their prevalence, severity, and aetiology. This study was conducted to synthesize the first-ever population-level evidence about oral SEs of COVID-19 vaccines in Europe. The European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Pharmacovigilance (EudraVigilance) database was accessed in August 2022 to extract summary data of all potential oral SEs reported after COVID-19 vaccination. The data were reported descriptively and cross-tabulated to facilitate sub-group analysis per vaccine type, sex, and age group. Dysgeusia was the most commonly reported oral SE (0.381 case per each 100 received reports), followed by oral paraesthesia (0.315%), ageusia (0.296%), lip swelling (0.243%), dry mouth (0.215%), oral hypoaesthesia (0.210%), swollen tongue (0.207%), and taste disorder (0.173%). Females had significantly (Sig. < 0.001) a higher prevalence of all most common (top 20) oral SEs, except for salivary hypersecretion, which was equally prevalent among females and males. The present study revealed a low prevalence of oral SEs, with taste-related, other sensory and anaphylactic SEs being the most common SEs in Europe, similar to what was found earlier among the US population. Future studies should explore the potential risk factors of oral sensory and anaphylactic SEs to verify whether they are causally linked to COVID-19 vaccines.
- MeSH
- anafylaxe * MeSH
- COVID-19 * epidemiologie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nežádoucí účinky léčiv MeSH
- systémy pro sběr zpráv o nežádoucích účincích léků MeSH
- vakcíny proti COVID-19 * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
BACKGROUND: Signal management is considered an important activity in pharmacovigilance and should be performed using any available source of data, including scientific literature. The main aim of this study was to assess the role of scientific literature in both indexed and unindexed journals and compare the relevance of both in the signal management process. METHODS: The study was a retrospective analysis of safety data. For the purposes of the study, drugs for which safety signals were evaluated by European Medicine Agency (EMA) were chosen. A match analysis of data collected in the EudraVigilance (EV) database with data from bibliographic databases such as MEDLINE, Embase or EBSCO (International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, IPA and the Allied and the Complementary Medicine Database, AMED) was performed. RESULTS: A total of 73 drug event associations (DEA) and 4160 individual case safety reports (ICSRs) were analyzed. About 33% of ICSRs were created based on scientific literature. A total of 1196 ICSRs were submitted to the EV database based on journals indexed in global bibliographic databases Embase (86.00%) or MEDLINE (81.96%) or EBSCO (IPA or AMED, 0.66%). CONCLUSION: This study underlines the importance of scientific literature for the signal management process in addition to other data sources. Most literature ICSRs from this analysis were created based on scientific journals indexed in bibliographic databases; therefore, it can be concluded that a systematic review of bibliographic databases, such as Embase or MEDLINE is highly relevant for the signal management process.
