OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to identify, catalogue, and characterize previously reported tools, techniques, methods, and processes that have been recommended or used by evidence synthesizers to detect fraudulent or erroneous data and mitigate its impact. INTRODUCTION: Decision-making for policy and practice should always be underpinned by the best available evidence-typically peer-reviewed scientific literature. Evidence synthesis literature should be collated and organized using the appropriate evidence synthesis methodology, best exemplified by the role systematic reviews play in evidence-based health care. However, with the rise of "predatory journals," fraudulent or erroneous data may be invading this literature, which may negatively affect evidence syntheses that use this data. This, in turn, may compromise decision-making processes. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will include peer-reviewed articles, commentaries, books, and editorials that describe at least 1 tool, technique, method, or process with the explicit purpose of identifying or mitigating the impact of fraudulent or erroneous data for any evidence synthesis, in any topic area. Manuals, handbooks, and guidance from major organizations, universities, and libraries will also be considered. METHODS: This review will be conducted using the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Databases and relevant organizational websites will be searched for eligible studies. Title and abstract, and, subsequently, full-text screening will be conducted in duplicate. Data from identified full texts will be extracted using a pre-determined checklist, while the findings will be summarized descriptively and presented in tables. REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/u8yrn.

• MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Fraud prevention & control   MeSH
• Systematic Reviews as Topic MeSH
• Scientific Misconduct * MeSH
• Research Design standards   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Review MeSH

IL-8 and its polymorphisms are involved in multiple acute and chronic inflammatory processes including pathological changes to surrounding structures of the teeth called periodontal diseases or periodontitis. The aim of this manuscript was to systematically review studies from 2006 to 2021 on IL-8 polymorphisms and their association with periodontitis. Literature analysis was done following the PRISMA protocol guidance using articles not older than 15 years (2006-2021). The search was carried out using PubMed (MEDLINE), ScienceDirect and Wiley Online Library databases. For the focus question, the PICO (population (P), intervention (I), control (C), and outcome (O)) study design protocol was used, and the following question was formulated: are IL-8 gene polymorphisms associated with periodontitis? A total of 2422 articles were found at the beginning of the search. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, screening, and full-text article exclusion with reasons, 31 studies were included in the analysis. In conclusion, IL-8 and its gene polymorphisms are associated with an increased risk of periodontal diseases.

• MeSH
• Chronic Periodontitis * MeSH
• Interleukin-8 genetics   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Periodontitis * genetics   MeSH
• Polymorphism, Genetic MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Review MeSH

Well-being and social interaction are among the primary goals to be achieved for the elderly. Intergenerational physical activity (PA) has gained increasing attention due to its potential to encourage PA and social interaction, providing both social and physical benefits to both younger and older individuals. This review aimed to gain a deeper understanding of the potential roles of PA in facilitating intergenerational interactions and provide practical insights. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, the systematic review identified specific keywords to search for articles that met the chosen inclusion and exclusion criteria (n. 5 RCT articles, selected between 2009 and 2024), conducted by three independent reviewers. Scopus, PubMed, EBSCOhost, and Web of Science were consulted to identify relevant articles. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2. For the narrative dissertation, articles were identified across three key areas of focus: types of PA, age groups, and intended goals. Results: Few studies have specifically implemented PA protocols in intergenerational relationships, and most have planned remote activities without monitoring outcomes. The main advantages of intergenerational PA are oriented towards the social and relational sphere rather than simple PA involvement. Conclusions: For the elderly, these programs may help mitigate age-related deficits, while children and adolescents, when adapting to their older counterparts, experience greater effectiveness when provided with clear guidance during shared activities. Considering the characteristics and needs of individuals of different ages, different activities must be proposed to obtain different results. The organization of workshops and preparatory sessions will help in facilitating relationships and interactions among participants.

• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Review MeSH