BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) reduces disease recurrence and progression in intermediate- and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). BCG-associated adverse events during instillations are common, leading to treatment cessation. Prophylactic use of quinolones in conjunction with BCG instillations is one approach for reducing BCG-associated adverse events. Our aim was to delineate the clinical impact of quinolone prophylaxis (QP) in patients receiving adjuvant BCG instillations for NMIBC. METHODS: In October 2024, a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials was performed. Prospective and retrospective studies reporting comparative outcomes for patients with and without QP during BCG instillations were included. Outcomes were reported in a binary fashion. Random-effects meta-analysis using the weighted mean difference was conducted. Primary outcomes for pooled analyses included BCG-associated toxicities, the completion rate for BCG induction, the likelihood of antituberculosis treatment, and disease recurrence and progression at 12 mo. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: The systematic review included five studies. Four randomised controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis, and one nonrandomised study was also included in the narrative review. The studies involved 445 patients, of whom 194 received QP + BCG and 251 received BCG alone. QP use was associated with lower incidence of class ≥2 (40.8% vs 54.7%; relative risk [RR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.94; p = 0.006), and class ≥3 BCG-associated toxicities (25.3% vs 36.4%; RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50-0.98; p = 0.04) and a higher completion rate for BCG induction (83.0% vs 70.6%; RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01-1.34; p = 0.04). The 12-mo recurrence rates (14.7% vs 19.4%; RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.46-1.27; p = 0.3) and progression rates (4.5% vs 6.4%; RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.09-8.25; p = 0.9) did not significantly differ for QP + BCG versus BCG alone. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The use of QP with adjuvant BCG for NMIBC mitigated debilitating BCG-associated toxicities and improved the completion rate for BCG induction therapy.
- Klíčová slova
- Adjuvant intravesical therapy, Antibiotic prophylaxis, Bacillus Calmette-Guérin, Non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer, Quinolone,
- MeSH
- adjuvancia imunologická * terapeutické užití aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- adjuvantní chemoterapie MeSH
- aplikace intravezikální MeSH
- BCG vakcína * terapeutické užití aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- chinolony * terapeutické užití aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- invazivní růst nádoru * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře neinvadující svalovinu MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře * farmakoterapie patologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
- Názvy látek
- adjuvancia imunologická * MeSH
- BCG vakcína * MeSH
- chinolony * MeSH
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We present a summary of the 2025 update for the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The aim is to provide practical recommendations on the clinical management of UTUC with a focus on diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. METHODS: For the 2025 guidelines on UTUC, new and relevant evidence was identified, collated, and appraised via a structured assessment of the literature. Databases searched included Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries. Recommendations within the guidelines were developed by the panel to prioritise clinically important care decisions. The strength of each recommendation was determined according to a balance between desirable and undesirable consequences of alternative management strategies, the quality of the evidence (including the certainty of estimates), and the nature and variability of patient values and preferences. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Key recommendations emphasise the importance of thorough diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up for patients with UTUC. The guidelines stress the importance of appropriate treatment taking into account patient values and preferences. Key updates in the 2025 UTUC guidelines include: significant changes to the recommendations for UTUC diagnosis; complete revision of the sections addressing risk stratification, ureteroscopy, and the surgical approach for radical nephroureterectomy; addition of four new recommendations, two related to kidney-sparing management of localised low-risk UTUC and a further two related to management of high-risk nonmetastatic UTUC; a review and adaptation of recommendation for UTUC follow-up; and addition of a new section addressing quality indicators for UTUC management. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This overview of the 2025 EAU guidelines on UTUC offers valuable insights into risk factors, diagnosis, classification, treatment, and follow-up for UTUC. The guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to the current best evidence and are designed for effective integration in clinical practice.
- Klíčová slova
- (Neo)adjuvant therapy, Chemotherapy, Genetic screening, Immunotherapy, Management, Prognostic factors, Renal pelvis, Surgery, Ureter, Urothelial carcinoma,
- Publikační typ
- úvodníky MeSH
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There is no standardized regimen for follow-up after radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BC). To address this gap, we conducted a multicenter study involving urologist members from the European Association of Urology (EAU) bladder cancer guideline panels. Our objective was to identify consistent post-RC follow-up strategies and develop a practice-based framework based on expert opinion. METHODS: We surveyed 27 urologist members of the EAU guideline panels for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer using a pre-tested questionnaire with dichotomous responses. The survey inquired about follow-up strategies after RC and the use of risk-adapted strategies. Consistency was defined as >75% affirmative responses for follow-up practices commencing 3 mo after RC. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: We received responses from 96% of the panel members, who provided data from 21 European hospitals. Risk-adapted follow-up is used in 53% of hospitals, with uniform criteria for high-risk (at least ≥pT3 or pN+) and low-risk ([y]pT0/a/1N0) cases. In the absence of agreement for risk-based follow up, a non-risk-adapted framework for follow-up was developed. Higher conformity was observed within the initial 3 yr, followed by a decline in subsequent follow-up. Follow-up was most frequent during the first year, including patient assessments, physical examinations, and laboratory tests. Computed tomography of the chest and abdomen/pelvis was the most common imaging modality, initially at least biannually, and then annually from years 2 to 5. There was a lack of consistency for continuing follow-up beyond 10 yr after RC. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This practice-based post-RC follow-up framework developed by EAU bladder cancer experts may serve as a valuable guide for urologists in the absence of prospective randomized studies. PATIENT SUMMARY: We asked urologists from the EAU bladder cancer guideline panels about their patient follow-up after surgical removal of the bladder for bladder cancer. We found that although urologists have varying approaches, there are also common follow-up practices across the panel. We created a practical follow-up framework that could be useful for urologists in their day-to-day practice.
- Klíčová slova
- Bladder cancer, Cystectomy, Follow-up, Imaging, Urothelial carcinoma,
- MeSH
- cystektomie * metody normy MeSH
- lékařská praxe - způsoby provádění * normy MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře * chirurgie patologie MeSH
- následná péče * normy MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma MeSH
- společnosti lékařské MeSH
- urologie normy MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Given the uncertainty regarding the role of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) as part of a multimodal treatment strategy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients with cN+ disease, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the corresponding literature. METHODS: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we identified 17 observational comparative and noncomparative studies, published between January 2000 and September 2024, evaluating UTUC patients with cTanyN+M0 disease (P) who received RNU as part of a multimodal treatment strategy (I), as compared with any treatment strategy if applicable (C), to assess oncological or postoperative outcomes (O). Meta-analyses were further performed, as appropriate. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 15 studies evaluated the effectiveness of adding chemotherapy to RNU in the perioperative setting without specifying the exact timing of delivery (n = 1), in the induction setting (n = 14), or in the adjuvant setting (n = 5), while two studies evaluated the effectiveness of adding RNU to chemotherapy. Meta-analyses showed that the use of induction chemotherapy plus RNU versus RNU alone was associated with greater odds of pathological downstaging (risk ratio [RR] = 3.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [2.48-3.77]; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%; p = 0.44) and pathological complete nodal response (RR = 2.80; 95% CI = [2.03-3.86]; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%; p = 0.47) as well as prolonged overall survival (HR = 0.52; 95% CI = [0.42-0.64]; p < 0.001; I2 = 14%; p = 0.33) without any significant impact on the risk of overall (RR = 1.14; 95% CI = [0.79-1.64]; p = 0.48; I2 = 0%; p = 0.76) and major (RR = 0.48; 95% CI = [0.18-1.24]; p = 0.13; I2 = 0%; p = 0.87) postoperative complications. In addition, the use of induction chemotherapy plus RNU versus RNU plus adjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 0.58; 95% CI = [0.38-0.89]; p = 0.01) or chemotherapy alone (HR = 0.49; 95% CI = [0.32-0.76]; p = 0.001; I2 = 46%; p = 0.17) was associated with prolonged overall survival. Limitations include the observational design of all included studies. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The use of RNU could provide the greatest oncological benefits without any significant harm in selected UTUC patients with fit general condition and resectable cN+ disease responding to induction chemotherapy. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we looked at the outcomes of radical surgery in combination with systemic chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma with clinical evidence of dissemination to the surrounding lymph nodes. We observed that the use of radical surgery was associated with the greatest oncological benefits without any increased risk of postoperative complications in patients with fit general condition and resectable disease responding to induction chemotherapy. We conclude that the use of induction chemotherapy plus radical surgery could be the best multimodal treatment strategy for these patients.
- Klíčová slova
- Effectiveness, Induction chemotherapy, Lymph node metastasis, Radical nephroureterectomy, Upper tract urothelial carcinoma,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This publication represents a summary of the updated 2024 European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), TaT1, and carcinoma in situ. The information presented herein is limited to urothelial carcinoma, unless specified otherwise. The aim is to provide practical recommendations on the clinical management of NMIBC with a focus on clinical presentation. METHODS: For the 2024 guidelines on NMIBC, new and relevant evidence was identified, collated, and appraised via a structured assessment of the literature. Databases searched included Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries. Recommendations within the guidelines were developed by the panel to prioritise clinically important care decisions. The strength of each recommendation was determined according to a balance between desirable and undesirable consequences of alternative management strategies, the quality of the evidence (including the certainty of estimates), and the nature and variability of patient values and preferences. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Key recommendations emphasise the importance of thorough diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up for patients with NMIBC. The guidelines stress the importance of defining patients' risk stratification and treating them appropriately. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This overview of the 2024 EAU guidelines offers valuable insights into risk factors, diagnosis, classification, prognostic factors, treatment, and follow-up of NMIBC. These guidelines are designed for effective integration into clinical practice.
- Klíčová slova
- Bacillus Calmette-Guérin, Bacillus Calmette-Guérin unresponsive, Bladder cancer, Classification, Cystoscopy, Diagnosis, Follow-up, Guidelines, Intravesical chemotherapy, Prognosis, Radical cystectomy, Transurethral resection, Urothelial carcinoma,
- MeSH
- invazivní růst nádoru * MeSH
- karcinom in situ * terapie patologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře neinvadující svalovinu MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře * terapie patologie MeSH
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma MeSH
- urologie normy MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
PURPOSE: A re-transurethral resection of the bladder (re-TURB) is a well-established approach in managing non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) for various reasons: repeat-TURB is recommended for a macroscopically incomplete initial resection, restaging-TURB is required if the first resection was macroscopically complete but contained no detrusor muscle (DM) and second-TURB is advised for all completely resected T1-tumors with DM in the resection specimen. This study assessed the long-term outcomes after repeat-, second-, and restaging-TURB in T1-NMIBC patients. METHODS: Individual patient data with tumor characteristics of 1660 primary T1-patients (muscle-invasion at re-TURB omitted) diagnosed from 1990 to 2018 in 17 hospitals were analyzed. Time to recurrence, progression, death due to bladder cancer (BC), and all causes (OS) were visualized with cumulative incidence functions and analyzed by log-rank tests and multivariable Cox-regression models stratified by institution. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 45.3 (IQR 22.7-81.1) months. There were no differences in time to recurrence, progression, or OS between patients undergoing restaging (135 patients), second (644 patients), or repeat-TURB (84 patients), nor between patients who did or who did not undergo second or restaging-TURB. However, patients who underwent repeat-TURB had a shorter time to BC death compared to those who had second- or restaging-TURB (multivariable HR 3.58, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Prognosis did not significantly differ between patients who underwent restaging- or second-TURB. However, a worse prognosis in terms of death due to bladder cancer was found in patients who underwent repeat-TURB compared to second-TURB and restaging-TURB, highlighting the importance of separately evaluating different indications for re-TURB.
- Klíčová slova
- Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, Prognosis, Re-TURB, Repeat TURB, Restaging TURB, Second TURB,
- MeSH
- cystektomie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- močový měchýř chirurgie patologie MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře neinvadující svalovinu * MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře * chirurgie patologie MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- staging nádorů MeSH
- urologické chirurgické výkony MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
CONTEXT: The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines panel on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has updated the guidelines to aid clinicians in evidence-based management of UTUC. OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The recommendations provided in these guidelines are based on a review of the literature via a systematic search of the PubMed, Ovid, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Data were searched using the following keywords: urinary tract cancer, urothelial carcinomas, renal pelvis, ureter, bladder cancer, chemotherapy, ureteroscopy, nephroureterectomy, neoplasm, (neo)adjuvant treatment, instillation, recurrence, risk factors, metastatic, immunotherapy, and survival. The results were assessed by a panel of experts. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Even though data are accruing, for many areas there is still insufficient high-level evidence to provide strong recommendations. Patient stratification on the basis of histology and clinical examination (including imaging) and assessment of patients at risk of Lynch syndrome will aid management. Kidney-sparing management should be offered as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk UTUC and two functional kidneys. In particular, for patients with high-risk or metastatic UTUC, new treatment options have become available. In high-risk UTUC, platinum-based chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy, and adjuvant nivolumab for unfit or patients who decline chemotherapy, are options. For metastatic disease, gemcitabine/carboplatin chemotherapy is recommended as first-line treatment for cisplatin-ineligible patients. Patients with PD-1/PD-L1-positive tumours should be offered a checkpoint inhibitor (pembrolizumab or atezolizumab). CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to the current best evidence. Urologists should take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen according to the risk stratification of these tumours. PATIENT SUMMARY: Cancer of the upper urinary tract is rare, but because 60% of these tumours are invasive at diagnosis, timely and appropriate diagnosis is most important. A number of known risk factors exist.
- Klíčová slova
- (Neo)adjuvant therapy, Chemotherapy, Genetic screening, Immunotherapy, Management, Prognostic factors, Renal pelvis, Surgery, Ureter, Urothelial carcinoma,
- MeSH
- karcinom z přechodných buněk * diagnóza terapie patologie MeSH
- ledvinná pánvička patologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory ledvin * diagnóza terapie patologie MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře * patologie MeSH
- nádory močovodu * diagnóza terapie patologie MeSH
- urologie * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
BACKGROUND/AIM: Serum thymidine kinase 1 (STK1) is a proliferation biomarker that has been used as a diagnostic marker of several malignant diseases. However, there are limited data for prostate cancer (PCa). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively analysed serum samples from 169 patients with biopsy confirmed PCa, who had been indicated for radical prostatectomy (RP) between 2013-2016. The results were compared with those in serum samples from 39 healthy men. We used commercially available enzymatic immunoassay to determine the levels of STK1. The patients were divided into groups according to the Gleason score (GS) and risk factors for adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT), which were defined as GS 8-10, pT3, and a positive surgical margin. RESULTS: The median serum level of STK1 in PCa patients was 0.289 pmol/l. In the control group, the median value was 0.0116 pmol/l (p<0.001). By comparing the patients with GS≤6 vs. 7 vs. ≥8 (p=0.01), we found statistically significant differences. In the correlation of STK1 values with risk factors, we found statistically significant differences both in comparison of 0 vs. 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 risk factors (p=0.021), as well as ≤1 vs. 2≥ risk factors (p=0.009). CONCLUSION: The levels of STK1 are significantly higher in patients with PCa than those in healthy controls. Furthermore, STK1 values correlate with GS and predefined risk factors for aRT. Therefore, STK1 can be considered as a potential tumour marker of PCa diagnosis and risk stratification.
- Klíčová slova
- Prostate cancer, STK1, serum biomarker, thymidine kinase 1,
- MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery * MeSH
- nádory prostaty * patologie MeSH
- prostata patologie MeSH
- prostatektomie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- stupeň nádoru MeSH
- thymidinkináza MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- nádorové biomarkery * MeSH
- thymidine kinase 1 MeSH Prohlížeč
- thymidinkináza MeSH
BACKGROUND: Ta grade 3 (G3) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a relatively rare diagnosis with an ambiguous character owing to the presence of an aggressive G3 component together with the lower malignant potential of the Ta component. The European Association of Urology (EAU) NMIBC guidelines recently changed the risk stratification for Ta G3 from high risk to intermediate, high, or very high risk. However, prognostic studies on Ta G3 carcinomas are limited and inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic value of categorizing Ta G3 compared to Ta G2 and T1 G3 carcinomas. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Individual patient data for 5170 primary Ta-T1 bladder tumors from 17 hospitals were analyzed. Transurethral resection of the tumor was performed between 1990 and 2018. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Time to recurrence and time to progression were analyzed using cumulative incidence functions, log-rank tests, and multivariable Cox-regression models with interaction terms stratified by institution. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Ta G3 represented 7.5% (387/5170) of Ta-T1 carcinomas of which 42% were classified as intermediate risk. Time to recurrence did not differ between Ta G3 and Ta G2 (p = 0.9) or T1 G3 (p = 0.4). Progression at 5 yr occurred for 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7-4.8%) of Ta G2, 13% (95% CI 9.3-17%) of Ta G3, and 20% (95% CI 17-23%) of T1 G3 carcinomas. Time to progression for Ta G3 was shorter than for Ta G2 (p < 0.001) and longer than for T1 G3 (p = 0.002). Patients with Ta G3 NMIBC with concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS) had worse prognosis and a similar time to progression as for patients with T1 G3 NMIBC with CIS (p = 0.5). Multivariable analyses for recurrence and progression showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of Ta G3 tumors in terms of progression appears to be in between that of Ta G2 and T1 G3. However, patients with Ta G3 NMIBC with concomitant CIS have worse prognosis that is comparable to that of T1 G3 with CIS. Our results support the recent EAU NMIBC guideline changes for more refined risk stratification of Ta G3 tumors because many of these patients have better prognosis than previously thought. PATIENT SUMMARY: We used data from 17 centers in Europe and Canada to assess the prognosis for patients with stage Ta grade 3 (G3) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Time to cancer progression for Ta G3 cancer differed from both Ta G2 and T1 G3 tumors. Our results support the recent change in the European Association of Urology guidelines for more refined risk stratification of Ta G3 NMIBC because many patients with this tumor have better prognosis than previously thought.
- Klíčová slova
- Bladder, Cancer, Carcinomas, G3, Grade, Non–muscle-invasive, Stage Ta, Urothelial, World Health Organization,
- MeSH
- karcinom * diagnóza patologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- močový měchýř patologie MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře * diagnóza terapie patologie MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- staging nádorů MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
