This article describes the discovery of novel potent muscarinic receptor antagonists identified during a search for more active histamine H3 receptor (H3R) ligands. The idea was to replace the flexible seven methylene linker with a semirigid 1,4-cyclohexylene or p-phenylene substituted group of the previously described histamine H3R antagonists ADS1017 and ADS1020. These simple structural modifications of the histamine H3R antagonist led to the emergence of additional pharmacological effects, some of which unexpectedly showed strong antagonist potency at muscarinic receptors. This paper reports the routes of synthesis and pharmacological characterization of guanidine derivatives, a novel chemotype of muscarinic receptor antagonists binding to the human muscarinic M2 and M4 receptors (hM2R and hM4R, respectively) in nanomolar concentration ranges. The affinities of the newly synthesized ADS10227 (1-{4-{4-{[4-(phenoxymethyl)cyclohexyl]methyl}piperazin-1-yl}but-1-yl}-1-(benzyl)guanidine) at hM2R and hM4R were 2.8 nM and 5.1 nM, respectively.

• Keywords
• Antagonists, guanidine derivatives, histamine H3 receptor, muscarinic M2 receptor, muscarinic M4 receptor, structure−activity relationships,
• MeSH
• Histamine H3 Antagonists * pharmacology   MeSH
• Muscarinic Antagonists MeSH
• Histamine Antagonists MeSH
• Cholinergic Agents MeSH
• Guanidines pharmacology   MeSH
• Histamine MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Receptors, Histamine H3 * MeSH
• Structure-Activity Relationship MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
• Names of Substances
• Histamine H3 Antagonists * MeSH
• Muscarinic Antagonists MeSH
• Histamine Antagonists MeSH
• Cholinergic Agents MeSH
• Guanidines MeSH
• Histamine MeSH
• Receptors, Histamine H3 * MeSH

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: More than 30% of currently marketed medications act via GPCRs. Thus, GPCRs represent one of the most important pharmacotherapeutic targets. In contrast to traditional agonists activating multiple signalling pathways, agonists activating a single signalling pathway represent a new generation of drugs with increased specificity and fewer adverse effects. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We have synthesized novel agonists of muscarinic ACh receptors and tested their binding and function (on levels of cAMP and inositol phosphates) in CHO cells expressing individual subtypes of muscarinic receptors, primary cultures of rat aortic smooth muscle cells and suspensions of digested native tissues from rats. Binding of the novel compounds to M2 receptors was modelled in silico. KEY RESULTS: Two of the tested new compounds (1-(thiophen-2-ylmethyl)-3,6-dihydro-2H-pyridinium and 1-methyl-1-(thiophen-2-ylmethyl)-3,6-dihydro-2H-pyridinium) only inhibited cAMP synthesis in CHO cells, primary cultures, and native tissues, with selectivity for M2 muscarinic receptors and displaying bias towards the Gi signalling pathway at all subtypes of muscarinic receptors. Molecular modelling revealed interactions with the orthosteric binding site in a way specific for a given agonist followed by agonist-specific changes in the conformation of the receptor. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The identified compounds may serve as lead structures in the search for novel non-steroidal and non-opioid analgesics acting via M2 and M4 muscarinic receptors with reduced side effects associated with activation of the phospholipase C signalling pathway.

• MeSH
• Muscarinic Agonists * pharmacology   MeSH
• Muscarinic Antagonists pharmacology   MeSH
• CHO Cells MeSH
• Cricetulus MeSH
• Cricetinae MeSH
• Rats MeSH
• Receptor, Muscarinic M2 MeSH
• Receptors, Muscarinic * MeSH
• Signal Transduction MeSH
• Animals MeSH
• Check Tag
• Cricetinae MeSH
• Rats MeSH
• Animals MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
• Names of Substances
• Muscarinic Agonists * MeSH
• Muscarinic Antagonists MeSH
• Receptor, Muscarinic M2 MeSH
• Receptors, Muscarinic * MeSH

Proper determination of agonist efficacy is essential in the assessment of agonist selectivity and signalling bias. Agonist efficacy is a relative term that is dependent on the system in which it is measured, especially being dependent on receptor expression level. The operational model (OM) of functional receptor agonism is a useful means for the determination of agonist functional efficacy using the maximal response to agonist and ratio of agonist functional potency to its equilibrium dissociation constant (KA) at the active state of the receptor. However, the functional efficacy parameter τ is inter-dependent on two other parameters of OM; agonist's KA and the highest response that could be evoked in the system by any stimulus (EMAX). Thus, fitting of OM to functional response data is a tricky process. In this work we analyse pitfalls of fitting OM to experimental data and propose a rigorous fitting procedure where KA and EMAX are derived from half-efficient concentration of agonist and apparent maximal responses obtained from a series of functional response curves. Subsequently, OM with fixed KA and EMAX is fitted to functional response data to obtain τ. The procedure was verified at M2 and M4 muscarinic receptors fused with the G15 G-protein α-subunit. The procedure, however, is applicable to any receptor-effector system.

• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop potent and long-acting antagonists of muscarinic ACh receptors. The 4-hexyloxy and 4-butyloxy derivatives of 1-[2-(4-oxidobenzoyloxy)ethyl]-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridin-1-ium were synthesized and tested for biological activity. Antagonists with long-residence time at receptors are therapeutic targets for the treatment of several neurological and psychiatric human diseases. Their long-acting effects allow for reduced daily doses and adverse effects. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The binding and antagonism of functional responses to the agonist carbachol mediated by 4-hexyloxy compounds were investigated in CHO cells expressing individual subtypes of muscarinic receptors and compared with 4-butyloxy analogues. KEY RESULTS: The 4-hexyloxy derivatives were found to bind muscarinic receptors with micromolar affinity and antagonized the functional response to carbachol with a potency ranging from 30 nM at M1 to 4 μM at M3 receptors. Under washing conditions to reverse antagonism, the half-life of their antagonistic action ranged from 1.7 h at M2 to 5 h at M5 receptors. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The 4-hexyloxy derivatives were found to be potent long-acting M1 -preferring antagonists. In view of current literature, M1 -selective antagonists may have therapeutic potential for striatal cholinergic dystonia, delaying epileptic seizure after organophosphate intoxication or relieving depression. These compounds may also serve as a tool for research into cognitive deficits.

• MeSH
• Muscarinic Antagonists chemical synthesis   chemistry   pharmacology   MeSH
• CHO Cells MeSH
• Cricetulus MeSH
• Carbachol chemistry   pharmacology   MeSH
• Cells, Cultured MeSH
• Molecular Structure MeSH
• Pyridines chemical synthesis   chemistry   pharmacology   MeSH
• Receptors, Muscarinic metabolism   MeSH
• Dose-Response Relationship, Drug MeSH
• Structure-Activity Relationship MeSH
• Animals MeSH
• Check Tag
• Animals MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
• Names of Substances
• Muscarinic Antagonists MeSH
• Carbachol MeSH
• Pyridines MeSH
• Receptors, Muscarinic MeSH