INTRODUCTION: Four approved immune-based combinations for untreated metastatic renal carcinoma have demonstrated survival benefits. The ARON-1 study (NCT05287464) analyzed real-world data of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving first-line immuno-oncology combinations. This sub-analysis is focused on the nivolumab plus cabozantinib effectiveness. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study across 52 centers in 17 countries, including patients with metastatic renal carcinoma treated with first-line nivolumab plus cabozantinib, regardless of histologic characteristics, performance status, or risk by IMDC prognostic model. Patients with incomplete medical data were excluded. The primary objective of this sub-analysis of the ARON-1 study was to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety. RESULTS: A total of 333 patients were treated with nivolumab plus cabozantinib, clinical characteristics included ECOG performance status ≥2 20%, non-clear cell histology 16%, sarcomatoid de-differentiation 12%, and poor-risk by IMDC 28%. At a median follow-up of 15.9 months (95%CI 11.2-44.0), the median overall survival was not reached (40.0-NR), the probability of survival at 2 years was 75%, while median progression free survival was 33.7 months (95%CI 21.1-38.9). In the entire cohort, an objective response was observed in 58%, with 6% complete responses, and a median duration of response of 38.9 months (95%CI 33.7-NR). At multivariate analysis, adverse prognostic factors for overall survival included ECOG performance status ≥2, sarcomatoid de-differentiation, brain and bone metastases, and poor IMDC group. In the safety analysis, the incidence of grade 3 or higher toxicity was 37%, with hypertension and hand-foot syndrome being the most frequent adverse events. CONCLUSION: The findings in the present real-world study reaffirm the clinical benefits and safety of the nivolumab plus cabozantinib combination across all subgroups, including populations that are generally excluded from clinical trials for whom data is often missing. Poor performance status, sarcomatoid de-differentiation, bone or central nervous system metastases and IMDC poor risk group were confirmed as negative prognostic factors.

• Klíčová slova
• clear cell renal cell carcinoma, metastatic renal cell carcinoma, nivolumab plus cabozantinib, non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma, real-world evidence,
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

AIMS: The objective of this study was to investigate the association and combined prognostic significance of the PD-L1, Smoothened protein and β-catenin expressions in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). METHODS: The PD-L1, Smoothened protein and β-catenin expression were evaluated in 104 ccRCC patients. All studied tumor samples were acquired from nephrectomy specimens of primary tumors and not from biopsies or metastases. An indirect immunohistochemistry using polyclonal rabbit anti-Smoothened antibody, monoclonal mouse anti-human β-catenin-1 antibody, immunohistochemical assay PD-L1 28-8 pharmDx using monoclonal rabbit anti-PD-L1 antibody and anti-VHL (C- terminal) rabbit antibody was used. Immunohistochemistry was scored semiquantitavely. RESULTS: Median overall survival (OS) was significantly better in patients with lower PD-L1 expression (≤5%), Smoothened protein (SMO) expression (<5%) or cytoplasmic β-catenin expression (≤75%) than in patients with higher expressions of these biomarkers (P<0.001, P=0.047, and P<0.001, respectively). Membranous β-catenin showed an opposite effect with its lower expression (≤75%) being associated with longer OS (P=0.020). There was significant association between PD-1 and PD-L1 expression (P=0.007) and significant association of tumor grade (WHO 2016) with membranous β-catenin (P<0.001), cytoplasmic β-catenin (P=0.005), pVHL (P=0.042), PD-L1 (P=0.049) and PD-1 (P=0.028) expression. CONCLUSION: The present study provides the first data on the potential association and combined prognostic significance of frequency of primary cilia, PD-L1, Smoothened protein and β-catenin expression with the outcome in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

• Klíčová slova
• clear cell renal carcinoma, cytoplasmic β-catenin, membranous β-catenin, primary cilia, programmed cell death protein ligand 1, smoothened protein,
• MeSH
• antigeny CD274 * metabolismus   MeSH
• beta-katenin * metabolismus   MeSH
• cilie * metabolismus   patologie   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• imunohistochemie MeSH
• karcinom z renálních buněk * metabolismus   mortalita   patologie   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nádorové biomarkery metabolismus   MeSH
• nádory ledvin * metabolismus   mortalita   patologie   MeSH
• prognóza MeSH
• receptor Smoothened metabolismus   MeSH
• receptory spřažené s G-proteiny * metabolismus   MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• Názvy látek
• antigeny CD274 * MeSH
• beta-katenin * MeSH
• CD274 protein, human MeSH Prohlížeč
• CTNNB1 protein, human MeSH Prohlížeč
• nádorové biomarkery MeSH
• receptor Smoothened MeSH
• receptory spřažené s G-proteiny * MeSH
• SMO protein, human MeSH Prohlížeč

BACKGROUND: The optimal first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains uncertain, despite recent advancements in immune-based combinations. This retrospective study compares the effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus axitinib (PA) and nivolumab plus cabozantinib (NC) as first-line treatments for mRCC in a real-world setting. METHODS: Patient data were collected from 55 centers across 16 countries, encompassing individuals diagnosed with mRCC receiving first-line treatment with PA or NC between January 2016 and October 2023. Clinical and tumor features and treatment responses were recorded. The primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and time to second progression. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, Cox proportional hazard models, and chi-square tests. RESULTS: A total of 760 patients with a median age of 64 years (range, 29-88) were included. Of them, 607 received PA, and only 153 NC. In the overall study population, ORR was 59% for and 49% for PA. Median OS was 55.7 months and not reached (NR) for PA and NC, respectively (P = .51), while median PFS was longer with NC (27.6 months) than for PA (16.2 months, P = .003). Subgroup analysis suggested a PFS benefits for NC in male, younger patients, intermediate risk group, clear cell histology, and lung involvement, as well as ORR favored NC in good risk patients. Multivariate analysis identified first-line therapy as a significant factor associated with PFS. CONCLUSIONS: In this certainly biased retrospective comparison, NC demonstrated superior ORR and longer PFS compared to PA in mRCC. These findings underscore the importance of considering individual patient characteristics and risk profiles when selecting first-line therapy for mRCC.

• Klíčová slova
• ARON-1 study, Axitinib plus pembrolizumab, Cabozantinib plus nivolumab, Immune-oncology combinations,
• MeSH
• anilidy * terapeutické užití   farmakologie   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• axitinib * terapeutické užití   farmakologie   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky * terapeutické užití   farmakologie   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• karcinom z renálních buněk * farmakoterapie   mortalita   patologie   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nádory ledvin * farmakoterapie   patologie   mortalita   MeSH
• nivolumab * terapeutické užití   farmakologie   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• pyridiny terapeutické užití   MeSH
• retrospektivní studie MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• srovnávací studie MeSH
• Názvy látek
• anilidy * MeSH
• axitinib * MeSH
• cabozantinib MeSH Prohlížeč
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky * MeSH
• nivolumab * MeSH
• pembrolizumab MeSH Prohlížeč
• pyridiny MeSH

BACKGROUND: Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib is a treatment option for metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC). In the ARON-1 study we investigated we the real-world experiences gained from the use of this combination for mRCC. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated real-world clinical outcomes of mRCC patients receiving pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib within the ARON-1 study. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the start of pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib to death for any cause. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the start of pembrolizumab to progression or death from any cause. Duration of response (DoR) was defined as the time from the start of pembrolizumab to disease progression or death, whichever occurred first, in patients who achieved complete remission (CR) or partial response (PR). Overall Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of patients who achieve a CR or PR per RECIST criteria. Adverse events were retrospectively collected from electronic and paper charts and categorized by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. RESULTS: Overall, we included 202 mRCC patients treated with pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib. The median follow-up time was 15.1 months. The median OS was not reached (NR), with a median PFS of 25.6 months and an Overall Response Rate (ORR) of 59%. The median Duration of Response (DoR) was 26.2 months. G3-G4 adverse events (AEs) were observed in 92 patients (46%), with hypertension being the most common AE (13%). CONCLUSIONS: Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib is an effective and tolerable treatment for mRCC also in the real-world setting.

• Klíčová slova
• ARON- 1, Immune-combinations, Lenvatinib, Pembrolizumab, Real-world data, Renal cell carcinoma, Survival,
• MeSH
• chinoliny * terapeutické užití   aplikace a dávkování   farmakologie   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• fenylmočovinové sloučeniny * terapeutické užití   aplikace a dávkování   farmakologie   MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky * terapeutické užití   aplikace a dávkování   farmakologie   MeSH
• karcinom z renálních buněk * farmakoterapie   mortalita   patologie   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• metastázy nádorů MeSH
• nádory ledvin * farmakoterapie   patologie   mortalita   MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• retrospektivní studie MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• Názvy látek
• chinoliny * MeSH
• fenylmočovinové sloučeniny * MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky * MeSH
• lenvatinib MeSH Prohlížeč
• pembrolizumab MeSH Prohlížeč

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab significantly improved efficacy versus sunitinib in treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) in the phase 3 CLEAR study. We report results of an exploratory post hoc analysis of tumor response data based on baseline metastatic characteristics of patients who received lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib, at the final overall survival analysis time point of CLEAR (cutoff: July 31, 2022). Treatment-naïve adults with aRCC were randomized to: lenvatinib (20 mg PO QD in 21-day cycles) plus pembrolizumab (n = 355; 200 mg IV Q3W); lenvatinib plus everolimus (not reported here); or sunitinib (n = 357; 50 mg PO QD; 4 weeks on/2 weeks off). The most common (lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab; sunitinib, respectively) metastatic site was lung (71.0%; 63.9%), followed by lymph node (45.6%; 43.7%), bone (22.5%; 24.9%), and liver (17.7%; 19.6%). Across treatment arms, ≥65% had two or more metastatic organs/sites involved, >80% of patients had nontarget lesions, and ~45% had baseline sums of diameters of target lesions ≥60 mm. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated greater progression-free survival, objective response rate, and duration of response versus sunitinib across evaluable subgroups regardless of site or size of baseline metastasis or number of metastatic sites at baseline. Overall survival generally trended to favor lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib; and tumor shrinkage was greater across sites (lung, lymph node, liver, and bone) for patients in the lenvatinib-plus-pembrolizumab arm versus the sunitinib arm. These results further support lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab as a standard-of-care in patients with aRCC regardless of site or size of baseline metastasis or the number of metastatic sites.

• Klíčová slova
• lenvatinib, lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab, pembrolizumab, renal cell carcinoma,
• MeSH
• chinoliny * aplikace a dávkování   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• fenylmočovinové sloučeniny * aplikace a dávkování   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky * aplikace a dávkování   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• karcinom z renálních buněk * farmakoterapie   patologie   mortalita   sekundární   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• metastázy nádorů MeSH
• nádory ledvin * farmakoterapie   patologie   mortalita   MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• sunitinib * aplikace a dávkování   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
• srovnávací studie MeSH
• Názvy látek
• chinoliny * MeSH
• fenylmočovinové sloučeniny * MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky * MeSH
• lenvatinib MeSH Prohlížeč
• pembrolizumab MeSH Prohlížeč
• sunitinib * MeSH

PURPOSE: CheckMate 914 is a two-part, randomized phase III trial evaluating adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab (part A) or adjuvant nivolumab monotherapy (part B) versus placebo in mutually exclusive populations of patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at high risk of postnephrectomy recurrence. Part A showed no disease-free survival (DFS) benefit for adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus placebo. We report results from part B. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned (2:1:1) to nivolumab (240 mg once every 2 weeks for up to 12 doses), placebo, or nivolumab (240 mg once every 2 weeks for up to 12 doses) plus ipilimumab (1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks for up to four doses). The planned treatment duration was 24 weeks (approximately 5.5 months). The primary end point was DFS per blinded independent central review (BICR) for nivolumab versus placebo; safety was a secondary end point. RESULTS: Overall, 825 patients were randomly assigned to nivolumab (n = 411), placebo (n = 208), or nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n = 206). With a median follow-up of 27.0 months (range, 18.0-42.4), the primary end point of improved DFS per BICR with nivolumab versus placebo was not met (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.21]; P = .40); the median DFS was not reached in either arm, and 18-month DFS rates were 78.4% versus 75.4%. The HR for DFS per investigator was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.58 to 1.12; P = .19). Grade 3-4 all-cause adverse events (AEs) occurred in 17.2%, 15.0%, and 28.9% of patients with nivolumab, placebo, and nivolumab plus ipilimumab, respectively. Any-grade treatment-related AEs led to discontinuation in 9.6%, 1.0%, and 28.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Part B of CheckMate 914 did not meet the primary end point of improved DFS for nivolumab versus placebo in patients with localized RCC at high risk of postnephrectomy recurrence.

• MeSH
• adjuvantní chemoterapie MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• ipilimumab * terapeutické užití   aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• karcinom z renálních buněk * farmakoterapie   chirurgie   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• lokální recidiva nádoru * MeSH
• nádory ledvin * farmakoterapie   patologie   chirurgie   MeSH
• nefrektomie * MeSH
• nivolumab * terapeutické užití   aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• přežití bez známek nemoci MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
• Názvy látek
• ipilimumab * MeSH
• nivolumab * MeSH

INTRODUCTION: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most common types of urogenital cancer. The introduction of immune-based combinations, including dual immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or ICI plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), has radically changed the treatment landscape for metastatic RCC, showing varying efficacy across different prognostic groups based on the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study, part of the ARON-1 project, aimed to evaluate the outcomes of favorable-risk metastatic RCC patients treated with immune-based combinations or sunitinib. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate. We carried out a survival analysis by a Cox regression model. RESULTS: A total of 524 favorable-risk patients were included in the analysis. After a median follow-up of 37.2 months, the median OS in the overall population was 56.1 months. There was no significant difference in OS between patients receiving sunitinib and those receiving TKI + ICI combinations (p = 0.761). Patients on TKI + ICI had significantly longer PFS compared to patient treated with sunitinib (30.7 vs 22.9 months, p = 0.007). Analysis of OS and PFS based on metastatic site revealed that patients with bone metastases benefited more from ICI plus TKI (56 patients with bone metastases receiving IO + TKI, 38 received pembrolizumab plus axitinib, 15 cabozantinib plus nivolumab and 3 pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib), while sunitinib was more effective for pancreatic and glandular metastases. Additionally, the number of metastatic sites played a role, with TKI plus ICI showing superiority in patients with a single metastatic site. The time from RCC diagnosis to metastatic disease also impacted outcomes, with TKI plus ICI being more effective in patients with a shorter interval (i.e., < 36 months). CONCLUSIONS: The choice between upfront combination or monotherapy for metastatic favorable prognosis RCC remains a current issue. While combination therapy offers prolonged PFS, it does not necessarily translate to improve OS compared to sunitinib. This real-world study supports the superiority in terms of PFS of TKI plus ICI vs TKI monotherapy but not in OS. Probable, other clinical factors should be taking into account to make clinical treatment decisions in this setting.

• Klíčová slova
• ARON-1 study, Good favorable-risk IMDC criteria, Immune-based combinations, Immunotherapy, Renal cell carcinoma,
• MeSH
• chinoliny terapeutické užití   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• fenylmočovinové sloučeniny terapeutické užití   aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• inhibitory kontrolních bodů * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• inhibitory proteinkinas terapeutické užití   MeSH
• karcinom z renálních buněk * farmakoterapie   imunologie   mortalita   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• metastázy nádorů MeSH
• nádory ledvin * farmakoterapie   imunologie   mortalita   patologie   MeSH
• prognóza MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• pyridiny MeSH
• retrospektivní studie MeSH
• rizikové faktory MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• sunitinib * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• srovnávací studie MeSH
• Názvy látek
• cabozantinib MeSH Prohlížeč
• chinoliny MeSH
• fenylmočovinové sloučeniny MeSH
• inhibitory kontrolních bodů * MeSH
• inhibitory proteinkinas MeSH
• lenvatinib MeSH Prohlížeč
• pyridiny MeSH
• sunitinib * MeSH

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic advancements based on immuno-oncology combinations have revolutionized the management of patients with renal cell carcinoma. However, patients who have progressive disease as the best response, "primary refractory" (Pref), face dismal outcomes. OBJECTIVE: Our multicenter retrospective real-world study aims to assess the prevalence and clinicopathological characteristics of Pref patients. METHODS: This study collected data from 72 centers across 22 countries (1709 patients), involving patients aged ≥18 years with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. All patients were treated with first-line immune-oncology combinations. Data included patient demographics, histology, metastatic sites, and treatment responses. Radiological assessments followed Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Statistical analyses employed Kaplan-Meier method, Cox proportional hazard models, logistic regression, and the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: In our study, the Pref rate was 19%. Nivolumab/ipilimumab showed the highest Pref rate (27%), while pembrolizumab/lenvatinib exhibited the lowest (10%). Primary refactory patients demonstrated significantly lower median overall survival (7.6 months) compared with non-Pref patients (55.7 months), p < 0.001. At the multivariate analysis, nephrectomy, sarcomatoid de-differentiation, intermediate/poor International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk, and bone and brain metastases emerged as significant predictors of overall survival for Pref patients with renal cell carcinoma. Logistic regression showed a significant relationship between liver metastases, intermediate/poor International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk, and no surgery and an increased risk of Pref. This study presents limitations, mainly because of its retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS: The ARON-1 study provides valuable insights into Pref patients, emphasizing the challenges of this precociously resistant subgroup. Identified predictors could guide risk stratification, aiding clinicians in tailored therapeutic approaches.

• MeSH
• chemorezistence MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• karcinom z renálních buněk * farmakoterapie   patologie   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nádory ledvin * farmakoterapie   patologie   MeSH
• retrospektivní studie MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH

INTRODUCTION: Combined immuno-oncology (IO) regimens are the cornerstone of the current front-line systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Despite the fact that combined IO regimens show high efficacy, they are often accompanied by a wide spectrum of immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a case of rare irAEs manifested as giant cell temporal arteritis (GCA) followed by severe encephalopathy occurring after continuing immunotherapy in a 66-year-old man with mRCC receiving a combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab in the first line of systemic therapy. GCA occurred 4 months after the initiation of IO and responded promptly to the low-dose prednisone therapy. Four months after the continuation of nivolumab maintenance, the patient was hospitalized due to severe irAE encephalopathy which presented as psycho-behavioral abnormalities and progressive cognitive decline. He was treated with high-dose methylprednisolone which led to complete resolution of the symptoms and IO was permanently discontinued. The patient achieved a durable partial response. CONCLUSION: Both GCA and the subsequent encephalopathy in our patient responded well to the corticosteroid therapy, leading to the complete resolution of the symptoms and the patient achieved a durable partial response. Although the risk of severe neurologic irAEs affecting the central nervous system induced by IO re-administration, following previous discontinuation due to irAE, is not well-defined because of their rarity, this case highlights the need for caution, particularly in cases with a history of previous irAE-associated GCA.

• Klíčová slova
• Encephalopathy, Giant cell arteritis, Immune-related adverse effects, Immune-related adverse events, Immunotherapy, Nivolumab, Renal cell carcinoma,
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• kazuistiky MeSH

PURPOSE: Open-label phase II study (RELATIVITY-060) to investigate the efficacy and safety of first-line nivolumab, a PD-1-blocking antibody, plus relatlimab, a lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3)-blocking antibody, plus chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC). METHODS: Patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic GC/GEJC were randomly assigned 1:1 to nivolumab + relatlimab (fixed-dose combination) + chemotherapy or nivolumab + chemotherapy. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR; per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review [BICR]) in patients whose tumors had LAG-3 expression ≥1%. RESULTS: Of 274 patients, 138 were randomly assigned to nivolumab + relatlimab + chemotherapy and 136 to nivolumab + chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 11.9 months. In patients with LAG-3 expression ≥1%, BICR-assessed ORR (95% CI) was 48% (38 to 59) in the nivolumab + relatlimab + chemotherapy arm and 61% (51 to 71) in the nivolumab + chemotherapy arm; median progression-free survival (95% CI) by BICR was 7.0 months (5.8 to 8.4) versus 8.3 months (6.9 to 12.1; hazard ratio [HR], 1.41 [95% CI, 0.97 to 2.05]), and median overall survival (95% CI) was 13.5 months (11.9 to 19.1) versus 16.0 months (10.9 to not estimable; HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.70 to 1.54]), respectively. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 69% and 61% of all treated patients, and 42% and 36% of patients discontinued because of any-grade TRAEs in the nivolumab + relatlimab + chemotherapy and nivolumab + chemotherapy arms, respectively. CONCLUSION: RELATIVITY-060 did not meet its primary end point of improved ORR in patients with LAG-3 expression ≥1% when relatlimab was added to nivolumab + chemotherapy compared with nivolumab + chemotherapy. Further studies are needed to address whether adding anti-LAG-3 to anti-PD-1 plus chemotherapy can benefit specific GC/GEJC patient subgroups.

• MeSH
• adenokarcinom * farmakoterapie   patologie   mortalita   MeSH
• doba přežití bez progrese choroby MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• gastroezofageální junkce * patologie   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nádory jícnu * farmakoterapie   patologie   mortalita   MeSH
• nádory žaludku * farmakoterapie   patologie   mortalita   MeSH
• nivolumab * terapeutické užití   aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• protein genu 3 aktivace lymfocytů * MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze II MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
• Názvy látek
• Lag3 protein, human MeSH Prohlížeč
• nivolumab * MeSH
• protein genu 3 aktivace lymfocytů * MeSH