The engineering of efficient enzymes for large-scale production of industrially relevant compounds is a challenging task. Utilizing rational protein design, which relies on a comprehensive understanding of mechanistic information, holds significant promise for achieving success in this endeavor. Pre-steady-state kinetic measurements, obtained either through fast-mixing techniques or photoswitchable substrates, provide crucial mechanistic insights. The latter approach not only furnishes mechanistic clarity but also affords real-time structural elucidation of reaction intermediates via time-resolved femtosecond crystallography. Unfortunately, only a limited number of such valuable mechanistic probes are available. To address this gap, we applied a multidisciplinary approach, including computational analysis, chemical synthesis, physicochemical property screening, and enzyme kinetics to identify promising candidates for photoswitchable probes. We demonstrate the approach by designing an azobenzene-based photoswitchable substrate tailored for haloalkane dehalogenases, a prototypic class of enzymes pivotal in developing computational tools for rational protein design. The probe was subjected to steady-state and pre-steady-state kinetic analysis, which revealed new insights about the catalytic behavior of the model biocatalysts. We employed laser-triggered Z-to-E azobenzene photoswitching to generate the productive isomer in situ, opening avenues for advanced mechanistic studies using time-resolved femtosecond crystallography. Our results not only pave the way for the mechanistic understanding of this model enzyme family, incorporating both kinetic and structural dimensions, but also propose a systematic approach to the rational design of photoswitchable enzymatic substrates.

• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

HaloTag labeling technology has introduced unrivaled potential in protein chemistry and molecular and cellular biology. A wide variety of ligands have been developed to meet the specific needs of diverse applications, but only a single protein tag, DhaAHT, is routinely used for their incorporation. Following a systematic kinetic and computational analysis of different reporters, a tetramethylrhodamine- and three 4-stilbazolium-based fluorescent ligands, we showed that the mechanism of incorporating different ligands depends both on the binding step and the efficiency of the chemical reaction. By studying the different haloalkane dehalogenases DhaA, LinB, and DmmA, we found that the architecture of the access tunnels is critical for the kinetics of both steps and the ligand specificity. We showed that highly efficient labeling with specific ligands is achievable with natural dehalogenases. We propose a simple protocol for selecting the optimal protein tag for a specific ligand from the wide pool of available enzymes with diverse access tunnel architectures. The application of this protocol eliminates the need for expensive and laborious protein engineering.

• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

Transport of ligands between bulk solvent and the buried active sites is a critical event in the catalytic cycle of many enzymes. The rational design of transport pathways is far from trivial due to the lack of knowledge about the effect of mutations on ligand transport. The main and an auxiliary tunnel of haloalkane dehalogenase LinB have been previously engineered for improved dehalogenation of 1,2-dibromoethane (DBE). The first chemical step of DBE conversion was enhanced by L177W mutation in the main tunnel, but the rate-limiting product release was slowed down because the mutation blocked the main access tunnel and hindered protein dynamics. Three additional mutations W140A + F143L + I211L opened-up the auxiliary tunnel and enhanced the product release, making this four-point variant the most efficient catalyst with DBE. Here we study the impact of these mutations on the catalysis of bulky aromatic substrates, 4-(bromomethyl)-6,7-dimethoxycoumarin (COU) and 8-chloromethyl-4,4'-difluoro-3,5-dimethyl-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (BDP). The rate-limiting step of DBE conversion is the product release, whereas the catalysis of COU and BDP is limited by the chemical step. The catalysis of COU is mainly impaired by the mutation L177W, whereas the conversion of BDP is affected primarily by the mutations W140A + F143L + I211L. The combined computational and kinetic analyses explain the differences in activities between the enzyme-substrate pairs. The effect of tunnel mutations on catalysis depends on the rate-limiting step, the complementarity of the tunnels with the substrates and is clearly specific for each enzyme-substrate pair.

• Keywords
• BDP, 8-chloromethyl-3,5-dimethyl-4,4-difluoro-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene, COU, 4-(bromomethyl)-6,7-dimethoxycoumarin, Enzyme kinetics, Enzyme mutation, MD, molecular dynamics, MSM, Markov state model, NAC, near-attack conformer, Substrate specificity,
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH