-
Something wrong with this record ?
Value of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of follicular lymphoma: the end of a dilemma?
A Janikova, K Bolcak, T Pavlik, J Mayer, Z Kral
Language English Country United States
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Financing, Organized MeSH
- Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 diagnostic use MeSH
- Lymphoma, Follicular diagnosis mortality physiopathology pathology MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Positron-Emission Tomography methods MeSH
- Disease-Free Survival MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Recurrence MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Neoplasm Regression, Spontaneous MeSH
- Neoplasm Staging MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
BACKGROUND: [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is a powerful tool for the imaging of various lymphomas. Despite its high FDG avidity, there is little data on PET in follicular lymphoma (FL). In this work, we present findings concerning PET at staging and posttreatment evaluation in FL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 181 PET scans were evaluated in 117 patients with FL in a retrospective study. Positron emission tomography-based results were compared with conventional staging in 82 patients. Posttreatment PET evaluation was performed in 99 patients; there were comparable progression-free survivals of PET-positive and PET-negative patients. RESULTS: Positron emission tomography showed more involvement than computed tomography (CT) with clinical examination in 41 of 82 patients (50%), less in 11 of 82 (13%); the same extension was found in 27 of 82 patients (33%), and 3 patients revealed discordant foci visible on PET only and lymphadenopathy without PET activity (P < .001). Including the results of trephine biopsy, PET finally upstaged FL in 15 of 82 patients (18%), which was projected in change of treatment strategy. There were 73 of 99 negative posttreatment PET scans; 54 of 73 PET-negative patients (74%) remain in complete remission (median follow-up, 27 months); 19 (26%) of them relapsed with median of 12 months. Fourteen of 20 (70%) PET-positive patients relapsed with a median of 4.5 months regardless of findings on CT and subsequent therapy. The difference in relapse rates between PET-positive and PET-negative patients is statistically significant (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Positron emission tomography at staging is able to substantially change treatment strategy in an important proportion of patients with FL. Persisting PET positivity after treatment predicts for a high risk of an early relapse and can identify patients with poor prognosis.
- 000
- 02167naa 2200493 a 4500
- 001
- bmc11004990
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160404095528.0
- 008
- 110311s2008 xxu e eng||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Janíková, Andrea $7 xx0103433
- 245 10
- $a Value of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of follicular lymphoma: the end of a dilemma? / $c A Janikova, K Bolcak, T Pavlik, J Mayer, Z Kral
- 314 __
- $a Department of Internal Medicine - Haematooncology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine of Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. ajanikova@fnbrno.cz
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is a powerful tool for the imaging of various lymphomas. Despite its high FDG avidity, there is little data on PET in follicular lymphoma (FL). In this work, we present findings concerning PET at staging and posttreatment evaluation in FL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 181 PET scans were evaluated in 117 patients with FL in a retrospective study. Positron emission tomography-based results were compared with conventional staging in 82 patients. Posttreatment PET evaluation was performed in 99 patients; there were comparable progression-free survivals of PET-positive and PET-negative patients. RESULTS: Positron emission tomography showed more involvement than computed tomography (CT) with clinical examination in 41 of 82 patients (50%), less in 11 of 82 (13%); the same extension was found in 27 of 82 patients (33%), and 3 patients revealed discordant foci visible on PET only and lymphadenopathy without PET activity (P < .001). Including the results of trephine biopsy, PET finally upstaged FL in 15 of 82 patients (18%), which was projected in change of treatment strategy. There were 73 of 99 negative posttreatment PET scans; 54 of 73 PET-negative patients (74%) remain in complete remission (median follow-up, 27 months); 19 (26%) of them relapsed with median of 12 months. Fourteen of 20 (70%) PET-positive patients relapsed with a median of 4.5 months regardless of findings on CT and subsequent therapy. The difference in relapse rates between PET-positive and PET-negative patients is statistically significant (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Positron emission tomography at staging is able to substantially change treatment strategy in an important proportion of patients with FL. Persisting PET positivity after treatment predicts for a high risk of an early relapse and can identify patients with poor prognosis.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a přežití bez známek nemoci $7 D018572
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a fluorodeoxyglukosa F18 $x diagnostické užití $7 D019788
- 650 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a folikulární lymfom $x diagnóza $x mortalita $x patofyziologie $x patologie $7 D008224
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a spontánní regrese nádoru $7 D009365
- 650 _2
- $a staging nádorů $7 D009367
- 650 _2
- $a pozitronová emisní tomografie $x metody $7 D049268
- 650 _2
- $a prognóza $7 D011379
- 650 _2
- $a recidiva $7 D012008
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a financování organizované $7 D005381
- 700 1_
- $a Bolčák, Karol $7 xx0101550
- 700 1_
- $a Pavlík, Tomáš $7 xx0093293
- 700 1_
- $a Mayer, Jiří, $d 1960- $7 nlk20000083651
- 700 1_
- $a Král, Zdeněk, $d 1964- $7 nlk20000083648
- 773 0_
- $t Clinical Lymphoma & Myeloma $w MED00188035 $g Roč. 8, č. 5 (2008), s. 287-293 $x 1557-9190
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b x $y 1 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20110414093949 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160404095604 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 832859 $s 697030
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2008 $b 8 $c 5 $d 287-293 $i 1557-9190 $m Clinical lymphoma & myeloma $n Clin Lymphoma Myeloma $x MED00188035
- LZP __
- $a 2011-4B/vtme