-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Rapid and sensitive detection of cytokines using functionalized gold nanoparticle-based immuno-PCR, comparison with immuno-PCR and ELISA
L. Potůčková, F. Franko, M. Bambousková, P. Dráber,
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, hodnotící studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- cytokiny analýza imunologie MeSH
- ELISA MeSH
- imunoanalýza metody statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- indikátory a reagencie MeSH
- interleukin-3 analýza imunologie MeSH
- kovové nanočástice MeSH
- kultivované buňky MeSH
- mastocyty imunologie MeSH
- myši MeSH
- nanotechnologie MeSH
- polymerázová řetězová reakce metody statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- protilátky MeSH
- růstový faktor kmenových buněk analýza imunologie MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
- zlato MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- myši MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- hodnotící studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
Reliable and simple methods are required for detection of low concentrations of cytokines and some other proteins in complex biological fluids. This is especially important when monitoring the immune responses under various physiological and pathophysiological conditions in vivo or following production of these compounds in in vitro systems. Cytokines and other immunologically active molecules are being predominantly detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and newly also by immuno-polymerase chain reactions (iPCR). New simplified variants of iPCR have recently been described where antibodies are connected with multiple DNA templates through gold nanoparticles (Au-NPs) to form a new class of detection reagents. In this study we compared functionalized Au-NP-based iPCR (Nano-iPCR) with standard ELISA and iPCR for the detection of interleukin (IL)-3 and stem cell factor (SCF). The same immunoreagents (IL-3- and SCF-specific polyclonal antibodies and their biotinylated forms) were used throughout the assays. The obtained data indicate that both Nano-iPCR and iPCR are superior in sensitivity and detection range than ELISA. Furthermore, Nano-iPCR is easier to perform than the other two methods. Nano-iPCR was used for monitoring changes in concentration of free SCF during growth of mast cells in SCF-conditioned media. The results show that growing cultures gradually reduce the amount of SCF in supernatant to 25% after 5 days. The combined data indicate that Nano-iPCR assays may be preferable for rapid detection of low concentrations of cytokines in complex biological fluids.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12027486
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20121207125455.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120817e20110624ne f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jim.2011.06.012 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21704628
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Potůčková, Lucie $u Laboratory of Signal Transduction, Institute of Molecular Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-14220 Prague 4, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Rapid and sensitive detection of cytokines using functionalized gold nanoparticle-based immuno-PCR, comparison with immuno-PCR and ELISA / $c L. Potůčková, F. Franko, M. Bambousková, P. Dráber,
- 520 9_
- $a Reliable and simple methods are required for detection of low concentrations of cytokines and some other proteins in complex biological fluids. This is especially important when monitoring the immune responses under various physiological and pathophysiological conditions in vivo or following production of these compounds in in vitro systems. Cytokines and other immunologically active molecules are being predominantly detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and newly also by immuno-polymerase chain reactions (iPCR). New simplified variants of iPCR have recently been described where antibodies are connected with multiple DNA templates through gold nanoparticles (Au-NPs) to form a new class of detection reagents. In this study we compared functionalized Au-NP-based iPCR (Nano-iPCR) with standard ELISA and iPCR for the detection of interleukin (IL)-3 and stem cell factor (SCF). The same immunoreagents (IL-3- and SCF-specific polyclonal antibodies and their biotinylated forms) were used throughout the assays. The obtained data indicate that both Nano-iPCR and iPCR are superior in sensitivity and detection range than ELISA. Furthermore, Nano-iPCR is easier to perform than the other two methods. Nano-iPCR was used for monitoring changes in concentration of free SCF during growth of mast cells in SCF-conditioned media. The results show that growing cultures gradually reduce the amount of SCF in supernatant to 25% after 5 days. The combined data indicate that Nano-iPCR assays may be preferable for rapid detection of low concentrations of cytokines in complex biological fluids.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a protilátky $7 D000906
- 650 _2
- $a kultivované buňky $7 D002478
- 650 _2
- $a cytokiny $x analýza $x imunologie $7 D016207
- 650 _2
- $a ELISA $7 D004797
- 650 _2
- $a zlato $7 D006046
- 650 _2
- $a imunoanalýza $x metody $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D007118
- 650 _2
- $a indikátory a reagencie $7 D007202
- 650 _2
- $a interleukin-3 $x analýza $x imunologie $7 D007377
- 650 _2
- $a mastocyty $x imunologie $7 D008407
- 650 _2
- $a kovové nanočástice $7 D053768
- 650 _2
- $a myši $7 D051379
- 650 _2
- $a nanotechnologie $7 D036103
- 650 _2
- $a polymerázová řetězová reakce $x metody $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D016133
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a růstový faktor kmenových buněk $x analýza $x imunologie $7 D019089
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Franko, Filip
- 700 1_
- $a Bambousková, Monika
- 700 1_
- $a Dráber, Petr
- 773 0_
- $w MED00010028 $t Journal of immunological methods $x 1872-7905 $g Roč. 371, č. 1-2 (20110624), s. 38-47
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21704628 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
- 990 __
- $a 20120817 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20121207125529 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 949528 $s 784832
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 371 $c 1-2 $d 38-47 $e 20110624 $i 1872-7905 $m Journal of immunological methods $n J Immunol Methods $x MED00010028
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120817/11/03