-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Bacterial proteins pinpoint a single eukaryotic root
R. Derelle, G. Torruella, V. Klimeš, H. Brinkmann, E. Kim, Č. Vlček, BF. Lang, M. Eliáš,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 1915 do Před 6 měsíci
Freely Accessible Science Journals
od 1915 do Před 6 měsíci
PubMed Central
od 1915 do Před 6 měsíci
Europe PubMed Central
od 1915 do Před 6 měsíci
Open Access Digital Library
od 1915-01-15
Open Access Digital Library
od 1915-01-01
PubMed
25646484
DOI
10.1073/pnas.1420657112
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- Bacteria klasifikace genetika metabolismus MeSH
- bakteriální geny MeSH
- bakteriální proteiny fyziologie MeSH
- datové soubory jako téma MeSH
- Eukaryota * MeSH
- fylogeneze MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
The large phylogenetic distance separating eukaryotic genes and their archaeal orthologs has prevented identification of the position of the eukaryotic root in phylogenomic studies. Recently, an innovative approach has been proposed to circumvent this issue: the use as phylogenetic markers of proteins that have been transferred from bacterial donor sources to eukaryotes, after their emergence from Archaea. Using this approach, two recent independent studies have built phylogenomic datasets based on bacterial sequences, leading to different predictions of the eukaryotic root. Taking advantage of additional genome sequences from the jakobid Andalucia godoyi and the two known malawimonad species (Malawimonas jakobiformis and Malawimonas californiana), we reanalyzed these two phylogenomic datasets. We show that both datasets pinpoint the same phylogenetic position of the eukaryotic root that is between "Unikonta" and "Bikonta," with malawimonad and collodictyonid lineages on the Unikonta side of the root. Our results firmly indicate that (i) the supergroup Excavata is not monophyletic and (ii) the last common ancestor of eukaryotes was a biflagellate organism. Based on our results, we propose to rename the two major eukaryotic groups Unikonta and Bikonta as Opimoda and Diphoda, respectively.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15022835
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20150727122126.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 150709s2015 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1073/pnas.1420657112 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)25646484
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Derelle, Romain $u Centre for Genomic Regulation, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; romain.derelle@crg.es.
- 245 10
- $a Bacterial proteins pinpoint a single eukaryotic root / $c R. Derelle, G. Torruella, V. Klimeš, H. Brinkmann, E. Kim, Č. Vlček, BF. Lang, M. Eliáš,
- 520 9_
- $a The large phylogenetic distance separating eukaryotic genes and their archaeal orthologs has prevented identification of the position of the eukaryotic root in phylogenomic studies. Recently, an innovative approach has been proposed to circumvent this issue: the use as phylogenetic markers of proteins that have been transferred from bacterial donor sources to eukaryotes, after their emergence from Archaea. Using this approach, two recent independent studies have built phylogenomic datasets based on bacterial sequences, leading to different predictions of the eukaryotic root. Taking advantage of additional genome sequences from the jakobid Andalucia godoyi and the two known malawimonad species (Malawimonas jakobiformis and Malawimonas californiana), we reanalyzed these two phylogenomic datasets. We show that both datasets pinpoint the same phylogenetic position of the eukaryotic root that is between "Unikonta" and "Bikonta," with malawimonad and collodictyonid lineages on the Unikonta side of the root. Our results firmly indicate that (i) the supergroup Excavata is not monophyletic and (ii) the last common ancestor of eukaryotes was a biflagellate organism. Based on our results, we propose to rename the two major eukaryotic groups Unikonta and Bikonta as Opimoda and Diphoda, respectively.
- 650 _2
- $a Bacteria $x klasifikace $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D001419
- 650 _2
- $a bakteriální proteiny $x fyziologie $7 D001426
- 650 _2
- $a datové soubory jako téma $7 D066264
- 650 12
- $a Eukaryota $7 D056890
- 650 _2
- $a bakteriální geny $7 D005798
- 650 _2
- $a fylogeneze $7 D010802
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Torruella, Guifré $u Institut de Biologia Evolutiva, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08003 Barcelona, Spain;
- 700 1_
- $a Klimeš, Vladimír $u Faculty of Science, Department of Biology and Ecology, University of Ostrava, 710 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic;
- 700 1_
- $a Brinkmann, Henner $u Leibniz-Institut DSMZ-Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH, D-38124 Braunschweig, Germany;
- 700 1_
- $a Kim, Eunsoo $u Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics and Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024;
- 700 1_
- $a Vlček, Čestmír $u Institute of Molecular Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 142 20 Prague 4, Czech Republic; and.
- 700 1_
- $a Lang, B Franz $u Robert Cedergren Centre for Bioinformatics and Genomics, Département de Biochimie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada H3T 1J4.
- 700 1_
- $a Eliáš, Marek $u Faculty of Science, Department of Biology and Ecology, University of Ostrava, 710 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic;
- 773 0_
- $w MED00010472 $t Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America $x 1091-6490 $g Roč. 112, č. 7 (2015), s. E693-9
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25646484 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20150709 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20150727122210 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1083174 $s 905828
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 112 $c 7 $d E693-9 $i 1091-6490 $m Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America $n Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A $x MED00010472
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20150709