-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
J. Brahmer, KL. Reckamp, P. Baas, L. Crinò, WE. Eberhardt, E. Poddubskaya, S. Antonia, A. Pluzanski, EE. Vokes, E. Holgado, D. Waterhouse, N. Ready, J. Gainor, O. Arén Frontera, L. Havel, M. Steins, MC. Garassino, JG. Aerts, M. Domine, L....
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze III, srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 1980-01-03 do Před 3 měsíci
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 1980-01-03 do Před 3 měsíci
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 1980-01-03 do Před 3 měsíci
Family Health Database (ProQuest)
od 1980-01-03 do Před 3 měsíci
Psychology Database (ProQuest)
od 1980-01-03 do Před 3 měsíci
Health Management Database (ProQuest)
od 1980-01-03 do Před 3 měsíci
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 1980-01-03 do Před 3 měsíci
PubMed
26028407
DOI
10.1056/nejmoa1504627
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- analýza přežití MeSH
- antigeny CD274 metabolismus MeSH
- antigeny CD279 imunologie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- imunoglobulin G MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- monoklonální protilátky škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- nádory plic farmakoterapie mortalita MeSH
- nemalobuněčný karcinom plic farmakoterapie mortalita MeSH
- protinádorové látky škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- spinocelulární karcinom farmakoterapie mortalita MeSH
- taxoidy škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have disease progression during or after first-line chemotherapy have limited treatment options. This randomized, open-label, international, phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab, a fully human IgG4 programmed death 1 (PD-1) immune-checkpoint-inhibitor antibody, as compared with docetaxel in this patient population. METHODS: We randomly assigned 272 patients to receive nivolumab, at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight every 2 weeks, or docetaxel, at a dose of 75 mg per square meter of body-surface area every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: The median overall survival was 9.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.3 to 13.3) with nivolumab versus 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.1 to 7.3) with docetaxel. The risk of death was 41% lower with nivolumab than with docetaxel (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.79; P<0.001). At 1 year, the overall survival rate was 42% (95% CI, 34 to 50) with nivolumab versus 24% (95% CI, 17 to 31) with docetaxel. The response rate was 20% with nivolumab versus 9% with docetaxel (P=0.008). The median progression-free survival was 3.5 months with nivolumab versus 2.8 months with docetaxel (hazard ratio for death or disease progression, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.81; P<0.001). The expression of the PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) was neither prognostic nor predictive of benefit. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were reported in 7% of the patients in the nivolumab group as compared with 55% of those in the docetaxel group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with advanced, previously treated squamous-cell NSCLC, overall survival, response rate, and progression-free survival were significantly better with nivolumab than with docetaxel, regardless of PD-L1 expression level. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; CheckMate 017 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01642004.).
Bristol Myers Squibb Princeton NJ
Centro Internacional de Estudios Clinicos Santiago Chile
From the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Baltimore
Massachusetts General Hospital Boston
Nemocnice Na Bulovce Prague Czech Republic
Oncology Hematology Care Cincinnati
the Centrum Onkologii Instytut im Marii Skłodowskiej Curie Warsaw Poland
the City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center Duarte CA
the Duke University Medical Center Durham NC
the H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Tampa FL
the Hospital Madrid Norte Sanchinarro all in Spain
the N N Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center Moscow
the Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology Nashville
the University Hospital of Perugia Perugia both in Italy
the University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences Chicago
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15031334
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230109125520.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 151005s2015 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1056/NEJMoa1504627 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26028407
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Brahmer, Julie $u From the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.B.); the City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA (K.L.R.); the Netherlands Cancer Institute and Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam (P.B.), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam (J.G.A.), and Ziekenhuis Amphia, Breda (J.G.A.) - all in the Netherlands; the University Hospital of Perugia, Perugia (L.C.), and the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (M.C.G.) - both in Italy; the Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, Universitätsklinikum Essen, and the Ruhrlandklinik, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen (W.E.E.E.), the Thoraxklinik, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg (M.S.), and the LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf (M.R.) - all in Germany; the N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow (E.P.); the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL (S.A.); the Centrum Onkologii-Instytut im. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie, Warsaw, Poland (A.P.); the University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago (E.E.V.); the Hospital Madrid Norte Sanchinarro (E.H.), the Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid (M.D.), and the Hospital Universitario Virgen Del Rocío, Seville (L.P.-A.) - all in Spain; Oncology Hematology Care, Cincinnati (D.W.); the Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (N.R.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (J.G.); Centro Internacional de Estudios Clinicos, Santiago, Chile (O.A.F.); Nemocnice Na Bulovce, Prague, Czech Republic (L.H.); Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ (C.B., C.T.H., B.L.); and the Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, Nashville (D.R.S.).
- 245 10
- $a Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer / $c J. Brahmer, KL. Reckamp, P. Baas, L. Crinò, WE. Eberhardt, E. Poddubskaya, S. Antonia, A. Pluzanski, EE. Vokes, E. Holgado, D. Waterhouse, N. Ready, J. Gainor, O. Arén Frontera, L. Havel, M. Steins, MC. Garassino, JG. Aerts, M. Domine, L. Paz-Ares, M. Reck, C. Baudelet, CT. Harbison, B. Lestini, DR. Spigel,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have disease progression during or after first-line chemotherapy have limited treatment options. This randomized, open-label, international, phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab, a fully human IgG4 programmed death 1 (PD-1) immune-checkpoint-inhibitor antibody, as compared with docetaxel in this patient population. METHODS: We randomly assigned 272 patients to receive nivolumab, at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight every 2 weeks, or docetaxel, at a dose of 75 mg per square meter of body-surface area every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: The median overall survival was 9.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.3 to 13.3) with nivolumab versus 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.1 to 7.3) with docetaxel. The risk of death was 41% lower with nivolumab than with docetaxel (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.79; P<0.001). At 1 year, the overall survival rate was 42% (95% CI, 34 to 50) with nivolumab versus 24% (95% CI, 17 to 31) with docetaxel. The response rate was 20% with nivolumab versus 9% with docetaxel (P=0.008). The median progression-free survival was 3.5 months with nivolumab versus 2.8 months with docetaxel (hazard ratio for death or disease progression, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.81; P<0.001). The expression of the PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) was neither prognostic nor predictive of benefit. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were reported in 7% of the patients in the nivolumab group as compared with 55% of those in the docetaxel group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with advanced, previously treated squamous-cell NSCLC, overall survival, response rate, and progression-free survival were significantly better with nivolumab than with docetaxel, regardless of PD-L1 expression level. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; CheckMate 017 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01642004.).
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a monoklonální protilátky $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000911
- 650 _2
- $a antigeny CD274 $x metabolismus $7 D060890
- 650 _2
- $a protinádorové látky $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000970
- 650 _2
- $a nemalobuněčný karcinom plic $x farmakoterapie $x mortalita $7 D002289
- 650 _2
- $a spinocelulární karcinom $x farmakoterapie $x mortalita $7 D002294
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a imunoglobulin G $7 D007074
- 650 _2
- $a nádory plic $x farmakoterapie $x mortalita $7 D008175
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a antigeny CD279 $x imunologie $7 D061026
- 650 _2
- $a analýza přežití $7 D016019
- 650 _2
- $a taxoidy $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D043823
- 655 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky, fáze III $7 D017428
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Reckamp, Karen L
- 700 1_
- $a Baas, Paul
- 700 1_
- $a Crinò, Lucio
- 700 1_
- $a Eberhardt, Wilfried E E
- 700 1_
- $a Poddubskaya, Elena
- 700 1_
- $a Antonia, Scott $7 gn_A_00007420
- 700 1_
- $a Pluzanski, Adam
- 700 1_
- $a Vokes, Everett E
- 700 1_
- $a Holgado, Esther
- 700 1_
- $a Waterhouse, David
- 700 1_
- $a Ready, Neal
- 700 1_
- $a Gainor, Justin
- 700 1_
- $a Arén Frontera, Osvaldo $7 gn_A_00008212
- 700 1_
- $a Havel, Libor
- 700 1_
- $a Steins, Martin
- 700 1_
- $a Garassino, Marina $7 xx0280337
- 700 1_
- $a Aerts, Joachim G $7 gn_A_00001962
- 700 1_
- $a Domine, Manuel
- 700 1_
- $a Paz-Ares, Luis
- 700 1_
- $a Reck, Martin
- 700 1_
- $a Baudelet, Christine
- 700 1_
- $a Harbison, Christopher T
- 700 1_
- $a Lestini, Brian
- 700 1_
- $a Spigel, David R
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003517 $t The New England journal of medicine $x 1533-4406 $g Roč. 373, č. 2 (2015), s. 123-35
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26028407 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20151005 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230109125518 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1092210 $s 914460
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 373 $c 2 $d 123-35 $e 20150531 $i 1533-4406 $m The New England journal of medicine $n N Engl J Med $x MED00003517
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20151005