-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Evaluation of Tumor Markers and Their Impact on Prognosis in Gallbladder, Bile Duct and Cholangiocellular Carcinomas - A Pilot Study
V. Liska, V. Treska, T. Skalicky, J. Fichtl, J. Bruha, O. Vycital, O. Topolcan, R. Palek, J. Rosendorf, J. Polivka, L. Holubec,
Jazyk angličtina Země Řecko
Typ dokumentu hodnotící studie, časopisecké články
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2004 do Před 2 roky
Open Access Digital Library
od 2004-01-01
- MeSH
- antigen CA-19-9 krev MeSH
- antigeny nádorové krev MeSH
- cholangiokarcinom krev patologie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- imunoanalýza MeSH
- keratin-19 krev MeSH
- kohortové studie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- míra přežití MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery krev MeSH
- nádory žlučníku krev patologie MeSH
- nádory žlučových cest krev patologie MeSH
- pilotní projekty MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- staging nádorů MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- hodnotící studie MeSH
BACKGROUND/AIM: The behavior of tumor markers in biliary tract malignancies is not well-known and has been scarcely studied. Such markers could play important roles in diagnostic and prognostic schemes as well as in decision-making about the best treatment strategies. This study analyzed the preoperative serum levels of conventional tumor markers (AFP, CEA, CA 19-9, CA 72-4), proliferative marker thymidine kinase (TK) and cytokeratins (TPA, TPS and CYFRA 21.1) in patients with gallbladder carcinoma, bile duct carcinoma (Klatskin) and cholangiocellular carcinoma, in relation to the patient prognosis. The study aimed in finding the role of tumor markers in not properly investigated diseases, where their importance is often marginalized. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 43 patients, who underwent either radical surgical procedure (n=21) or explorative laparotomy without any surgical treatment (n=22) for gallbladder carcinoma, bile duct carcinoma (Klatskin tumor) and cholangiocellular carcinoma (24, 8 and 11 patients, respectively) between 2003 and 2010 at our Department. The association of serum tumor markers and patients' prognosis were assessed for the entire cohort and for each cancer type and also with regard to treatment (radical surgery versus explorative laparotomy). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free interval (DFI) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and statistically evaluated using the LogRank test. DFI was computed only in the subgroup of patients treated by radical surgery. RESULTS: The statistical analysis of tumor markers revealed TK as a poor prognostic factor for shorter DFI (HR=3.5, 95%CI=0.6-21.3, p<0.05) and also OS (HR=4.6, 95%CI=1.0-4.7, p<0.05) in patients with gallbladder carcinoma treated with radical surgery. TPS was demonstrated as a poor prognostic factor for OS in patients with gallbladder carcinoma (HR=12.7, 95%CI=1.4-117.7, p<0.05). CEA was proven to be a factor of poor prognosis with shorter OS in patients after explorative laparotomy for all cumulated studied diagnoses (HR=9.8, 95%CI=1.05-92.7, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggested the importance of tumor markers for assessment of prognosis (OS or DFI) in patients with gallbladder carcinoma, bile duct carcinoma, and cholangiocellular carcinoma.
Biomedical Center Faculty of Medicine in Plzen Charles University Plzen Czech Republic
Central Immunoanalytical Laboratory Faculty Hospital Plzen Plzen Czech Republic
Department of Surgery Faculty of Medicine in Plzen Charles University Plzen Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17023162
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180605083744.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170720s2017 gr f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.21873/anticanres.11544 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28373474
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gr
- 100 1_
- $a Liska, Vaclav $u Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic vena.liska@gmail.com. Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Evaluation of Tumor Markers and Their Impact on Prognosis in Gallbladder, Bile Duct and Cholangiocellular Carcinomas - A Pilot Study / $c V. Liska, V. Treska, T. Skalicky, J. Fichtl, J. Bruha, O. Vycital, O. Topolcan, R. Palek, J. Rosendorf, J. Polivka, L. Holubec,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND/AIM: The behavior of tumor markers in biliary tract malignancies is not well-known and has been scarcely studied. Such markers could play important roles in diagnostic and prognostic schemes as well as in decision-making about the best treatment strategies. This study analyzed the preoperative serum levels of conventional tumor markers (AFP, CEA, CA 19-9, CA 72-4), proliferative marker thymidine kinase (TK) and cytokeratins (TPA, TPS and CYFRA 21.1) in patients with gallbladder carcinoma, bile duct carcinoma (Klatskin) and cholangiocellular carcinoma, in relation to the patient prognosis. The study aimed in finding the role of tumor markers in not properly investigated diseases, where their importance is often marginalized. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 43 patients, who underwent either radical surgical procedure (n=21) or explorative laparotomy without any surgical treatment (n=22) for gallbladder carcinoma, bile duct carcinoma (Klatskin tumor) and cholangiocellular carcinoma (24, 8 and 11 patients, respectively) between 2003 and 2010 at our Department. The association of serum tumor markers and patients' prognosis were assessed for the entire cohort and for each cancer type and also with regard to treatment (radical surgery versus explorative laparotomy). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free interval (DFI) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and statistically evaluated using the LogRank test. DFI was computed only in the subgroup of patients treated by radical surgery. RESULTS: The statistical analysis of tumor markers revealed TK as a poor prognostic factor for shorter DFI (HR=3.5, 95%CI=0.6-21.3, p<0.05) and also OS (HR=4.6, 95%CI=1.0-4.7, p<0.05) in patients with gallbladder carcinoma treated with radical surgery. TPS was demonstrated as a poor prognostic factor for OS in patients with gallbladder carcinoma (HR=12.7, 95%CI=1.4-117.7, p<0.05). CEA was proven to be a factor of poor prognosis with shorter OS in patients after explorative laparotomy for all cumulated studied diagnoses (HR=9.8, 95%CI=1.05-92.7, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggested the importance of tumor markers for assessment of prognosis (OS or DFI) in patients with gallbladder carcinoma, bile duct carcinoma, and cholangiocellular carcinoma.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a antigeny nádorové $x krev $7 D000951
- 650 _2
- $a nádory žlučových cest $x krev $x patologie $7 D001650
- 650 _2
- $a nádorové biomarkery $x krev $7 D014408
- 650 _2
- $a antigen CA-19-9 $x krev $7 D018395
- 650 _2
- $a cholangiokarcinom $x krev $x patologie $7 D018281
- 650 _2
- $a kohortové studie $7 D015331
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a nádory žlučníku $x krev $x patologie $7 D005706
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a imunoanalýza $7 D007118
- 650 _2
- $a keratin-19 $x krev $7 D053539
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a staging nádorů $7 D009367
- 650 _2
- $a pilotní projekty $7 D010865
- 650 _2
- $a prognóza $7 D011379
- 650 _2
- $a míra přežití $7 D015996
- 655 _2
- $a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Treska, Vladislav $u Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Skalicky, Tomas $u Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Fichtl, Jakub $u Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Bruha, Jan $u Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic. Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Vycital, Ondrej $u Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic. Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Topolcan, Ondrej $u Central Immunoanalytical Laboratory, Faculty Hospital Plzen, Plzen, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Palek, Richard $u Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic. Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Rosendorf, Jáchym $u Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic. Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic. $7 xx0224963
- 700 1_
- $a Polivka, Jiri $u Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic. Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Holubec, Luboš, $d 1972- $7 xx0068645 $u Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000478 $t Anticancer research $x 1791-7530 $g Roč. 37, č. 4 (2017), s. 2003-2009
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28373474 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170720 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180605083947 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1238843 $s 984075
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 37 $c 4 $d 2003-2009 $i 1791-7530 $m Anticancer research $n Anticancer Res $x MED00000478
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170720