Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Impact of automated ICA-based denoising of fMRI data in acute stroke patients

D. Carone, R. Licenik, S. Suri, L. Griffanti, N. Filippini, J. Kennedy,

. 2017 ; 16 (-) : 23-31. [pub] 20170630

Language English Country Netherlands

Document type Journal Article

Different strategies have been developed using Independent Component Analysis (ICA) to automatically de-noise fMRI data, either focusing on removing only certain components (e.g. motion-ICA-AROMA, Pruim et al., 2015a) or using more complex classifiers to remove multiple types of noise components (e.g. FIX, Salimi-Khorshidi et al., 2014 Griffanti et al., 2014). However, denoising data obtained in an acute setting might prove challenging: the presence of multiple noise sources may not allow focused strategies to clean the data enough and the heterogeneity in the data may be so great to critically undermine complex approaches. The purpose of this study was to explore what automated ICA based approach would better cope with these limitations when cleaning fMRI data obtained from acute stroke patients. The performance of a focused classifier (ICA-AROMA) and a complex classifier (FIX) approaches were compared using data obtained from twenty consecutive acute lacunar stroke patients using metrics determining RSN identification, RSN reproducibility, changes in the BOLD variance, differences in the estimation of functional connectivity and loss of temporal degrees of freedom. The use of generic-trained FIX resulted in misclassification of components and significant loss of signal (< 80%), and was not explored further. Both ICA-AROMA and patient-trained FIX based denoising approaches resulted in significantly improved RSN reproducibility (p < 0.001), localized reduction in BOLD variance consistent with noise removal, and significant changes in functional connectivity (p < 0.001). Patient-trained FIX resulted in higher RSN identifiability (p < 0.001) and wider changes both in the BOLD variance and in functional connectivity compared to ICA-AROMA. The success of ICA-AROMA suggests that by focusing on selected components the full automation can deliver meaningful data for analysis even in population with multiple sources of noise. However, the time invested to train FIX with appropriate patient data proved valuable, particularly in improving the signal-to-noise ratio.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18024803
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180717085917.0
007      
ta
008      
180709s2017 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.06.033 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28736698
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Carone, D $u Acute Vascular Imaging Centre, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Laboratory of Experimental Stroke Research, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Milano Bicocca, Milan Center of Neuroscience, Monza, Italy.
245    10
$a Impact of automated ICA-based denoising of fMRI data in acute stroke patients / $c D. Carone, R. Licenik, S. Suri, L. Griffanti, N. Filippini, J. Kennedy,
520    9_
$a Different strategies have been developed using Independent Component Analysis (ICA) to automatically de-noise fMRI data, either focusing on removing only certain components (e.g. motion-ICA-AROMA, Pruim et al., 2015a) or using more complex classifiers to remove multiple types of noise components (e.g. FIX, Salimi-Khorshidi et al., 2014 Griffanti et al., 2014). However, denoising data obtained in an acute setting might prove challenging: the presence of multiple noise sources may not allow focused strategies to clean the data enough and the heterogeneity in the data may be so great to critically undermine complex approaches. The purpose of this study was to explore what automated ICA based approach would better cope with these limitations when cleaning fMRI data obtained from acute stroke patients. The performance of a focused classifier (ICA-AROMA) and a complex classifier (FIX) approaches were compared using data obtained from twenty consecutive acute lacunar stroke patients using metrics determining RSN identification, RSN reproducibility, changes in the BOLD variance, differences in the estimation of functional connectivity and loss of temporal degrees of freedom. The use of generic-trained FIX resulted in misclassification of components and significant loss of signal (< 80%), and was not explored further. Both ICA-AROMA and patient-trained FIX based denoising approaches resulted in significantly improved RSN reproducibility (p < 0.001), localized reduction in BOLD variance consistent with noise removal, and significant changes in functional connectivity (p < 0.001). Patient-trained FIX resulted in higher RSN identifiability (p < 0.001) and wider changes both in the BOLD variance and in functional connectivity compared to ICA-AROMA. The success of ICA-AROMA suggests that by focusing on selected components the full automation can deliver meaningful data for analysis even in population with multiple sources of noise. However, the time invested to train FIX with appropriate patient data proved valuable, particularly in improving the signal-to-noise ratio.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a počítačové zpracování obrazu $7 D007091
650    12
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a nervové dráhy $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D009434
650    _2
$a kyslík $x krev $7 D010100
650    12
$a analýza hlavních komponent $7 D025341
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a cévní mozková příhoda $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D020521
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Licenik, R $u Acute Vascular Imaging Centre, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Suri, S $u Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Griffanti, L $u Oxford Centre of Functional MRI of the Brain, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Filippini, N $u Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, West Wing level 6, JR hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Kennedy, J $u Acute Vascular Imaging Centre, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
773    0_
$w MED00188130 $t NeuroImage. Clinical $x 2213-1582 $g Roč. 16, č. - (2017), s. 23-31
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28736698 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180709 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180717090217 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1316934 $s 1021724
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 16 $c - $d 23-31 $e 20170630 $i 2213-1582 $m NeuroImage. Clinical $n Neuroimage Clin $x MED00188130
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180709

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...