• Something wrong with this record ?

Role of DESH, callosal angle and cingulate sulcus sign in prediction of gait responsiveness after shunting in iNPH patients

P. Skalický, A. Vlasák, A. Mládek, J. Vrána, M. Bajaček, H. Whitley, V. Beneš, O. Bradáč

. 2021 ; 83 (-) : 99-107. [pub] 20201214

Language English

Document type Journal Article

Primary endpoint of this single-centre, prospective consecutive cohort study was to evaluate DESH score, CA, CSS and Evans index of suspected iNPH patients against the reference standard of lumbar infusion test (LIT) and external lumbar drainage (ELD) in prediction of gait response after VP shunt implantation in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). Patients were assigned to NPH and non-NPH groups based on LIT and ELD results. Age-matched controls were added for group comparison. 32 NPH, 46 non-NPH and 15 control subjects were enrolled in the study. There were significant differences in mean preoperative DESH scores of NPH, non-NPH and control groups (6.3 ± 2.3 ([±SD]) (range 2-10) vs 4.5 ± 2.4 (range 0-10) vs 1.0 ± 1.2 (range 0-4)). Differences in mean CA and Evans index were not significant between NPH and non-NPH groups. CSS showed 62.5% sensitivity, 60.87% specificity, 52.63% PPV and 70% NPV for differentiation of NPH and non-NPH groups. A CA of 68 degrees had 48.49% sensitivity, 76.09% specificity, 59.26% PPV 67.31% NPV and DESH score of 4 had 93.75% sensitivity, 41.30% specificity, 52.63% PPV and 90.48% NPV for differentiation between NPH and non-NPH groups. The groups of probable iNPH patients with gait impairment diagnosed by high DESH score or positive functional testing did not overlap and DESH score did not correlate with gait improvement after ELD. DESH score should not be used as a simple diagnostic or prognostic marker of iNPH and we could not confirm the benefit of measurement of callosal angle and cingulate sulcus sign.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21011662
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220103085155.0
007      
ta
008      
210420s2021 stk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.11.020 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33334664
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a stk
100    1_
$a Skalický, Petr $u Dpt. of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Medical Faculty, Charles University and Military University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
245    10
$a Role of DESH, callosal angle and cingulate sulcus sign in prediction of gait responsiveness after shunting in iNPH patients / $c P. Skalický, A. Vlasák, A. Mládek, J. Vrána, M. Bajaček, H. Whitley, V. Beneš, O. Bradáč
520    9_
$a Primary endpoint of this single-centre, prospective consecutive cohort study was to evaluate DESH score, CA, CSS and Evans index of suspected iNPH patients against the reference standard of lumbar infusion test (LIT) and external lumbar drainage (ELD) in prediction of gait response after VP shunt implantation in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). Patients were assigned to NPH and non-NPH groups based on LIT and ELD results. Age-matched controls were added for group comparison. 32 NPH, 46 non-NPH and 15 control subjects were enrolled in the study. There were significant differences in mean preoperative DESH scores of NPH, non-NPH and control groups (6.3 ± 2.3 ([±SD]) (range 2-10) vs 4.5 ± 2.4 (range 0-10) vs 1.0 ± 1.2 (range 0-4)). Differences in mean CA and Evans index were not significant between NPH and non-NPH groups. CSS showed 62.5% sensitivity, 60.87% specificity, 52.63% PPV and 70% NPV for differentiation of NPH and non-NPH groups. A CA of 68 degrees had 48.49% sensitivity, 76.09% specificity, 59.26% PPV 67.31% NPV and DESH score of 4 had 93.75% sensitivity, 41.30% specificity, 52.63% PPV and 90.48% NPV for differentiation between NPH and non-NPH groups. The groups of probable iNPH patients with gait impairment diagnosed by high DESH score or positive functional testing did not overlap and DESH score did not correlate with gait improvement after ELD. DESH score should not be used as a simple diagnostic or prognostic marker of iNPH and we could not confirm the benefit of measurement of callosal angle and cingulate sulcus sign.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a kohortové studie $7 D015331
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a neurologické poruchy chůze $x etiologie $x chirurgie $7 D020233
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a normotenzní hydrocefalus $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D006850
650    _2
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $x metody $7 D008279
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a neurozobrazování $x metody $7 D059906
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a ventrikuloperitoneální zkrat $x metody $7 D017287
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Vlasák, Aleš $u Dpt. of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Medical Faculty, Charles University and Military University Hospital, Prague, Czechia $7 xx0267978
700    1_
$a Mládek, Arnošt $u Dpt. of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Medical Faculty, Charles University and Military University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Vrána, Jiří $u Dpt. of Radiology, Military University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Bajaček, Michal $u Dpt. of Neurology, Military University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Whitley, Helen $u Dpt. of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Medical Faculty, Charles University and Military University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Beneš, Vladimír $u Dpt. of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Medical Faculty, Charles University and Military University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Bradáč, Ondřej $u Dpt. of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Medical Faculty, Charles University and Military University Hospital, Prague, Czechia. Electronic address: ondrej.bradac@uvn.cz
773    0_
$w MED00166944 $t Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia $x 1532-2653 $g Roč. 83, č. - (2021), s. 99-107
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33334664 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210420 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220103085155 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1650126 $s 1132041
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 83 $c - $d 99-107 $e 20201214 $i 1532-2653 $m Journal of clinical neuroscience $n J. clin. neurosci. $x MED00166944
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210420

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...